Re: Notehead Position

Hi Dave, Here is my code for centering notes in a bar. It's based on work by David Nalesnik and Thomas Morley, to whom many thanks. Works for 2.19.80. Not for 2.18. Andrew % Thanks to David Nalesnik and Thomas Morley. #(define (sort-by-X-coord sys grob-lst) "Arranges a list of grobs

Re: Notehead Position

Hi All, It's clear to me he just wants the note in the middle. I use this a lot for 18C music, and contemporary music. I have a nice generalised function to do this, but I will have to wait a bit to post as my machine is undergoing a complete rebuild. Stand by! Andrew

Re: Notehead Position

On 12/29/2017 8:37 AM, Dave Higgins wrote: Is there a way to center a whole notehead in the bar? << { c'1 } \new Dynamics { \override Hairpin #'minimum-length = #8 s8\> s s s s\p\< s s s\! } >> I know I could use silence and fractional note lengths, but that seems sloppy. Also, why

Re: Change the text within a volta

On 29/12/17 22:32, nokel81 wrote: > Yes, I tried using the raw tag, I guess it didn't work. > > \omit Score.BarLine > \repeat volta 3 {} > \alternative { > {} > { > \undo \omit Score.BarLine > \bar "|" > f2 > \bar "|" > } >

Re: Change the text within a volta

Yes, I tried using the raw tag, I guess it didn't work. \omit Score.BarLine \repeat volta 3 {} \alternative { {} { \undo \omit Score.BarLine \bar "|" f2 \bar "|" } { f4( ees c) ees ees(

Re: Change the text within a volta

Hi, On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 12:16 PM, nokel81 wrote: > I currently have the following: > I see nothing here. Could you include a short code example? Thanks, David ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: include puzzlement

Shane Brandes writes: > Thanks all, and Kieran that pattern will definitely work for future > projects. Unfortunately that leaves me with unwinding, separating the > music from the score definitions, 200 some such files for a current > one to get it to work. I had

Re: include puzzlement

Thanks all, and Kieran that pattern will definitely work for future projects. Unfortunately that leaves me with unwinding, separating the music from the score definitions, 200 some such files for a current one to get it to work. I had anticipated that the whole bookpart thing simply encapsulated

Re: include puzzlement

On 12/29/17, 12:35 PM, "Shane Brandes" wrote: wow. o.k. That does mean there is no simple way of maintaining vast projects via tidy compartmentalization. %--- file a.ly \version "2.17.97" aTitle = "a" righteOne = \relative g' { \clef "treble"

Re: Notehead Position

On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 8:37 AM, Dave Higgins wrote: > Is there a way to center a whole notehead in the bar? > > << { c'1 } \new Dynamics { \override Hairpin #'minimum-length = #8 s8\> s > s s s\p\< s s s\! } >> > > I know I could use silence and fractional note lengths,

Re: include puzzlement

Shane Brandes writes: > o.k. back to the include with book part problem. Here is my almost > minimal code example, which consists of files a.ly, b.ly and test.ly. > The two files compile alone correctly but when stuck in the bookpart > they go to pieces. Sigh. Your

Re: include puzzlement

On 12/29/17 20:26, Carl Sorensen wrote: > Variables can only be defined at the top level. See the Notation Reference > 3.1.4 That's not entirely true. You can define variables in \paper, \layout, and \midi blocks too. Also, you could use the (ly:parser-define! k v) function inside a bookpart,

Re: include puzzlement

p.s. While it's arguably less "simple", there's also Jan-Peter's amazing lilytemplate system… =) > On Dec 29, 2017, at 2:39 PM, Kieren MacMillan > wrote: > > Hi Shane, > >> wow. o.k. That does mean there is no simple way of >> maintaining vast projects via

Re: include puzzlement

Hi Shane, > wow. o.k. That does mean there is no simple way of > maintaining vast projects via tidy compartmentalization. No… I do it all the time: a_notes.ly a_single_score.ly b_notes.ly b_single_score.ly ab_double_score.ly etc. For example, "Robin Hood: The Legendary Musical

Re: include puzzlement

wow. o.k. That does mean there is no simple way of maintaining vast projects via tidy compartmentalization. Thanks for the clarification. Shane On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote: > > > On 12/29/17, 12:17 PM, "Timothy Lanfear" wrote: >

Re: include puzzlement

On 12/29/17, 12:17 PM, "Timothy Lanfear" wrote: A bookpart cannot contain statements like music = { c'1 } Yes, this is true. Variables can only be defined at the top level. See the Notation Reference 3.1.4 Carl

