Am 8. April 2019 03:01:26 MESZ schrieb Andrew Bernard
:
>Hi Gianmaria,
>
>Can you explain the purpose of nulling out the list?
>
>I am somewhat concerned that there is a misunderstanding you have about
>Scheme. Scheme procedures are call-by-value. This means the arguments
>are
>evaluated and
On 2019-04-07 6:01 pm, Andrew Bernard wrote:
I am somewhat concerned that there is a misunderstanding you have about
Scheme. Scheme procedures are call-by-value. This means the arguments
are
evaluated and the value then passed to the procedure. The value of the
parameter in the calling
I'm so jealous. Thanks for the photos Pierre.
Craig
On Mon., 8 Apr. 2019, 10:44 am Kieren MacMillan, <
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > Here's some pics:
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/148245202@N06/albums/72157706397021461
>
> How inspiring!
> Thank you for the
Hi Gianmaria,
Can you explain the purpose of nulling out the list?
I am somewhat concerned that there is a misunderstanding you have about
Scheme. Scheme procedures are call-by-value. This means the arguments are
evaluated and the value then passed to the procedure. The value of the
parameter in
Hello,
> Here's some pics:
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/148245202@N06/albums/72157706397021461
How inspiring!
Thank you for the photographic evidence. =)
Best,
Kieren.
Kieren MacMillan, composer
‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info
‣ email:
Is there a way to force the rehearsal mark to be under the tie (or
slur)? \override did not work either. I'm hoping I'm just misreading
the documentation.
\version "2.19.83"
\fixed c''' { \set Staff.RehearsalMark.outside-staff-priority = #1 a1 ~
| \mark \default a1 }
--
Thanks,
Dave
Hi Carl et All,
Here's some pics:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/148245202@N06/albums/72157706397021461
Cheers,
Pierre
Le sam. 6 avr. 2019 à 01:04, Carl Sorensen a écrit :
> Wish I was in France to see it!
>
> Carl
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> lilypond-user
