modify the fingering
setup of their instruments to suit their personal preferences and needs.
And that's before we even begin to get into the issue of French vs. German
system ... :-)
I ran through the whole set of keys for the low-bass-clarinet and saw yet some
more problems (I only did
.
Bear in mind that this is not limited to bass clarinet -- there are
basset clarinets, basset horns and contra-alto/contrabass clarinets
to take into account as well. And in all these cases, players may
well modify the fingering setup of their instruments to suit their
personal preferences
of Reform-Boehm instruments was in the Netherlands. Anyway,
it was just a curiosity.
B.t.w. years ago I made a small fingering help-application on my Palm organizer.
I'm thinking of putting this fingering stuff in a web-database (for fun). There
are already plenty people who do something like
On 29 Jan 2013, at 22:29 , m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
Just a note to say thank you to all those who want to make this code
better. It's tough for me to take it any farther with my non-expert
knowledge of woodwind instruments, but I would be glad to answer any
and on questions addressed
On 29 Jan 2013, at 22:17 , Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On 01/29/2013 09:50 PM, Wim van Dommelen wrote:
Since you're finding it relatively straightforward to play with the
Scheme code, can I put in a feature request -- any chance of fixing
the shape of the register key for clarinet/bass
On 01/29/2013 10:46 PM, Wim van Dommelen wrote:
Uhh, never too old for a challenge, as I see it the register key is also
inherited, so it is one and the same definition. Can give it a try. What were
you thinking about?
Just a register key that looks like an actual clarinet register key, rather
On 29 janv. 2013, at 22:17, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net wrote:
On 01/29/2013 09:50 PM, Wim van Dommelen wrote:
6. Lot's of models have a right-hand low-ees key (with the thumb), There
is no
such key. Wishlist.
Not recent French models, in my experience, but I
to display unused as well as used keys (Wim's request);
-- an option to place the diagram upside down, so looking at it you see
what you see as a player looking down the instrument. I've seen this
used in one or two different fingering references and it has some
merit, even though I
Wim van Dommelen-4 wrote
Hi,
I'm trying to get some prints with the woodwind fingering diagrams on
it. When I use the basic diagram, all defined keys show up, but as
soon as I enter one hole to be used some of the keyholes (not of the
central one to six holes, but especially
Hi,
It should be pointed out that it's a common notational practice to hide the
unused non-center keys in fingering diagrams; this behavior is idiomatic.
(Although there's no reason why that means you can't display all the keys,
as you want.)
just sayin,
Jeff
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 2:27 AM
On 01/28/2013 11:34 AM, Jeffrey Trevino wrote:
It should be pointed out that it's a common notational practice to hide the
unused non-center keys in fingering diagrams; this behavior is idiomatic.
Common, but not ubiquitous or standard, I'd say.
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 2:27 AM, Eluze wrote
Minimal example attached, in diagram 3 lots of keys are gone.On 28 Jan 2013, at 12:03 , Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:On 01/28/2013 11:34 AM, Jeffrey Trevino wrote:It should be pointed out that it's a common notational practice to hide theunused non-center keys in fingering diagrams; this behavior
On 01/28/2013 01:54 PM, Wim van Dommelen wrote:
Agreed, but for a series showing e.g. a scale it would be nice to have similar
diagrams, so I would like to control the behaviour myself.
Personally I prefer to see all the keys when it's a visual diagram.
