Re: RFC: new location for openLilyLib repository

Am 13.11.2015 um 10:57 schrieb Davide Liessi: > 2015-11-13 6:02 GMT+01:00 Henning Hraban Ramm : >> Why not combine the options? Use GitHub as long as it makes sense, but >> always keep a mirror on OLL server. > That's my opinion, too: option a), plus mirroring the

Re: RFC: new location for openLilyLib repository

Hello Urs, I think this makes a very sound and nice impression. Go ahead! Thanks, Simon On 13.11.2015 11:58, Urs Liska wrote: Am 13.11.2015 um 10:57 schrieb Davide Liessi: 2015-11-13 6:02 GMT+01:00 Henning Hraban Ramm: Why not combine the options? Use GitHub as long

Re: RFC: new location for openLilyLib repository

I also vote for option a, and I agree with the comments of Sharon on option c. Cheers, Matteo On 12/11/2015 23:22, ciconia wrote: But there are also drawbacks to c) because it is hosted on my own (well, hosted in a data center) server: - I can guarantee availability to a lesser extent than

Re: RFC: new location for openLilyLib repository

2015-11-13 6:02 GMT+01:00 Henning Hraban Ramm : > Why not combine the options? Use GitHub as long as it makes sense, but always > keep a mirror on OLL server. That's my opinion, too: option a), plus mirroring the repositories at git.openlilylib.org.

Re: RFC: new location for openLilyLib repository

On 13.11.2015 15:49, Urs Liska wrote: (note: this will make it possible to create private/project/house repositories that take advantage of the openLilyLib infrastructure) Will this also be possible for repositories hosted outside GitHub (e.g. with BitBucket?) ~Simon

Re: RFC: new location for openLilyLib repository

Il giorno ven 13 nov 2015 alle 11:58, Urs Liska ha scritto: I suggest (and if noone objects will do it) renaming the "openlilylib" repository to "snippets" -> https://github.com/openlilylib/snippets NOTE: This may require users to adapt their repository set-ups and

Re: RFC: new location for openLilyLib repository

Am 13.11.2015 um 16:48 schrieb Simon Albrecht: > On 13.11.2015 15:49, Urs Liska wrote: >> (note: this will make it possible to create private/project/house >> repositories that take advantage of the openLilyLib infrastructure) > > Will this also be possible for repositories hosted outside GitHub

Re: RFC: new location for openLilyLib repository

On 13.11.2015 17:19, Federico Bruni wrote: Il giorno ven 13 nov 2015 alle 11:58, Urs Liska ha scritto: I suggest (and if noone objects will do it) renaming the "openlilylib" repository to "snippets" -> https://github.com/openlilylib/snippets NOTE: This may require users

Re: RFC: new location for openLilyLib repository

Am 13.11.2015 um 18:51 schrieb Simon Albrecht: > On 13.11.2015 17:19, Federico Bruni wrote: >> Il giorno ven 13 nov 2015 alle 11:58, Urs Liska >> ha scritto: >>> I suggest (and if noone objects will do it) >>> renaming the "openlilylib" repository to "snippets" >>> ->

Re: RFC: new location for openLilyLib repository

Am 13.11.2015 um 15:03 schrieb Paul Morris: >> On Nov 13, 2015, at 5:58 AM, Urs Liska > > wrote: >> >> Regaring the location of the individual libraries, what would you >> consider best: >> >> * adding all beside oll-core >> (keeping the

Re: RFC: new location for openLilyLib repository

Am 13. November 2015 14:55:43 MEZ, schrieb Paul Morris : >> On Nov 13, 2015, at 5:58 AM, Urs Liska wrote: >> renaming the "openlilylib" repository to "snippets" >> -> https://github.com/openlilylib/snippets >

Re: RFC: new location for openLilyLib repository

> On Nov 13, 2015, at 5:58 AM, Urs Liska wrote: > Regaring the location of the individual libraries, what would you consider > best: > > adding all beside oll-core > (keeping the option that anyone creates libraries in their own place) > creating a new openlilylib sibling

Re: RFC: new location for openLilyLib repository

> On Nov 13, 2015, at 5:58 AM, Urs Liska wrote: > renaming the "openlilylib" repository to "snippets" > -> https://github.com/openlilylib/snippets > > NOTE: This may require users to adapt their repository set-ups and LilyPond >

Re: RFC: new location for openLilyLib repository

> But there are also drawbacks to c) because it is hosted on my own (well, hosted in a data center) server: > > - I can guarantee availability to a lesser extent than a big service > provider > - I can't guarantee not to break things or lose everything due to > misconfiguration > - I can't

Re: RFC: new location for openLilyLib repository

Am 2015-11-13 um 04:22 schrieb ciconia : > Exactly those drawbacks, and a some more: > - People would have to register on your site in order contribute, while at > least a substantial part of them are already on github. > - Github is also kind of the place to hang among younger

Re: RFC: new location for openLilyLib repository

Il giorno gio 12 nov 2015 alle 17:06, Urs Liska ha scritto: c) We could move everything to https://git.openlilylib.org. In a way I would prefer c) because: - it "looks" more natural - it would move away some stuff from Github - it would make it more natural to have git

Re: RFC: new location for openLilyLib repository

Hi Urs, this is a great idea! This would mean development of an API for plugins/modules - and anybody can develop against that API ... I am at work right now, so now for short: The solution c would be nice, but I would say, we should stay on github ... we have other work to do and life

Re: RFC: new location for openLilyLib repository

Am 12. November 2015 17:56:51 MEZ, schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt : >Hi Urs, > >this is a great idea! This would mean development of an API for >plugins/modules - and anybody can develop against that API ... Well, actually this is more or less in place already now. Re-building OLL

Re: RFC: new location for openLilyLib repository

Am 12. November 2015 18:40:37 MEZ, schrieb Federico Bruni : >Il giorno gio 12 nov 2015 alle 17:06, Urs Liska ha > >scritto: >> c) >> We could move everything to https://git.openlilylib.org. >> >> In a way I would prefer c) because: >> >> - it "looks"

Re: RFC: new location for openLilyLib repository

Am 12.11.2015 um 19:38 schrieb Urs Liska: Am 12. November 2015 17:56:51 MEZ, schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt : Hi Urs, this is a great idea! This would mean development of an API for plugins/modules - and anybody can develop against that API ... Well, actually this is more or less