On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Richard Shann wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 13:12 +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
>> Or do you refer to the accidental after the line break?
>
> The one after the line break (which I called a line boundary in my
> original message).
> I think it
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Urs Liska wrote:
> Anyway, I also think there should be only one accidental in the measure
> after the line break (although i don't have a strong opinion on which one to
> emend.
> If I put an accidental on the first (i.e. the tied note) then I definitely
> don't n
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Colin Campbell wrote:
> I still don't understand the original error.
The problem is that voltas specified in lyrics are inserted right
where lyrics are, not aligned with voltas from music.
Maybe this will help you visualise what happens (it may be worth to
a
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Richard Shann
wrote:
> Dear LilyPonders,
> When a tied note with accidental ties across a line boundary the
> accidental is repeated in the next bar. If there is a further note with
> the same accidental, the accidental is repeated, which looks very odd,
> as the
Hi Harm,
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:34 AM, Thomas Morley wrote:
> 2013/3/25 Thomas Morley :
>> 2013/3/24 Janek Warchoł :
>>> Could i ask you to write a function that would print a red dot on top
>>> of a grob's refpoint?
>>
>> Will try the upcomin
Hi all,
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
> I think this is useful material. I would put it in the CG: a new section in
> Programming work: Tutorial on grob alignment.
Maybe.
> If you do this and are
> certain make doc runs without a problem, then pushing directly to staging
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Alberto Simões
wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> On 24/03/13 14:55, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> Well, I am somewhat unhappy with that focus on the pricing of Finale as
>> my own work is being funded by LilyPond users who are typically paying
>> somewhat more to substantially more t
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Keith OHara wrote:
> People have been talking about making LilyPond align the height of dynamics
> in a row, as if they were jointed by a hairpin crescendo. Probably best if
> this is done upon request, with some indication like b\mp\_ to make an
> alignment
> to
[snip long discussion]
hi people,
I'd love to be able to write R*4 to get 4 full measure rests without
having to think about time signature. This would be very convenient.
Therefore i'm sorry to hear that such a feature is likely impossible
to implement properly (if David says so, there's a good
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Noeck wrote:
> 2.) For notes outside the staff (on ledger lines, like c’) there is in
> my opinion no reason to place ties below the note heads. I would prefer
> to have them placed like for the d or b example, because currently ties
> are almost undistinguish
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 2:59 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> "Torsten Hämmerle" writes:
>
>> I'm just happy that in the meantime some "main actors" as David or
>> even Jan seem to acknowledge the fact that Lilypond would certainly
>> benefit from being able to produce "jazz output".
>
> It's not "just
Hi Torsten,
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 11:36 AM, "Torsten Hämmerle"
wrote:
> I've attached a zip file containing the current (albeit
> unfinished) versions of the LilyJAZZ music and LilyJAZZ Text font plus the
> corresponding LilyJAZZ.ily include.
> As an example to demonstrate what's already there
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Pierre Perol-Schneider
wrote:
>
>> I want to place the mark over some specific time within the bar, e.g. at
>> the third quarter in a 4/4.
>
> then simply add a hidden bar :
>
> {
>c c c
>\bar ""
>\mark\default
>c
> }
uh, you don't need that hidde
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Rutger Hofman wrote:
> On 03/14/2013 01:01 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
>> I'm not sure i understand your problem. You can simply insert a \mark
>> anywhere you want it to be:
>>
>> { c'8 c' d' d' \mark \default e&
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Rutger Hofman wrote:
> Good afternoon list,
>
> I want to have a rehearsal \mark halfway a bar. I cannot find anything in
> the v2.16 manual.
I'm not sure i understand your problem. You can simply insert a \mark
anywhere you want it to be:
{ c'8 c' d' d' \
Hi,
please be careful with using caps.
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 8:24 PM, wrote:
> Why a new syntax? I frequently find that if I jump to the end of a big, long
> \relative { ... }, then frequently I don't remember which octave I'm in.
Maybe using Frescobaldi would solve this problem for you?