Re: include puzzlement

A bookpart cannot contain statements like music = { c'1 } After the include processing, your file test.ly begins with something like: \bookpart {   music = { c'1 }   \score { \music } } whereas, you should have music = { c'1 } \bookpart {   \score { \music } } On 29/12/17 18:35, Shane

Re: include puzzlement

o.k. back to the include with book part problem. Here is my almost minimal code example, which consists of files a.ly, b.ly and test.ly. The two files compile alone correctly but when stuck in the bookpart they go to pieces. I even tried it running lilypond-book as a tex file which interestingly

Change the text within a volta

I currently have the following: However, I would like to be able to change the text within the volta since I am not actually using it as a repeat but more of an option depending on the calendar. -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html

Re: getting paid for an include (I offer)

>> ??? Are you really trying to reactivate Neue Deutsche >> Orgeltabulatur, three hundred years after it was abandonded? > > There can be multiple reasons why one would do that: [...] All of these are valid points. However, it seems to me that he wants to actually *add* features to this

Re: include puzzlement

Never mind that code does not function. Still trying to reduce the full files into minimal examples that both preserve the problem and compile correctly independently and then crash when included. Shane On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Shane Brandes wrote: > O.k. after

Re: edition-editor usage

Mason Hock: > Urs Liska: >> >> Actually I do not see why any of this should be incompatible. Both >> page-layout and partial-compilation *use* the EE. Maybe it is a naming >> conflict somehow. > > Here's a reduced example of what I have. Can you spot what I'm doing wrong? > > \version

Re: fixed vertical spacing within staff-group

Am 29.12.2017 um 05:30 schrieb Eby Mani: Hi, How to set fixed vertical spacing within staff-group ?. Hi, please always give a minimal working (and compilable) code example that shows what you are doing currently. I have tried the following in \layout { \context } section. Vertical

Re: getting paid for an include (I offer)

Dear Karl, Werner and All, Thanks Karl these are two points. Also stretching the score is really a poit in concert (not mentionned that another aproach of the matter is recommended from pedagogists). I had a try with OO-calc and OO-writer, the score reduces to half of traditional score, and more

Re: include puzzlement

O.k. after reducing things here is the problem that causes the snafu. The independent files to be included all happen to have the same structure where the score is defined and the voices called to a variable. as in the following. altoVoice = \relative c' { a } \score { \new Staff \with {

Notehead Position

Is there a way to center a whole notehead in the bar? << { c'1 } \new Dynamics { \override Hairpin #'minimum-length = #8 s8\> s s s s\p\< s s s\! } >> I know I could use silence and fractional note lengths, but that seems sloppy. Also, why doesn't R1*1 work like R1*2 (by putting the 2 in

Guitar PMs - almost done

Dear All, After plenty of tweaking (as I have found it's always the case) I've come up with quite a satisfying code (based on David Kastrup's one) for guitar palm mutes. Please check out the tiny example. There are still two things I can't figure out, though, and I would be grateful if anyone

Re: scheme function generating multiple score

On 29 December 2017 at 12:28, Gianmaria Lari wrote: > > > On 29 December 2017 at 11:26, Timothy Lanfear wrote: > >> On 29/12/17 07:03, Gianmaria Lari wrote: >> >>> Sorry to bother but I'm unable to get out from this problem. >>> This code generate

Re: getting paid for an include (I offer)

Werner: ... > ??? Are you really trying to reactivate Neue Deutsche Orgeltabulatur, > three hundred years after it was abandonded? There can be multiple reasons why one would do that: . the somewhat academic point in being able to do that . when transcribing things I've found that that is

Re: scheme function generating multiple score

On 29 December 2017 at 11:26, Timothy Lanfear wrote: > On 29/12/17 07:03, Gianmaria Lari wrote: > >> Sorry to bother but I'm unable to get out from this problem. >> This code generate two scores: >> >> \version "2.19.80" >> >> \score { >> \transpose c d {c' d'

Re: scheme function generating multiple score

On 29/12/17 07:03, Gianmaria Lari wrote: Sorry to bother but I'm unable to get out from this problem. This code generate two scores: \version "2.19.80" \score {   \transpose c d {c' d' e'}   \layout{} } \score {   \transpose c e {c' d' e'}   \layout{} } I

Re: include puzzlement

Shane Brandes writes: > O.k. having gone in circles trying to figure out the whole bookpart > apparatus I discovered that the documentations statement that using > include is the same as copying and pasting the include into a document > is false if the include consists of a