Re: lilyglyphs: Python 2 deprecation

2019-11-11 Thread Martin Tarenskeen
On Tue, 12 Nov 2019, Werner LEMBERG wrote: If you are the maintainer of any of these packages, and still are using Python2, please try to update to Python3 as soon as possible. ... lilyglyphs/ py2 only lilyglyphs/lily-glyph-commands.py

lilyglyphs: Python 2 deprecation

2019-11-11 Thread Werner LEMBERG
On the TeXLive mailing list, Norbert Preining , one of the maintainers of TeXLive posted the following today. With the end of 2019, Python2 will be deprecated and not receive any security updates. Most distributions will throw out Python2 completely. (Don't ask me about my opinion on

Re: midiPanPosition in midi context block

2019-11-11 Thread Thomas Morley
Hi Matt, I had a hard time to compile your code, because your email-client inserts not common spacers at line-begin, but something else. I didn't bother to identify... Please: Use plain text !!! Here your _compilable_ example: sopStaff = \new Staff = "sop" { \relative c' { e4 f g a } }

Re: Invisible midi layer for specific measures

2019-11-11 Thread Paolo Prete
Thanks Aaron, it worked perfectly. Il lunedì 11 novembre 2019, 21:29:36 CET, Aaron Hill ha scritto: On 2019-11-11 12:16 pm, Paolo Prete wrote: > Thank you Karl for your help. > However, in the way you suggested, I have to repeat the music of the > first \score block into the second

Re: Very weird output on any compilation

2019-11-11 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 11/11/19, 12:59 PM, "David Wright" wrote: On Mon 11 Nov 2019 at 17:17:00 (+0100), David Menéndez Hurtado wrote: > I am having trouble compiling even the simplest of scores. For example, > this is the template from Frescobaldi, compiled with lilypond from the > command line:

Re: m7.5- transposed to sus#4 b3 ??

2019-11-11 Thread Thomas Morley
Am Mo., 11. Nov. 2019 um 21:38 Uhr schrieb Sandro Santilli : > > I transcribed an A major song with this chords snippet: > > ees:m7.5- | aes:7 | aes:m7.5- | des:7 | > > When transposing it to Eb major it is rendered as: > > Bbbø | Ebb7 | Ebb7sus#4 b3 | Abb7 > > I don't understand why the third

Re: m7.5- transposed to sus#4 b3 ??

2019-11-11 Thread Malte Meyn
Am 11.11.19 um 21:38 schrieb Sandro Santilli: I transcribed an A major song with this chords snippet: ees:m7.5- | aes:7 | aes:m7.5- | des:7 | Are you sure you want those chords instead of dis:m7.5- gis:7 gis:m7.5- cis:7 ? Who wants to read a a-flat half-diminished chord (a-flat c-flat

m7.5- transposed to sus#4 b3 ??

2019-11-11 Thread Sandro Santilli
I transcribed an A major song with this chords snippet: ees:m7.5- | aes:7 | aes:m7.5- | des:7 | When transposing it to Eb major it is rendered as: Bbbø | Ebb7 | Ebb7sus#4 b3 | Abb7 I don't understand why the third chord (m7.5-) gets rendered as a "7sus#4 b3" chord, very hard to read ...

Re: Invisible midi layer for specific measures

2019-11-11 Thread Aaron Hill
On 2019-11-11 12:16 pm, Paolo Prete wrote: Thank you Karl for your help. However, in the way you suggested, I have to repeat the music of the first \score block into the second \score block for the first and third measure of my snippet. I would like to avoid this redundancy, and I would like to

Re: 64 bit

2019-11-11 Thread Hans Åberg
> On 11 Nov 2019, at 19:04, Jonathan Armitage > wrote: > > On 11/11/2019 15:32, Eric wrote: >> On the assumption that it would have been pointed out if this link was >> dangerous phished spam (apologies, Mr Sorensen!!) I have decided to install >> this development version to replace my

RE: Very weird output on any compilation

2019-11-11 Thread Mark Stephen Mrotek
David, It compiled perfect from Frescobaldi for me. Mark From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of David Menéndez Hurtado Sent: Monday, November 11, 2019 8:17 AM To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Very weird output on any compilation

Re: Invisible midi layer for specific measures

2019-11-11 Thread Paolo Prete
Thank you Karl for your help. However, in the way you suggested, I have to repeat the music of the first \score block into the second \score block for the first and third measure of my snippet. I would like to avoid this redundancy, and I would like to specify the notes of "custom" generated

Re: Very weird output on any compilation

2019-11-11 Thread Pierre Perol-Schneider
Hi David, Le lun. 11 nov. 2019 à 18:46, David Menéndez Hurtado a écrit : [...] > The output is the same for PNG and PDF. The same problem happens with any > other score from Mutopia. Does anyone know what is going on? > [...] Are you sure that the scores are in v.2.19 (many scores frome

Re: Very weird output on any compilation

2019-11-11 Thread David Wright
On Mon 11 Nov 2019 at 17:17:00 (+0100), David Menéndez Hurtado wrote: > I am having trouble compiling even the simplest of scores. For example, > this is the template from Frescobaldi, compiled with lilypond from the > command line: > > [image: Untitled.png] > > The output is the same for PNG

