On 24 July 2011 21:46, Xavier Scheuer x.sche...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Neil!
It works great. I'll use it as a workaround until Mike's fix is OK and
pushed. Thank you Mike too. Good luck.
I'm sorry, I always report issues and when people suggest a workaround
I manage to find issues in the
On 26 July 2011 14:01, Xavier Scheuer x.sche...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm sorry, I always report issues and when people suggest a workaround
I manage to find issues in the workaround; but I always need your help
to solve these issues.
I have an arpeggio in my piano score and even with Neil's
On 24 July 2011 21:46, Xavier Scheuer x.sche...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Neil!
It works great. I'll use it as a workaround until Mike's fix is OK and
pushed. Thank you Mike too. Good luck.
I did not notice first but Neil's workaround produces a strange message
in the console when
On Mon 25 Jul 2011, 09:21 Xavier Scheuer wrote:
On 24 July 2011 21:46, Xavier Scheuer x.sche...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Neil!
It works great. I'll use it as a workaround until Mike's fix is OK and
pushed. Thank you Mike too. Good luck.
I did not notice first but Neil's workaround
On 23 July 2011 22:27, Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's the scheme engraver if you want to try it out. It's obviously
not as sophisticated as Mike's proposed fix, but it does have the
advantage of aligning absolute dynamics properly (assuming there's a
NoteColumn present at the
On 20 July 2011 15:26, Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
Let me think about it for a bit. I have an idea using a scheme
engraver which might work.
Here's the scheme engraver if you want to try it out. It's obviously
not as sophisticated as Mike's proposed fix, but it does have the
[Sorry for late follow-up, I was on holiday. :-) ]
Hi Neil,
I see you merged issue 1724 : DynamicTextSpanner inside Dynamics
context are shifted due to pedal into issue 620 : It should be
possible to specify more specific spanner bounds..
I was wondering if you (or someone else) would have
On 20 July 2011 13:27, Xavier Scheuer x.sche...@gmail.com wrote:
I was wondering if you (or someone else) would have maybe a workaround
I could use in order to have a fairly good output for the code attached
to #1724 ?
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1724
Let me think
