I also agree with the suggestions, you should place two 8th rests instead.
But in case you wished to know the solution for your initial layout problem,
you could just put
"\set tupletFullLength = ##t" before the lower tuplet!
--
Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html
On 04.05.2018 16:18, Aaron Hill wrote:
On 2018-05-04 13:47, Chris Yate wrote:
The following might be the tidiest solution (i.e. just remove the number
and brace). Other opinions welcome!
If you wanted the keep the lower tuplet bracket, you could write two
explicit eighth rests to line up with
On 2018-05-04 13:47, Chris Yate wrote:
The following might be the tidiest solution (i.e. just remove the
number
and brace). Other opinions welcome!
If you wanted the keep the lower tuplet bracket, you could write two
explicit eighth rests to line up with the eighth notes above instead of
the
The following might be the tidiest solution (i.e. just remove the number
and brace). Other opinions welcome!
\transpose f g { \relative c'{
<<
{ r2 r4 \tuplet 3/2 { c8-. f-. c'-. } f4 r r2}
\\
{ r2 \tuplet 3/2 { f,8-. c-. f-. }
\omit TupletBracket \omit TupletNumber \tuplet 3/2 {
Hi guys,
This passage is a little tricky to write tidily on one staff, and I might
change the way this is done. But the placing of the lower tuplet bracket
(covereing the quaver and crotchet rest) doesn't seem to help...
\transpose f g { \relative c'{
<<
{ r2 r4 \tuplet 3/2 { c8-. f-. c'-. }
