, 2012 12:46 PM
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org; David Kastrup; Daniel Rosen
Subject: Re: Modified laissez vibrer ties
David Kastrup wrote Sunday, October 28, 2012 10:07 AM
Daniel Rosen drose...@gmail.com writes:
I did consider that; the problem is those ties go _over_ the barline
instead
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Daniel Rosen drose...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a way to extend laissez vibrer ties so that they stop just short of
the barline,
as in the attached example? I can't seem to find a way that doesn't involve
manually adjusting control points.
You may consider
: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Modified laissez vibrer ties
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Daniel Rosen drose...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a way to extend laissez vibrer ties so that they stop just
short of the barline, as in the attached example? I can't seem to find a way
that doesn't
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Daniel Rosen drose...@gmail.com wrote:
I did consider that; the problem is those ties go _over_ the barline instead
of stopping just short, so they'd still need to be adjusted manually.
Not if you scale the durations:
{ r2 b' d'' g''2*7/8 ~ \hideNotes q2*1/8
On 28/10/12 17:28, Daniel Rosen wrote:
Is there a way to extend laissez vibrer ties so that they stop just short of
the barline, as in the attached example? I can't seem to find a way that
doesn't involve manually adjusting control points.
You can change the default length of LV ties to make
Daniel Rosen drose...@gmail.com writes:
I did consider that; the problem is those ties go _over_ the barline
instead of stopping just short, so they'd still need to be adjusted
manually.
I tried using normal ties to invisible notes after the barline and
tweaking to-barline in order to have
David Kastrup wrote Sunday, October 28, 2012 10:07 AM
Daniel Rosen drose...@gmail.com writes:
I did consider that; the problem is those ties go _over_ the barline
instead of stopping just short, so they'd still need to be adjusted
manually.
I tried using normal ties to invisible notes
