Hello all,
Consider the following minimal snippet:
\version 2.17.13
global = {
\repeat unfold 8 { s1 }
}
notes = \relative c' {
R1*4
c1
R1*3
}
\score {
\new Staff \global \notes
}
This may seem like a contrived example — and in its minimal state, I suppose it
is — but I run into
Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca writes:
Hello all,
Consider the following minimal snippet:
\version 2.17.13
global = {
\repeat unfold 8 { s1 }
}
notes = \relative c' {
R1*4
c1
R1*3
}
\score {
\new Staff \global \notes
}
This may seem like a
2013/10/16 Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca:
Question: Is there a way to force the MMRs (in \notes) to combine (in the
Staff), despite the fact that the skips (in \global) are broken up? Currently,
I'm using a series of tags to work around it, but it is extremely hacky,
Hi all,
FWIW, i'd like to be able to do this, too.
Maybe there's a way for a function (or engraver?) to extract the duration of
skip-only music (i.e., uninterrupted by things like \mark or \tempo or \bar)
and [re-]combine them?
Thanks,
Kieren.
___
Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca writes:
Hi all,
FWIW, i'd like to be able to do this, too.
Maybe there's a way for a function (or engraver?) to extract the
duration of skip-only music (i.e., uninterrupted by things like
\mark or \tempo or \bar) and [re-]combine them?
It
Hi David,
It would be the job of the engraver for multimeasure rests.
Good to know — thanks!
However, I have distinct problems imagining what the output of the following
should be if one were to combine multimeasure rests:
I have no problem seeing the desired (at least by me) output of your
Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca writes:
Hi David,
It would be the job of the engraver for multimeasure rests.
Good to know — thanks!
However, I have distinct problems imagining what the output of the following
should be if one were to combine multimeasure rests:
I have no
Hi David,
You did not address the scripts attached to multimeasure rests.
Not sure what you mean here — other than the A and the B (both of which I
addressed in my modified snippet), what scripts were there in your original
snippet?
When combining multiple multimeasure rests, you may end up
Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca writes:
Perhaps equivalently (for 99% of my purposes) would be this rule:
Simultaneous skip events should be ignored when compressing MMRs.
Is that easier to understand and/or implement?
Why do you use s rather than \skip if you don't want
Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca writes:
Hi David,
You did not address the scripts attached to multimeasure rests.
Not sure what you mean here — other than the A and the B (both of
which I addressed in my modified snippet), what scripts were there in
your original snippet?
Hi David,
Why do you use s rather than \skip if you don't want to have LilyPond notice
events?
It's comments (questions) like that which make me feel like there are deep,
deep secrets about Lilypond that even I (after more than a decade of heavy
Lily-use) have no inkling. =)
What's the
Hi David,
You attached them to rests different from the original rests.
I attached them to moments identical to the original moments — that's all that
matters (from a user's perspective).
Then we are obviously talking about different things.
I find that often happens… =)
Use \skip rather
Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca writes:
Why do you use s rather than \skip if you don't want to have
LilyPond notice events?
It's comments (questions) like that which make me feel like there are
deep, deep secrets about Lilypond that even I (after more than a
decade of heavy
13 matches
Mail list logo
