Re: musicxml2ly in python

Hello Sebastian,This can also be done with a make file, but maybe that is not your use case. Doing so offers means to place the generated files in sub-folders and to remove them seamlessly. Also, only the .xml files modified or created since the last ‘make’ execution are converted.Attached is an

Re: musicxml2ly in python

Hi Jean and Valentin, Thanks to both of you for your help. The find command in the terminal solves the problem perfectly, it iterates over a folder. So that's one great way to do this I think I see a way to do what Valentin suggested in musicxml2ly_conversion.py - it looks like it's just a

Re: musicxml2ly in python

Le 25/02/2022 à 00:27, Sebastian Adams a écrit : Does anybody out there have a Python script for converting a folder of musicxml (.xml) files into .ly or know how to do this? Welcome to the list. This question sounds like you want to learn about what your shell can do. Assuming UNIX (not

Re: musicxml2ly in python

Hello Sebastian, musicxml2ly is not a part of python-ly, but a standalone python script included with lilypond using lilylib. It shouldn’t be too hard to figure out how to turn this into a module. The file does already come with a main method that is called on calling it as a script. Just

Re: musicxml2ly problem as of 2.20.0

Calling lilypond same the way doesn’t solve the original issue, though: /Applications/LilyPond-2.22.0-1.app/Contents/Re sources/bin/lilypond dyld: Library not loaded: @executable_path/../lib/libintl.8.dylib Referenced from: /Applications/LilyPond-2.22.0-1.app/Contents/Resources/bin/lilypond

Re: musicxml2ly problem as of 2.20.0

Hello Jean, Thanks a lot, that idea didn’t come to me, and it works fine. Thanks for the workaround! JM > Le 26 mars 2021 à 18:09, Jean Abou Samra a écrit : > > Doesn't ring any bell here :-( Any Mac OS experts out there? > > > And, what happens if you run >

Re: musicxml2ly problem as of 2.20.0

Le 26/03/2021 à 17:57, Jacques Menu a écrit : Hello Jean, I get the same problem with 2.22.0-1: The version of Python that comes in the bundle is: *menu@macbookprojm*: /Applications/LilyPond-2.22.0-1.app/Contents/Resources/bin > ls -sal python*    0 lrwxr-xr-x@ 1 menu  admin       45 Jan

Re: musicxml2ly problem as of 2.20.0

Hello Jean, I get the same problem with 2.22.0-1: The version of Python that comes in the bundle is: menu@macbookprojm: /Applications/LilyPond-2.22.0-1.app/Contents/Resources/bin > ls -sal python* 0 lrwxr-xr-x@ 1 menu admin 45 Jan 10 15:49 python3 ->

Re: musicxml2ly problem as of 2.20.0

Le 26/03/2021 à 17:28, Jacques Menu a écrit : Hello folks, I have the following version: menu@macbookprojm: ~/libmusicxml-git/soundnotation/Beispiel1 > lilypond -v GNU LilyPond 2.20.0 Copyright (c) 1996--2015 by Han-Wen Nienhuys Jan Nieuwenhuizen and others. This program is free

Re: musicxml2ly

Am Montag, den 25.05.2020, 16:17 +0200 schrieb Lukas-Fabian Moser: > On Sat, 23 May 2020, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: > > > > There must be something seriously broken if musicxml2ly can't convert > > > > this > > > > > > P.S. I just tried downgrading to lilypond 2.19.84 (from Fedora repo) and > > >

Re: musicxml2ly

On Sat, 23 May 2020, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: There must be something seriously broken if musicxml2ly can't convert this P.S. I just tried downgrading to lilypond 2.19.84 (from Fedora repo) and the problem disappeared. So it does look like a regression to me. Thanks Martin; I’ve opened this

Re: musicxml2ly

On 5/23/20, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: > > On Sat, 23 May 2020, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: >> There must be something seriously broken if musicxml2ly can't convert >> this > > P.S. I just tried downgrading to lilypond 2.19.84 (from Fedora repo) and > the problem disappeared. So it does look like a

Re: musicxml2ly

On Sat, 23 May 2020, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: Attached: a simple single F chord created from Musescore 3.4.2 (simpleChord.mscz), exported as musicxml, (simpleChord.musicxml) and converted using musicxml2ly without extra options (simpleChord.ly). Using Lilypond 2.21.1 on Linux Fedora 32.

