Re: harp basic muffle

On 2/5/19, N. Andrew Walsh wrote: > A question: is there a way to get the stem_engraver to accept these glyphs? Well, of course you can always replace the NoteHead stencil with a markup: %% mufflePath= \markup \path #0.15 #'((moveto -1.25 0) (lineto 1.25 0)

Re: harp basic muffle

Hi Rachel, thanks for the muffle glyphs, they look really nice. A question: is there a way to get the stem_engraver to accept these glyphs? If it could, it would be possible to notate string-specific muffling (something called for by some contemporary scores). Thanks for the help, A On Fri,

Re: harp basic muffle

Hi all, In super old scores, an asterisk was used, but that is not true of scores today. The example below that says English Ballad is from 1942. The next one is from 2005 and seems to be what is standard. The final one is one I created last year with Finale so you could see what proportions

Re: harp basic muffle

My piece with the adjusted muffle: > On Jan 25, 2019, at 10:30 AM, Rachel Knight wrote: > > Hi all, > > In super old scores, an asterisk was used, but that is not true of scores > today. The example below that says English Ballad is from 1942. The next one > is from 2005 and seems to be

Re: harp basic muffle

>> This is Valentins code with a few values changed to get the >> appearance closer to what you are looking for: [...] > > Perfect, thanks so much! Is the exact shape of this symbol `universal'? I.e., do German, French, and US publishers use exactly this shape? If the answer is yes the glyph

Re: harp basic muffle

Perfect, thanks so much! Rachel > On Jan 24, 2019, at 3:49 PM, Leo Correia de Verdier > wrote: > > This is Valentins code with a few values changed to get the appearance closer > to what you are looking for: > > mufflePath= > \markup > \path #'0.25 #'((moveto -1.5 0) > (lineto

Re: harp basic muffle

On 2019-01-24 2:36 pm, Rachel Knight wrote: The second muffle is very close to what I am looking for! All the lines could be thicker and the straight parts should stick just a little further past the circle. Would there be a way to include it apart from having it in a dynamic context? Often in

Re: harp basic muffle

This is Valentins code with a few values changed to get the appearance closer to what you are looking for: mufflePath= \markup \path #'0.25 #'((moveto -1.5 0) (lineto 1.5 0) (moveto 0 -1.5) (lineto 0 1.5)) muffleMarkup= \markup \translate #'(0 . 1)

Re: harp basic muffle

The second muffle is very close to what I am looking for! All the lines could be thicker and the straight parts should stick just a little further past the circle. Would there be a way to include it apart from having it in a dynamic context? Often in harp music, we need the muffle below the

Re: harp basic muffle

On 1/24/19, N. Andrew Walsh wrote: > In contemporary notation, a dotted line > connects a note or chord to a later-occurring dampen symbol, indicating > that those strings *and those strings only* are dampened at that point. Is that the sort of things you’re referring to?

Re: harp basic muffle

On 1/23/2019 11:53 PM, Federico Bruni wrote: Il giorno gio 24 gen 2019 alle 6:46, Andrew Bernard ha scritto: Hi Rachel, I feel sure this came up on the list a while ago. Try an archive search. I'm not

Re: harp basic muffle

Hi Andrew, I was anticipating this coming up immediately after the OP question. I was looking at Smufl and there is a whole page of specialist harp symbols. I imagine people would want all of those if they want the muffle. I don;'t know enough to say how one would gp about proving them, and

Re: harp basic muffle

Hi Valentin, On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 9:05 AM Valentin Villenave wrote: > > Greetings everybody, > I’ve just added a LSR snippet for harp muffle notation, feel free to > let me know if there’s any way I can improve it… > > http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=1085 thank you very much for posting

Re: harp basic muffle

PS- it turns out that Gould, p. 365, has a recommended notation for damping individual strings, and it's less cluttered: she uses small notes with damping symbols on their stems, and has other notation for damping a specific range. That's probably easier than a spanner.

Re: harp basic muffle

On 1/24/19, Federico Bruni wrote: > Greetings everybody, I’ve just added a LSR snippet for harp muffle notation, feel free to let me know if there’s any way I can improve it…

Re: harp basic muffle

Il giorno gio 24 gen 2019 alle 6:46, Andrew Bernard ha scritto: Hi Rachel, I feel sure this came up on the list a while ago. Try an archive search. I'm not quite sure what keywords would work. Others may

Re: harp basic muffle

Hi Rachel, Could you accept a coda symbol? Then something like this can be done: %== \version "2.19.82" treble = { c''4 } bass = { \clef bass \once \override Script.outside-staff-priority = ##f \once \override Script.Y-offset = 6 c4_\coda } \score { << \new Staff {

Re: harp basic muffle

There's a Unicode symbol for this somewhere. I'll find it. On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 at 16:53, Andrew Bernard wrote: > Hi Rachel, > > Could you accept a coda symbol? Then something like this can be done: > > %== > \version "2.19.82" > > treble = { > c''4 > } > > bass = { > \clef bass >

Re: harp basic muffle

Hi Rachel, I feel sure this came up on the list a while ago. Try an archive search. I'm not quite sure what keywords would work. Others may remember who were in on that thread. Andrew On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 at 16:10, Rachel Knight wrote: > How would I create this harp muffle symbol and place

harp basic muffle

How would I create this harp muffle symbol and place it centered between the treble and bass clefs? Rachel ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user