bar lines shift when using proportional notation

Hi LilyPonders, I would like to notate a piece proportionally. To do this, I have created (with a little help) a markup command that I can use to place time signatures above the bar lines. But as soon as I do this, they move to the left, whereas the bar lines are in the right place if I don't

Re: barline in proportional notation disappear

> Thank you sooo much for your answer! > That’s amazing, it’s really clear and I’ll take a deep look at it! > What is MusicSE? I cannot find anything on google. Can u point me out to the > reference u said? > Cheers! As Jean said it is the music stackexchange thing. You’ve accidently replied

Re: barline in proportional notation disappear

Hello, this was also posted on MusicSE, for reference here my reply: You are not getting some barlines as s1^"text" \bar "!" will insert the bar line after the skip, which is in your case in a random position later. Rather do \bar "!" s1^"text" to have the bar line at the exact

barline in proportional notation disappear

Hello, A while back, I reached out to this mailing list seeking assistance in building a Csound to LilyPond converter. What I had in mind was a tool to enhance the readability and presentation of Csound scores using LilyPond. For context, the Csound score format I'm working with is relatively

Re: Proportional notation not working as expected.

On Sun, 2019-09-15 at 10:51 +1000, Andrew Bernard wrote: > engrave. I disagree with one of his major concepts, which is that > the  > bars should be 3.0 cm wide and represent one second of music. He's  > really insistent on this. Personally I don't believe this helps the  > musicians at all, and

Re: Proportional notation not working as expected.

; really insistent on this. Personally I don't believe this helps the > musicians at all, and music is not graph paper as far as I am concerned, > speaking as a player. > > I have tried for years to make equal, fixed width bars with proportional > notation in Lilypond. With his music changing

Re: Proportional notation not working as expected.

Hi Andrew, > With his music changing time signature sometimes every bar, I am utterly > unable to achieve what he wants. The requirement is simple - fixed width bars > of a specified size. Does the fixed width include all prefatory material? e.g., if a measure included a TimeSignature and a

Re: Proportional notation not working as expected.

the musicians at all, and music is not graph paper as far as I am concerned, speaking as a player. I have tried for years to make equal, fixed width bars with proportional notation in Lilypond. With his music changing time signature sometimes every bar, I am utterly unable to achieve what he wants

Re: Proportional notation not working as expected.

ure width using proportional spacing.  And > it's not working as expected. > > I created a kind of "into/out of" proportional notation wrapper: > > ePUT  = > #(define-music-function >  (parser location num music) >  (number? ly:music?) > #{ > \set Score.prop

Proportional notation not working as expected.

Dear list, I'm trying to control measure width using proportional spacing.  And it's not working as expected. I created a kind of "into/out of" proportional notation wrapper: ePUT  = #(define-music-function  (parser location num music)  (number? ly:music

Re: Cross staff stem spacing with proportional notation

On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:41 AM, David Nalesnik wrote: > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:19 AM, David Nalesnik > wrote: >> Hi again, >> >> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:15 AM, David Kastrup wrote: >>> David Nalesnik

Re: Cross staff stem spacing with proportional notation

On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:19 AM, David Nalesnik wrote: > Hi again, > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:15 AM, David Kastrup wrote: >> David Nalesnik writes: >> >>> Oh, there's some extra code. I decided to use a flag to avoid >>>

Re: Cross staff stem spacing with proportional notation

Hi again, On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:15 AM, David Kastrup wrote: > David Nalesnik writes: > >> Oh, there's some extra code. I decided to use a flag to avoid >> redundant calculations, but didn't follow through. The music function >> should read >> >>

Re: Cross staff stem spacing with proportional notation

David Nalesnik writes: > Oh, there's some extra code. I decided to use a flag to avoid > redundant calculations, but didn't follow through. The music function > should read > > spaceStemsEvenly = > #(define-music-function (mus) (ly:music?) >#{ > \override

Re: Cross staff stem spacing with proportional notation

t;> not produce a reliable answer as far as I can see. >> >> When using proportional notation with cross staff beamed groups, it looks >> vastly better if the stems are evenly spaced, but proportional notation >> messes this up, and only in the cross staff situation. >>

