Re: Syntax for multiple slurs per Voice?

Hi David, On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 8:11 PM, David Nalesnik wrote: > Hi Trevor, > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 8:38 AM, Trevor Bača wrote: > > Hi David (Nalesnik), > > > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 11:49 AM, David Nalesnik < > david.nales...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi Trevor, > >> > >> On Tue,

Re: Syntax for multiple slurs per Voice?

Hi Trevor, On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 8:38 AM, Trevor Bača wrote: > Hi David (Nalesnik), > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 11:49 AM, David Nalesnik > wrote: >> >> Hi Trevor, >> >> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Trevor Bača >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm coming late to this discussion, but potentia

Re: Syntax for multiple slurs per Voice?

Hi David (Nalesnik), On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 11:49 AM, David Nalesnik wrote: > Hi Trevor, > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Trevor Bača > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm coming late to this discussion, but potentially *very* excited about >> what this might mean. Will the available of spanner IDs

Re: Syntax for multiple slurs per Voice?

David Nalesnik writes: > Hi Trevor, > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Trevor Bača wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm coming late to this discussion, but potentially *very* excited about >> what this might mean. Will the available of spanner IDs mean that a single >> voice will (eventually) be able to

Re: Syntax for multiple slurs per Voice?

Trevor Bača writes: > Hi, > > I'm coming late to this discussion, but potentially *very* excited > about what this might mean. Will the available of spanner IDs mean > that a single voice will (eventually) be able to carry multiple *text > spanners*??? Well, that was the motivation for renaming

Re: Syntax for multiple slurs per Voice?

Hi Trevor, On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Trevor Bača wrote: > Hi, > > I'm coming late to this discussion, but potentially *very* excited about > what this might mean. Will the available of spanner IDs mean that a single > voice will (eventually) be able to carry multiple *text spanners*??? >

Re: Syntax for multiple slurs per Voice?

Hi, I'm coming late to this discussion, but potentially *very* excited about what this might mean. Will the available of spanner IDs mean that a single voice will (eventually) be able to carry multiple *text spanners*??? This would be incredibly useful in my own scores (and probably also in the s

Re: Syntax for multiple slurs per Voice?

Thomas Morley writes: > (4) > Observation: > Using Slurs with and without setted 'spanner-id works as well > \relative { c'\=1( d( e\=1) f) } > > \relative { c'\=1(^( e\=1)) } The default is a spanner-id of "" so that's not much of a surprise. -- David Kastrup

Re: Syntax for multiple slurs per Voice?

2015-10-02 13:13 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : > > Hi, issue 4625 in the tracker > https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4625/> is the final > straw to provide an actual input syntax for setting the spanner-id > property introduced before version 2.16. I think currently only slurs > and phra

Re: Syntax for multiple slurs per Voice?

>>> How do people feel about choosing one of the following variations of >>> \- and \= (code compiles and does the expected thing even in 2.18): >> >> I think I prefer \=, but I would be happy with either. +1 for `\=', since `@' looks a bit clumsy. Werner __

Re: Syntax for multiple slurs per Voice?

Am 02.10.2015 um 16:06 schrieb Kieren MacMillan: > Hi David, > >> issue 4625 in the tracker >> https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4625/> is the final >> straw to provide an actual input syntax for setting the spanner-id >> property introduced before version 2.16. > Fabulous! > >> How

Re: Syntax for multiple slurs per Voice?

Hi David, > Personally I'd rather keep @ for user extensions. Fair enough. > At any rate, a nice idea might be to have a context property slur-ids > (and phrasing-slur-ids and beam-ids) that can be set to a list and will > then cause the Slur_engraver to only look at slurs in that set of ids. >

Re: Syntax for multiple slurs per Voice?

Kieren MacMillan writes: > Hi David, > >> issue 4625 in the tracker >> https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4625/> is the final >> straw to provide an actual input syntax for setting the spanner-id >> property introduced before version 2.16. > > Fabulous! > >> How do people feel about

Re: Syntax for multiple slurs per Voice?

Hi David, > issue 4625 in the tracker > https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4625/> is the final > straw to provide an actual input syntax for setting the spanner-id > property introduced before version 2.16. Fabulous! > How do people feel about choosing one of the following variation

Syntax for multiple slurs per Voice?

Hi, issue 4625 in the tracker https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4625/> is the final straw to provide an actual input syntax for setting the spanner-id property introduced before version 2.16. I think currently only slurs and phrasing slurs heed them. While the principal property is