[Lilypond 2.19.49 slow compilation time and font cache]
But the solution seems
> to be to simply delete the cache, prompting a rebuild, so it's not
> a big deal for most of us.
It's not a big deal if you know it!
Because it's a very annoying issue and it makes a very bad impression it
would be
Thank you for the override and tweak Pierre!
Simon, my following question is just a curiosity to understand better how
Lilypond works and the philosophy of this tool. Is for historical reason
that there are two different engravers (Regarding Fingering_engraver and
New_fingering_engraver)? Could
In the manual is written:
By default, vertically oriented fingerings are positioned outside the
staff. However, this behavior can be canceled. Note: you must use a chord
construct <>, even if it is only a single note.
Why to obtain this behavior the chord construct is mandatory?
g.
>
> If I do this...
>
> \version "2.19.48"
> { c' }
> \midi { }
>
> ...and open the resulting MIDI file in SpeedyMidi (
> http://speedymidi.sourceforge.net/ ) it looks like LilyPond set the
> volume to 100. (MIDI allows 0 - 128, right?)
I tried to do the same with speedmidi and some other midi
What's the default midi volume in case I don't specify an absolute dynamic
mark (like \p \f etc)? Is there any way to change this default value?
A crescendo mark that's not ending with an absolute dynamic mark how much
does increase or decrease the midi volume?
In case I separate the dynamics
If you don't use the dynamic mark from \p to \f but you limit
yourseft from \p to \f, the midi output is often too tight.
Is there any (easy) way to make the range from \p to \f playing as \p
to \f?
Thank you, g.
___
lilypond-user
I tried
> > {
> > s1*0 \p \< \repeat unfold 3 {c'4 d' e' f'} s1*0 \!
> > }
> > \addlyrics { \repeat unfold 3 { c d e f } }
and I simply see it doesn't work but I have no idea why
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
The spacer rest does not work but the empty chord does!
So here it is a working example that in my opinion can be very useful:
\version "2.19.40"
{
<> \p \< \repeat unfold 3 {c' d' e' f'} <> \!
}
Thank you Abraham!
___
lilypond-user mailing list
The expressive marks must be attached to a note. I was wondering if it
exists any void/invisible note that it is possible to use to avoid
this constraint, something like: "voidelement" \p
Thank you, g.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
3 { a'-4 g'-3 e'-2 c''-5 }
> \\
> { s1\p\< | s1 | s2. s4\! }
>>>
>
> JM
>
>> Le 27 mai 2016 à 22:11, Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>
>>>> Is there any way to write the previous code using a repeat? Something
>>&
>> Is there any way to write the previous code using a repeat? Something
>> like this (that of course does not work):
>>
>> \p \< \repeat unfold 3 {a'-4 g'-3 e'-2 c''-5} \!
>>
>
> <<
> \repeat unfold 3 { a'-4 g'-3 e'-2 c''-5 }
> { s1\p\< | s1 | s2. s4\! }
> >>
Oh! You're right, it
Have a look to the following code. Please note that each line contain
the same notes but different dynamic information:
\version "2.19.40"
{
a'-4 \p \< g'-3 e'-2 c''-5
a'-4 g'-3 e'-2 c''-5
a'-4 g'-3 e'-2 c''-5 \!
}
Is there any way to write the previous code using a repeat? Something
like
Thank you to Robert Schmaus, Andrew Bernard, David Wright for the
suggestions.
I try to be more precise.
It's not that really I need to be able to enroll some lilypond code.
(1) I was curios to know if LP or Frescobaldi give this functionality
(2) I thought that maybe this functionality was
Is there any tool to "unroll" the code. For instance, suppose you have
something like this...
\version "2.19.40"
fragment.1 =
{
a b c d
}
fragment.2 =
{
e f g a
}
music =
{
\repeat unfold 3 {\fragment.1}
\repeat unfold 2 {\fragment.1 \fragment.2}
}
\score
{
\music
\layout{}
t doesn't look like a screenshot of the midi output - it has the
> fingerings and also rests in the second measure, whereas you say the rests
> are in the first measure.
>
> --
> Phil Holmes
>
>
> ----- Original Message - From: "Gianmaria Lari"
> <gianmarial
I don't understand the following behavior of articulate.ly.
I wrote this measure:
a-1 b-2 a-1 b-2
and then the same without fingering:
a b a b
The midi output of these two measures looks curious to me, because
some rests are introduced ONLY in the first measure. Is it normal?
Here it
Dear David you wrote:
[separating midi/layout]
> I had wondered whether writing such things as "M" in the score would
> make the midi sound bad, but T (H. S. Teoh) effectively answered that
> question with some of his/her own examples. [...]
