Hi Ben,
SoundsFromSound wrote
> I can't figure out how to box marked-up notes as one unit.
you can use a whole score as markup, so as a point to start, how about:
%---
\version "2.19.81"
\header {
title = "Example"
}
\relative c'
{
c1 c1^\markup \box {
Hello,
I am stumped on how to enclose these markup noteheads in one box around
them all? I can only seem to get them individually boxed. In the past, I
have only had to box text markup before, and that's about it. So I can't
figure out how to box marked-up notes as one unit. (see attached)
Hi Urs,
I've been looking at the Latex integration (lycritrprt) but I'm afraid it's
a bit over my head. I'd need a couple of pointers into making it work
before I could play with it and test it.
Craig
On Sat, 14 Jul 2018 at 09:00, Craig Dabelstein
wrote:
> Hi Urs,
>
> Just confirming, as
Hi Urs,
Just confirming, as you've discovered, that compiling is lots slower.
Craig
On Sat, 14 Jul 2018 at 08:04, Craig Dabelstein
wrote:
> Hi Urs,
>
> I've been converting one of my old projects to the new versions to test
> for you and so far it has all worked perfectly. You are a genius!
Hi Urs,
I've been converting one of my old projects to the new versions to test for
you and so far it has all worked perfectly. You are a genius!
I haven't got to the Latex integration yet (so please don't delete the
temp-print-message branch of scholarly just yet!)
All the best,
Craig
On
Hi Ben,
> I probably confused you with my wording, sorry! I just meant it's above the
> staff when it's supposed to be (in rare situations where dynamics are
> technically different between the same instrument parts)...and then it's
> below for the part 'extraction' single staff file. ;)
Hi Richard and Martin
@Richard:
the reason it failed to compile for you is because I messed up the
Makefile. It is fixed now. Lilydumper compiles just fine with g++-6
and g++-7. You can try again if you want.
@Martin:
Sadly since I use debian and didn't get much time for the packaging,
this was
On 7/13/2018 1:37 PM, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Ben,
You're absolutely right. Wow. I just tried it with the example I gave earlier
w/ the two flutes. Sure enough, the pp dynamic is above the staff for the
full score but both pp are below for Flute 1 and Flute 2 separately.
Hmmm… It
Hi Ben,
> You're absolutely right. Wow. I just tried it with the example I gave earlier
> w/ the two flutes. Sure enough, the pp dynamic is above the staff for the
> full score but both pp are below for Flute 1 and Flute 2 separately.
Hmmm… It should appear below the staff in all cases,
On 7/13/2018 1:00 PM, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Ben,
If you have a full orchestra score, with Flutes 1 & 2 on one staff in the score
and also separated out parts via partcombine, where/how do you place a dynamic then
so that it applies to both locations without redundant markings?
The
Hi Ben,
> If you have a full orchestra score, with Flutes 1 & 2 on one staff in the
> score and also separated out parts via partcombine, where/how do you place a
> dynamic then so that it applies to both locations without redundant markings?
The part-combiner actually does a great job of
On 7/13/2018 10:52 AM, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
So what's the best way to do this in your opinion? Should every instance of brief rests
like this in one part but not the other be prefaced with "once...apart"
If I recall correctly, I settled on the fact that part combinations (and the related
As suspected the post below wasn't delivered (at least not yet) due to
the large attachments.
The two files mentioned in the text can temporarily be downloaded from
https://cloud.ursliska.de/s/bhN8Kd5MxdgjAea and
https://cloud.ursliska.de/s/0LRvGdvL4azL4Za
Am 13.07.2018 um 17:31 schrieb Urs
On 7/13/2018 10:27 AM, Michael Hendry wrote:
I have taken steps to improve the security of my passwords.
I'd be lost without a password manager. Quite a few to choose from, I
can think of 1Password, Dashlane, Encryptr, KeePass, LastPass... various
architectures and business models among
On 13/07/18 11:40, Michael Hendry wrote:
I’ve recently received a message from a hacker who told me he knew my password
(and quoted it correctly)
Michael,
Your e-mail address is listed on https://haveibeenpwned.com/ so it's
possible they have obtained your details from one of these
> On 13 Jul 2018, at 12:12, Simon Albrecht wrote:
>
>> On 13.07.2018 - 12:42, Michael Hendry wrote:
>>
>>
>> I’ve recently received a message from a hacker who told me he knew my
>> password (and quoted it correctly), demanding money in bitcoin for not
>> forwarding details of my recent
> On 13 Jul 2018, at 12:34, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Michael Hendry writes:
>
>> I’ve recently received a message from a hacker who told me he knew my
>> password (and quoted it correctly), demanding money in bitcoin for not
>> forwarding details of my recent visit to a porn website to all my
On 7/13/2018 9:29 AM, Ben wrote:
Is there a way to input the notes in a better way to anticipate this
'bug' in partcombine?