Re: musicxml2ly 2.20 bug

Hello David*2, You may be interested in xml2ly 0.93, which I’m currently finalizing. The doc is at https://github.com/grame-cncm/libmusicxml/tree/lilypond/doc , in particular

Re: musicxml2ly 2.20 bug

David Wright writes: > On Sun 22 Mar 2020 at 10:54:29 (+0300), Павел Буданов wrote: >> I tried to use musicxml2ly from official repository of manjaro linux and >> get this output: >> Traceback (most recent call last): >> File "/usr/bin/musicxml2ly", line 44, in >> import lilylib as ly >>

Re: musicxml2ly 2.20 bug

On Sun 22 Mar 2020 at 10:54:29 (+0300), Павел Буданов wrote: > I tried to use musicxml2ly from official repository of manjaro linux and > get this output: > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/bin/musicxml2ly", line 44, in > import lilylib as ly > ImportError: No module named

Re: musicxml2ly 2.20 bug

It's no bug in musicxml2ly. I compiled v2.20 from source and it works as expected. Either it's a problem with the manjaro repository or with your python environment. On 3/22/20 10:15 AM, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: > > > On Sun, 22 Mar 2020, Павел Буданов wrote: > >> I tried to use musicxml2ly

Re: musicxml2ly 2.20 bug

On Sun, 22 Mar 2020, Павел Буданов wrote: I tried to use musicxml2ly from official repository of manjaro linux and get this output: Traceback (most recent call last):   File "/usr/bin/musicxml2ly", line 44, in     import lilylib as ly ImportError: No module named lilylib Then I tried to

Re: musicxml2ly was re abc2ly

Am 10.12.18 um 13:22 schrieb Andrew Bernard: Using musicxml2ly with 2.19.82 on a file converted from ABC with the current downloadbale versionof abc2xml, I get a badly messed up header block, which throws errors in lilypond. Here's an example of a tune converted from thesession.org

Re: musicxml2ly makes an apparently defective lilypond file

Hello Patrick, I did as you said with LP 2.19.44 and got in the end what follows. JM -- \version "2.19.47" % automatically converted by musicxml2ly from test.xml \pointAndClickOff \header { encodingsoftware = "MuseScore 2.0.3.1" encodingdate = "2016-12-15" }

Re: MusicXML2Ly: Problem with minor chords

Jacques Menu Muzhic writes: >> Le 17 août 2016 à 21:26, David Kastrup a écrit: >> >> Johan Vromans writes: >> >>> David Kastrup wrote: >>> ... the change to let c:5 exclude the third was introduced as late

Re: MusicXML2Ly: Problem with minor chords

BTW, how are such regression tests devised and organized? JM > Le 17 août 2016 à 21:26, David Kastrup a écrit : > > Johan Vromans writes: > >> David Kastrup wrote: >> >>> ... the change to let >>> c:5 exclude the third was introduced as

Re: MusicXML2Ly: Problem with minor chords

Johan Vromans writes: > David Kastrup wrote: > >> ... the change to let >> c:5 exclude the third was introduced as late as version 2.19.28). > > Does that mean that there are no (regression)tests for musicxml2ly? Probably not enough. -- David Kastrup

Re: MusicXML2Ly: Problem with minor chords

David Kastrup wrote: > ... the change to let > c:5 exclude the third was introduced as late as version 2.19.28). Does that mean that there are no (regression)tests for musicxml2ly? ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: MusicXML2Ly: Problem with minor chords