That said, I think my preference _in
Hi,
I'm trying to get some prints with the woodwind fingering diagrams on
it. When I use the basic diagram, all defined keys show up, but as
soon as I enter one hole to be used some of the keyholes (not of the
central one to six holes, but especially on the side keys) disappear
from
On 14/01/13 17:31, Keith OHara wrote:
Nick Payne nick.payne at internode.on.net writes:
To indicate guide fingering I've been using the code below. In 2.17.10,
the fingering with guide is placed above the stem even though
Fingering.add-stem-support = ##f. In 2.17.9 and earlier it was placed
On 14 janv. 2013, at 09:05, Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net wrote:
On 14/01/13 17:31, Keith OHara wrote:
Nick Payne nick.payne at internode.on.net writes:
To indicate guide fingering I've been using the code below. In 2.17.10,
the fingering with guide is placed above the stem even
On 14/01/13 19:12, m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
On 14 janv. 2013, at 09:05, Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net wrote:
On 14/01/13 17:31, Keith OHara wrote:
Nick Payne nick.payne at internode.on.net writes:
To indicate guide fingering I've been using the code below. In 2.17.10
On 14/01/13 17:31, Keith OHara wrote:
Nick Payne nick.payne at internode.on.net writes:
To indicate guide fingering I've been using the code below. In 2.17.10,
the fingering with guide is placed above the stem even though
Fingering.add-stem-support = ##f. In 2.17.9 and earlier it was placed
To indicate guide fingering I've been using the code below. In 2.17.10,
the fingering with guide is placed above the stem even though
Fingering.add-stem-support = ##f. In 2.17.9 and earlier it was placed at
the same height as normal fingering. I've attached pngs of the output on
2.17.9
Nick Payne nick.payne at internode.on.net writes:
To indicate guide fingering I've been using the code below. In 2.17.10,
the fingering with guide is placed above the stem even though
Fingering.add-stem-support = ##f. In 2.17.9 and earlier it was placed at
the same height as normal
Nick Payne nick.payne at internode.on.net writes:
To indicate guide fingering I've been using the code below. In 2.17.10,
the fingering with guide is placed above the stem even though
Fingering.add-stem-support = ##f. In 2.17.9 and earlier it was placed at
the same height as normal
.nabble.com/Parenthesize-slashed-grace-with-fingering-tp138701p138733.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Eluze elu...@gmail.com writes:
Colin Campbell-8 wrote
I regret that I couldn't get your code to work, as it complains about
unexpected postevent after the
\parenthesize.
with 2.17.9 there is no complaint - I'll check again when 2.17.10 is out!
Well, there _is_ a postevent in a bad
In transcribing some cello exercises, I need to show a slashed grace
note, with a fingering, in parentheses. The exercise involves shifting
between first and third position on the same string, so it emphasizes
the intermediate target position, with the intent that the grace note
gets
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Colin Campbell c...@shaw.ca wrote:
In transcribing some cello exercises, I need to show a slashed grace
note, with a fingering, in parentheses. The exercise involves shifting
between first and third position on the same string, so it emphasizes
Colin Campbell-8 wrote
In transcribing some cello exercises, I need to show a slashed grace
note, with a fingering, in parentheses. The exercise involves shifting
between first and third position on the same string, so it emphasizes
the intermediate target position, with the intent
On 13-01-02 03:39 PM, Olivier Biot wrote:
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Colin Campbell c...@shaw.ca
mailto:c...@shaw.ca wrote:
In transcribing some cello exercises, I need to show a slashed
grace note, with a fingering, in parentheses. The exercise
involves shifting between
On 13-01-02 03:42 PM, Eluze wrote:
Colin Campbell-8 wrote
In transcribing some cello exercises, I need to show a slashed grace
note, with a fingering, in parentheses. The exercise involves shifting
between first and third position on the same string, so it emphasizes
the intermediate target
Hi all,
I'd like to write down an alternate way of playing a chord for guitar. As
you all probably know, a note can be played at different frets/strings.
This makes no difference on a score, and with regular fingering notation
it's easy to describe, but how do I change it in a tablature
Merry Christmas,
do you want to indicate on which string a note should be played?
In that case, please look here:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/notation/common-notation-for-fretted-strings#string-number-indications
The following small example shows two times the same notes on
Merry Christmas,
do you want to indicate on which string a note should be played?
In that case, please look here:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/notation/common-notation-for-fretted-strings#string-number-indications
The following small example shows two times the same notes* on
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:25 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net writes:
Eluze eluzew at gmail.com writes:
maybe this could be merged into
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2830
That issue is about fingering and string numbers
{}
}
\set stringNumberOrientations = #'(up)
and
\override StringNumber #'outside-staff-priority = #
will help
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Displaying-string-number-above-fingering-tp137522p137715.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive
Eluze eluzew at gmail.com writes:
maybe this could be merged into
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2830
That issue is about fingering and string numbers inside chord brackets ,
documenting how the order of input works together with script-priority
d-1\28( e-\thumb\1 d-1
Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net writes:
Eluze eluzew at gmail.com writes:
maybe this could be merged into
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2830
That issue is about fingering and string numbers inside chord brackets ,
documenting how the order of input works together
David Kastrup dak at gnu.org writes:
Keith OHara k-ohara5a5a at oco.net writes:
The irregular behavior Oliver sees occurs when there is no chord
indication.
