Re: non adjacent glissando: state of the art?

2007-04-05 Thread Andrea Valle
Another good idea, Victor... thanks! Best -a- On 5 Apr 2007, at 00:01, v!ctor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have to say that I've been assuming proportional notation all the time since I use it always (8.4.3 in manual). -- Andrea Valle

Re: non adjacent glissando: state of the art?

2007-04-04 Thread v!ctor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Andrea, The example I gave is the simplest I could think of and, since the middle note falls exactly in between the other two, you don't have to consider the horizontal spacing. In the general case you definitely have to consider it. I have to say that I've been assuming proportional

Re: non adjacent glissando: state of the art?

2007-04-02 Thread v!ctor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Andrea, This may be possible, but I'm affraid I'm pretty much a Scheme illiterate myself. I'd suggest you doing it in python (which is a language you seem to know well). This is what i do. best, Victor. On 4/1/07, Andrea Valle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks a lot Victor, I'm

Re: non adjacent glissando: state of the art?

2007-03-30 Thread v!ctor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Trevor, Andrea, all, Back when I suggested the inclusion of this feature in Lilypond Han-Wen gave me a brief explanation of why this was complicated to implement. Didn't fully understand, but in general this seems to require a major rewrite of the way glissandi (and probably line spanners

Re: non adjacent glissando: state of the art?

2007-03-30 Thread Trevor Bača
On 3/30/07, v!ctor [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Trevor, Andrea, all, Back when I suggested the inclusion of this feature in Lilypond Han-Wen gave me a brief explanation of why this was complicated to implement. Didn't fully understand, but in general this seems to

Re: non adjacent glissando: state of the art?

2007-03-29 Thread Trevor Bača
On 3/29/07, Andrea Valle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Mats. here's the mail starting the thread I'm referring to, and pointing to a previous and related one: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2006-08/msg00271.html Best -a- On 29 Mar 2007, at 09:16, Mats Bengtsson wrote:

Re: non adjacent glissando: state of the art?

2007-03-29 Thread Mats Bengtsson
It would be much easier to realize exactly what you want to achieve if you included an example of the LilyPond code you use today (or at least provide an exact reference to some of the earlier emails you mention). /Mats Andrea Valle wrote: Hi to all, I'm experimenting what seems to be a

Re: non adjacent glissando: state of the art?

2007-03-29 Thread Andrea Valle
Thanks Mats. here's the mail starting the thread I'm referring to, and pointing to a previous and related one: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2006-08/msg00271.html Best -a- On 29 Mar 2007, at 09:16, Mats Bengtsson wrote: It would be much easier to realize exactly what

Re: non adjacent glissando: state of the art?

2007-03-29 Thread José Luis Cruz
I would like to take advantage of Andrea's request, to say that i would want to collaborate with the sponsoring if this could be related with a feature I want for glissandos. I'd want to be able to have glissando chords, with a glissando line between every note of the chord I specify (pretty

non adjacent glissando: state of the art?

2007-03-28 Thread Andrea Valle
Hi to all, I'm experimenting what seems to be a common problem. I have to use glissandos connecting non adjacent notes, e.g. g4~g16 a8. . The common notation, and also the one suggested by Stone (p. 21), is to indicate the rhythm without noteheads. So, I'd like to have a straight line