Re: Compound meter

Mea culpa. It's built in to 2.19.82. Apologies for the noise. Andrew On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 at 12:52, Andrew Bernard wrote: > > But it's a very large chunk of Scheme for a relatively small matter, yet > another bit of complex code to look after locally. Is this functionality > built in to

Compound meter

LSR 745 does a nice job of providing for complex compound meter time signatures. But it's a very large chunk of Scheme for a relatively small matter, yet another bit of complex code to look after locally. Is this functionality built in to lilypond by now? Andrew

FW: beat divisions and compound meter

pond-user <lilypond-user@gnu.org> Subject: beat divisions and compound meter Here's the whole thing in a MWE: - \version "2.19.80" beambreakOn = { \set subdivideBeams = ##t \set baseMoment = #(ly:make-m

Re: beat divisions and compound meter

On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Urs Liska wrote: > > Short answer: not yet. I have been working on an analysis of the whole > matter but got interrupted by privare matters. > I'll at least provide a complete assessment of the matter but can't > promise a solution. > > Urs >

Re: beat divisions and compound meter

Am 25. November 2017 12:13:30 MEZ schrieb "N. Andrew Walsh" : >Hi List, > >I have a file with the following functions defined: > >beambreakOn = { > \set subdivideBeams = ##t > \set baseMoment = #(ly:make-moment 1/8) > \set beatStructure = #'(2 2 2 2) >} >

beat divisions and compound meter

Hi List, I have a file with the following functions defined: beambreakOn = { \set subdivideBeams = ##t \set baseMoment = #(ly:make-moment 1/8) \set beatStructure = #'(2 2 2 2) } beambreakOff = { \set subdivideBeams = ##f \set baseMoment = #(ly:make-moment 1/8) \set beatStructure =

Re: tuplets in compound meter

On Wed 27 Jul 2016 at 07:57:29 (+0200), Malte Meyn wrote: > > > Am 26.07.2016 um 20:34 schrieb David Wright: > >>>What I didn't take into account is tuplet's optional argument for the > >>>tuplet spanner duration. > >Can you do this in compound time? What would be the syntax? > > Of course, you

Re: tuplets in compound meter

Am 26.07.2016 um 20:34 schrieb David Wright: >What I didn't take into account is tuplet's optional argument for the >tuplet spanner duration. Can you do this in compound time? What would be the syntax? Of course, you can use scaled and dotted durations like \time 6/8 \tuplet 7/6 2. { … }

Re: tuplets in compound meter

On Mon 25 Jul 2016 at 12:21:21 (+0200), Urs Liska wrote: > Am 25.07.2016 um 12:00 schrieb Malte Meyn: > > Am 25.07.2016 um 11:44 schrieb Andrew Bernard: > >> So they are tuplet 10/9. Can you not simply set the tuplet numbers > >> accordingly? > >> > >> \once \override TupletNumber.text = "" > > >

Re: tuplets in compound meter

Am 25.07.2016 um 12:00 schrieb Malte Meyn: > > > Am 25.07.2016 um 11:44 schrieb Andrew Bernard: >> So they are tuplet 10/9. Can you not simply set the tuplet numbers >> accordingly? >> >> \once \override TupletNumber.text = "" > > I could. But like my solutions with scaled durations, the input >

Re: tuplets in compound meter

Hi Malte, Does the input have to match the output? Does it have to be ‘real’? I never thought of lilypond that way. I have to do hundreds of these sorts of mods also. Can’t you just write a function and say something like: \tn 5 [And live with the ‘inelegance’?] Andrew On 25/07/2016,

Re: tuplets in compound meter

Am 25.07.2016 um 11:44 schrieb Andrew Bernard: So they are tuplet 10/9. Can you not simply set the tuplet numbers accordingly? \once \override TupletNumber.text = "" I could. But like my solutions with scaled durations, the input doesn’t really reflect the output. And when you have many of

Re: tuplets in compound meter

Hi Malte, So they are tuplet 10/9. Can you not simply set the tuplet numbers accordingly? \once \override TupletNumber.text = "" What does Scriabin put for the tuplet number? I have to use this technique extensively for the New Complexity scores I engrave, where it gets a lot weirder than

tuplets in compound meter

do something like \tuplet 5/9 \scaleDurations 1/2 { r4 ... } or \tuplet 5/9 { r4*1/2 ... } but wouldn’t it be nice to have a version of tuplet that works better with compound meter? \tuplet 5/4½ is a special example but \tuplet 2/1½ is more common (it is often written as \tuplet 2/3 but I’ve

Repeat time signature change / compound meter

Hi lilyponders, On the score I’m engraving there is repetitively measure of 2 and 3 fourths (like \repeat unfold 10 {\time 2/4 s2 \time 3/4 s2.}) I’d like to have one time signature 2/4+3/4, but with bar lines every 2 and 3 fourths. Using \compoundMeter #'((2 4) (3 4)), bars come only every 7

Re: problem with compound meter

with the compoundMeter command. In the below quoted snippet the compound meter is displayed only in the very high staff, but not in the following one! \version 2.14.1 global= { \compoundMeter #'((1 4) (5 16)) s4 s16*5 } UPstaff = { c' 16 d' e' f' g' a' b' c'' d'' } Downstaff = { c'' b' a' g' f' e

problem with compound meter

Dear community, I have a problem with the compoundMeter command. In the below quoted snippet the compound meter is displayed only in the very high staff, but not in the following one! \version 2.14.1 global= { \compoundMeter #'((1 4) (5 16)) s4 s16*5 } UPstaff = { c' 16 d' e' f' g' a' b' c'' d

Re: problem with compound meter

On 11-10-08 09:13 AM, Stefan Thomas wrote: Dear community, I have a problem with the compoundMeter command. In the below quoted snippet the compound meter is displayed only in the very high staff, but not in the following one! \version 2.14.1 global= { \compoundMeter #'((1 4) (5 16)) s4 s16*5