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 2:13 AM, Peter Wannemacher
wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I have a part which crosses between two staves. I would like the stems to go
> down when on the upper staff and up when on the lower staff. I have succeeded
> in
> the example below, but I would like not to have to ty
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 9:34 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
>> On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 12:20:19AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> So the first pitch will _always_ be special-cased. With a reference
>>> pitch, it is special-cased to refer to that absolute pitch. Withou
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:55 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
>> This reminds me of an idea i had: make stafflines under rests grey,
>> to make it immediately obvious where an instrument is resting (see
>> attached - obviously a bigger example would demonstrate this idea
>> better, but i don' have one)
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Kieren MacMillan
wrote:
> Hi Jan-Peter (and anyone else still interested in this thread):
>
> In the end, the conductor of my chamber opera asked to have the bar lines
> solid for all measures, but 50% grey and slightly thicker than default as the
> "baselin
:)
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 11:10 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Janek Warchoł writes:
>
>> On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Wim van Dommelen wrote:
>>> Compared with the \clef behaviour, I see this variant:
>>> melody = { \relative c='4 d e f g f e d c \absolut
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 1:08 AM, Alexander Kobel wrote:
> On a different side note, it'd also be really nice if one could specify that
> no additional space should be introduced if there is no hyphen. At least
> that's how hand-engraved scores seem to do if horizontal space is at a
> premium: writ
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 12:38 AM, Tim McNamara wrote:
> My last attempt to install it on my Mac to run in an X11 window resulted in
> literally hundreds of things being downloaded by MacPorts- dependencies for
> the dependencies for the dependencies in what seemed to be nearly infinite
> recurs
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Wim van Dommelen wrote:
>
> On 10 Mar 2013, at 10:06 , David Kastrup wrote:
>> Barely tongue-in-cheek:
>>
>> absolute =
>> #(define-music-function (parser location music) (ly:music?)
>> (make-music 'TransposedMusic 'element music))
>>
>> When placed inside of a
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Olivier Biot wrote:
> Thinking of which, I believe I am struggling with "music entry notation"
> versus "music storage": writing in relative pitch is often easier for note
> entry, but absolute pitches are IMHO better suited for storing music. I may
> be trying to d
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 7:02 AM, Nick Payne wrote:
> See attached graphic. Quite a number of these in the score (Brahms Sextet Op
> 18).
you can use a clever function written by David K. While it results in
different (i'd say a bit worse) spacing, it makes input code
infinitely more readable:
at
Hi,
this suggestion might take the crown of the most discussed change away
from the treble clef touchup - i'm impressed :)
Anyway, i see the situation as follows:
- most of us consider changing the behaviour of \relative {} (without
explicit reference pitch) a good idea,
- we (i.e. user community)
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Katie Ganem wrote:
> I tried copying it into a new file, but it goes through the motions,
> says that it successfully compiled and then shows nothing.
> Does anyone know what could cause this?
This may happen if you define your music variables but don't actually
us
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Klaus Föhl wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Some German lyrics from before the times of Neue Deutsche Rechtschreibung
> feature ck between two syllables. Without Hyphen it is "lecker", with hyphen
> it is "lek-ker". Using lec -- ker or lek -- ker ( on purpose not le -- cker
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 6:24 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
>>> I really would not like to have to tell LilyPond for every single
>>> fragment to not use a final bar line.
>>
>> Could you explain what you didn't like in my suggestion that said "if
>> the music is more than 3 bars long, use a "|."
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 8:06 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> The idea is that \relative { ... } (namely \relative used without an
> explicit reference pitch) uses the first note inside as the reference
> pitch. That is, if the first note happens to be written as fis'' it
> will sound as fis'' (absolute
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 6:45 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Marc Hohl writes:
>> No – I still would prefer if LilyPond draws the final bar line without
>> having to explicitely tell her.
>
> Take a look at
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/writing-pitches>
>
> I really would
quivalent to a definition:
> \defineBarLine "|!." #'("|!." "" "|!.")
> If you want a different definition you would have to write it, of course.
sounds interesting. I think David suggests something similar.
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Marc
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 11:56 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Janek Warchoł writes:
>> Similarly to Marc i'd very much like to see LilyPond automatically end
>> pieces with final barline.