On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 14:15:02 +0200 David Kastrup wrote: > Well, musicxml2ly.py presumably also generates a \version header, and > running convert-ly on the resulting file possibly fixes a number of > those problems (even though it complicates the rules, the change to let > c:5

Re: MusicXML2Ly: Problem with minor chords

Johan Vromans writes: > Johan Vromans wrote: > >> is translated into >> >> d:m5 >> >> and apparently not understood -- lilypond renders it as a major D chord >> without warning. > > The code in musicxml2ly.py does, indeed, generate :m5 for minor.

Re: MusicXML2Ly: Problem with minor chords

Johan Vromans wrote: > is translated into > > d:m5 > > and apparently not understood -- lilypond renders it as a major D chord > without warning. The code in musicxml2ly.py does, indeed, generate :m5 for minor. Surprisingly, the NR, A.2 Common chord modifiers, reads:

Re: musicxml2ly evolution

http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/usage/invoking-musicxml2ly Knute Snortum (via Gmail) On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 3:03 AM, Menu Jacques wrote: > Hello folks, > > I’ve started looking at the internals of musicxml2ly, to try and > understand what it does. > Is

Re: musicxml2ly evolution

Hello Knute, Sorry for not being more clear, it’s documentation about the source code that I’m looking for. JM > Le 29 oct. 2015 à 15:48, Knute Snortum a écrit : > > http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/usage/invoking-musicxml2ly >

Re: musicxml2ly evolution

Il giorno gio 29 ott 2015 alle 17:56, Menu Jacques ha scritto: Sorry for not being more clear, it’s documentation about the source code that I’m looking for. AFAIK it doesn't exist, as it's an "external" script. I suggest trying to contact people who have worked or are

Re: musicxml2ly evolution

Thanks Federico, I’ve sent them a mail. JM > Le 29 oct. 2015 à 18:10, Federico Bruni a écrit : > > Il giorno gio 29 ott 2015 alle 17:56, Menu Jacques ha > scritto: >> Sorry for not being more clear, it’s documentation about the source code >> that I’m

Re: musicxml2ly

On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:20:56AM +0100, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: I am not a Mac user. But first thing I thought was: doesn't a Mac have a PATH variable like Linux and Windows have, where the long path to ./bin can be added before having to type such long commands? Also, like most

Re: musicxml2ly

PATH=${PATH}:/Applications/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/bin/musicxml2ly The folder should be in the path, not the executable: PATH=${PATH}:/Applications/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/bin ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: musicxml2ly

D'oh! Thanks for catching my proofreading error. On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 12:20:46AM +0100, Noeck wrote: PATH=${PATH}:/Applications/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/bin/musicxml2ly The folder should be in the path, not the executable:

Re: musicxml2ly

On 19 Mar 2015, at 23:20, Martin Tarenskeen m.tarensk...@zonnet.nl wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015, Noeck wrote: Hi Craig, Do I append for f in *.xml to the end of my command; No, you put all your command within the for loop: for f in *.xml; do

Re: musicxml2ly

In DOS you can use this: @echo off setlocal enableDelayedExpansion set MYDIR=C:\bin for /F %%x in ('dir /B/D %MYDIR%') do ( echo File: %%x ) Knute Snortum (via Gmail) On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org wrote: Am 19.03.2015 um 21:14 schrieb Noeck: Hi

Re: musicxml2ly

Hi Craig, Do I append for f in *.xml to the end of my command; No, you put all your command within the for loop: for f in *.xml; do /Applications/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/bin/musicxml2ly --nd --nrp --npl --no-beaming -m --language=english $f; done (all this is one line – or written in

Re: musicxml2ly

for i in *.xml; do path/musicxml2ly --nd --nrp --npl --no-beaming -m --language=english $i; done path shouldn't be needed if musicxml2lyis in your path so this should be fine for i in *.xml; do musicxml2ly --nd --nrp --npl --no-beaming -m --language=english $i; done Stephen On Thu, Mar 19,

