Re: Slur over single note?

On 2016-07-20 3:48 AM, Urs Liska wrote: > If I'm not mistaken this is a piano reduction? > If that's the case i'd assume there's a tied note or two slurred ones in > an instrumental part here. > > I see two options here, depending on what you want with this score: > > 1 (the scholarly approach):

Re: Slur over single note?

Am 20.07.2016 um 04:26 schrieb Andrew Bernard: > All the rest of the signs are phrasing slurs in this snippet. I would > say it’s also a phrasing slur, and not a mistake or error. > I disagree. I have skimmed through the whole score, and I'm still nearly sure (maybe now 98.5 % instead of merely

Re: Slur over single note?

All the rest of the signs are phrasing slurs in this snippet. I would say it’s also a phrasing slur, and not a mistake or error. The Peter Pan score seems to be full of such _descriptive_ indications. Not all scores are entirely _prescriptive_. Andrew

Re: Slur over single note?

On Tue 19 Jul 2016 at 15:12:37 (-0700), Flaming Hakama by Elaine wrote: > > >> >> It could be a LaissezVibrer tie, but I'm wondering if there isn't > > >a > > >> >> connection to the next bar. The tie extends so far and touches the > > >> >> BarLine at the end of that measure that makes me wonder,

Re: Slur over single note?

> >> >> It could be a LaissezVibrer tie, but I'm wondering if there isn't > >a > >> >> connection to the next bar. The tie extends so far and touches the > >> >> BarLine at the end of that measure that makes me wonder, but it's > >> >only > >> >> speculation at this point. Given the ending tip's

Re: Slur over single note?

> On 19 Jul 2016, at 22:10, Joel C. Salomon wrote: > > On 2016-07-19 2:37 PM, Urs Liska wrote: >> Mind sending that (privately if you want) or a download link? > > The file is “39087011212125score.pdf” from > , the piece “The Flying

Re: Slur over single note?

On 2016-07-19 2:37 PM, Urs Liska wrote: > I'm 98% sure that's an engraving error of some kind that may > be resolved by analogy. I'd have to see the full score ... > > Mind sending that (privately if you want) or a download link? The file is “39087011212125score.pdf” from

Re: Slur over single note?

On Tue 19 Jul 2016 at 18:58:36 (+0200), Urs Liska wrote: > Am 19. Juli 2016 18:11:14 MESZ, schrieb "Joel C. Salomon" > : > >On 2016-07-19 2:45 AM, tisimst wrote: > >> It could be a LaissezVibrer tie, but I'm wondering if there isn't a > >> connection to the next bar. The

Re: Slur over single note?

Am 19. Juli 2016 20:02:10 MESZ, schrieb David Wright : >On Tue 19 Jul 2016 at 18:58:36 (+0200), Urs Liska wrote: >> Am 19. Juli 2016 18:11:14 MESZ, schrieb "Joel C. Salomon" >: >> >On 2016-07-19 2:45 AM, tisimst wrote: >> >> It could be a

Re: Slur over single note?

Am 19. Juli 2016 18:11:14 MESZ, schrieb "Joel C. Salomon" : >On 2016-07-19 2:45 AM, tisimst wrote: >> It could be a LaissezVibrer tie, but I'm wondering if there isn't a >> connection to the next bar. The tie extends so far and touches the >> BarLine at the end of that

Re: Slur over single note?

On 2016-07-19 2:45 AM, tisimst wrote: > It could be a LaissezVibrer tie, but I'm wondering if there isn't a > connection to the next bar. The tie extends so far and touches the > BarLine at the end of that measure that makes me wonder, but it's only > speculation at this point. Given the ending

Re: Slur over single note?

Hi Abraham, I don’t think it is actually a laissezvibrer tie, I am only suggesting that because that is a way to do it in lilypond, which does not have single sided slurs, as I call them, built in. OP: here is the code to extend a laissezviber tie to ‘fake out’ a long indication like this on a

Re: Slur over single note?

On Monday, July 18, 2016, Andrew Bernard [via Lilypond] < ml-node+s1069038n192810...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > Hi Joel > > Use a laissezvibrer tie. I have a function to extend them, Away from the > computer right now. Will send later. Can't remember if it is on LSR. > > Andrew > > On Tuesday, 19

Re: Slur over single note?

Hi Joel Use a laissezvibrer tie. I have a function to extend them, Away from the computer right now. Will send later. Can't remember if it is on LSR. Andrew On Tuesday, 19 July 2016, Joel C. Salomon wrote: > Still from the John Crook’s Peter Pan score project, but a