Yes, the "M" markup would not be a problem: midi
David Wright wrote:
> [...] use tag groups.
(1) Thank you David, I didn't see this command (tagGroup)
(2) Very useful and interesting 'command'. If you use tags this is an
almost mandatory command!
(3) It works extremely well! I have been able to write the code as I wanted.
Is there any way I
Dear David thank you for explaining the problem and pointing me out
the documentation where this is discussed.
Yes, I could organize my code differently but this would be less
clear. Try to have a look to the attached image capture.png.
The first line is the wanted screen output, the second line
I thought that
\keepWithTag #'(A B) \music
and
\keepWithTag #'A {\keepWithTag #'B \music}
would be equivalent. But according to the following test it doesn't.
1 Could you please confirm they are not the same?
2 Is it because \keepWithTag create a list of tags starting always
from the
I'm very much interested.
g.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Scheme-book-p-review-tp190300p190307.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
My guess is that a large part of Lilypond mailing list messages deals
with issues related to graphic output (lilypond is a sort of
typesetting system, isn't it?)
If this is correct I think emails would take advantage of inline
images because these elements can make more clear messages.
Attaching
Thank you Simon for the explanation. I think I will try to avoid it as
much as possible but not more than that:)
P.S. Be patient with my English
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Simon Albrecht <simon.albre...@mail.de> wrote:
> On 28.04.2016 11:52, Gianmaria Lari wrote:
>&g
Dear Harm,
some weeks ago replying to me, you used a variable name syntax that I
didn't know:
> mynote.7 = .
I see the compiler didn't complain and having the possibility to use
number in the variable name would be very practical (at least for me).
But is it a "standard programming style"?
Dear Cynthia,
thank you for your help!
What you propose works correctly but it is not practical. I use tag to
avoid duplicating code so it is crucial to be able to do not create
two different variables music_screenOut and music_midiOut.
Thank you, g.
Dear Harm,
I made many test, and... it works really well! Thanks a lot for your kind
help!
g.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> 2016-04-27 10:56 GMT+02:00 Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com>:
> > I don't know if the f
I personally prefer simple text email... everytime I can avoid html.
But in case of not trivial subject, using formatting give me the possibility
to explain more clearly my ideas. Yes of course, I could do something
similar using ascii but it would be more difficult, time consuming and the
final
I don't know if the following code is well written (suggestions are pretty
welcome!!) but it works as I like (:)) and let me generate two different
output according the tag midiOut or screenOut.
\version "2.19.40"
mynote = c
mynoteExp = {\mynote}
mynoteDouble = {<\mynote' \mynote>}
cC = {\tag
Thank you David, that's clear!
g.
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 11:08 AM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
> Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > What if I change this
> >
> > note = \partcombine {e'} {\tag #'pdfOut c' \tag #'midiOut c'}
> &
What if I change this
note = \partcombine {e'} {\tag #'pdfOut c' \tag #'midiOut c'}
in this:
note = { \new Voice << {e'} {\tag #'pdfOut c' \tag #'midiOut c'}>>}
Now it works, but should I expect any side effects? It is equivalent?
Thanks, g.
___
!
Thanks, g.
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Ciao David you wrote:
>
> [...]
>> \partcombine runs and creates a common score. Since none of the tags is
>> removed, the result contains both c4 and c'4. This is stored in
I'm trying to understand how to use partcombine and tag and I don't
understand why compiling the following code I obtain two measures
4 4 | 4
instead of just one
4 4 4
In the attached image the resulting score.
Here it is the code.
%%%
\version "2.19.40"
note = \partcombine {e'4} {\tag
Thomas, it works fantastically well!
> So why? I don't see any advantage.
I'm writing a kind of library to write accordion music. Let me finish the
work and then I will post it here so that others can take advantage of it
(I hope so) and/or suggest a better way to do it.
Thanks again!
g.
To generate the dominant seventh chord of c we use
\chordmode {c:7}
Does exist any way to make the same thing but starting from a variable
containing a note?
Something like this:
mynote = {c}
\chordmode { \mynote:7 }
Thank you, g.
___
wrote:
>
>
> Am 19. April 2016 16:01:43 MESZ, schrieb David Nalesnik <
> david.nales...@gmail.com>:
> >Hi Gianmaria,
> >
> >On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Gianmaria Lari
> ><gianmarial...@gmail.com>
> >wrote:
> >
> >> I
Is there any way to apply an articulation (accent, staccato etc.) to a
musical expression instead of a single note?