Re: musicxml2ly

Thanks for your responses everyone. I'm on a Mac. Do I append for f in *.xml to the end of my command; e.g. /Applications/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/bin/musicxml2ly --nd --nrp --npl --no-beaming -m --language=english for f in *.xml Craig On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 at 06:58 Stephen MacNeil

Re: musicxml2ly

On Fri, 20 Mar 2015, Noeck wrote: Hi Craig, Do I append for f in *.xml to the end of my command; No, you put all your command within the for loop: for f in *.xml; do /Applications/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/bin/musicxml2ly --nd --nrp --npl --no-beaming -m --language=english $f;

Re: musicxml2ly

Thanks everyone -- all working great now! On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 at 09:21 Martin Tarenskeen m.tarensk...@zonnet.nl wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015, Noeck wrote: Hi Craig, Do I append for f in *.xml to the end of my command; No, you put all your command within the for loop: for f in

Re: musicxml2ly

Am 19.03.2015 um 21:14 schrieb Noeck: Hi Craig, on which OS? On Linux (bash) you can do this: for f in folder/*.xml; do musicxml2ly $f; done where folder is your folder containing the xml files. or simply for f in *.xml when you are already in the same folder. (I think this should

Re: musicxml2ly

Hi Craig, on which OS? On Linux (bash) you can do this: for f in folder/*.xml; do musicxml2ly $f; done where folder is your folder containing the xml files. HTH, Joram Is there a command for converting a whole folder of xml files to lilypond, rather than doing them one by one?

Re: musicxml2ly

Hi Urs, thank you, I will have a look at neoscores. Cheers, Jan-Peter Am 06.02.2015 um 13:21 schrieb Urs Liska: Am 06.02.2015 um 11:57 schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt: Hi list, in the project, Iam currently working on, I am importing music-xml-files created by Score Perfect. I have to repair all

Re: musicxml2ly

Hi Richard, I installed Denemo on my ubuntu workstation and it did import the xml-file - even with the wrong work-information. The exported lilypond file seems to be fine for me, except the lyrics are missing? I will have a deeper look at it. For now best, Jan-Peter Am 06.02.2015 um 13:08

Re: musicxml2ly

On Sat, 2015-02-07 at 10:35 +0100, Jan-Peter Voigt wrote: Hi Richard, I installed Denemo on my ubuntu workstation and it did import the xml-file - even with the wrong work-information. The exported lilypond file seems to be fine for me, except the lyrics are missing? yes, lyrics are not

Re: musicxml2ly

Hi Jan-Peter, I’m very familiar with musicxml2ly. I can offer to have a look at your files (tomorrow or sunday). Cheers, Patrick On 06.02.2015, at 11:57, Jan-Peter Voigt jp.vo...@gmx.de wrote: Hi list, in the project, Iam currently working on, I am importing music-xml-files created by

Re: musicxml2ly

Tank you :) I'll send one later Cheers, Jan-Peter Am 6. Februar 2015 12:08:09 MEZ, schrieb pls p.l.schm...@gmx.de: Hi Jan-Peter, I’m very familiar with musicxml2ly. I can offer to have a look at your files (tomorrow or sunday). Cheers, Patrick On 06.02.2015, at 11:57, Jan-Peter Voigt

Re: musicxml2ly

On Fri, 2015-02-06 at 11:57 +0100, Jan-Peter Voigt wrote: Hi list, in the project, Iam currently working on, I am importing music-xml-files created by Score Perfect. I have to repair all of the files and remove the work-part. That way most files can be converted, but some files fail with

Re: musicxml2ly

Am 06.02.2015 um 11:57 schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt: Hi list, in the project, Iam currently working on, I am importing music-xml-files created by Score Perfect. I have to repair all of the files and remove the work-part. That way most files can be converted, but some files fail with the message:

Re: musicxml2ly on Windows

; tao_lilyponduser@ gt; To: lt; lilypond-user@ gt; Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2014 3:32 PM Subject: Re: musicxml2ly on Windows Phil Holmes-2 wrote - Original Message - From: TaoCG lt; tao_lilyponduser@ gt; To: lt; lilypond-user@ gt; Sent: Sunday, January 05

Re: musicxml2ly on Windows

- Original Message - From: TaoCG tao_lilypondu...@gmx.net To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2014 2:40 PM Subject: musicxml2ly on Windows Dear all, what would be the best way to invoke musicxml2ly on Windows when there is also a Python 3 installation. When I try to

Re: musicxml2ly on Windows

Phil Holmes-2 wrote - Original Message - From: TaoCG lt; tao_lilyponduser@ gt; To: lt; lilypond-user@ gt; Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2014 2:40 PM Subject: musicxml2ly on Windows Dear all, what would be the best way to invoke musicxml2ly on Windows when there is also a

Re: musicxml2ly on Windows

- Original Message - From: TaoCG tao_lilypondu...@gmx.net To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2014 3:32 PM Subject: Re: musicxml2ly on Windows Phil Holmes-2 wrote - Original Message - From: TaoCG lt; tao_lilyponduser@ gt; To: lt; lilypond-user@ gt

Re: musicxml2ly on Windows

Phil Holmes-2 wrote - Original Message - From: TaoCG lt; tao_lilyponduser@ gt; To: lt; lilypond-user@ gt; Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2014 3:32 PM Subject: Re: musicxml2ly on Windows Phil Holmes-2 wrote - Original Message - From: TaoCG lt; tao_lilyponduser

Re: musicxml2ly on Windows

TaoCG wrote Phil Holmes-2 wrote - Original Message - From: TaoCG lt; tao_lilyponduser@ gt; To: lt; lilypond-user@ gt; Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2014 3:32 PM Subject: Re: musicxml2ly on Windows Phil Holmes-2 wrote - Original Message - From: TaoCG lt

Re: musicxml2ly on Windows

; To: lt; lilypond-user@ gt; Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2014 3:32 PM Subject: Re: musicxml2ly on Windows Phil Holmes-2 wrote - Original Message - From: TaoCG lt; tao_lilyponduser@ gt; To: lt; lilypond-user@ gt; Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2014 2:40 PM Subject

Re: musicxml2ly bug: Fails on empty work-title / node

On 21.12.2013, at 09:14, James Harkins jamshar...@gmail.com wrote:In case anybody is working on musicxml2ly:I just found that it doesn't handle the case of an XML document where the title node exists, but is empty. I've uploaded a zip archive of two musicxml documents.Hi James,we fixed this bug

Re: musicxml2ly bug: Fails on empty work-title / node

Am 21.12.2013 10:56, schrieb pls: These files are not minimal examples and contain loads of faulty xml markup. I attached a tiny example to show that musicxml2ly-dev (but not musicxml2ly) can handle empty work-title nodes. What would be the necessary approach to port your -dev work back to

Re: musicxml2ly bug: Fails on empty work-title / node

On 21.12.2013, at 10:58, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org wrote: What would be the necessary approach to port your -dev work back to main LilyPond's musicxml2ly? Nothing special. It's a git repository. I simply haven't had the time (and probably won't in the near future) to prepare small

Re: musicxml2ly bug: Fails on empty work-title / node

On Dec 21, 2013 5:56 PM, pls p.l.schm...@gmx.de wrote: On 21.12.2013, at 09:14, James Harkins jamshar...@gmail.com wrote: I just found that it doesn't handle the case of an XML document where the title node exists, but is empty. I've uploaded a zip archive of two musicxml documents. we fixed