Re: Invisible midi layer for specific measures

2019-11-11 Thread karl
Paolo: ... > I would like to add an invisible midi layer of notes to the > previous ones ... Use this template: \score { << % displayed music >> \layout { } } \score { \unfoldRepeats << % midi music >> \midi { } }

Re: 64 bit

2019-11-11 Thread Carl Sorensen
From: Eric Date: Monday, November 11, 2019 at 8:32 AM To: Subject: Re: 64 bit On the assumption that it would have been pointed out if this link was dangerous phished spam (apologies, Mr Sorensen!!) I have decided to install this development version to replace my slashed-out 32-bit

Invisible midi layer for specific measures

2019-11-11 Thread Paolo Prete
Hello, please, consider this snippet: http://lilybin.com/ttlid3/1 I would like to add an invisible midi layer of notes to the previous ones so that I can obtain, when required, effects (for example: the tremolo) that are not provided by default, without using the "articulate" script. In the

Re: 64 bit

2019-11-11 Thread Jonathan Armitage
On 11/11/2019 15:32, Eric wrote: On the assumption that it would have been pointed out if this link was dangerous phished spam (apologies, Mr Sorensen!!) I have decided to install this development version to replace my slashed-out 32-bit Lilyponds. Has anyone else - or are others who use Mac

Re:64 bit

2019-11-11 Thread Mario Bolognani
I am a LilyPond user on MacOsX and am anxiously waiting for a 64bit version of LilyPond, before installing Catalina. I am managing a baroque music site (baroque music.it) with many followers and at present I can’t evolve my transcription platform for this 64bit problem. Best wishes Mario

Very weird output on any compilation

2019-11-11 Thread David Menéndez Hurtado
I am having trouble compiling even the simplest of scores. For example, this is the template from Frescobaldi, compiled with lilypond from the command line: [image: Untitled.png] The output is the same for PNG and PDF. The same problem happens with any other score from Mutopia. Does anyone know

Re: 64 bit

2019-11-11 Thread Eric
On the assumption that it would have been pointed out if this link was dangerous phished spam (apologies, Mr Sorensen!!) I have decided to install this development version to replace my slashed-out 32-bit Lilyponds. Has anyone else - or are others who use Mac Catalina waiting for Lilypond 2.20 to

Re: harmonyli.ly beta 0.91 released

2019-11-11 Thread mason
On 11/11, David Wright wrote: > On Mon 11 Nov 2019 at 00:11:53 (-0800), ma...@masonhock.com wrote: > > Assuming that your architecture is amd64: > > > > $ wget > > http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/l/lilypond/lilypond_2.19.83-1~exp1_amd64.deb > > > > $ sudo dpkg -i

Re: harmonyli.ly beta 0.91 released

2019-11-11 Thread David Wright
On Mon 11 Nov 2019 at 00:11:53 (-0800), ma...@masonhock.com wrote: > On 11/10, Karsten Reincke wrote: > > I've just tried to test your version. But it does not work, because my > > LilyPond version 2.18.2, offered by Ubuntu 19.10, does not contain a > > function \overlay. I have the hope, that the

Re: How stable is 2.21?

2019-11-11 Thread Peter Toye
Sorry I wasn't clear. The bug was in 2.21 (unofficial release). I wouldn't expect retrospective bug fixes. Best regards, Peter mailto:lilyp...@ptoye.com www.ptoye.com - Monday, November 11, 2019, 2:01:14 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:  No point in telling anyone really,

Re: How stable is 2.21?

2019-11-11 Thread Phil Holmes
Re: How stable is 2.21? No point in telling anyone really, since it won't be fixed in 2.18. I run Windows and have over 50 versions installed. I wrote a little application to select which one is run, but you should be able to do the same with a full directory specification for which version

Re: midiPanPosition in midi context block

2019-11-11 Thread David Kastrup
Matt Wallis writes: > On 08/11/2019 14:30, David Kastrup wrote: >> Matt Wallis writes: >> >>> But it doesn't work if I try to set the midiPanPosition inside a midi >>> context block like this: >>> >>> \version "2.19.83" >>> >>> \include "english.ly" >>> sopStaff = \new Staff = "sop" { >>>  

Re: midiPanPosition in midi context block

2019-11-11 Thread Matt Wallis
On 08/11/2019 14:30, David Kastrup wrote: Matt Wallis writes: But it doesn't work if I try to set the midiPanPosition inside a midi context block like this: \version "2.19.83" \include "english.ly" sopStaff = \new Staff = "sop" {   \relative c' { e4 f g a } } altoStaff = \new Staff =

Re: How stable is 2.21?

2019-11-11 Thread Peter Toye
Phil, There's a slight problem here - LP doesn't seem to allow me to have two versions installed on the machine at the same time. I found this when I was pointed towards the unofficial release of 2.21 on gnu.org. And another point - when I installed this I found that the layout-set-staff-size

Re: harmonyli.ly beta 0.91 released

2019-11-11 Thread mason
On 11/10, Karsten Reincke wrote: > I've just tried to test your version. But it does not work, because my > LilyPond version 2.18.2, offered by Ubuntu 19.10, does not contain a > function \overlay. I have the hope, that the coming LTS Ubuntu version > 20.04 will contain the newer 2.19.x -