Re: Cross staff stem spacing with proportional notation

Hi Andrew, On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 3:11 AM, Andrew Bernard <andrew.bern...@gmail.com> wrote: > This issue has dogged me for a long time, and searching the archives does > not produce a reliable answer as far as I can see. > > When using proportional notation with cross s

Cross staff stem spacing with proportional notation

This issue has dogged me for a long time, and searching the archives does not produce a reliable answer as far as I can see. When using proportional notation with cross staff beamed groups, it looks vastly better if the stems are evenly spaced, but proportional notation messes this up, and only

Re: proportional notation problem

On 22.09.2015 01:12, Neil Thornock wrote: Thanks Simon. Sample code: \transpose c c' { << { 16 q q q q q q q q q q q \times 2/3 { q8 q q } } \\ { \times 2/3 { des'4 des'8 } \times 2/3 { b8\rest 8 q } \times 2/3 { q q q } q q } >> } Simple solution: Use two

Re: proportional notation problem

Am 22.09.2015 um 00:51 schrieb Neil Thornock: > See the two attached images for my problem spot. > > I'd like something more like the Finale output, but no matter what > combination of proportional notation options I try, it won't budge. It > seems like the ledger lines are too g

Re: proportional notation problem

<simon.albre...@mail.de> wrote: > On 22.09.2015 00:51, Neil Thornock wrote: > >> See the two attached images for my problem spot. >> >> I'd like something more like the Finale output, but no matter what >> combination of proportional notation options I try, it w

Re: proportional notation problem

and the accidentals of the note group in question. I tried using proportional notation on the example, but for me, it never really gets these issues right, no matter what duration you choose for the moment. Lilypond is so skilful at avoiding collisions that it always seems difficult to get

Re: proportional notation problem

On 22.09.2015 00:51, Neil Thornock wrote: See the two attached images for my problem spot. I'd like something more like the Finale output, but no matter what combination of proportional notation options I try, it won't budge. It seems like the ledger lines are too greedy. Also, I have

proportional notation problem

See the two attached images for my problem spot. I'd like something more like the Finale output, but no matter what combination of proportional notation options I try, it won't budge. It seems like the ledger lines are too greedy. Also, I have no idea how to get the flats in the lower voice

Re: proportional notation problem

:07 PM, Simon Albrecht <simon.albre...@mail.de> > wrote: > >> On 22.09.2015 00:51, Neil Thornock wrote: >> >>> See the two attached images for my problem spot. >>> >>> I'd like something more like the Finale output, but no matter what >>>

Re: proportional notation problem

Am 22.09.2015 um 01:12 schrieb Neil Thornock: > Thanks Simon. Sample code: > > \transpose c c' { << { > 16 q q q q q q q q q q q \times 2/3 { q8 q q } > } \\ { > \times 2/3 { des'4 des'8 } \times 2/3 { b8\rest 8 q } > \times 2/3 { q q q } q q > } >> } > \override

Re: proportional notation from MIDI file

Peter: Thanks for your reaction. I could not open the miditoly.pl file. You don't open it, save it somewhere and then run it from the command line (to run it you need a perl interpreter). but that is no problem. At first I will try the conversion with LilyPond. If that doesn't work (good

proportional notation from MIDI file

Hello Karl, Thanks for your reaction. I could not open the miditoly.pl file. but that is no problem. At first I will try the conversion with LilyPond. If that doesn't work (good enough) I'll try your program and ask you again. Peter ___ lilypond-user

Re: proportional notation from MIDI file

(spacial) notated score with LilyPond? In other words: can LilyPond calculate the right spaces between the notes based on timing in a MIDI file? You have to convert the MIDI to a lilypond file first, then you can read this page: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/proportional

Re: proportional notation from MIDI file

file? You have to convert the MIDI to a lilypond file first, then you can read this page: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/proportional-notation ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman

proportional notation from MIDI file

Hi, Does anyone know if it is possible to convert a MIDI file to an proportional (spacial) notated score with LilyPond? In other words: can LilyPond calculate the right spaces between the notes based on timing in a MIDI file? I have no experience with LilyPond yet, and wonder if it is

