Quick answer, and I’m not sure it will help much:
\dynamicUp affects the context (Voice) in which it’s placed.
\partCombine combines its arguments into new Voices and \dynamicUp
ended up in a different voice than the p
Thank you for your answer.
When you remove \dynamicUp ALL dynamics
Quick answer, and I’m not sure it will help much:
\dynamicUp affects the context (Voice) in which it’s placed. \partCombine
combines its arguments into new Voices and \dynamicUp ended up in a different
voice than the p
Thank you for your answer.
When you remove \dynamicUp ALL dynamics
Quick answer, and I’m not sure it will help much:
\dynamicUp affects the context (Voice) in which it’s placed. \partCombine
combines its arguments into new Voices and \dynamicUp ended up in a different
voice than the p
Thank you for your answer.
When you remove \dynamicUp ALL dynamics
I presume that partCombine overrides the dynamic placement so that
dynamics for the two parts are placed above and below, which seems a
reasonable approach when the parts are more distinct than in the given
example. Using ^ to override it in this case seems a tolerable alternative.
Thank you
From: Michael Gerdau
To: lilypond-user
Sent: 13/10/2023 11:30
Subject: Dynamics placement in partCombine
Hi list,
the following code places the 2nd \p under the music but I'd like it
above. I know I could explicitly add a placement (like ^\p) but wonder
why \dynamicUp
Quick answer, and I’m not sure it will help much:
\dynamicUp affects the context (Voice) in which it’s placed. \partCombine
combines its arguments into new Voices and \dynamicUp ended up in a different
voice than the p
> 13 okt. 2023 kl. 12:32 skrev Michael Gerdau :
>
> Hi list,
>
> the
Hi list,
the following code places the 2nd \p under the music but I'd like it
above. I know I could explicitly add a placement (like ^\p) but wonder
why \dynamicUp doesn't do its job.
- snip - snip - snip - snip - snip - snip - snip -
\version "2.25.9"
musa = { \dynamicUp c'4\p \repeat
