2010/1/8 Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) lilypondt...@organum.hu:
Why not spend a minute to find an authoritative answer before sending
speculations to the list?
Because my memory works like a hash map, so I can find data in it constant
time, while looking in the manual or the archive is in
Robert,
are you clicking Reply instead of Reply all? I haven't seen any of
your messages since the first one, and they aren't appearing in the
archives. This can happen if you send replies just to one person and
not to the whole list.
Please keep all discussion on list - the easiest way to do
2009/12/12 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Robin Bannister r...@dataway.ch writes:
c4*3 g e'2.
Mmm, that was where you started. Sorry for the noise.
You can get a better-looking result at the cost of quadrupling the
number of warnings.
{
\clef G \relative c' {
\once
I'm confused by the docs for collision resolution:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond/Multiple-voices#Multiple-voices
In the example, the c2 and c8 are not merged because they have
different note-heads. But in the second bar, the e2 and e8 *are*
merged, despite having
2009/12/11 Jay Anderson horndud...@gmail.com:
I've done triple-stops like this in the past:
c4 g' e'2.\fermata
I'd prefer to do the triple-stop something more like this to avoid warnings:
\tweak #'duration-log #2 \tweak #'dot-count #0 c g' e'2.\fermata |
Unfortunately I can't make the dot
2009/12/11 Owain Sutton m...@owainsutton.co.uk:
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 09:20 +, Philip Potter wrote:
2009/12/11 Jay Anderson horndud...@gmail.com:
I've done triple-stops like this in the past:
c4 g' e'2.\fermata
I'd prefer to do the triple-stop something more like this to avoid
2009/12/11 Owain Sutton m...@owainsutton.co.uk:
I realise now I've checked that the Tchaikovsky does have rests in the
lower 'voice'. The Stravinsky doesn't, however, - but you can just
about make it out here, at figure 2:
http://www.sheetmusicplus.com/look_inside/5867960/image/262798
How
2009/12/11 stefankaegi ska...@hispeed.ch:
Hi
I have a litte problem with acciaccatura. I have something like this:
\acciaccatura { c16 [ d16 e16 ]}
Now I'd like to have this line drawn through the stem like I would have
it when it would be a single note.
I see you didn't get a response
2009/12/2 Hugh Myers hsmy...@gmail.com:
Same chord repeated three times.
This works for me:
\relative c' {
\times 2/3 { e gis b e e gis b e e gis b e }
e gis b e e gis b e e gis b e
}
For 3 triplets followed by 3 regular notes.
Phil
___
2009/11/27 -Eluze elu...@gmail.com:
Philip Potter wrote:
Dear all,
I'd like to get a direction for swung quavers at the top of my score.
What I want is:
quaver-beam-quaver = triplet[ crotchet quaver ]
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1id=204 lsr helps:
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR
Dear all,
I'd like to get a direction for swung quavers at the top of my score.
What I want is:
quaver-beam-quaver = triplet[ crotchet quaver ]
if that makes sense. I've had a look through the lilypond-user
archives and it seems it wasn't possible 5 years ago:
That looks good, thanks! I'll try it out when I get home from work...
2009/11/27 -Eluze elu...@gmail.com:
Philip Potter wrote:
Dear all,
I'd like to get a direction for swung quavers at the top of my score.
What I want is:
quaver-beam-quaver = triplet[ crotchet quaver ]
http
12 matches
Mail list logo