Re: proportional notation from MIDI file

program is more to the experimental variety. If you need help with the conversion, feel free to ask for more help. then you can read this page: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/proportional-notation Regards, /Karl Hammar

Re: Proportional notation

will give it a try and see how it goes. Thanks a lot for your reply, take care! Gilberto -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Proportional-notation-tp170481p170484.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com

Re: Proportional notation

Am 14.01.2015 um 21:35 schrieb Gilberto Agostinho: Hello LilyPonders, I composed my first piece in proportional notation using a constant measurement of 1 second per bar (thus, each bar must always have the same length throughout the whole score). The notes consist of noteheads only, no flags

Proportional notation

Hello LilyPonders, I composed my first piece in proportional notation using a constant measurement of 1 second per bar (thus, each bar must always have the same length throughout the whole score). The notes consist of noteheads only, no flags, no beams, no stems, so the only reference

Re: Proportional notation

, Gilberto -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Proportional-notation-tp170481p170489.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org

Re: Proportional notation

://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Proportional-notation-tp170481p170484.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Proportional-Notation Durations

PMA wrote: Thomas Morley wrote: 2014-07-09 0:24 GMT+02:00 PMApeterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu: Hi List. I'm looking for a LilyPond way to specify note duration in a Proportional Notation context using exactly _one_ stemless notehead type. Perhaps the first option is a mid-level horizontal line

Re: Proportional-Notation Durations

On Jul 24, 2014, at 9:08 PM, PMA peterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu wrote: PMA wrote: Thomas Morley wrote: 2014-07-09 0:24 GMT+02:00 PMApeterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu: Hi List. I'm looking for a LilyPond way to specify note duration in a Proportional Notation context using exactly _one_ stemless

Re: Proportional-Notation Durations

Mike Solomon wrote: On Jul 24, 2014, at 9:08 PM, PMApeterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu wrote: PMA wrote: Thomas Morley wrote: 2014-07-09 0:24 GMT+02:00 PMApeterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu: Hi List. I'm looking for a LilyPond way to specify note duration in a Proportional Notation context using

Re: Proportional-Notation Durations

Thomas Morley wrote: 2014-07-09 0:24 GMT+02:00 PMApeterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu: Hi List. I'm looking for a LilyPond way to specify note duration in a Proportional Notation context using exactly _one_ stemless notehead type. Perhaps the first option is a mid-level horizontal line extending

Re: Proportional-Notation Durations

2014-07-09 0:24 GMT+02:00 PMA peterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu: Hi List. I'm looking for a LilyPond way to specify note duration in a Proportional Notation context using exactly _one_ stemless notehead type. Perhaps the first option is a mid-level horizontal line extending distance-X from

Proportional-Notation Durations

Hi List. I'm looking for a LilyPond way to specify note duration in a Proportional Notation context using exactly _one_ stemless notehead type. Perhaps the first option is a mid-level horizontal line extending distance-X from the notehead. (The space following would indicate silence.) But I

Re: allowing any horizontal collision in proportional notation

, Michael Winter mwin...@unboundedpress.orgwrote: Dear All, It seems that with proportional notation even strict spanning does not allow collisions of notehead and accidentals. Is it possible to allow any collision such that the resolution and accuracy are exact no matter what? Or maybe I am

Re: allowing any horizontal collision in proportional notation

lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: allowing any horizontal collision in proportional notation Message-ID: candx-fdbr63cb_ejpmhnz3xzjs-_vaf8od-byzcdibd_osm...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Hi Michael, Do you still want legible accidentals

allowing any horizontal collision in proportional notation

Dear All, It seems that with proportional notation even strict spanning does not allow collisions of notehead and accidentals. Is it possible to allow any collision such that the resolution and accuracy are exact no matter what? Or maybe I am missing something Many thanks in advance

allowing any horizontal collision in proportional notation

Dear All, It seems that with proportional notation even strict spanning does not allow collisions of notehead and accidentals. Is it possible to allow any collision such that the resolution and accuracy are exact no matter what? Or maybe I am missing something Many thanks in advance

Re: flatten ties ~ proportional notation.