Fingering_engraver
Well, fingerings go to Fingering_engraver but the string-numbers go to
New_fingering_engraver. (Better than
Keith OHara k-ohara5a5a at oco.net writes:
There are two or
three separate pieces of code setting fingerings and scripts according to
different combinations of rules,
It seems if we give Fingerings and StringNumbers different script-priorities
by default, as David suggested, it would
Hi all,
How can I display the string number above fingerings in all cases?
Here's a small snippet that will semi randomly arrange fingerings and
string numbers:
%%% BEGIN snippet
\version 2.16.1
theMusic = \new Staff \with {midiInstrument = #cello} {
\relative d {
\key c \major
\time
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Olivier Biot olivier.b...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
How can I display the string number above fingerings in all cases?
[...]
Both StringNumbers and Fingerings have script-priority set to 100.
Increasing one seems to solve the problem:
\new Staff \relative c''
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Nathan when.possi...@gmail.com wrote:
\override StringNumber #'script-priority = #150
Hi Nathan,
Many thanks, as this was precisely what I was looking for!
Best regards,
Olivier
___
lilypond-user mailing list
Nathan when.possi...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Olivier Biot olivier.b...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
How can I display the string number above fingerings in all cases?
[...]
Both StringNumbers and Fingerings have script-priority set to 100.
Increasing one seems to
-priority set to 100.
Increasing one seems to solve the problem:
Shouldn't we have that be the default?
In guitar scores there's also stroke-fingering. They're hardly ever all
on the same side of the note, but if they were I would say that the
conventional order would be fingering closest
and Fingerings have script-priority set to 100.
Increasing one seems to solve the problem:
Shouldn't we have that be the default?
In guitar scores there's also stroke-fingering. They're hardly ever all
on the same side of the note, but if they were I would say that the
conventional order would
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1642q=tuplet%20fingeringcolspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20Stars%20Owner%20Patch%20Needs%20Summary
Thanks for confirming that this is an outstanding bug.
as workarounds you'll find (change the numbers to fit)
\override Fingering #'staff-padding
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Thomas Morley
thomasmorle...@googlemail.com wrote:
2012/12/6 Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com:
%% Using a value 250 will place the DynamicText *inside* the
%% TupletBracket, depends on what you want.
\override TupletBracket
2012/12/11 Olivier Biot olivier.b...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Thomas Morley
thomasmorle...@googlemail.com wrote:
2012/12/6 Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com:
%% Using a value 250 will place the DynamicText *inside* the
%% TupletBracket, depends on what
Dear all,
I am now aware of the \shape + list of control point offsets tweak thanks
to this thread, but are there always 4 control points?
I am also aware of yet another tweak: \once \override Slur #'positions (as
in
Hi Olivier,
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Olivier Biot olivier.b...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
I am now aware of the \shape + list of control point offsets tweak thanks to
this thread, but are there always 4 control points?
Yes. TupletBracket used to have a 'control-points property that
Hi David,
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=748 gave me exactly the answer I needed
for the positions tweak.
And the v2.17 documentation pointer you provided gave exactly the
information I needed for understanding how to tweak a slur.
Many thanks!
Best regards,
Olivier
On Sat, Dec 8,
Am 03.12.2012 07:06, schrieb David Kastrup:
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Noeck noeck.marb...@gmx.de writes:
Why has that been inverted? To me, \shape PhrasingSlur #… is easier to
read than \shape #… PhrasingSlur. Could someone briefly explain the
reason for that?
The old syntax was
\layout {
\context {
\Staff
\override Fingering #'add-stem-support = ##t
\override Fingering #'avoid-slur = #'outside
\override TupletBracket #'bracket-visibility = ##t
}
}
}
% END snippet 2
Best regards,
Olivier
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Olivier
2012/12/6 Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com:
[...]
%% Using a value 250 will place the DynamicText outside the
%% TupletBracket, depends on what you want.
Sorry.
Should read:
%% Using a value 250 will place the DynamicText *inside* the
%% TupletBracket, depends on
Many thanks for the help and for the extra clarifications regarding usage
of these tweaks.
Best regards,
Olivier
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Olivier Biot olivier.b...@gmail.com writes:
Many thanks for the help and for the extra clarifications regarding
usage of these tweaks.