For instance, if I have a variable like this:
c4 e g a
c a g e
is there any way to transform it to:
c4\staccato e\staccato g\staccato a\staccato
c\staccato a\staccato
I writing some accordion scores and for this reason I'm trying to create
the lilypond tools that will make the task more easy.
I started writing the following vaiables:
cC = {c4}
cc = \chordmode {c4}
ccC = { \new Voice << {\cC} {\cc}>>}%first solution
(In the attached image you can see an
Ciao Thomas
[How can I make lilypond display single note in the score but generate
chords in the midi file?]
Maybe:
>
> \version "2.19.36"
>
> m = \chordmode { c4 d:m e:m7 }
>
> \score {
> \new Staff $(event-chord-reduce m)
> }
>
> \score {
> \new Staff \m
> \midi {}
> }
>
this does not
On the accordion the recommended notation to indicate a chord is writing in
the bass staff a *single* note between d' and d and writing on top of them
'M' for major, 'm' for minor etc.
Doing this with lilypond is easy but the generated midi file will contain
single notes and not chords.
How can
wrote:
>
> On Apr 9, 2016, at 2:34 AM, Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I have a music score like this:
>
> a a a a
> b b b b
> c c c c
> r1
> a a a a
> b b b b
> c c c c
>
>
>
>
> Then it would be nice to
I have a music score like this:
a a a a
b b b b
c c c c
r1
a a a a
b b b b
c c c c
Then it would be nice to create a variable
fragment =
{
a a a a
b b b b
c c c c
}
and write the score in the following way:
\fragment
r1
\fragment
This is perfect but sometimes I need to format the
Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> > The situation is a little more problematic, though.
>> > \chordmode { c_\markup { test } }
>> > works, yes, but both of the following two ret
>
> Thomas Morley writes:
>
> > The situation is a little more problematic, though.
> > \chordmode { c_\markup { test } }
> > works, yes, but both of the following two return an error:
> > \chordmode { c-\markup { test } }
> > \chordmode { c^\markup { test } }
>
Is
>> Why this is not correct:
>>\chordmode {c} \markup {test}
[Carl]
>When you do \chordmode{c}, you have ended the music expression containing
>the c, so you can no longer attach a markup to the c chord. So you just
>move the markup inside the \chormode music expression, where it is
>attached to
Sorry to ask something probably trivial but reading manual and making tests
didn't help me.
This works perfectly:
\version "2.19.39"
{
a4 _\markup {test}
}
but this doesn't:
\version "2.19.39"
{
\chordmode {c} \markup {test}
}
Why? How can I write some text on the chords?
g.
Ciao Martin,
- Which Lilypond version did you installed?
- If you installed Frescobaldi could you test if the "import midi" feature
works? To test it: File/Import/Import midi and then specify a simple midi
file. In my tests it should not work IF you have Lilypond version 2.19.39
and 2.19.36
Ciao Federico,
regarding [configure Frescobaldi to reference a specific phyton compiler]
you wrote:
You must add it to the path in system preferences, as explained here:
> http://lilypond.org/windows.html
Yes, I can change the system path but this is something I wanted to avoid.
I have other
Ciao Carl,
[configure Frescobaldi to reference a specific phyton compiler]
> You set it on the Frecobaldi Preferences page (Edit/Preferences/Helper
> Applications).
In the Frescobaldi Preferences page (Edit/Preferences/Helper Applications)
I can set the path for the following applications: Pdf,
.
On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> 2016-04-03 1:03 GMT+02:00 Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com>:
> > Ciao Thomas,
> >
> > I tried to run directly from the shell but I got same error:
> >
> > C:\Pr
uot;, line 54, in
import midi
ImportError: No module named midi
I'm using lilypond 2.19.35.
g.
On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> 2016-04-02 11:52 GMT+02:00 Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com>:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Whe
Hello,
When I try to convert from Midi to Lilypond using Frescobaldi I get the
following error:
The file couldn't be converted Error message:
Traceback (Most recent call last):
File "C:\Program Files (x86)\LilyPond\usr\bin\midi2ly.py", line 54, in ?
import midi
ImportError: DLL load failed: The
Ciao Robert,
sorry if I reply so late.
What you propose to do is a bit too complicated for me and I'll use it as a
last resort. What I'm trying to do now is just to open the midi file with
musescore and add a note in the file to correctly shift the others.
Anyway, it would be great having some
u'd like in the score.
> Just leave out the bar checks, they'll throw warnings ...
>
> Best, Robert
>
> __
>
> The cure for a fallacious argument is a better argument, not the
> suppression of ideas.
