Hi -
I'm running LilyPond 2.12.2 under Ubuntu 9.10. I have a .ly file I've been
writing/editing for a while using 2.12.2 under Ubuntu 9.9 (I think - Jaunty
Jackalope). I upgraded yesterday, and found I needed to reinstall LilyPond.
The package that came with Ubuntu 9.10 was, if fact, 2.12.2, so I
ecified, so it should "just work", right?
Thanks for any tips.
Vivian.
- Original Message
From: Valentin Villenave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Steve Schow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Friday, 20 July, 2007 3:46:25 AM
Subject: Re: PDF Problem
2007/7
Rune. THANKS FOR TRACKING THAT DOWN BRUTHA!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/PDF-Problem-tf4114229.html#a11702477
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
Rune Zedeler skrev:
I understand why the viewers have problems with lilypond's pdfs: For
some reason lilypond does loads of conversions to and from millimeters.
Oh, I never learn not to post comments late at night.
The above really had nothing (afaics) to do with the problem.
It should be fai
Okay, I took a look.
I understand why the viewers have problems with lilypond's pdfs: For
some reason lilypond does loads of conversions to and from millimeters.
I think it has something to do with lily defining one point to be
1/72.27 inch, whereas a postscript (and pdf) point is 1/72 inch.
The
e.com/file/p11701415/test.ps test.ps
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/PDF-Problem-tf4114229.html#a11701415
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gn
Steve Schow skrev:
Ok, here is a short example.
Would you please post a /pdf/ (or ps)?
-Rune
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
:
http://www.nabble.com/PDF-Problem-tf4114229.html#a11701393
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Steve Schow skrev:
I use ghostscript to produce overture and finale PDF's
which look spectacular on screen on windows.
Would you please post a small pdf created by finale, so that we have
something to compare?
-Rune
___
lilypond-user mailing li
wish I
knew postscript better or the guts of lilypond to contribute to the
programming effort, but I don't. Just making observations and PLEADING for
someone to consider that even linux developers may want to share their PDF's
with people that aren't on linux.
--
View this message
2007/7/20, Steve Schow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Unfortunately I can't, which is why I am now reduced to begging, pleading,
groveling and anything else that will influence the developers of Lilypond
to consider fixing it.
For what it's worth, here's my screenshot of the same snippet
(Linux64). It's
at.
>
> - Graham
>
>
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/PDF-Problem-tf4114229.htm
Steve Schow wrote:
Seems to me that lilypond is producing some form of postscript that is not
resiliant enough, or portable enough to display well in all viewers and
platforms.
I repeat:
Please search the mailists (user, devel, and possibly bug) for previous
discussions about this. If you can
>
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/PDF-Problem-tf4114229.html#a11699968
Sent from the Gnu
2007/7/20, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Because your on-screen PDF viewer lies to you. Particularly on windows.
Yes, this is something I noticed. On windows for example, the JPedal
viewer which is included in LilyPondTool produces awfuls results ;
Adobe is not very good either. I used
Steve Schow wrote:
Ok, here's a question. I know this question comes up occasionally. I
have been one of the people bringing it up. Why do lilypond PDF's look
crappy on-screen, even though they print fine? particularly on windows.
Because your on-screen PDF viewer lies to you. Particularl
screen AND print(not including generating PNG
files, etc.???
thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/PDF-Problem-tf4114229.html#a11699420
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
17 matches
Mail list logo