>
> No question about that: of course I'd also always like LilyPond to do
> the
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Tim Roberts wrote:
> I had it in my brain that Lilypond had a simple switch to enable the
> pseudo-handwritten font and engraving style that one often sees in jazz and
> stage band music, but after a lengthy search last night, I now wonder if I
> was hallucinating.
Marc,
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Marc Hohl wrote:
> Am 06.03.2013 17:47, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
>> i was very surprised by Marc's suggestion to revert his barline
>> interface commit. I'm pretty sure that everyone regards Marc's (and
>> Harm's) wor
Hi all,
i was very surprised by Marc's suggestion to revert his barline
interface commit. I'm pretty sure that everyone regards Marc's (and
Harm's) work in this area as very valuable and noone thinks of
deleting it at all!
What I see are two issues:
a) should we change the character that produc
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Urs Liska wrote:
> Am 04.03.2013 15:16, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
>> For example, take a look at
>> https://github.com/janek-warchol/eja-mater-demonstration .
>
> Sorry for not answering your first post about this. The archive with the
> repo
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 6:51 PM, m...@mikesolomon.org
wrote:
> This is a great idea. What'd I'd recommend is doing a "natural" version and
> a version with lots of tweaks.
> If you define all the tweaks in a separate file, then all you need to do is
> sub that file with one that has empty defini
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> As for demonstrations, you might be interested in the attachment. It
> contains a small git repository (13 commits) with Lily sources of a
> choir part from 3rd movement of Antonin Dvorak's Stabat Mater. [...]
Apparently
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 1:12 AM, Jim Long wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 02:56:45PM +0100, Janek Warcho?? wrote:
>>
>> Yes, it's a nice example and i wouldn't hesitate to post it in that
>> discussion. I don't see it there; would you like me to post it?
>
> Thanks for your kind comments.
>
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 2:30 AM, Adam Spiers
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 5:22 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Adam Spiers writes:
>>> I just blogged about this:
>>>
>>> http://blog.adamspiers.org/2013/02/25/music-industry-learns-nothing-from-the-avid-sibelius-saga/
>>
>> Well, I see some f
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 6:34 AM, Jim Long wrote:
> Thanks for this tip, and also to Xavier for mentioning
> \partcombine. It simplified the code nicely.
>
> I modified the combined trombone score to show all four parts
> on one staff.
>
> The code looks much cleaner now.
Yes, it's a nice ex
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 12:42 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> ryanmichaelmcclure writes:
>> Let those who want to have freedom use their OS, and those who don't
>> care use their OS.
>
> Those who don't care will not actively help Free Software including
> LilyPond, so it is in LilyPond's best interes
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Urs Liska wrote:
> Hi,
>
> did anybody do some functional analysis with LilyPond (I'm talking about
> printing the results of course, not the act of analysis itself)?
> The attached image is done with an ancient version of Finale, where I had
> bought an analy
Hi Werner,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> consider this real-life example (omitting the unimportant voices).
> [..]
>
> There is an ugly clash between the two beams. Due to the cross-staff
> beam, this is sort-of expected.
>
> What can I do to improve the formatting?
I
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
> you need to have a variety of rule sets (at least 2: chromatic and tonal),
> you need to be able to switch arbitrarily between the two (e.g. some music
> may have tonal parts and atonal parts).
+1
I had encountered a piece that nee
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Urs Liska wrote:
> "Music Engraving on Metal Plates":
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=345o3Wu95Qo
That's awesome!
However, despite the fact that this man is truly skilled, there are
some imperfections. For example http://youtu.be/345o3Wu95Qo?t=2m23s -
the eight
(i cannot resist my lilypond addiction...)
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Urs Liska wrote:
> But I probably won't touch [online tutorial] until I reformat it as a PDF
> version. There
> had been some valuable comments on this list right after the first 'release'
> of the tutorial - which stil
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
>> You will want someone who is sensitive to Cyrillic to Latin and who
>> can manage the difficulties of the dense use of diacritics in Czech
>> set which are significant. Is Polish relevant?
>
> Interestingly, no. There aren't any Polish o
Hi,
you seem to use some very strange quotation style. Please use regular
quotation style (i.e. your text without > marks, each quotation level
has one > more).