> *-- Carl Sagan*
>
>
> On 26 Mar 2016, at 01:06, Gianmar
Hello,
Is there any automatic tool to shift some lilypond music of a certain
rhythm amount? For instance consider the following fragment:
\time 2/4
r4 a4 ~ |
a4 b4 ~|
b4 r4
How can I shift (convert) it to:
\time 2/4
a2 |
b2 |
r4
Thank you, g.
I'm sorry I have not been clear in my old messages, hope my last one it is
clearer.
Regarding:
\relative c'
>{
>...
> \setOctave c'
> \relative c' \changePitch \rhythmPattern { ...
>
> I'm not even sure of how LP interprets that last \relative.
>
>
Last "relative" applies only
Ciao Patric,
to use "changePitch.ly" with Lilypond 2.19 you need to convert it. In case
you need you can check at the end of this old thread:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/changepitch-compilation-error-td187658.html
g.
___
lilypond-user
Thank you David for your help. I think the behaviour of "\relative" and
"\resetRelativeOctave" are clear. If the latter is not deprecated IMHO
there are cases where it can be very useful. That one you mention
(preventing up
and down octave when changing code) it is just one. For instance, suppose
Thank you Patrick, this works exactly as I expected. Why it is not
documented? Can we use it or do we risk that it will deprecated?
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Dear Carl,
thank you for pointing me out the octave check, didn't know it and now I'm
testing it (even if it looks it doesn't work as I need).
Thanks, g.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Ciao Thomas,
thank you for your suggestion about inline-images etc.
"changePitch" is an external function. This is a link to it:
http://gillesth.free.fr/Lilypond/changePitch/
Regarding you function setOtherPitchOctave, this is similar to what I was
thinking except that the parameter is not the
.uk>
wrote:
> On Tue 08 Mar 2016 at 17:45:35 (+0100), Gianmaria Lari wrote:
> >[...]
> >So, more precisely I would write:
> >
> > \version "2.19.35"
> > pattern =
> > {
> > c16 d e f g a b c
> > }
&
Suppose you have this:
[image: Inline image 2]
This is something like
\fragment d d
\fragment c e
\fragment e c
So, more precisely I would write:
\version "2.19.35"
pattern =
{
c16 d e f g a b c
}
\relative c'
{
\pattern d4 d4
\pattern c4 e4
\pattern e4 c4
}
But the previous
Thank Richard and Thomas, it works!
I report here what I did in case others have the same problem (and like me
are beginner):
- open the file changePitch.ly in frescobaldi
- then menu "Tools/Update with convert-ly..."
- in the dialog box, in the "From version", enter 2.18.0 and in the "To
I've used "changePitch.ly" in the past without problem but when I tried
today I get some compilation error. I'm using lilypond 2.19.35 with
Frescobaldi.
This is the code I'm trying to compile (it should be an example from the
changepitch.ly author):
\include "changePitch.ly"
\version "2.19.35"
Hello,
I have the following source
g8 \grace {e16 f16} e8 d8
In the resulting midi output (using articulate.ly) the grace notes are
played too quick (1/64?) and they are almost not audible. Is there any way
to increase their duration?
Thank you, gianmaria
Hello,
the lilypond default note duration is 1/4. For example if I write
{ a b }
lilypond generates two quarter notes. There is any way to set the _default_
note value to another value for example to 1/8 so that the previous code
would generate two 1/8 notes?
Thank you, g.
Thank you Simon for the "cheat", this is exactly what I wanted to know :)
g.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 9:28 PM, Simon Albrecht <simon.albre...@mail.de>
wrote:
> On 22.01.2016 19:16, Gianmaria Lari wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> the lilypond default note
First, I'm not a politician and I'm not here to win a war :) My suggestion is
just a suggestion that have to be analyzed and in case it brings more
benefits than disavantages it should be considered; if an expert explains me
it is not advantageous I will not cry and I will be glad having learnt
I wonder if there is better and more coincise way to write the following
scale:
musict = {
g16 g'' g g a,, a'' a a b,, b'' b b c,, c'' c c
d,, d'' d d e,, e'' e e fis,, fis'' fis fis g,, g'' g g
a,, a'' a a b,, b'' b b c,, c'' c c d,, d'' d d
e,, e'' e e fis,, fis'' fis fis
I'm not a musician. I'm editing a published violin score using lilypond. The
book is a set of studies by Robert Pracht and in many of them the note which
ends a hairpin falls on a downbeat. I don't know if this is something
exceptional or pretty normal in modern music but in this book this is
It works perfectly! Thank you!
g.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/g-g-g-g-tp177750p177783.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Why was it decided that hairpins by default stop at the barline?
