Hallo,
I often used just r1 instead of R1 in 4/4 and 2/2 time.
Now I thought, it would be good, to use the horizontally centered full-measure
rests. BUT:
I write two voices in one staff. For a while the lower voice plays quite high,
the higher voice rests for some measures.
The r1-rests are
2012/10/19 David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com
to comment #21 at
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2445 . Understand
that this version might cause problems if you're running a batch of
files (which won't happen with the version that's in the review
process.) The
Am 21.10.2012 15:51, schrieb Helge Kruse:
[...]
This measure counter allows a start and a stop. I did not find an
option to start at a specific number. Image you start at rehearsel
mark H, have a multi-measure rest of 16 bars. In the 17th measure you
have some cue notes. It would be nice to
it gives a calm picture when the empty space
between the staves is used. The attached picture shows this starting at
Allegretto. Further it would be good to have the number of multi-measure
rests between the staves.
How can I write _one_ multi measure rest number in piano staff between
it would be good to have the number of
multi-measure rests between the staves.
How can I write _one_ multi measure rest number in piano staff between
the staff lines?
How can I add a counter starting at a measure n and counting to measure
n+x? This should not be the current bar number
I'm currently transcribing parts from music with frequently changing
meters and segments where a part is resting. The sequence below is
typical.
\time 3/4 R1*3/4 |
\time 3/8 R1*3/8 |
\time 4/4 R1*8/4 | % 2 bars
\time 3/8 R1*3/8 |
Does anyone know how to write a music function
I can't answer your question, but I have two responses to the dilemma.
First, R2. is more compact than R1*3/4, and R1*2 is better than
R1*8/4. Same with R4*5 vs R1*5/4.
Also, if you happen to use Vim -- I keep all my time signatures in a
separate file from the notes. It's then simple to map
Thanks Neil, those are good tips. I'm a long time vim user so
shortcuts are certainly a possibility. OTOH, I've recently found that
JEdit + LilyPondTool makes a real difference in my productivity
compared to vim + some helper scripts I had put together.
I know JEdit has its own Java-based macro
/lilypond-user
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Multi-Measure-Rests%3A-Adding-to-what-gets-printed--tp27288983p27337870.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
rasAK wrote:
I don't have time to look into this, but wanted you to be aware: I went
ahead and used the BarNumberStaff rather than the BarNumberVoice. In trying
to adjust the Y-Offset of the BarNumberVoice, it moves the lyrics down as
well. The BarNumberStaff does not.
Ah, I think I see the
,
Alexander
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Multi-Measure-Rests%3A-Adding-to-what-gets-printed--tp27288983p27348877
/p27319831/Bach_Singet_dem_Herrn_04_choir_I_bassoon_pg_2.pdf
Bach_Singet_dem_Herrn_04_choir_I_bassoon_pg_2.pdf
Alexander Kobel wrote:
rasAK wrote:
In my orchestral parts, I would like Multi-Measure Rests to have both:
(1) an integer representing the number of measures in the current MMR
rasAK wrote:
Alexander,
The only remaining issue is the positioning of the text that results from
your function. It is currently being placed above the number (which is
above the MMR). I tried to adjust some of the Y-offset and Y-extent
numbers, but could only get the text to move up. I
me - stanford wrote:
2) Also, do you think #'outside-staff-priority = #150 is a reasonable
priority setting for the MMR Text? I'm not sure what most objects'
settings are for this property. I was just trying to get it to win over
the Lyrics setting.
Oh, and just a few words about this
the
MMR). Something like the following:
6
|-|
( 121 - 126 )
Thoughts?
Thanks,
Randy
Alexander Kobel wrote:
rasAK wrote:
In my orchestral parts, I would like Multi-Measure Rests to have both:
(1) an integer representing the number of measures in the current MMR
In my orchestral parts, I would like Multi-Measure Rests to have both:
(1) an integer representing the number of measures in the current MMR,
centered above (default behavior)
(2) a second text indicating which measures are included in the given MMR,
in parentheses and centered BELOW the MMR.
(1
rasAK wrote:
In my orchestral parts, I would like Multi-Measure Rests to have both:
(1) an integer representing the number of measures in the current MMR,
centered above (default behavior)
(2) a second text indicating which measures are included in the given MMR,
in parentheses and centered
Alexander,
Thanks so much. I'll take a look at your suggestion in detail.
Randy
rasAK wrote:
In my orchestral parts, I would like Multi-Measure Rests to have both:
(1) an integer representing the number of measures in the current MMR,
centered above (default behavior)
(2) a second
. But if the instrument has notes, these
are spaced out unacceptably. See below. I can't use textLengthOn and Off
in the 'tempos' voice, because some instruments will be playing at a
particular point, while others will not be.
Is there some way to have \textLengthOn apply only to multi-measure rests
Hi,
When several voices are combined on one staff with \partcombine,
multi-measure rests in the first voice are only printed in the first
measure of their span if voiceTwo contains skips. The following measures
are empty.
Am I doing something wrong or is this a bug?
When voiceTwo contains rests
the first spacer note.
