Re: [Józsa Márton] RE: Beams == Melismata?

2003-09-18 Thread Arvid Grøtting
Han-Wen Nienhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Actually, the lyric alignment code was contributed by Glen Prideaux, who since disappeared off the face of the earth. This probably means that someone else should step forward and maintain and/or replace the lyric alignment code, right? Anyway, it's

Re: Beams == Melismata?

2003-09-17 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Jozsa Marton writes: Why beams mean melismata? Because that's the convention, at least in the music with lyrics that I have seen. It is very strange for me that setting \property Staff.automaticMelismata = ##t \autoBeamOff c-[ d e-] will mean a melisma for the lyrics, but I think

[Józsa Márton] RE: Beams == Melismata?

2003-09-17 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
---BeginMessage--- Well, then I think it depends on the language of lyrics. According to Hungarian conventions beams never mean melismata, only slurs and ties. (I came to this problem when I wanted to unbeam two notes. Can it be done without switching autobeaming temporarily off?) I suppose that

[Józsa Márton] RE: Beams == Melismata?

2003-09-17 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Well, then I think it depends on the language of lyrics. According to Hungarian conventions beams never mean melismata, only slurs and ties. (I came to this problem when I wanted to unbeam two notes. Can it be done without switching autobeaming temporarily off?) I

Beams == Melismata?

2003-09-16 Thread Jozsa Marton
Why beams mean melismata? It is very strange for me that setting \property Staff.automaticMelismata = ##t \autoBeamOff c-[ d e-] will mean a melisma for the lyrics, but I think only c-( d e-) (i.e. slurs) should mean that. ___ Lilypond-user