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 8:44 PM, SoundsFromSound
wrote:
>
> Janek Warchoł-2 wrote
>> - contributing to Lily your
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Paul Scott wrote:
> 2.17.6
>
> I found several threads about this but the discussion doesn't give me any
> ideas
> as to what to change.
>
> ../common22.ily:83:12: error: bad grob property path
> \override
> Staff #'fontSize = #-2
You need to use \s
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 1:25 AM, SoundsFromSound
wrote:
> I'll keep you posted for sure. Say, do you suppose that this boxed notation
> utility could be implemented sooner (and perhaps with more powerful
> features) in LilyPond if funding/support increased?
Well, i think the situation is like th
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 2:49 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Janek Warchoł writes:
>> What really annoys me is the fact that rm has no reasonable safeguard.
>> [...] i'd like to see a safeguard against deleting too many files
>
> rm is not a file manager. I do larger renami
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 2:56 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Janek Warchoł writes:
>
>> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 10:31 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>>> You did not copy and paste valid LilyPond code into #{ #}. You replaced
>>> a constant in a constant list by a
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Urs Liska wrote:
> I'm happy (and also proud) to be able to announce a new release of my
> lilyglyphs LaTeX package.
> While I label it version 0.2 I am convinced that it is the first release
> that is really useable, so I consider this the initial 'public' release
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "Janek Warchoł"
>> I had a 2-week old backup, and i managed to recover some files created
>> after the backup (unfortunately it seems that SSD drives fragment the
>> data
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 10:31 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Janek Warchoł writes:
>> Well, i don't quite understand why
>>
>> manualBeam =
>> #(define-music-function
>> (parser location beg-end)
>> (pair?)
>>#{
>> \once \ov
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Thomas Morley
wrote:
> 2012/11/9 Janek Warchoł :
>> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 9:21 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> [...)
>> Sorry for being grumpy - i'm frustrated with some other things, for
>> example the fact that all my data got de
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 9:21 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> First, let's assume 2.16 (the current development version will not
> accept the above syntax of \overrideProperty even in the first variant).
Yes. I haven't made the switch yet.
> Then inside of # itself, like with #'((alignement-distances
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Marc Hohl wrote:
> Well, I don't feel a *conflict* situation here, but that may be
> founded in me born in the "wrong" piece of earth ;-)
>
> If there really *is* a conflict/misunderstanding here, the
> concerning parties *should* try to solve it: via private mail,
Hi friends,
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 8:54 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>Janek wrote:
>> Imagine that next month David receives 10 times the money
>> he usually gets: we'd have David covered for next ~10 months,
>
> More like the next 6 months. [snip explanation]
ok, i'm fine with that.
And i definitel
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 9:02 AM, SoundsFromSound
wrote:
> I apologize, my brain is a bit tired - it's almost 4am here :) I think I
> typed the word forum because it was fresh on my mind since I visit the
> Nabble "forum" archive for the mailing list. Sorry for the confusion. I
> should rest my b
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 7:12 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> soundsfromsound writes:
>
>> Do you guys have a PayPal donation link or something where perhaps I
>> could send a little something your way? I couldn't find anything on
>> the website... :)
>
> Then I need to rethink my strategies.
...and w
% Hi people,
% here's what i want to do:
<<
{
\overrideProperty #"Score.NonMusicalPaperColumn"
#'line-break-system-details #'((alignment-distances . (30)))
a a a a
}
{ b b b b }
>>
% the override is very long, so i wanted to create a helper music
function. I tried this
staff
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 9:18 AM, soundsfromsound
wrote:
> Sorry, yes you are right! I had pasted from an MusicXML conversion - I
> haven't edited anything out of it yet.
>
> Are you saying that this is somehow hindering me from being able to use a
> mid-measure clef change? I'm confused. How shou
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 3:24 AM, soundsfromsound
wrote:
> Can someone weigh in and let me know if LilyPond offers similar slur
> parameters that can be controlled by the user? Or is this editing slightly
> limited?
You definitely want to know about \shape function. If you're using
development ve
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>
> commit 917dab12e7a838f1f153e7c57fb921c0b19b9bc2
> Author: Phil Holmes
> Date: Fri Jan 6 17:23:15 2012 +
>
> Stops Windows PATH being changed
>
> Such messages, and this one in particular can annoy me immensly.
