Chris Yate writes:
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 at 19:34 David Kastrup wrote:
>
>>
>> That's pretty good, actually. Not being able to do native/online
>> compilations by anybody wanting to is bad. Yes. Fixes to GUB (possibly
>> even just to its
On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 at 23:05 Chris Yate wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 at 19:34 David Kastrup wrote:
>
>>
>> That's pretty good, actually. Not being able to do native/online
>> compilations by anybody wanting to is bad. Yes. Fixes to GUB (possibly
>> even
On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 at 19:34 David Kastrup wrote:
>
> That's pretty good, actually. Not being able to do native/online
> compilations by anybody wanting to is bad. Yes. Fixes to GUB (possibly
> even just to its information/documentation, maybe it _can_ do it
> already) are of
On 26 Sep 2016 20:16, "Phil Holmes" wrote:
>
> TBH, you'd probably find it far easier to install a Linux VM on your
Windows host, and compile the problematic score on that. I've done both,
and what I suggest here is what I would do.
That's exactly what I've done - I do a
On 26.09.2016 04:55, David Kastrup wrote:
Carl Sorensen writes:
On 9/25/16, 2:46 PM, "Simon Albrecht" wrote:
On 25.09.2016 22:06, Trevor Daniels wrote:
When needed, isn't this adequate?
\version "2.19.48"
triplet = \tuplet 3/2 \etc
\triplet {
TBH, you'd probably find it far easier to install a Linux VM on your Windows
host, and compile the problematic score on that. I've done both, and what I
suggest here is what I would do.
I also used Sibelius - for my college course. I always now use LilyPond in
preference.
--
Phil Holmes
Chris Yate writes:
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 at 19:34 David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> Chris Yate writes:
>>
>> > Hi Phil,
>> >
>> > Sigh... Yes, that's basically the conclusion I'd already come to, but
>> that
>> > it seemed such a ludicrous state
On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 at 19:34 David Kastrup wrote:
> Chris Yate writes:
>
> > Hi Phil,
> >
> > Sigh... Yes, that's basically the conclusion I'd already come to, but
> that
> > it seemed such a ludicrous state of affairs that _somebody_ must have a
> > better
Chris Yate writes:
> Hi Phil,
>
> Sigh... Yes, that's basically the conclusion I'd already come to, but that
> it seemed such a ludicrous state of affairs that _somebody_ must have a
> better solution.
If you can find _any_ free software project requiring a number of free
Hi Phil,
Sigh... Yes, that's basically the conclusion I'd already come to, but that
it seemed such a ludicrous state of affairs that _somebody_ must have a
better solution.
I've just installed mingw on Ubuntu, which might possibly do the job...
At the moment my scores have a habit of crashing
Hi Lukas,
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 5:06 AM, Lukas Tuggener wrote:
> Dear All
>
> To create labeled training data for a machine learning project, I need to
> extract the location at which symbols are printed. Is it possible to extract
> coordinates for every symbol? Methods
Gub uses http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/lilypond.git as its source. I know
of no way of changing that without a lot of effort changing its codebase. I
personally know of no simple way of cross-compiling LilyPond for Windows
without using Gub as the tool. However, you can (in principle)
Hi all,
Apologies for the potentially "blindingly obvious" question, bu't having
read the devel webpages about compiling Lilypond for mingw/Windows, I'm
none the wiser.
I can compile for native linux using the gnu make (via the
smart-autoconf.sh script). However, I'm trying to track down a crash
Hi all,
in order to improve the multi-segment slurs I would like to know if it
is possible to get information about arbitrary grobs from within an
event function.
Concretely I would like to know if there's a way to get hold of the
coordinates (anchor points) of an arbitrary other grob from
Original-Nachricht
From an unsecured network, out of town…
Had hopes for 2.19.48 but if anything, it is even slower on Mac OS 10.11.6 than
was 2.19.47. Have to revert (again) to 2.19.46. From what I’ve read, my
experience is not unique. Shouldn’t this be noted on the web
15 matches
Mail list logo