Han-Wen Nienhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually, the lyric alignment code was contributed by Glen Prideaux,
who since disappeared off the face of the earth.
This probably means that someone else should step forward and maintain
and/or replace the lyric alignment code, right?
Anyway, it's
Jozsa Marton writes:
Why beams mean melismata?
Because that's the convention, at least in the music with lyrics that
I have seen.
It is very strange for me that setting
\property Staff.automaticMelismata = ##t
\autoBeamOff
c-[ d e-] will mean a melisma for the lyrics, but I think
---BeginMessage---
Well, then I think it depends on the language of lyrics. According to
Hungarian conventions beams never mean melismata, only slurs and ties.
(I came to this problem when I wanted to unbeam two notes. Can it be
done
without switching autobeaming temporarily off?)
I suppose that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, then I think it depends on the language of lyrics. According to
Hungarian conventions beams never mean melismata, only slurs and ties.
(I came to this problem when I wanted to unbeam two notes. Can it be
done
without switching autobeaming temporarily off?)
I
Why beams mean melismata?
It is very strange for me that setting
\property Staff.automaticMelismata = ##t
\autoBeamOff
c-[ d e-] will mean a melisma for the lyrics, but I think only c-( d e-)
(i.e. slurs) should mean that.
___
Lilypond-user