Re: musicxml2ly output indentation style

On Sat, 16 Nov 2013, Peter Bjuhr wrote: On 11/14/2013 09:16 AM, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: Hi, The lilypond output that is produced from musicxml2ly uses another indentation style than I see in my own scores when using for example Vim or Frescobaldi, or in all examples in the Lilypond

Re: musicxml2ly output indentation style

On 11/17/2013 07:02 PM, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: I did a short try with the dev version from Github (downloaded zip there) but I see no difference. Still had to use Tools-Format manually. Sorry for a stupid question, but did you install after download? But even if it works, it would

Re: musicxml2ly output indentation style

On 11/14/2013 09:16 AM, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: Hi, The lilypond output that is produced from musicxml2ly uses another indentation style than I see in my own scores when using for example Vim or Frescobaldi, or in all examples in the Lilypond documentation. for example: %commonly used

Re: musicxml2ly output indentation style

Peter Bjuhr peterbj...@gmail.com schrieb: On 11/14/2013 09:16 AM, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: Hi, The lilypond output that is produced from musicxml2ly uses another indentation style than I see in my own scores when using for example Vim or Frescobaldi, or in all examples in the Lilypond

Re: musicxml2ly introduction (Fwd: New LilyPond blog message from Luis)

There is MusicXML import into Denemo which then generates LilyPond. This used to be hopelessly broken, but now it always generates the bare bones of the score (AFAIK). That would give an route not needing command line expertise. Richard On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 00:06 +0100, Urs Liska wrote: Hi,

Re: musicxml2ly introduction (Fwd: New LilyPond blog message from Luis)

Hi all, I sent Luis an explanation yesterday. He managed to not run it from the command line, but he left a space in the file name so it looked like an invocation with a switch included. He has been advised to remove the space from his file name. Hopefully that will get him going. If not it is

Re: musicxml2ly introduction (Fwd: New LilyPond blog message from Luis)

The problem is that any solution uses the Terminal: the command itself, or the installation of Frescobaldi (no fixed, even for the last OS X release). Philippe -- View this message in context:

Re: musicxml2ly introduction (Fwd: New LilyPond blog message from Luis)

I don't think the OP would insist on not using the command line. He is just completely confused and would need a helping hand. Isn't there an installer for Mac by now? Or did I get something wrong there? flup2 phili...@philmassart.net schrieb: The problem is that any solution uses the

Re: musicxml2ly introduction (Fwd: New LilyPond blog message from Luis)

Yes, using the Macports package distribution system. Perhaps could you send me his mail in order to make step by step instructions. The instructions posted on Frescoabaldi website are OK with some command line knowledge. Macport isn't completely easy, but is more straightforward once installed.

Re: musicxml2ly enhancements

Am Mittwoch, den 10.04.2013, 12:28 +0200 schrieb Werner LEMBERG: %{ 5 %} a,4 ( a4 ) ( b4 ) d4 | I like that. It's tedious to type manually, but a computer program doesn't know that word :-) Indeed, but i find it unreadable, especially if it was placed at every line. Really?

RE: musicxml2ly enhancements

: Re: musicxml2ly enhancements Am 09.04.2013 13:19, schrieb Janek Warchoł: 2013/4/9 Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org: Putting the bar number at the start of the line would require %{ 5 %} a,4 ( a4 ) ( b4 ) d4 | instead. I like that. It's tedious to type manually, but a computer program

RE: musicxml2ly enhancements

%{ 5 %} a,4 ( a4 ) ( b4 ) d4 | instead. I like that. It's tedious to type manually, but a computer program doesn't know that word :-) Indeed, but i find it unreadable, especially if it was placed at every line. In general I think tools like musicxml2ly and other programs that convert

Re: musicxml2ly enhancements

%{ 5 %} a,4 ( a4 ) ( b4 ) d4 | I like that. It's tedious to type manually, but a computer program doesn't know that word :-) Indeed, but i find it unreadable, especially if it was placed at every line. Really? It's like having a BASIC program which always starts with a line number:

