- Original Message -
From: David Rogers davidandrewrog...@gmail.com
To: Carl Peterson carlopeter...@gmail.com
Cc: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org; Mailinglist lilypond-user
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 4:38 AM
Subject: Re: Double slurs on automatic part combining
David Kastrup:
...
I know SATB as basically
\new ChoirStaff
\new Staff { \clef treble { \soprano } \\ { \alto } }
\new Staff { \clef bass { \tenor } \\ { \bass } }
namely _without_ joining stems.
...
Not so fast,
\\ is a pain with vocal music, we want a explicit voice name for
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 4:53 AM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
I have to my right hand Hymns and Modern, New Standard and behind me
Songs of Praise, New Standard. Both of these use separate voices for Sop
and Alto; Tenor and Bass. I strongly believe this is the best way of
setting
Carl Peterson carlopeter...@gmail.com writes:
Some hymnals (the same ones) also do not beam flagged notes unless the
notes are for the same syllable (in which case, the beam serves as the
slur). I have adopted this change.
You'll find that switching autobeaming off will make lyric syllables
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 8:46 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Carl Peterson carlopeter...@gmail.com writes:
Some hymnals (the same ones) also do not beam flagged notes unless the
notes are for the same syllable (in which case, the beam serves as the
slur). I have adopted this change.
On 13-09-06 06:55 AM, Carl Peterson wrote:
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 8:46 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
mailto:d...@gnu.org wrote:
Carl Peterson carlopeter...@gmail.com
mailto:carlopeter...@gmail.com writes:
Some hymnals (the same ones) also do not beam flagged notes
unless the
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 12:59 PM, David Rogers
davidandrewrog...@gmail.comwrote:
In practical terms, Carl's and my hymn books may in fact be considered
correct, because in many churches and/or church-music traditions, the
congregation is expected to sing in unison most of the time, the choir
Carl Peterson carlopeter...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 4:53 AM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
wrote:
I have to my right hand Hymns and Modern, New Standard and
behind me Songs of Praise, New Standard. Both of these use
separate voices for Sop
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Carl Peterson carlopeter...@gmail.comwrote:
This probably means that if it bothers me enough, I'm going to have to go
back into the part-combiner.scm file and dissect it. While my hands are in
the patient, I might as well figure out how to get it to combine
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Carl Peterson carlopeter...@gmail.comwrote:
So getting back to this, I had somewhat a stroke of inspiration, but I
can't find in the documentation whether this is possible. Is it possible to
define a global context for all voice ones and all voice twos? In other
Karl Hammar wrote:
Not so fast,
\\ is a pain with vocal music, we want a explicit voice
name for \lyricsto
see below
Carl Peterson wrote:
Yes. The template I'm using is actually fairly robust.
I've moved as many of the tweaks and customizations (such
as autobeaming and shaped notes) to
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com wrote:
Karl and Carl (and other choral typesetters),
I've added a new context to the source code called
NullVoice which is designed exactly for this purpose.
It's not yet available as a release, but you can get it by
I am using the automatic part combiner in preparing SATB hymn sheets. The
issue I have is that when the notes are chorded by the apc, if there is a
slur (in both parts), only one slur is printed (as is seen in the
documentation for automatic part combining). In virtually all the examples
I've
Carl Peterson carlopeter...@gmail.com writes:
I am using the automatic part combiner in preparing SATB hymn sheets. The
issue I have is that when the notes are chorded by the apc, if there is a
slur (in both parts), only one slur is printed (as is seen in the
documentation for automatic part
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 9:44 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Carl Peterson carlopeter...@gmail.com writes:
I am using the automatic part combiner in preparing SATB hymn sheets. The
issue I have is that when the notes are chorded by the apc, if there is a
slur (in both parts), only
Carl Peterson carlopeter...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 9:44 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Carl Peterson carlopeter...@gmail.com writes:
I am using the automatic part combiner in preparing SATB hymn sheets. The
issue I have is that when the notes are chorded by the
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 10:11 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Well, this is probably going nowhere fast, but it's moderately amusing
that it seems to do something:
Agreed on both counts.
This probably means that if it bothers me enough, I'm going to have to go
back into the
Carl Peterson carlopeter...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 9:44 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Why would you use the part combiner? I know SATB as basically
\new ChoirStaff
\new Staff { \clef treble { \soprano } \\ { \alto } }
\new Staff { \clef
18 matches
Mail list logo
