Hello,
Had to stop on Friday before 2.15.28 came through. Hence was testing
2.15.27 on Intel Mac OS 10.4.11, double-clicking on program icon after
unpacking. Traceback looks similar to the previous PPC error messages.
Will download version 28 now, and then try command line as well.
Best regards
On Feb 3, 2012, at 10:30 AM, James Worlton wrote:
On my PPC 10.4 machine Lily 2.15.26 was the last one that ran (the
GUI) without problems. I am not near my machine now, and so I can't
test if 2.15.27 will run from the command line. I'll test that
tonight.
So, I'm a bit late with the
James Worlton jworl...@gmail.com writes:
On Feb 3, 2012, at 10:30 AM, James Worlton wrote:
On my PPC 10.4 machine Lily 2.15.26 was the last one that ran (the
GUI) without problems. I am not near my machine now, and so I can't
test if 2.15.27 will run from the command line. I'll test that
On Feb 4, 2012, at 5:07 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
James Worlton jworl...@gmail.com writes:
On Feb 3, 2012, at 10:30 AM, James Worlton wrote:
On my PPC 10.4 machine Lily 2.15.26 was the last one that ran (the
GUI) without problems. I am not near my machine now, and so I can't
On Feb 4, 2012, at 5:07 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
James Worlton jworl...@gmail.com writes:
On Feb 3, 2012, at 10:30 AM, James Worlton wrote:
On my PPC 10.4 machine Lily 2.15.26 was the last one that ran (the
GUI) without problems. I am not near my machine now, and so I can't
test if
Stan Sanderson stans...@gmail.com writes:
On Feb 4, 2012, at 5:07 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
James Worlton jworl...@gmail.com writes:
On Feb 3, 2012, at 10:30 AM, James Worlton wrote:
On my PPC 10.4 machine Lily 2.15.26 was the last one that ran (the
GUI) without problems. I
Hi,
in the list of critical issues the recent issue 2271
URL:http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2271 is the
only one I see without an obvious path forward.
One serious option is ending the support for MacOSX 10.4. If you are a
user that would be affected by such a step, or a
Hi,
It looks from the trace that it's the UI that's not working. May be the command
line tool is still working, and may be the command line tool built from Fink (a
package manager on MacOS) is working as well. (MacPorts requires MacOS 10.6).
So there might be workarounds.
My opinion is that
Hello,
Working (also) with a MacMini Intel Core Duo under 10.4.x and would like to be
able to use 2.16 as well. If it were a question of UI, would be quite happy to
use the tool unix-style from the terminal.
Best regards
Klaus
P.S. would it help if I test MacOS X x86: LilyPond 2.15.27-1
- Original Message -
From: Klaus Föhl klaus.fo...@uni-giessen.de
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 3:10 PM
Subject: Re: Roadblock MacOSX 10.4 for release of LilyPond 2.16
Hello,
Working (also) with a MacMini Intel Core Duo under 10.4.x and would like
Klaus Föhl klaus.fo...@uni-giessen.de writes:
Hello,
Working (also) with a MacMini Intel Core Duo under 10.4.x and would like to be
able to use 2.16 as well. If it were a question of UI, would be quite happy to
use the tool unix-style from the terminal.
Best regards
Klaus
P.S. would it
On Feb 3, 2012, at 4:56 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
Hi,
in the list of critical issues the recent issue 2271
URL:http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2271 is the
only one I see without an obvious path forward.
One serious option is ending the support for MacOSX 10.4. If
Tim McNamara tim...@bitstream.net writes:
Eventually legacy system support gets broken in every project.
PPC-based Mac users (of which I am one, we have three PPC based Macs
that continue to run fine) mostly can update to 10.5.
How expensive is that step? If the sum is nontrivial, I'd rather
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 10:05 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Tim McNamara tim...@bitstream.net writes:
Eventually legacy system support gets broken in every project.
PPC-based Mac users (of which I am one, we have three PPC based Macs
that continue to run fine) mostly can update to
James Worlton jworl...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 10:05 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Tim McNamara tim...@bitstream.net writes:
Eventually legacy system support gets broken in every project.
PPC-based Mac users (of which I am one, we have three PPC based Macs
that
On 3 Feb 2012, at 17:30, James Worlton wrote:
Quick search shows 10.5 for between $200-300. Definite ouch,
especially for a dead-end OS, IMO.
Since it seems to have been discontinued, there is no way to ensure that was is
sold is legal.
As for 10.7, one can create an install DVD - just net
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Hans Aberg haber...@telia.com wrote:
On 3 Feb 2012, at 17:30, James Worlton wrote:
Quick search shows 10.5 for between $200-300. Definite ouch,
especially for a dead-end OS, IMO.
Since it seems to have been discontinued, there is no way to ensure that was
Hello,
On 3 February 2012 18:54, James Worlton jworl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Hans Aberg haber...@telia.com wrote:
On 3 Feb 2012, at 17:30, James Worlton wrote:
Quick search shows 10.5 for between $200-300. Definite ouch,
especially for a dead-end OS, IMO.
Since
On 3 Feb 2012, at 20:26, James wrote:
Quick search shows 10.5 for between $200-300. Definite ouch,
especially for a dead-end OS, IMO.
Since it seems to have been discontinued, there is no way to ensure that
was is sold is legal.
As for 10.7, one can create an install DVD - just net
Hello,
On 3 February 2012 19:52, Hans Aberg haber...@telia.com wrote:
On 3 Feb 2012, at 20:26, James wrote:
Quick search shows 10.5 for between $200-300. Definite ouch,
especially for a dead-end OS, IMO.
Since it seems to have been discontinued, there is no way to ensure that
was is sold
20 matches
Mail list logo