Re: musicxml2ly enhancements

On 10 Apr 2013, at 11:38 , Martin Tarenskeen wrote: Just like my lilypond scores I often still write (simple) html code using just Vim. Maybe I'm just getting old and old fashioned :-) +1, we're not alone.. Regards, Wim. ___ lilypond-user

Re: musicxml2ly enhancements

Jacques Menu jacques.m...@tvtmail.ch writes: Hello folks, I've been experimenting with Sibelius 7.1.3 as a front-end to Lily, i.e. as a note input engine. This lead me to fix some issues in musicxml2ly: - the comment bar number at the end of regular lines is one too much; I don't

Re: musicxml2ly enhancements

Am 09.04.2013 08:49, schrieb David Kastrup: Jacques Menu jacques.m...@tvtmail.ch writes: Hello folks, I've been experimenting with Sibelius 7.1.3 as a front-end to Lily, i.e. as a note input engine. This lead me to fix some issues in musicxml2ly: - the comment bar number at the end

Re: musicxml2ly enhancements

On 09.04.2013, at 09:01, Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de wrote: Am 09.04.2013 08:49, schrieb David Kastrup: Jacques Menu jacques.m...@tvtmail.ch writes: Hello folks, I've been experimenting with Sibelius 7.1.3 as a front-end to Lily, i.e. as a note input engine. This lead me to fix some

Re: musicxml2ly enhancements

The math I mentioned is because I interpreted the bar number in: a,4 ( a4 ) ( b4 ) d4 | % 6 as a help to locate the offending bar number… David, sorry I offended you about work going on. I've got only one experience in open software contributions so far, which lead to a dead-end: these

Re: musicxml2ly enhancements

Jacques Menu TvTMail jacques.m...@tvtmail.ch writes: The math I mentioned is because I interpreted the bar number in: a,4 ( a4 ) ( b4 ) d4 | % 6 as a help to locate the offending bar number… Well, it is a help but probably not immediately what you'd like best. I think it is reasonable to

Re: musicxml2ly enhancements

Putting the bar number at the start of the line would require %{ 5 %} a,4 ( a4 ) ( b4 ) d4 | instead. I like that. It's tedious to type manually, but a computer program doesn't know that word :-) Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list

Re: musicxml2ly enhancements

Am 09.04.2013 11:38, schrieb Werner LEMBERG: Putting the bar number at the start of the line would require %{ 5 %} a,4 ( a4 ) ( b4 ) d4 | instead. I like that. It's tedious to type manually, but a computer program doesn't know that word :-) Werner Would something like %@5 a,4 (

Re: musicxml2ly enhancements

Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de writes: Am 09.04.2013 11:38, schrieb Werner LEMBERG: Putting the bar number at the start of the line would require %{ 5 %} a,4 ( a4 ) ( b4 ) d4 | instead. I like that. It's tedious to type manually, but a computer program doesn't know that word :-)

Re: musicxml2ly enhancements

2013/4/9 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org: In the same sense that drilling a hole in your knee and pouring in milk is an option, definitely. ROFLMAO ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: musicxml2ly enhancements

OK. Please consider my suggestion as obsolete, but I'd like to clarify what I intended to say (but obviously failed to do so) Quoting David Kastrup d...@gnu.org: Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de writes: Would something like %@5 a,4 ( a4 ) ( b4 ) d4 | be an option? The combination'%@' would

Re: musicxml2ly enhancements

2013/4/9 Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org: Putting the bar number at the start of the line would require %{ 5 %} a,4 ( a4 ) ( b4 ) d4 | instead. I like that. It's tedious to type manually, but a computer program doesn't know that word :-) Indeed, but i find it unreadable, especially if it

Re: musicxml2ly enhancements

Am 09.04.2013 13:19, schrieb Janek Warchoł: 2013/4/9 Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org: Putting the bar number at the start of the line would require %{ 5 %} a,4 ( a4 ) ( b4 ) d4 | instead. I like that. It's tedious to type manually, but a computer program doesn't know that word :-) Indeed,

