know how to set line-width in the \layout block to apply it to the
>> whole score. But is it possible to set line-widths on an individual
>> line basis (or for groups of lines), for example one width for lines
>> 1-2, and then a different width for lines 3-4? I know about
>&g
On 2023-10-16 7:15 pm, Benjamin Bruce wrote:
I know how to set line-width in the \layout block to apply it to the
whole score. But is it possible to set line-widths on an individual
line basis (or for groups of lines), for example one width for lines
1-2, and then a different width for lines 3
I know how to set line-width in the \layout block to apply it to the whole
score. But is it possible to set line-widths on an individual line basis (or
for groups of lines), for example one width for lines 1-2, and then a different
width for lines 3-4? I know about ragged-right, but I don't
>> Actually,
>>
>> ```
>> \begin[line-width=394\pt]{lilypond}
>> ```
>>
>> is also correct.
>
> Nope. It is backward compatibility but should not be used anywhere.
>
> git grep '\\begin\['
>
> unfortunately shows that this i
Werner LEMBERG writes:
>> The correct syntax is
>>
>> \begin{lilypond}[line-width=394\pt]
>
> Actually,
>
> ```
> \begin[line-width=394\pt]{lilypond}
> ```
>
> is also correct.
Nope. It is backward compatibility but should not be used anywhere.
Le 25/10/2022 à 15:56, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
The correct syntax is
\begin{lilypond}[line-width=394\pt]
Actually,
```
\begin[line-width=394\pt]{lilypond}
```
is also correct.
Ah, OK, I didn't know that. Then we need more info from the OP to
understand what the problem actually is.
> The correct syntax is
>
> \begin{lilypond}[line-width=394\pt]
Actually,
```
\begin[line-width=394\pt]{lilypond}
```
is also correct.
Werner
Le 25/10/2022 à 10:31, Stefan Thomas a écrit :
Community,
I just noticed that it doesn't seem to make any difference whether I
write
\begin[line-width=394\pt]{lilypond}
or
\begin[line-width=394\pt]{lilypond}
in a latex file, that I process with lilypond-book.
The lines don't fit the page
Community,
I just noticed that it doesn't seem to make any difference whether I write
\begin[line-width=394\pt]{lilypond}
or
\begin[line-width=394\pt]{lilypond}
in a latex file, that I process with lilypond-book.
The lines don't fit the page margins.
Does anyone know what to do here?
Thanks
I've added this issue:
https://github.com/jperon/lyluatex/issues/195
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
I'm trying to increase the width of a snippet.
In LilyPond I can easily do it by changing the line-width and setting
ragged-right to false.
I've tried the following for lyluatex but nothing changes:
$ cat width.tex
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{lyluatex}
\begin{document}
\begin{lilypond}[r
Federico Bruni <f...@inventati.org> writes:
> Hi all
>
> Sorry if I use this list to ask questions about lyluatex, but I hope
> that other are interested on the topic.
>
> I'm trying to increase the width of a snippet.
> In LilyPond I can easily do it by changing
an easily do it by changing the line-width and setting
>ragged-right to false.
>I've tried the following for lyluatex but nothing changes:
>
>$ cat width.tex
>\documentclass{article}
>\usepackage{lyluatex}
>\begin{document}
>
>\begin{lilypond}[relative,line-width=300pt,
Hi all
Sorry if I use this list to ask questions about lyluatex, but I hope
that other are interested on the topic.
I'm trying to increase the width of a snippet.
In LilyPond I can easily do it by changing the line-width and setting
ragged-right to false.
I've tried the following
Hello LilyPonders
I want to reduce the distance between the tocItem text and its page
number while keeping the list *centered on the page*.
I tried the following but the list is left-aligned:
\version "2.19.29"
\paper {
tocItemMarkup = \markup \large \column {
\override #'(
Il giorno gio 29 ott 2015 alle 0:38, Thomas Morley
<thomasmorle...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
tocItemMarkup =
\markup
\large
\fill-line { %% <
\override #'(line-width . 80)
\fill-with-pattern #1 #CENTER .
\fromproperty #'toc:text
\fro
gt; \version "2.19.29"
\paper {
tocItemMarkup =
\markup
\large
\fill-line { %% <
\override #'(line-width . 80)
\fill-with-pattern #1 #CENTER .
