> On 31 Jan 2018, at 21:25, Michael Taylor wrote:
>
> Thank you for your message & the links. I have attached a fragment of the
> source to clarify what I am trying to replicate.
According to this link, some use E36 for such arrows, which LilyPond supports,
though
> On 1 Feb 2018, at 04:35, Michael Taylor wrote:
>
> No, the arrow modifications are the only departures from standard notation.
You might try this example, using the naturals with arrows instead, making a
change later if you so want: it will be only a matter of
No, the arrow modifications are the only departures from standard notation.
MT
On 31 January 2018 at 16:47, Hans Åberg wrote:
>
>
> > On 31 Jan 2018, at 21:25, Michael Taylor
> wrote:
> >
> > Thank you for your message & the links. I have
> On 31 Jan 2018, at 21:25, Michael Taylor wrote:
>
> Thank you for your message & the links. I have attached a fragment of the
> source to clarify what I am trying to replicate.
Are there any other microtonal accidentals, except for plain up and down
arrows?
Thank you for your message. I am hoping to reproduce the arrow notation used by
the composer,
rather than substituting a different notational convention (which this composer
has employed in other pieces).
The fact that he implies a difference between a slightly lowered F & a slightly
raised E
[Please cc the list so that others can follow.]
> On 31 Jan 2018, at 16:00, Michael Taylor wrote:
>
> Thank you for your message. I am hoping to reproduce the arrow notation used
> by the composer,
> rather than substituting a different notational convention (which
Thank you for your message. I am hoping to reproduce the arrow notation used by
the composer,
rather than substituting a different notational convention (which this composer
has employed in other pieces).
The fact that he implies a difference between a slightly lowered F & a slightly
raised E
> On 29 Jan 2018, at 22:39, Michael Taylor wrote:
>
> I am transcribing sketches in which small pitch adjustments are notated using
> up & down arrows. As my aim is to reproduce the composer's notation as
> closely as possible I don't want to substitute quarter-tone
> On 29 Jan 2018, at 22:39, Michael Taylor wrote:
>
> I am transcribing sketches in which small pitch adjustments are notated using
> up & down arrows. As my aim is to reproduce the composer's notation as
> closely as possible I don't want to substitute quarter-tone
msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca writes:
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2018, David Kastrup wrote:
>> > as closely as possible I don't want to substitute quarter-tone symbols. Is
>> > there a simple way to insert arrows in place of accidentals? Playback is
>> > not an issue.
>>
>> Quarter notes wouldn't work anyway
On Tue, 30 Jan 2018, David Kastrup wrote:
> > as closely as possible I don't want to substitute quarter-tone symbols. Is
> > there a simple way to insert arrows in place of accidentals? Playback is
> > not an issue.
>
> Quarter notes wouldn't work anyway since you'd not be able to
> distinguish a
Hi Michael,
It probably would have been helpful if you had provided an example (so that
we can see how exactly the arrows are supposed to look like).
But in the end all boils down to the possibility of replacing a standard
accidental by an arbitrary markup. There's a snippet demonstrating how
Michael Taylor writes:
> I am transcribing sketches in which small pitch adjustments are notated
> using up & down arrows. As my aim is to reproduce the composer's notation
> as closely as possible I don't want to substitute quarter-tone symbols. Is
> there a simple
I am transcribing sketches in which small pitch adjustments are notated
using up & down arrows. As my aim is to reproduce the composer's notation
as closely as possible I don't want to substitute quarter-tone symbols. Is
there a simple way to insert arrows in place of accidentals? Playback is
not
14 matches
Mail list logo