Rob Canning wrote: i was trying to do it with sed with a line like this: sed 's/~/\\glissando/' header-inserted ties-fixed; but ran into trouble with all the ^ sybols and so on - I tried this myself and it seems to work fine once add the 'g' flag: 's/~/\\glissando/g' However, horizontal

Re: flatten ties ~ proportional notation.

Brett Duncan wrote: Rob Canning wrote: i was trying to do it with sed with a line like this: sed 's/~/\\glissando/' header-inserted ties-fixed; but ran into trouble with all the ^ sybols and so on - I tried this myself and it seems to work fine once add the 'g' flag: 's/~/\\glissando/g'

Re: flatten ties ~ proportional notation.

2008/12/21 Rob Canning robcann...@eircom.net: Brett Duncan wrote: Rob Canning wrote: i was trying to do it with sed with a line like this: sed 's/~/\\glissando/' header-inserted ties-fixed; but ran into trouble with all the ^ sybols and so on - I tried this myself and it seems to work

Re: flatten ties ~ proportional notation.

This is the easiest way to do it, assuming you don't have any tied chords: \override TieColumn #'tie-configuration = #(lambda (grob) (let* ((notehead (ly:grob-parent grob X)) (y-off (* 2 (ly:grob-property notehead 'Y-offset (list (cons y-off 0 thanks

Re: flatten ties ~ proportional notation.

2008/12/19 Rob Canning robcann...@eircom.net: on its own this works fine but if i combine it with somthing else it fails - not sure what i am doing wrong here... Hmm, it doesn't work with broken ties, since the left-broken part is attached to a paper column rather than a notehead (you can't

flatten ties ~ proportional notation.

hello, i would like to replace ties between notes with a line connecting note heads. i'm not sure how to go about this. should i try and flatten the curve of the tie, make it slightly thicker and change its relative possition to the notehead or is there a better way. is there some sort of

Re: flatten ties ~ proportional notation.

Hi Rob, 2008/12/18 Rob Canning robcann...@eircom.net: hello, i would like to replace ties between notes with a line connecting note heads. i'm not sure how to go about this. should i try and flatten the curve of the tie, make it slightly thicker and change its relative possition to the

Re: flatten ties ~ proportional notation.

Neil Puttock wrote: Hi Rob, hi thanks for the response, 2008/12/18 Rob Canning robcann...@eircom.net: hello, i would like to replace ties between notes with a line connecting note heads. i'm not sure how to go about this. should i try and flatten the curve of the tie, make it slightly

Re: flatten ties ~ proportional notation.

Neil Puttock wrote: Hi Rob, hi thanks for the response, 2008/12/18 Rob Canning robcann...@eircom.net: hello, i would like to replace ties between notes with a line connecting note heads. i'm not sure how to go about this. should i try and flatten the curve of the tie, make it slightly

Re: flatten ties ~ proportional notation.

2008/12/18 Rob Canning i...@robcanning.info: strange this doesnt seem to make any difference here - no doubt i have it in the wrong place in the code or some such - i tried it in a few places but no luck Apart from my useless typing, if it still doesn't work you must be using a version before

Re: flatten ties ~ proportional notation.

ok so i have flattened the tie with: \override Tie #'details #'height-limit = #0 next i want to make sure all the ties start emerging from the actual note so there is no vertical offset i looked here for other tweekables: /usr/local/lilypond/usr/share/lilypond/current/scm/define-grobs.scm

Re: flatten ties ~ proportional notation.