\fromproperty #'toc:text
\fromproperty #'toc:page
}
}
>
> \markuplist \tab
Hi All,
Please find herewith my last attempt to reach a kind of modern and easy
gregorian notation (see previous discussion here :
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/kind-of-gregorian-moving-noteheads-tc170995.html
and here :
Hi Kevin,
thanks for your advise. I have found that in fact I have to adjust the
line-width file by file. Most of the times when a file has multiple lines
lilypond-book works fine, the problem arises when I have single lines which
lilypond doesn't split in two lines but which are too full
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Jayaratna jayara...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd simply like it to be as large as the textwidth. I have had a good
result
by manually inserting a slightly shorter line-width (2mm less than the
textwidth) in the paper block.
There is currently no way to fix the width
2015-01-23 10:47 GMT+01:00 Jayaratna jayara...@gmail.com:
\documentclass[a4paper]{article}
\begin{document}
Dummy text, dummy text...
\noindent \lilypondfile{exemple01.ly}
\end{document}
I think that the indent should be an option of \lilypondfile, as explained
in the doc:
in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Line-width-and-Lilypond-book-tp170880.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
result. I'm more worried about the right margin than
about the indent, though.
A
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Line-width-and-Lilypond-book-tp170880p170890.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
2015-01-23 14:17 GMT+01:00 Jayaratna jayara...@gmail.com:
give exactly the same result. I'm more worried about the right margin than
about the indent, though.
how do you want it to look like?
perhaps:
\noindent
Dummy text, dummy text...
???
see attached pdf
book.pdf
Description: Adobe
I'd simply like it to be as large as the textwidth. I have had a good result
by manually inserting a slightly shorter line-width (2mm less than the
textwidth) in the paper block.
A
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Line-width-and-Lilypond-book
Thanks to everyone who responded to my Line width question, and
especially to Janek Warchol and Robin Bannister who provided working
solutions. Robin's is: \stopStaff s16*25 placed just after the last
line inside each Voice in my application with ragged-last = ##f .
Charlie
Am 14.07.2014 13:01, schrieb Charles Marshall:
Thanks to everyone who responded to my Line width question, and
especially to Janek Warchol and Robin Bannister who provided working
solutions. Robin's is: \stopStaff s16*25 placed just after the last
line inside each Voice in my application
Charles Marshall wrote:
How can the length of a ragged last line be adjusted? With
ragged-last-line = ##t , the line is too short to look good; with = ##f
, it's right-justified and too long.
Quick and nasty: at the end, append (in any voice)
\stopStaff s16*40
and adjust the 40 to suit.
How can the length of a ragged last line be adjusted? With
ragged-last-line = ##t , the line is too short to look good; with = ##f
, it's right-justified and too long.
The answer must be in the documentation, but I have not been able to
speak the magic Google incantation to make it appear.
incantation to make it appear.
There's the line-width property:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/line-length
Although I don't know how or if it can be made to affect only the last line,
so you may have to look around in that section:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation
- Original Message -
From: Charles Marshall marsh...@potsdam.edu
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2014 2:22 PM
Subject: line width
How can the length of a ragged last line be adjusted? With
ragged-last-line = ##t , the line is too short to look good; with = ##f
On 12/07/14 14:22, Charles Marshall wrote:
How can the length of a ragged last line be adjusted? With
ragged-last-line = ##t , the line is too short to look good; with =
##f , it's right-justified and too long.
The answer must be in the documentation, but I have not been able to
speak the
Google: I use the following to get all the notation and tutorials:
site:lilypond.org/doc/v2.18 search-term
Knute Snortum
(via Gmail)
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 7:08 AM, James pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/07/14 14:22, Charles Marshall wrote:
How can the length of a ragged last line be
2014-07-12 15:22 GMT+02:00 Charles Marshall marsh...@potsdam.edu:
How can the length of a ragged last line be adjusted? With ragged-last-line
= ##t , the line is too short to look good; with = ##f , it's
right-justified and too long.
It's not possible to set the width of just one system.
Hi all,
It's not possible to set the width of just one system.
Not even by overriding NonMusicalPaperColumn.line-break-system-details?
Kieren.
___
Kieren MacMillan, composer
www: http://www.kierenmacmillan.info
email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info
Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca writes:
Hi all,
It's not possible to set the width of just one system.
Not even by overriding NonMusicalPaperColumn.line-break-system-details?
That sounds like a trick question. Mind you, I don't actually know the
answer myself.