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
>> I think both cheat sheets nicely complement each other.
>
> What about adding both of them to the lilypond distribution?
+1
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gn
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Noeck wrote:
> Dear Lilypond users and developers,
>
> many years ago I made a cheat sheet for Lilypond,
> [...]
> http://arsantiqua-karlsruhe.de/images/pdf/LilypondCheatsheet.pdf
WOW!! It's great! The way you use color and present alternatives and
variants... a
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Tim Roberts wrote:
> I'm transcribing a piece that has a dashed bar line in the middle of a bar,
> in only one staff in a system. The dashed line is marking a change of
> phrase. Is there an easy way to do that? I think I know how to do it by
> subverting the bar
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Mark Stephen Mrotek
wrote:
> If this were a video the Hallelujah Course would be playing in the
> background!
:)
> For about an hour I added code and regularly checked the results by clicking
> the Frescobaldi Lillypond icon. Each time the music appeared. Th
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Mark Stephen Mrotek
wrote:
> how to have the notation for the middle voice move from the
> treble staff to the bass staff and back (This to avoid ledger lines.) The
> online documentation (Notation Reference 2.2.1) provides instruction for all
> pitch notations in t
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Eluze wrote:
>
On 10/30/2012 11:43 PM, Thomas Morley wrote:
> if you want to affect only a single line of the score, use
>
> \overrideProperty #"Score.NonMusicalPaperColumn"
> #'line-break-system-details #'((alignment-distances . (30)))
>
>
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:51 PM, soundsfromsound
wrote:
> I just wanted to say hello and introduce myself. My name is Ben and I am a
> composer based out of Boston, MA (USA) and I am an active LilyPond user. In
> my opinion, LilyPond is the best music engraving program out there and I'm
>
Hi Wim,
Please reply to the whole list, so that others might benefit from our
discussion.
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Wim van Dommelen wrote:
> The other discussion would be: Are you going to use the Tiny Examples as a
> way of showing small pieces of code doing some specific action? Is tha
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 10:03 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Janek Warchoł writes:
> > You mean
> > \include "english.ly"
> > in the page about tiny examples? Actually, english.ly is a file
> > bundled with Lilypond, which allows to spell note names with englis
Hi,
sorry for delay, i was very busy...
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Wim van Dommelen wrote:
> But the top part of the example shown uses an include-file.
> That is not "tiny", anything can happen there. So I would add
> to the rules for a tiny example no use of include files.
You mean
\in
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 2:57 AM, James Harkins wrote:
> Actually not a complaint! But inspired by the thread on upgrading vs not
> upgrading, where it was suggested that LP has become inherently more complex
> and harder to use, even for simple typesetting.
>
> [...]
>
> I just wanted to mention i
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 11:09 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Janek Warchoł writes:
>> +1 for updating documentation.
>
> Would make sense for the bug squad to register the proposal. I don't
> think it would be suitable in the proposed form but that does not mean
> we shoul
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Daniel Rosen wrote:
> I did consider that; the problem is those ties go _over_ the barline instead
> of stopping just short, so they'd still need to be adjusted manually.
Not if you scale the durations:
{ r2 2*7/8 ~ \hideNotes q2*1/8 \unHideNotes R1 }
but i admit
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Daniel Rosen wrote:
> Is there a way to extend laissez vibrer ties so that they stop just short of
> the barline,
> as in the attached example? I can't seem to find a way that doesn't involve
> manually adjusting control points.
You may consider using a trick: c
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 2:18 AM, Kevin Patrick Barry wrote:
> Dear LilyPond users,
>
> I have found the recent debate about the difficulty of using LilyPond
> interesting and would like to offer my experience, as someone who has
> been using it for about six months. I apologise if this is a bit
>
+1 for updating documentation.
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 3:05 PM, james wrote:
> Perhaps there is a much simpler solution. Notation reference, 1.3.1 is where
> I got the example which I have been using since at least 2.12, because
> centering such a new dynamic is probably rarer than having it l
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Daniel Rosen wrote:
> That's really OK in my case--no one else I know uses LilyPond. :-P
You never know what will happen in the future :)
Anyway, i wouldn't do it.
