Re: chord symbol styling

2015-10-27 Thread Noeck
Hi, > For some reason, font-size seems to have a minimum. Value "1" seems to > be the minimum, and anything below that (e.g., 0.1) seems to be rounded > up to 1. I could be wrong. No, you can see the size as an exponent if you like. These sizes are not: 8pt, 12pt and similar but you can also

Re: chord symbol styling

2015-10-27 Thread Bric
On 10/27/2015 12:05 AM, tisimst wrote: \override ChordName #'font-size = #2 \override ChordName #'font-family = #'roman \override ChordName #'font-series = #'bold wonderful! it works. Including ChordName.color For some reason, font-size seems to have a minimum. Value "1" seems

Re: chord symbol styling

2015-10-27 Thread David Kastrup
Simon Albrecht writes: > On 27.10.2015 13:00, David Kastrup wrote: >> 6 whole steps per octave. So if I want to illustrate the shrinking of >> distances higher up the fretboard, I can just add -0.5 per semitone to >> the font-size. Or something. > > :-) Well, arguably

Re: chord symbol styling

2015-10-27 Thread Simon Albrecht
On 27.10.2015 13:00, David Kastrup wrote: 6 whole steps per octave. So if I want to illustrate the shrinking of distances higher up the fretboard, I can just add -0.5 per semitone to the font-size. Or something. :-) ___ lilypond-user mailing list

Re: chord symbol styling

2015-10-27 Thread Simon Albrecht
On 27.10.2015 11:33, Noeck wrote: Hi, For some reason, font-size seems to have a minimum. Value "1" seems to be the minimum, and anything below that (e.g., 0.1) seems to be rounded up to 1. I could be wrong. No, you can see the size as an exponent if you like. These sizes are not: 8pt, 12pt

Re: chord symbol styling

2015-10-27 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi all, On Oct 27, 2015, at 7:09 AM, Simon Albrecht wrote: > In other words: font-size isn’t given as absolute, but as relative size It can be given as absolute, if desired, via Mike S’s function. Cheers, Kieren. Kieren MacMillan,

Re: chord symbol styling

2015-10-27 Thread David Kastrup
Simon Albrecht writes: > On 27.10.2015 11:33, Noeck wrote: >> Hi, >> >>> For some reason, font-size seems to have a minimum. Value "1" seems to >>> be the minimum, and anything below that (e.g., 0.1) seems to be rounded >>> up to 1. I could be wrong. >> No, you can see

Re: chord symbol styling

2015-10-27 Thread mskala
On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, David Kastrup wrote: > Well, arguably it makes a bit more sense than Knuth's choice of a > magstep being a factor of 1.2. Because the powers of 2^{1:12} as the > basis of half a magstep are known to be close enough for practical > purposes to a variety of small-integer-based

Re: chord symbol styling

2015-10-26 Thread tisimst
ailing list > [hidden email] <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node=182781=0> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > > > -------------- > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion > below: > http://lilypond.1069038.n5.

chord symbol styling

2015-10-26 Thread Bric
none of the threads discussing this lead to any solution, in my research How do you change font-family, font-style, font-size of the chord fonts? I have tried things like... \override ChordName #'font-name = "DejaVu Serif" \override ChordName #'font-size = #2 \override ChordName