It is a nuisance if interfaces change, but sometimes it just takes some
time and experience to figure out shortcomings of the initial design.
Feel free to
' ) g ( b, g, )c,--\f ( e'-3 c'-4 ) c (
e, c, ) } | % Test 1: sextuplets
\times 2/3 { g'16 ( b' g' ) g ( b, g, ) } \times 2/3 { c,--\f ( e'-3
c'-4 ) c ( e, c, ) } | % Test 2: triplets
}
}
\score {
\theMusic
\layout {
\context {
\Staff
\override Fingering #'add-stem
' ) g ( b, g, ) } \times 2/3 { c,--\f (
\override Fingering #'extra-offset = #'(0 . 1)
e'-3 c'-4 ) c ( e, c, ) } | % Test 2: triplets
\revert Fingering #'extra-offset
}
}
\score {
\theMusic
\layout {
\context {
\Staff
\override Fingering #'add-stem-support
%20fingeringcolspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20Stars%20Owner%20Patch%20Needs%20Summary
as workarounds you'll find (change the numbers to fit)
\override Fingering #'staff-padding = #8
\override TupletBracket #'padding = #9
(and more)
which you can \revert later
Eluze
--
View this message in context
Staff {
\relative d' {
\key f \major
\time 3/4
\clef bass
\acciaccatura { e-\! } d4 cis8-\ \( ( a'16-.-3 ) a-.-\! \)
}
}
\score {
\theMusic
\layout {
\context {
\Staff
\override Fingering #'add-stem-support = ##t
\override Fingering #'avoid
Hi Olivier,
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Olivier Biot olivier.b...@gmail.com wrote:
I had to invert the control point list and the PhrasingSlur string in your
solution to make it work, as in:
\acciaccatura { e-\! } d4 \shape PhrasingSlur #'((0 . 1) (0 . 1.8) (0 . 1.8)
(0 . 0))
Nick
Am 03.12.2012 00:29, schrieb David Nalesnik:
\acciaccatura { e-\! } d4 \shape PhrasingSlur #'((0 . 1) (0 . 1.8) (0 . 1.8)
(0 . 0))
Nick has given you the new syntax (as of 2.17.4).
-David
Why has that been inverted? To me, \shape PhrasingSlur #… is easier to
read than \shape #…
2012/12/3 Noeck noeck.marb...@gmx.de:
Am 03.12.2012 00:29, schrieb David Nalesnik:
\acciaccatura { e-\! } d4 \shape PhrasingSlur #'((0 . 1) (0 . 1.8) (0 . 1.8)
(0 . 0))
Nick has given you the new syntax (as of 2.17.4).
-David
Why has that been inverted? To me, \shape PhrasingSlur #…
Noeck noeck.marb...@gmx.de writes:
Am 03.12.2012 00:29, schrieb David Nalesnik:
\acciaccatura { e-\! } d4 \shape PhrasingSlur #'((0 . 1) (0 . 1.8) (0 . 1.8)
(0 . 0))
Nick has given you the new syntax (as of 2.17.4).
-David
Why has that been inverted? To me, \shape PhrasingSlur #… is
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Noeck noeck.marb...@gmx.de writes:
Why has that been inverted? To me, \shape PhrasingSlur #… is easier to
read than \shape #… PhrasingSlur. Could someone briefly explain the
reason for that?
The old syntax was
\shape PhrasingSlur #'((0 . 1) (0 .
) a-.-\! \)
}
}
\score {
\theMusic
\layout {
\context {
\Staff
\override Fingering #'add-stem-support = ##t
\override Fingering #'avoid-slur = #'outside
\override TupletBracket #'bracket-visibility = ##t
}
}
}
% END
The following directive works for regular
\acciaccatura { e-\! } d4 cis8-\ \( ( a'16-.-3 ) a-.-\! \)
}
}
\score {
\theMusic
\layout {
\context {
\Staff
\override Fingering #'add-stem-support = ##t
\override Fingering #'avoid-slur = #'outside
\override TupletBracket #'bracket-visibility = ##t
}
}
}
% END
\clef bass
\times 2/3 { c16--\f e'-3 c'-4 c e, c, }
\times 2/3 { c16--\f ( e'-3 c'-4 ) c ( e, c, ) }
}
}
\layout {
\context {
\Staff
\override Fingering #'add-stem-support = ##t
\override Fingering #'avoid-slur = #'outside
\override TupletBracket
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 2:35 AM, Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi again,
I stumbled across
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=631
{
c'_\open^\open
}
works.