If I write something like this:
\time 4/4
{a\ b c d
e*\!* f g a
}
isn't absolutely clear that my intention is to stop the hairpin on the e ?
Doesn't the standard user writing the above example expect to stop the
hairpin on the e?
Ahhh!!! Thank you for the link to the documentation, very clear.
Ciao, g.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/dynamic-outside-staff-tp177417p177426.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
I would like that a symbol span outside staff. This is my code
\version 2.18.2
\time 4/4
\relative {
a\ b c d
e\! f g a
}
I found in the documentation the following example:
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/learning/outside_002dstaff-objects
% Set details for later Text Spanner
Sorry for my not clear english terminology! Yes, Federico, I want to span the
hairpin over the bar line. I had a look to the documentation you mentioned
and made some test and I have some issues.
If I do:
\version 2.18.2
\time 4/4
\relative {a\ b c d
e*\!* f g a
}
I expect that the hairpin is
Consider this musical expression
a b c d
e f g a
It is possible whitout rewriting it multiple times and marking opportunely
the
music generate multiple scores like the followings:
1) a b c d
2) c d e f
3) a b c d e f g
Thank you, g.
--
View this message in context:
Thank you Urs and thank you Mark for you answers. The situation is the
following.
I have a two page score that I created with lilypond. For study reasons I
would
like to split it in multiple parts. Parts could overlap. Each part will be
like a separate exercise printed in succession. Each part
Ciao Federico,
thank you for you help, now it works!! I didn't know score keyword can
compare multiple times in a single source file.
Best regards, g.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/articulate-effect-only-midi-tp177365p177367.html
Sent from the User
I'm trying to improve the quality of the midi output using the articulate
script. I don't understand why I cannot use the articulate keyword only with
the midi output to avoid to alterate the visual output.
This is what I can do:
\version 2.18.2
\include articulate.ly
\score {
*\articulate *
I'm trying to define a variable containing the header but lilypond does not
accept it. Am'I doing some error or is this forbidden?
% my source
\version 2.18.2
head = \header {
title = The Third Position
}
\score {
{a b c d}
\head
\layout {}
}
Thank you, g
--
View this message in
... and this close the thread :) It couldn't be more clear David and it makes
perfectly sense.
Thanks a lot!!!
g.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/slur-syntax-tp176928p177007.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Yes! Thank you Peter (and Urs), I think now it's clear
Lilypond use a postfix syntax. To apply a function 'f' to the note 'a' the
lilypond syntax is a \f and not viceversa. Because the open parenthese is
like a function (a function that marks the first item) it must be written as
for all the
Thank you!! It works, very nice!
Usual question (usual for me): why this functionality is not part of the
standard lilypond?
* * *
I'm a new user. To take advantage of this functionality I copied and pasted
the source code of this feature in my source. Is this the correct/best way
to work
Suppose I want to slur the followings notes:
a8 b c d
then I have to write
a8 (b c d)
This looks a bit strange to me because I think it would be more 'natural'
(for me) write this:
(a8 b c d)
There is any reason why the syntax is like it is?
Thank you, Gianmaria
--
View this message
I started using lilypond two weeks ago, wouldn't be a bit presumptuous for
me to propose this? Why the person that create the snippet does not propose
it?
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
- Original Message - From: Gianmaria Lari
gianmarial
-
*From:* Gianmaria Lari gianmarial...@gmail.com
*To:* Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
*Cc:* lilypond-user lilypond-user@gnu.org
*Sent:* Saturday, May 23, 2015 1:35 PM
*Subject:* Re: rhytm
I started using lilypond two weeks ago, wouldn't be a bit presumptuous
for me to propose this? Why
Ciao Urs,
thank you for the link!
I read the page
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/learning/on-the-un_002dnestedness-of-brackets-and-ties.nl.html
and I understood that slur markers are not brackets in the mathematical
sense but simply mark something to start or end but don't
I'm creating in lilypond a violin study.Every measures have the same
rhytmic configuration. For instance the first measure is:
g4. \tuplet 3/2 a8 (b8 c8)
and the second...
d4. \tuplet 3/2 e8 (f8 g8)
Does exist any way to simply write the melody and apply to the melody this
specific rhytm ?
Merci Pierre, ca marche tres bien!!!
Any idea why this is not part of the default Lilypond packages?
Thank you, Gianmaria
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Yes, I understand. The violin teachear of my daughter use it for her. I'm
not sure it exist a standard way to indicate that low or high finger
position. And probably it is something you use only for beginner.
If you have any suggestion you're welcome.
Ciao, G.
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 2:05 PM,
501 - 590 of 590 matches
Mail list logo