/Mats
Trevor Daniels wrote:
In the following example of writing a typical part
containing multi-measure rests, the annotation of the rests
in 2.11.34 collides if more notes are added to fill the line
(to simulate this, I've added ragged-right = ##t). This
seems
To me it seems a bug that you get collisions in your first example.
The second example can easily be modified to get what you want.
Just add \fatText before the first spacer note.
/Mats
Trevor Daniels wrote:
In the following example of writing a typical part
containing multi-measure rests
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Added this to the doco:
If you want to have a text on the left end of a multi-measure rest,
attach the text to a zero-length skip note, i.e.
@example
s1*0^Allegro
R1*4
@end example
This makes the multimeasure excessively wide
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This makes the multimeasure excessively wide and actually steals space
from a following MM rest.
Ah, that seems to be a bug. I fixed it partially in 2.0 CVS.
For the moment, you might want to put the allegro atop the 72 \mark.
Excellent!
to multi-measure rests now?
Is there a better way?
Cheers (in advance),
Ralph
--
Our communications with you matter to us. This e-mail and any attachments
are confidential and are sent on the basis of our copyright, e-mail and
security policy which can be inspected by visiting
http
of attaching text to multi-measure rests now?
Is there a better way?
The answer should be R1*2^\markup{ Allegro } but the markup hides the
measure count. I am waiting for a comment on that problem.
Paul Scott
___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED
1.8.2 now.
What's the recommended way of attaching text to multi-measure rests now?
Is there a better way?
The answer should be R1*2^\markup{ Allegro } but the markup hides the
measure count. I am waiting for a comment on that problem.
Added this to the doco:
If you want to have a text
Hi,
This is exactly the issue that I am having!
Same goes for:
R1*2_\markup{ Allegro }
..I guess.
Regards,
Ralph
-Original Message-
From: Paul Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 September 2003 10:09
To: Ralph Little
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Multi-measure rests
That's funky!
Thanks, I'll give it a try!
Ralph
-Original Message-
From: Han-Wen Nienhuys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 September 2003 10:28
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Ralph Little; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Multi-measure rests again again
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ralph
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Added this to the doco:
If you want to have a text on the left end of a multi-measure rest,
attach the text to a zero-length skip note, i.e.
@example
s1*0^Allegro
R1*4
@end example
This makes the multimeasure excessively wide and actually steals space
from a
Paul Scott wrote:
(Lily 1.8.1 on Debian unstable)
This makes the multimeasure excessively wide and actually steals space
from a following MM rest.
Paul
\score {
\property Score.skipBars = ##t
\context Staff =
How to I attach text markup to long multi-measure rests?
I've looked at multi-measure-rest-text.ly, but it only contains examples
for *single-measure* multi-measure rests. I want to do something like
this:
\property Score.skipBars = ##t
R2.*20_Tacet
Perhaps something like
On Sat, 29 Mar 2003 13:13:17 -0700 (MST)
John Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How to I attach text markup to long multi-measure rests?
You do a quick search in the mailist archives, at:
http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/
and find this thread:
http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html
s_Allegro
So I wonder why the effort to add textscripts to multi-measures rests if
they only work with single-measure multi-measure rests, and the R s
workaround already provides more (although somewhat flawed) funtionality?
~ John Williams
On Sat, 29 Mar 2003, Graham Percival wrote:
On Sat, 29
a question about the best way to
approach
a problem. I am typesetting some music and the time signature is 4/2. I
would like to modify the behaviour of multi-measure rests to use a breve
rest to represent 1 measure instead of a whole rest since the duration of
1 measure is a breve. I have
The bad news: you have hit a bug, Lilypond doesn't understand that
the multi-measure rests need a certain minimal width.
The good news: as soon as you add a couple of more bars of music,
Lilypond will break the music into several lines and you won't
suffer from the problem any more
The manual gives something like this for multi-measure rests. It works
if I don't try the 5 bar rest before '\mark 1'. With that rest
included I get everything on one line. I tried various combinations of
turning Score.skipBars on and off with no success.
Any ideas?
TIA,
Paul Scott
It doesn't seem to be possible to attach articulations to multi-measure
rests.
Is this by design? Although it is possible to work around this by using
skips.
\score {
\notes {
\time 3/4
R2.^Allegro | R2. s^Allegro | r2.^Allegro
I tried to increase the minimum length of multi-measure
rests, but the minimum-length property doesn't work as
I expected. How to do it? Bug?
Example:
\score{\notes\relative c'{
c1 R1*12 c1 }
\paper{
linewidth = -1.
\translator{
\ScoreContext
skipBars = ##t
% Why doesn't
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I tried to increase the minimum length of multi-measure
rests, but the minimum-length property doesn't work as
I expected. How to do it? Bug?
See Multi_measure_rest::set_spacing_rods ().
Hmm, especially the first line
The only problem with your attempt it that you changed the
padding of text scripts, but not of the multi-measure rests or
rehearsal marks that you wanted to affect.
Try
\property Staff.MultiMeasureRest \override #'padding = #3
or
\property Staff.MultiMeasureRest \override #'padding = #3
101 - 141 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