Thanks again Thomas, I completely forgot about the chord trick for
articulations.
Best regards,
string
fingering while TWO have been written. The order of _ and ^ play no
role in this bug.
Expected behavior: both \open fingerings are displayed, one above
and one below selected note.
[ ...]
Hi Olivier,
I'm not sure that it is a bug.
script-init.ly shows:
open = #(make-articulation
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 12:01 AM, Thomas Morley
thomasmorle...@googlemail.com wrote:
2012/11/5 Olivier Biot olivier.b...@gmail.com:
Dear all,
I think I just found a Lilypond bug.
The following snippet with fingerings does only show one open string
fingering while TWO have been written
Dear all,
I think I just found a Lilypond bug.
The following snippet with fingerings does only show one open string
fingering while TWO have been written. The order of _ and ^ play no
role in this bug.
Expected behavior: both \open fingerings are displayed, one above
and one below selected note
2012/11/5 Olivier Biot olivier.b...@gmail.com:
Dear all,
I think I just found a Lilypond bug.
The following snippet with fingerings does only show one open string
fingering while TWO have been written. The order of _ and ^ play no
role in this bug.
Expected behavior: both \open fingerings
On 11/10/12 13:18, Nick Payne wrote:
On 11/10/12 08:02, Marek Klein wrote:
Hello,
2012/10/10 Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net
mailto:nick.pa...@internode.on.net
See example below:
a) without any fingering orientation specified, the fingerings are
incorrectly placed
Hello,
2012/10/10 Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net
See example below:
a) without any fingering orientation specified, the fingerings are
incorrectly placed, such that the two fingerings above the staff
collide, and the fingerings also appear in the wrong order (the 0 should
not appear
On 11/10/12 08:02, Marek Klein wrote:
Hello,
2012/10/10 Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net
mailto:nick.pa...@internode.on.net
See example below:
a) without any fingering orientation specified, the fingerings are
incorrectly placed, such that the two fingerings above
See example below:
a) without any fingering orientation specified, the fingerings are
incorrectly placed, such that the two fingerings above the staff
collide, and the fingerings also appear in the wrong order (the 0 should
not appear next to the E and the 2 should not appear above).
b
a question about laying out some
fingering in guitar material for a new book I'm writing. I'm
not neglecting the copious documentation, but I'm still on the
learning curve for sure and have missed or misunderstood a lot
as of yet.
Using LilyPond 2.16.0, modified the scripts.scm definitions
Jim Tisdall wrote
My main question is this: I'd like to have the bow and
left-hand fingering and right-hand fingering appear in the
space between the two staffs, in a straight line, so they
can be seen easily by those reading either the standard
staff above, or the tablature staff below. How
Greetings! I'll introduce myself after asking my question.
I'm new to Lilypond and have a question about laying out some
fingering in guitar material for a new book I'm writing. I'm
not neglecting the copious documentation, but I'm still on the
learning curve for sure and have missed
Jim Tisdall tisd...@tisdall.net writes:
Greetings! I'll introduce myself after asking my question.
I'm new to Lilypond and have a question about laying out some
fingering in guitar material for a new book I'm writing. I'm
not neglecting the copious documentation, but I'm still
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 08:22:53AM +1000, Nick Payne wrote:
On 19/08/12 16:46, Nick Payne wrote:
In a chord containing a second, if I place the fingering above the
notes to avoid having the fingering numerals overlapping each
other (see
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2541
In a chord containing a second, if I place the fingering above the notes
to avoid having the fingering numerals overlapping each other (see
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2541), then the
numerals default to being placed much higher above the noteheads than is
normal
On 19/08/12 16:46, Nick Payne wrote:
In a chord containing a second, if I place the fingering above the
notes to avoid having the fingering numerals overlapping each other
(see https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2541), then
the numerals default to being placed much higher
Il 23/06/2012 23:36, and...@andis59.se ha scritto:
My main instrument is the Pedal Steel Guitar. One of the different
things about this instrument is that it has pedals that re-tune specific
strings.
I want to be able to add strings to my score.