And I'll pass
2014-07-12 20:57 GMT+02:00 Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca:
Hi all,
It's not possible to set the width of just one system.
Not even by overriding NonMusicalPaperColumn.line-break-system-details?
Hmm. Maybe, but i don't know anything about this - too advanced magic :)
On 12. Juli 2014 21:38:26 MESZ, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com
wrote:
2014-07-12 20:57 GMT+02:00 Kieren MacMillan
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca:
Hi all,
It's not possible to set the width of just one system.
Not even by overriding
NonMusicalPaperColumn.line-break-system-details?
I have just started using
\override #'(line-width . n)
for text markup, and I want the value n to be chosen so as to work out
as the distance between the margins of the paper I'm printing on. As it
is it is in staff spacing units which is inconvenient (I am writing the
critical commentary
Richard Shann wrote
I have just started using
\override #'(line-width . n)
for text markup, and I want the value n to be chosen so as to work out
as the distance between the margins of the paper I'm printing on. As it
is it is in staff spacing units which is inconvenient (I am writing
Richard Shann richard.sh...@virgin.net writes:
I have just started using
\override #'(line-width . n)
for text markup, and I want the value n to be chosen so as to work out
as the distance between the margins of the paper I'm printing on.
Uh, that's the default, isn't it?
--
David
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 16:58 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Richard Shann richard.sh...@virgin.net writes:
I have just started using
\override #'(line-width . n)
for text markup, and I want the value n to be chosen so as to work out
as the distance between the margins of the paper I'm
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 07:49 -0700, Eluze wrote:
Richard Shann wrote
I have just started using
\override #'(line-width . n)
for text markup, and I want the value n to be chosen so as to work out
as the distance between the margins of the paper I'm printing
Hallo Reinhold,
Changing the value of line-width (which according to the documentation sets
the width of music systems), I noticed that the copyright notice changed
position too. See the example in the attachment: it left-aligns with the
staves.
Actually, what you are observing
Dear all,
Changing the value of line-width (which according to the documentation sets the
width of music systems), I noticed that the copyright notice changed position
too. See the example in the attachment: it left-aligns with the staves.
Is there a way to keep the copyright notice centred
Am Sonntag, 20. Februar 2011, um 21:50:53 schrieb Ivo Bouwmans:
Dear all,
Changing the value of line-width (which according to the documentation sets
the width of music systems), I noticed that the copyright notice changed
position too. See the example in the attachment: it left-aligns
Mark Polesky wrote Saturday, August 08, 2009 6:30 PM
Kieren MacMillan wrote:
p.s. Valentin (and/or other Doc-tors): Shouldn't we mention in
this section that
ragged-right is true for single-system scores? If not, where is
this default
mentioned?
If you look up ragged-right in the NR
Hello!
I am writing some examples and try to make the systems wider, so that I
can write many dynamic sings between the notes. I set the width in
\paper{
indent=0\mm
line-width= 200\mm
oddFooterMarkup=##f
oddHeaderMarkup=##f
bookTitleMarkup = ##f
Hi Alexandros,
but from a point (somewhere after 70\mm) the width remains the same.
What do I do wrong?
If you only have one line of music, Lilypond does not stretch the
system by default — to change the behaviour, play around with
ragged-right = ##f
ragged-last = ##f
See
On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 13:17 -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
If you only have one line of music, Lilypond does not stretch the system by
default — to change the behaviour, play around with
ragged-right = ##f
ragged-last = ##f
See
Kieren MacMillan wrote:
p.s. Valentin (and/or other Doc-tors): Shouldn't we mention in this section
that
ragged-right is true for single-system scores? If not, where is this default
mentioned?
If you look up ragged-right in the NR index
Hi everyone,
I am trying to adjust the line width in a lilypond-book example, but
whatever I try, it always look like a ragged right style. What I want is
to stretch the line, in order to the chords places more distant one from
each other.
I searched in earlier messages and someone named Morton
2009/7/22 Hugo Leonardo Ribeiro hugole...@gmail.com:
Hi everyone,
I am trying to adjust the line width in a lilypond-book example, but
whatever I try, it always look like a ragged right style. What I want is
to stretch the line, in order to the chords places more distant one from
each other
To handle this problem on my own files, I make sure to use false
ragged-right setting inside the included lilypond file.