Hi Rob, 2008/12/18 Rob Canning robcann...@eircom.net: ok so i have flattened the tie with: \override Tie #'details #'height-limit = #0 next i want to make sure all the ties start emerging from the actual note so there is no vertical offset i looked here for other tweekables:

Re: programming error: when \break used before \grace or after \afterGrace in combination with proportional notation

on line breaks and having strict-note-spacing in proportional notation. So the following compiles correctly: %% START \version 2.11.64 \include english.ly \layout{ \context{ \Score proportionalNotationDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 32) \override

Re: programming error: when \break used before \grace or after \afterGrace in combination with proportional notation

between being able to have grace (or afterGrace) notes on line breaks and having strict-note-spacing in proportional notation. So the following compiles correctly: %% START \version 2.11.64 \include english.ly \layout{ \context{ \Score

Re: programming error: when \break used before \grace or after \afterGrace in combination with proportional notation

the errors. I searched the mailing lists for solutions to this, but I found no posts of this specific problem, so I guess this is new. The problem seems to be occur when combining three things: 1. proportional notation: proportionalNotationDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 34

Re: programming error: when \break used before \grace or after \afterGrace in combination with proportional notation

of this specific problem, so I guess this is new. The problem seems to be occur when combining three things: 1. proportional notation: proportionalNotationDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 34) \override SpacingSpanner #'strict-note-spacing =##t 2. \grace or \afterGrace notes 3. \break

programming error: when \break used before \grace or after \afterGrace in combination with proportional notation

found no posts of this specific problem, so I guess this is new. The problem seems to be occur when combining three things: 1. proportional notation: proportionalNotationDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 34) \override SpacingSpanner #'strict-note-spacing =##t 2. \grace or \afterGrace notes 3

proportional notation (a la earle brown etc.) was: Re: uniform-stretching

hi, i've just been looking at the threads on proportional notation (time-space notation) and found these: http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-user@gnu.org/msg35955.html http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-user@gnu.org/msg35775.html http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-user@gnu.org/msg26884

Re: proportional notation (a la earle brown etc.) was: Re:uniform-stretching

Rob There is quite a bit on proportional notation in the 2.11 Reference Manual, but you may have missed it as I don't think this section has been indexed yet. See section 4.5.5 Proportional notation. Trevor - Original Message - From: Rob Canning [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: lilypond-user

Proportional notation/spacetime notation

A big problem that several people I know have had with finale and the like is that of implementing time-space notation. The proportional notation setting in lilypond is close to this, but has the problem for people who want to use time-space notation that it only works on a bar-by-bar basis, when

Re: Proportional notation/spacetime notation

On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 4:24 AM, Stephen Lavelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A big problem that several people I know have had with finale and the like is that of implementing time-space notation. The proportional notation setting in lilypond is close to this, but has the problem for people who

After graces play nicely with proportional notation in 2.11.3

{ c'32 [ c'32 c'32 c'32 ] } c'8 c'8 ] c'8 [ c'8 \afterGrace c'8 { c'32 [ c'32 c'32 c'32 ] } c'8 ] c'8 [ c'8 c'8 \afterGrace c'8 ] { c'32 [ c'32 c'32 c'32 ] } } %%% END %%% If you work with the proportional notation package, this is a very cool improvement. -- Trevor Bača [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: proportional notation screws up score

Trevor Bača escreveu: On 12/3/06, Han-Wen Nienhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Trevor Bača escreveu: 2. There is a bug with proportional not dealing with skips correctly. Proportional notation handles notes and rests correctly. But proportional notation freaks out with skips. I noticed

Re: proportional notation screws up score

On 12/3/06, Han-Wen Nienhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Trevor Bača escreveu: 2. There is a bug with proportional not dealing with skips correctly. Proportional notation handles notes and rests correctly. But proportional notation freaks out with skips. I noticed this some time ago but haven't

proportional notation

Hi, trying to convince lilypond to keep the proportional notation correct is very time-consuming (ca. 1/2 hour for one line; sigh!). It is especially hard to figure out, why the second value of the ly:make-moment form sometimes has to get doubled in order to make a bar stretch out 10% more than

proportional notation screws up score

Hi, it seems proportional notation and the spacing is more broken than I ever expected. I'm extremely frustrated (especially after I put so much hope into lilypond) having spent 5 days to enter 12 lines of music and now having lost 4 hours of work trying to space 4 lines of music correctly

