Jan Kohnert-4 wrote
> But anyway, there is a possibility to put
> text above the chord names and make chord names look the way one wants it,
> but
> is there some kind of best practice? Could somebody point me to the
> correct
> LSR page, which surely exists?
>
> Thanks a lot, folks!
>
>
Hey there,
I recall having read about that topic in the list a (rather long) while ago,
though I'm not too sure about it. But anyway, there is a possibility to put
text above the chord names and make chord names look the way one wants it, but
is there some kind of best practice? Could somebody
Hey there,
I recall having read about that topic in the list a (rather long) while ago,
though I'm not too sure about it. But anyway, there is a possibility to put
text above the chord names and make chord names look the way one wants it, but
is there some kind of best practice? Could somebody
On 11/23/2017 1:14 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Are you aware of Urs's introduction to Scheme?
https://scheme-book.ursliska.de
Werner
Ooohh... this looks like a great resource! I did not know it existed,
thanks!
--
Karlin High
Missouri, USA
On 23.11.2017 17:28, Wols Lists wrote:
That "4" is actually a simple example of a common construct - it means
the fourth repeated bar. If I had had six bars, it might have had "4",
"5", "6" - it always starts counting at the first bar, but usually only
prints the count starting some way in (as
On Wed 22 Nov 2017 at 11:43:37 (+0100), Simon Albrecht wrote:
> On 20.11.2017 18:12, Hilary Snaden wrote:
> >If there are any "graphical tools" as good as LaTeX, I'll be
> >interested to hear of them.
>
> Adobe InDesign is certainly in many ways a “better” tool than LaTeX,
> in some “just as
Werner LEMBERG writes:
>> The problem, from my point of view, is that lilypond syntax is
>> simple and makes sense to me. As soon as scheme gets involved, the
>> learning curve is like hitting a cliff.
>
> Are you aware of Urs's introduction to Scheme?
>
>
> The problem, from my point of view, is that lilypond syntax is
> simple and makes sense to me. As soon as scheme gets involved, the
> learning curve is like hitting a cliff.
Are you aware of Urs's introduction to Scheme?
https://scheme-book.ursliska.de
Werner
Is this Windows-specific or is there a potential threat for other platforms?
Stan
> On Nov 23, 2017, at 6:42 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Knut Petersen writes:
>
>> Am 23.11.2017 um 10:23 schrieb David Kastrup:
>>> Stupid question: what does
On 23/11/17 18:14, David Kastrup wrote:
The problem, from my point of view, is that lilypond syntax is simple
and makes sense to me. As soon as scheme gets involved, the learning
curve is like hitting a cliff.
The Scheme "involved" here is a music function wrapper. The body of the
music
Wol's lists writes:
> On 23/11/17 17:17, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> Can anybody give me any hints?
>> I really hate it when people don't even_try_ entering a single note
>> themselves and leave all the work to every single reader.
>
> Sorry. But it might be a problem
On 23/11/17 17:17, David Kastrup wrote:
Can anybody give me any hints?
I really hate it when people don't even_try_ entering a single note
themselves and leave all the work to every single reader.
Sorry. But it might be a problem someone's already solved, seeing as
it's pretty common in my
On Thu 23 Nov 2017 at 10:27:36 (+), J Martin Rushton wrote:
> On 23/11/17 09:23, David Kastrup wrote:
> > Knut Petersen writes:
> >
> >> 12 years ago a security problem was introduced into lilypond-invoke-editor.
> >> On 2017/11/15 the problem was reported to the
Wols Lists writes:
> This is actually very common in my sort of music. As you can see, I have
> a "\repeat percent 4 {}", and I have both a crescendo starting on the
> fourth bar, plus the number "4" above it.
>
> And I don't know where to start trying to enter this ...
On 23/11/17 16:53, SoundsFromSound wrote:
> Wols Lists wrote
>> This is actually very common in my sort of music. As you can see, I have
>> a "\repeat percent 4 {}", and I have both a crescendo starting on the
>> fourth bar, plus the number "4" above it.
>>
>> Can anybody give me any hints?
>>
>>
Am 23.11.2017 um 17:53 schrieb Stanton Sanderson:
Is this Windows-specific or is there a potential threat for other platforms?
It definitely affects linux systems.
I suspect that also Windows/Mac systems are affected, but I cannot verify that.
Knut
This is actually very common in my sort of music. As you can see, I have
a "\repeat percent 4 {}", and I have both a crescendo starting on the
fourth bar, plus the number "4" above it.
And I don't know where to start trying to enter this ... :-)
That "4" is actually a simple example of a common
Helo Aiki,
Can you be more explicit?
JM
> Le 23 nov. 2017 à 08:42, aikizen a écrit :
>
> hi,
> i would like retrive notes from guitar tab with lilypond.
> and if not possible how can i do ?
>
> best regard,
> aiki.
>
> ___
>
on the topic of "graphical tools": an alternative to InDesign would be
Scribus, which also has "render frames" to include lilypond code
https://wiki.scribus.net/canvas/Help:Manual_Renderframes#Lilypond
greetings
Arne
--
Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html
On 2017-11-22 08:54 PM, Brett M. Gilio wrote:
I know the Frescobaldi developers have been planning for a transition to
PyQt5/Qt5. I am quite versed with python and qt5, does anybody know how
far along they have gone in this?
I'm running it in the following environment, with no particular
hi,
i would like retrive notes from guitar tab with lilypond.
and if not possible how can i do ?
best regard,
aiki.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Knut Petersen writes:
> Am 23.11.2017 um 10:23 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Stupid question: what does run-editor do to be inherently safer than
>> run-browser, and what would prevent run-browser from doing the same?
>
> Your suspicion is correct. Also textedit URIs are
Am 23.11.2017 um 10:23 schrieb David Kastrup:
Stupid question: what does run-editor do to be inherently safer than
run-browser, and what would prevent run-browser from doing the same?
Your suspicion is correct. Also textedit URIs are vulnerable to a very similar
attack.
So EVERYBODY should
Is this the well documented Windows URI security flaw dicussed about
2007?
https://www.networkworld.com/article/2286774/lan-wan/microsoft-to-fix-uri-security-flaw-after-criticism.html
https://blog.mozilla.org/security/2007/07/23/related-security-issue-in-url-protocol-handling-on-windows/
On 23/11/17 09:23, David Kastrup wrote:
> Knut Petersen writes:
>
>> 12 years ago a security problem was introduced into lilypond-invoke-editor.
>> On 2017/11/15 the problem was reported to the bug-lilypond mailing
>> list by Gabriel Corona.
>
> [...]
>
>> If you do
Knut Petersen writes:
> 12 years ago a security problem was introduced into lilypond-invoke-editor.
> On 2017/11/15 the problem was reported to the bug-lilypond mailing
> list by Gabriel Corona.
[...]
> If you do not know if you are affected:
>
> 1.: locate
Hi everybody!
12 years ago a security problem was introduced into lilypond-invoke-editor.
On 2017/11/15 the problem was reported to the bug-lilypond mailing list by
Gabriel Corona.
If you decided to install lilypond-invoke-editor helper as a general URI
helper, you _are_ affected.
If you
27 matches
Mail list logo