scripts-caesura - glyph not quite right

2004-08-04 Thread Paul Scott
It's great to have the caesura/cutoff/railroad tracks but the glyph scripts-caesura should be two simple straight lines - slashes // Paul Scott ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: scripts-caesura - glyph not quite right

2004-08-04 Thread Mats Bengtsson
There was a discussion about the layout of these when the symbol was introduced some year ago. If you can provide some references to well typeset scores and preferably some scanned images of what it should look like, I'm sure that the LilyPond implementors will be willing to change the layout or

Re: scripts-caesura - glyph not quite right

2004-08-04 Thread Paul Scott
Mats Bengtsson wrote: There was a discussion about the layout of these when the symbol was introduced some year ago. If you can provide some references to well typeset scores and preferably some scanned images of what it should look like, I'm sure that the LilyPond implementors will be willing to

Re: scripts-caesura - glyph not quite right

2004-08-04 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Just to avoid any risk of confusion, I hope that you have seen the caesura already available in LilyPond: \override BreathingSign #'text = #(make-musicglyph-markup scripts-caesura) es8[ d] \breathe es[ f g f] | This is taken from the example breathing-sign.ly in the

Re: scripts-caesura - glyph not quite right

2004-08-04 Thread Paul Scott
Mats Bengtsson wrote: Just to avoid any risk of confusion, I hope that you have seen the caesura already available in LilyPond: \override BreathingSign #'text = #(make-musicglyph-markup scripts-caesura) es8[ d] \breathe es[ f g f] | This is taken from the example breathing-sign.ly

Re: scripts-caesura - glyph not quite right

2004-08-04 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Sorry, I didn't read the mail subject carefully enough. Searching the mailing list archives, I realize that you were involved in the original discussion about the design of the symbol. May I remind you of Han-Wen's comment in http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2003-05/msg00283.html