Jon
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Hugo Leonardo Ribeiro
hugole...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi everyone,
I am trying to adjust the line width in a lilypond-book example
On 7/22/09 8:11 AM, Hugo Leonardo Ribeiro hugole...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
I am trying to adjust the line width in a lilypond-book example, but
whatever I try, it always look like a ragged right style. What I want is
to stretch the line, in order to the chords places more distant
Thanks, Kieran. That fixed it.
-David.
- Original Message
From: Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca
To: David Boothe dmboo...@yahoo.com
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 11:02:44 PM
Subject: Re: Can't Change Line Width
Hi David,
I have
Hi,
In 2.12 single line scores are by default short. To have single line scores
extend to the full line width, add ragged-right = ##f to the paper block.
( You *can* set line-width etc. in the \paper { } block, not the \layout
block. )
best regards,
Wilbert Berendsen
--
Frescobaldi
Lilypond to 2.12 (on Windows). Now the width of the line
is less than half the width of the page, causing the layout to be crowded,
horizontally. It readable, but not easily.
So I added this line to the layout block:
line-width = #150
using various values for the number. Nothing changes. I
Hi David,
I have a template that I use for setting the weekly Psalm antiphons
- a single line melody with lyrics on letter size paper in
landscape mode. It has always worked fine.
Recently I upgraded Lilypond to 2.12 (on Windows). Now the width
of the line is less than half the width of
What is the relationship between the digital size of the line-width
and staff height (in Lilypond specs, in the .ps file, and in the .pdf
file) and the printed output? Is it true and invariant?
If I specify that the line-width = 178 mm, is it truly 178 mm?
If I specify a staff height (#(set
Reilly reilly at together.net writes:
I am now preparing a major orchestral score and parts and sending the
.pdf files electronically to a print shop. I will format the musical
score for an 8.5 x 11 in original so that the print shop will enlarge
the score perfectly to 11x14 inches and
What is the relationship between the digital size of the line-width
and staff height (in Lilypond specs, in the .ps file, and in the .pdf
file) and the printed output? Is it true and invariant?
Depends on your printer and it might call for minor adjustments.
But it should be 1:1. Print out
Hello.
According to the 2.11 docs (8.1.9), I should be able to change the line width in
\markuplines using \override #'(line-width . X)
but it doesn't seem to work.
example:
http://www.tcgalaska.com/kliros/ly/esauWood.ly
Is it a bug?
--
Monk Panteleimon
Hermitage of the Holy Cross
Wayne
I get this warning:
lilypond-book: warning: deprecated ly-option used: line-width=9cm
what is to be used instead?
I'm using separate files for a latex project so lilypond-book can not
get the info she needs about the paper size from the file
Mats == Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mats With lilypond-book, you can easily override the line width
Mats using
Mats \begin[line-width=10\cm]{lilypond}
Mats ...
Mats \end{lilypond}
Yes, but if I have a file with 21 songs of four parts each, that means
I have
I tried a bunch of variations on the -d option, and haven't found one
that works yet:
$ lilypond -dline-width=\3\in\ essex-cantus.ly
GNU LilyPond 2.9.23
warning: no such internal option: line-width
And the lilypond process continues, but doesn't set the line width to
3 inches.
--
Laura
:
$ lilypond -dline-width=\3\in\ essex-cantus.ly
GNU LilyPond 2.9.23
warning: no such internal option: line-width
And the lilypond process continues, but doesn't set the line width to
3 inches.
--
Laura (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] , http://www.laymusic.org/ )
(617) 661-8097 fax: (501) 641-5011
233
Mats == Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mats Run lilypond -dhelp to see a full list of the options that
Mats can be set this way. (Run lilypond --help or lilypond -h to
Mats find out about the -dhelp option).
Would it be possible to add line-width to that list
With lilypond-book, you can easily override the line width
using
\begin[line-width=10\cm]{lilypond}
...
\end{lilypond}
/Mats
Laura Conrad wrote:
Mats == Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mats Run lilypond -dhelp to see a full list of the options that
Mats can
with Lilypond and it appears that my
line is correct. Copying and pasting the line from other files has also
produced no change in the line width. Anybody?
Walter HOfmeister
___
lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo
no difference. I have checked several files
in the Mutopia folder that is installed with Lilypond and it appears that my
line is correct. Copying and pasting the line from other files has also
produced no change in the line width. Anybody?
Walter HOfmeister
71 matches
Mail list logo