Re: musicxml2ly formatting

Am 22.03.2013 um 00:52 schrieb Martin Tarenskeen m.tarensk...@zonnet.nl: On Thu, 21 Mar 2013, pls wrote: Martin, IINM Julien Lerouge and me are the only ones who currently work on musicxml2ly. We publish our results on https://github.com/Philomelos/lilypond-musicxml2ly-dev. Feel

Re: musicxml2ly formatting

Martin, IINM Julien Lerouge and me are the only ones who currently work on musicxml2ly. We publish our results on https://github.com/Philomelos/lilypond-musicxml2ly-dev. Feel free to use it and help to improve it! Some of our latest improvements: recognition of credit-Elements (title,

Re: musicxml2ly formatting

On Thu, 21 Mar 2013, pls wrote: Martin, IINM Julien Lerouge and me are the only ones who currently work on musicxml2ly.   We publish our results on https://github.com/Philomelos/lilypond-musicxml2ly-dev.  Feel free to use it and help to improve it!  Some of our latest improvements: Why

Re: musicxml2ly

On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Colin Hall colingh...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:42:09AM +0200, pls wrote: It's not a regression. It has never been officially fixed. A while ago I posted a bug report and a minimal example:

Re: musicxml2ly

On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Rodolfo Zitellini xhero...@gmail.com wrote: who is the maintainer of musicxml2ly? I made a small small patch to preserve parenthesis on accidentals, would it be useful to anyone? I think musicxml2ly doesn't have any dedicated maintainer. I suggest that you send

Re: musicxml2ly

On 12-06-19 01:03 AM, Janek Warchoł wrote: On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Rodolfo Zitellinixhero...@gmail.com wrote: who is the maintainer of musicxml2ly? I made a small small patch to preserve parenthesis on accidentals, would it be useful to anyone? I think musicxml2ly doesn't have any

Re: musicxml2ly

On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Colin Campbell c...@shaw.ca wrote: On 12-06-19 01:03 AM, Janek Warchoł wrote: On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Rodolfo Zitellinixhero...@gmail.com  wrote: who is the maintainer of musicxml2ly? I made a small small patch to preserve parenthesis on

Re: musicxml2ly

On Sun, 8 Apr 2012, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: The good news is that in many cases only a little editing of the .ly file is required to turn a bad conversion into a good one. For example, all lead sheets from Wikifonia that I have tried have the Chords printed below instead of above the

Re: musicxml2ly

On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 09:33:09AM +0200, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: I did not see a reaction to this question, so I try again. What happened with this musicxml2ly bug ? First chords were printed below the staff, then I think it was fixed, and now the chords are below the staff again.

Re: musicxml2ly

On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 09:33:09AM +0200, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: The good news is that in many cases only a little editing of the .ly file is required to turn a bad conversion into a good one. For example, all lead sheets from Wikifonia that I have tried have the Chords printed below instead

Re: musicxml2ly

It's not a regression. It has never been officially fixed. A while ago I posted a bug report and a minimal example: http://old.nabble.com/musicxml2ly%3A-chordnames-placement-bug-td33309393.html. Here is a solution for the chord symbol bug: http://codereview.appspot.com/5697059/. I still

Re: musicxml2ly

On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:42:09AM +0200, pls wrote: It's not a regression. It has never been officially fixed. A while ago I posted a bug report and a minimal example: http://old.nabble.com/musicxml2ly%3A-chordnames-placement-bug-td33309393.html. Here is a solution for the chord symbol bug:

Re: musicxml2ly

On Sun, 8 Apr 2012, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: The good news is that in many cases only a little editing of the .ly file is required to turn a bad conversion into a good one. For example, all lead sheets from Wikifonia that I have tried have the Chords printed below instead of above the

  1   2   >