Janek
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 3:25 AM, Daniel Rosen wrote:
>[...]
> This is the first time I've answered a question on the list
That's great! I find your answer clear and helpful - hopefully Mark
will like it, too :)
> but I don't think I'd be out of line by asking you to use tiny examples in
> the
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 4:32 AM, Richard Rohrich wrote:
> The following results in a crescendo to forte on dis1:
>
> cis2. cis4 | dis1->\f | R1*2 | R1*2 \bar "|."
I don't quite see the decrescendo, but anyway, try this:
{
cis2.\< cis4 | dis1->\f\> <>\p | R1*2 | R1*2 \bar "|."
}
or this:
{
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 2:13 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> LilyPond is supposed to
> be useful without having to extend it.
>
>> In other words, an a-priori refusal of Scheme isn't helpful if you
>> want to explore the capabilities of LilyPond.
>
> If you want to _extend_ them. LilyPond is nowhere n
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 12:07 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> At any rate, in LilyPond 2.16 you _can_ write the above as
> rinforzamf =
> #(make-dynamic-script
> #{ \markup \line { \left-align \normal-text \whiteout \italic "rinforza"
> \hspace #0
> \whiteout
Jay,
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Jay Hamilton wrote:
> Janek-
> I'm not going to do that [upgrade to 2.16]. Here's a few reasons why.
> I've been using lilypond since some kind of 1 version. Some of the
> stable versions have been baby steps and easy to accommodate and understand.
> M
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 9:16 PM, wrote:
> Hello
>
> using version 2.14.1 [...]
please try latest stable version (2.16.0).
best,
Janek
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
David,
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 7:02 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Tim Roberts writes:
>
>> MING TSANG wrote:
>>
>>
>> This is my third post on the same subject. First time on Oct 14,
>> Second time on Oct 19. In the past, I get reply on the same day,
>> and sometime 2 to 3 day later. I
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 9:38 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Janek Warchoł writes:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 9:57 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> That's entirely selfish since I know you are reading the list. I write
>>> four answers, and you turn them into twen
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 9:57 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Thomas Morley writes:
>> Let me take the opportunity to express my deepest gratefulness for all
>> your work, not only for developing LilyPond, but for all the time you
>> spend on the user-list, answering/solving all kind of
>> questions/pr
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 9:04 PM, m...@mikesolomon.org
wrote:
> On 16 oct. 2012, at 18:49, Janek Warchoł wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 2:20 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> commit d8dfa746ead381a80901106b9c9b079dc9b5d004
>>> Author: Mike Solomon
>>> Da
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Urs Liska wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I want to redistribute the Emmentaler .otf files as part of a GPLed LaTeX
> package.
> I recall reading that Emmentaler is GPLed with the font exception (meaning
> that works created using the fonts aren't implicitely covered by the
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Thomas Morley
wrote:
> 2012/10/19 David Kastrup :
>> Thomas Morley writes:
>>> Calling the function for a single pitch doesn't work, if ##{ #} are
>>> omitted, but it'll work if the predicate would be ly:pitch?
>>> I don't understand this behaviour.
>>
>> Welcome
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 2:52 AM, Daniel Rosen wrote:
> The piece I'm working on has a repeat that ends in the middle of a measure,
> with a line break at the same point:
>
> I would like to have a bar number, perhaps in parentheses, at the beginning
> of the second line,
sorry, no time to
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 2:20 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> commit d8dfa746ead381a80901106b9c9b079dc9b5d004
> Author: Mike Solomon
> Date: Fri Aug 31 09:27:17 2012 +0200
>
> Uses a heuristic to determine if chord tremolos collide with accidentals.
>
> This heuristic makes several assumption
Hi,
David Nalesnik's function correcting tuplet number placement on kneed
beams throws an error with Lilypond 2.17.5 (it works with 2.16.0):
Drawing systems.../home/janek/desk/tuplet_numers_on_kneed_beams.ily:44:26:
In procedure * in expression (* 0.5 (ly:grob-property beam #)):
/home/janek/desk/
601 - 700 of 1192 matches
Mail list logo
