I guess that the PDF file you get doesn't look too good, at least not
on screen, since it will contain bitmap fonts instead of vector fonts.
What LilyPond does internally, is to call dvips with the following
flags:
dvips -Ppdf -u+lilypond -u+ec-mftrace filename.dvi
What happens when you try this
Thanks for your reply. I've just had a closer look at a few things, and
I found a log file named missfont.log in my project directory, which
contains the line
mktexpk --mfmode ljfour --bdpi 8000 --mag 1+0/8000 --dpi 8000 ecrm1000
Does this give any clues as to the problem?
Cameron
Alexandre
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks for your reply. I've just had a closer look at a few things, and
I found a log file named missfont.log in my project directory, which
contains the line
mktexpk --mfmode ljfour --bdpi 8000 --mag 1+0/8000 --dpi 8000 ecrm1000
Does this give any clues as
Thanks for your reply,
I have no problem with missfonts (anyway kpsewhich ecrm10.pfa returns
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/ec-fonts-mftraced/ecrm10.pfa)
Xdvi runs fine with dvi generated by lily ; but gv displays strange symbols for
graces notes and fermata on bar.
Anyway, I dug a little
Hi folks,
I've just downloaded Lilypond 2.3.24 (Debian Sid) from Pedro's
repository. I had a few font problems, which I fixed by upgrading to the
latest ec-fonts-mftraced, also from Pedro's site.
Now, however, when I use a global staff size less than 20 points I get
greater-than signs and
Hello,
I have similars problem using like you lily 2.3.24 (Debian Sid) from Pedro's
repository, having installed latest ec-fonts-mftraced and cleaned my
var/cache/fonts.
To complete your bug-report, I would notice that :
At default staff size :
- dvi produced by lily is correctly displayed in
Cameron Horsburgh wrote:
Hi folks,
I've just downloaded Lilypond 2.3.24 (Debian Sid) from Pedro's
repository. I had a few font problems, which I fixed by upgrading to
the latest ec-fonts-mftraced, also from Pedro's site.
Now, however, when I use a global staff size less than 20 points I get