This is close to the result I want, but it would
On 2012-06-24 11:48, -Eluze wrote:
this snippet might be of interest for you:
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=768 Eluze
Thank you very much!
It almost work as I want it! Just have to tweak it a bit...
// Anders
--
English isn't my first language.
So any error or strangeness is due to
My main instrument is the Pedal Steel Guitar. One of the different
things about this instrument is that it has pedals that re-tune specific
strings.
I want to be able to add strings to my score.
This is close to the result I want, but it would be nice to use a
similar syntax as for string
To David and Nick,
I thank you very much for your kind help.
I have now plenty of new ways to emprove my left fingering notation.
Pierre
2012/5/17 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net writes:
On 16/05/12 17:43, David Kastrup wrote:
Nick Paynenick.pa
On a chord containing a second, the fingering numerals overlap each
other if placed on the left. This isn't a regression, the output is the
same on 2.14.2 and 2.15.38.
\relative c'' {
\set fingeringOrientations = #'(left)
e-0 c-1 b-34
}
attachment
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 3:21 AM, Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.netwrote:
On a chord containing a second, the fingering numerals overlap each other
if placed on the left. This isn't a regression, the output is the same on
2.14.2 and 2.15.38.
\relative c'' {
\set fingeringOrientations
Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net writes:
On 16/05/12 17:43, David Kastrup wrote:
Nick Paynenick.pa...@internode.on.net writes:
2012/5/15 Pierre Perol-Schneiderpierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com:
Hi Group,
Sometimes I need to put a letter in front of a number as a fingering
2012/5/15 Pierre Perol-Schneider pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com:
Hi Group,
Sometimes I need to put a letter in front of a number as a fingering.
Is there any possibility to declare m (for ex;) as a number so that I
could codea-m1 as a fingering ?
Do you mean for right hand (stroke) fingering
Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net writes:
2012/5/15 Pierre Perol-Schneider pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com:
Hi Group,
Sometimes I need to put a letter in front of a number as a fingering.
Is there any possibility to declare m (for ex;) as a number so that I
could codea-m1
Thanks very much Thomas, I like your solution.
2012/5/16 Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com
2012/5/15 Pierre Perol-Schneider pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com:
Hi Group,
Sometimes I need to put a letter in front of a number as a fingering.
Is there any possibility to declare m
No Nick, sorry for the missundersanding, that's for left hand fingering.
But I'll keep your ideas in mind.
Thanks anyway
2012/5/16 Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net
2012/5/15 Pierre Perol-Schneider
pierre.schneider.paris@gmail.**compierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com
:
Hi Group
Lol !
2012/5/16 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net writes:
2012/5/15 Pierre Perol-Schneider pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com:
Hi Group,
Sometimes I need to put a letter in front of a number as a fingering.
Is there any possibility to declare m (for ex
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes:
2012/5/15 Pierre Perol-Schneider pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com:
Hi Group,
Sometimes I need to put a letter in front of a number as a fingering.
Is there any possibility to declare m (for ex;) as a number so that I
could code a-m1
#(define (fingering-event? m) (and (ly:music? m)
(music-is-of-type? m 'fingering-event)))
letter =
#(define-event-function (parser location l fingering)
(string? fingering-event?)
(let* ((finger (ly:music-property fingering 'digit))
(n (number
On 16/05/12 17:43, David Kastrup wrote:
Nick Paynenick.pa...@internode.on.net writes:
2012/5/15 Pierre Perol-Schneiderpierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com:
Hi Group,
Sometimes I need to put a letter in front of a number as a fingering.
Is there any possibility to declare m (for ex;) as a number
Hi Group,
Sometimes I need to put a letter in front of a number as a fingering.
Is there any possibility to declare m (for ex;) as a number so that I
could code a-m1 as a fingering ?
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https
2012/5/15 Pierre Perol-Schneider pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com:
Hi Group,
Sometimes I need to put a letter in front of a number as a fingering.
Is there any possibility to declare m (for ex;) as a number so that I
could code a-m1 as a fingering ?
Hi Pierre,
I'm not aware of any method
2012/4/29 Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net:
See attached. Overriding the fingering font works fine for fingering
attached to a note but is ignored when using \finger in a markup, where the
default fingering font is still used.
\version 2.15.37
\relative c'' {
\override
501 - 600 of 1060 matches
Mail list logo