Re: proportional notation screws up score

On 12/3/06, Orm Finnendahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, it seems proportional notation and the spacing is more broken than I ever expected. I'm extremely frustrated (especially after I put so much hope into lilypond) having spent 5 days to enter 12 lines of music and now having lost 4 hours

Re: proportional notation screws up score

Trevor Bača escreveu: 2. There is a bug with proportional not dealing with skips correctly. Proportional notation handles notes and rests correctly. But proportional notation freaks out with skips. I noticed this some time ago but haven't really drawn any special attention to the bug because

Re: proportional notation screws up score

Hi Trevor, Han-Wen, thanks a lot for your efforts to help me out and thanks a lot for your ideas and thoughts! Sorry if I sounded desperate. Trevor's post seems to indicate that it might not work out to get everything perfectly aligned (although I was very close for the first three lines before

Re: proportional notation screws up score

On 12/3/06, Han-Wen Nienhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Trevor Bača escreveu: 2. There is a bug with proportional not dealing with skips correctly. Proportional notation handles notes and rests correctly. But proportional notation freaks out with skips. I noticed this some time ago but haven't

Re: proportional notation screws up score

; the \newSpacingSection command is the way around this previous restriction.) I haven't played wtih spacing-increment much, but it seems like spacing-increment = #2 is the basic idea behind proportional notation, right? (Double duration == double spacing.) So, if that assumption is correct, I'm not really sure why

Re: proportional notation screws up score

On 12/3/06, Orm Finnendahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Trevor, Han-Wen, thanks a lot for your efforts to help me out and thanks a lot for your ideas and thoughts! Sorry if I sounded desperate. Trevor's post seems to indicate that it might not work out to get everything perfectly aligned

Re: proportional notation screws up score

Hi Trevor, thanks for the reply. When the piece is done it can be used for documentation. True proportional notation isn't exactly what I need and is far from desirable as the accidentals would always collide with barlines etc. I made much better experiences with shifting or removing extra

Re: changing proportional notation duration in mid-line

for the notice, I'll look into it. Proportional Notation in lilypond is far from what the name suggests: The output often is a mess (measures, which are too short (like 1/8) resulting in the previous measure to stretch out all the way to the right margin and such things...) I'm constantly changing

Re: changing proportional notation duration in mid-line

On 11/6/06, Orm Finnendahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am 06. November 2006, 13:09 Uhr (+0100) schrieb Mats Bengtsson: Just as any other context property, you can set it with \set. Example: \relative c'{ c d e f g f e d \set Score.proportionalNotationDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 64 ) c d

changing proportional notation duration in mid-line

Hi, I would like to change the amount of horizontal space for a specified duration in the middle of a line (reflecting a tempo change) globally (without having to deal with compress music for each staff). Is there a way to override the setting of Score.proportionalNotationDuration on the fly, or

Re: changing proportional notation duration in mid-line

Just as any other context property, you can set it with \set. Example: \relative c'{ c d e f g f e d \set Score.proportionalNotationDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 64 ) c d e f g f e d \unset Score.proportionalNotationDuration c d e f g f e d } /Mats Orm Finnendahl wrote: Hi, I would

Re: changing proportional notation duration in mid-line

Am 06. November 2006, 13:09 Uhr (+0100) schrieb Mats Bengtsson: Just as any other context property, you can set it with \set. Example: \relative c'{ c d e f g f e d \set Score.proportionalNotationDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 64 ) c d e f g f e d \unset

help with uneven proportional notation

Hello, I'm new to lilypond, and apologize if this is a simple question. I've searched the documentation and the online archives, and I can't seem to figure out what the problem is. I have a piece in proportional-time notation, yet some of the notes do not seem to be evenly spaced.

Re: help with uneven proportional notation

I don't understand exactly how the value of proportionalNotationDuration influences the result, but I managed to get nicely spaced notes in your example if I - replaced the note durations c4*105 - c4*105/840, ..., c4*420 - c4*420/840 (I guess you can figure out why I choose 840). - used