I won't claim a "better way," but I'm used to considering each
appearance of a partcombine text (like "Solo" or "a2") as suspicious and
calling for closer inspection to
Hi Ben,
> it does seem rather difficult to be able to predict when you'll need the
> "once partcombineapart" in the music until you go to actually *combine* the
> parts in a staff, and see the missing rest(s), correct?
That’s what I’ve found. (Disclaimer: The part combiner has been improved —
On 7/13/2018 9:59 AM, Torsten Hämmerle wrote:
Hi Ben,
Combining two parts is not a trivial task and, sometimes, automatic
\partcombine will not produce optimal results.
*What has happened in your example?*
In measure 2, Flute 1 rests, and therefore, the e' is marked "Solo II", has
neutral
On 7/13/2018 9:48 AM, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Ben,
Currently I'm struggling to understand why partcombine won't work as I expected
it to...for orchestral works, it's common to have, say 2 flutes, on the same
staff in the full score but for the parts, only print flute 1 and 2 on separate
Hi Ben,
Combining two parts is not a trivial task and, sometimes, automatic
\partcombine will not produce optimal results.
There are different cases when combining two parts in one stave:
*1. only one part plays, the other rests*
Write the active part only and mark it "Solo" or "Solo II"
Hi Ben,
> Currently I'm struggling to understand why partcombine won't work as I
> expected it to...for orchestral works, it's common to have, say 2 flutes, on
> the same staff in the full score but for the parts, only print flute 1 and 2
> on separate parts without the other music included.
Good morning,
I wanted to create a new thread which was inspired by my previous email
about voices-staves.
I figured a new thread could help more people this way.
Currently I'm struggling to understand why partcombine won't work as I
expected it to...for orchestral works, it's common to
Michael Hendry writes:
> I’ve recently received a message from a hacker who told me he knew my
> password (and quoted it correctly), demanding money in bitcoin for not
> forwarding details of my recent visit to a porn website to all my
> contacts.
You make it sound like you use only one
> On 13.07.2018 - 12:42, Michael Hendry wrote:
>
>
> I’ve recently received a message from a hacker who told me he knew my
> password (and quoted it correctly), demanding money in bitcoin for not
> forwarding details of my recent visit to a porn website to all my contacts.
>>
>> I had been
I’ve recently received a message from a hacker who told me he knew my password
(and quoted it correctly), demanding money in bitcoin for not forwarding
details of my recent visit to a porn website to all my contacts.
I had been using nabble to access the list - I've never accessed a porn
On Fri, 13 Jul 2018, Samuel DA MOTA wrote:
Hi Martin,
Thanks for the feedback.
Unfortunately since it always was a side project I didn't get much
time to polish it like I wanted. In any case, feel free to clone it
and improve upon.
I kept the build system simple on purpose so that fixing
On Fri, 2018-07-13 at 09:39 +0200, Samuel DA MOTA wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
> Unfortunately since it always was a side project I didn't get much
> time to polish it like I wanted. In any case, feel free to clone it
> and improve upon.
>
> I kept the build system simple
Michael,
thanks for drawing attention to this /superb/ tool! (It's quite old now
but works flawlessly with current Lilypond versions).
...but with additional "\book"s for Bb and Eb instruments. I'd like to be
able to avoid the potential for error in dealing with the odd line which
needs to
Hi Martin,
Thanks for the feedback.
Unfortunately since it always was a side project I didn't get much
time to polish it like I wanted. In any case, feel free to clone it
and improve upon.
I kept the build system simple on purpose so that fixing these issues
shouldn't be too hard. Had I more
On Thu, 12 Jul 2018, Samuel DA MOTA wrote:
Hi everyone!
I wrote a software a while ago that would play a music sheet generated
by lilypond. It shows the music sheet and follows it with a cursor. I
made a video to demo the end-result. You can watch it at
Hi Sam,
thanks a lot for sharing this!
Best
Jan-Peter
Am 12.07.2018 um 23:48 schrieb Samuel DA MOTA:
> Hi everyone!
>
> I wrote a software a while ago that would play a music sheet generated
> by lilypond. It shows the music sheet and follows it with a cursor. I
> made a video to demo the
Wow!
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
34 matches
Mail list logo
