Re: Tuplet number collision when slurred

of a \tuplet that can be seen with this code: > > {\clef alto \tuplet 3/2 {a8-3( g-2 f-1)}} > > to be compared with the same without the slur > > {\clef alto \tuplet 3/2 {a8-3 g-2 f-1}} > > for which there is no collision between fingering and tuplet number. > > In m

Tuplet number collision when slurred

Hello, I've got into a strange behavior of a \tuplet that can be seen with this code: {\clef alto \tuplet 3/2 {a8-3( g-2 f-1)}} to be compared with the same without the slur {\clef alto \tuplet 3/2 {a8-3 g-2 f-1}} for which there is no collision between fingering and tuplet number. In my

Re: Tuplet number note size/font

Sorry. I am guilty of using imprecise language. I use custom notehead stencils to achieve the look of the notes we want. Not a replacement custom font such as yours. [It's very successful but I confess I have never been able to make good breve noteheads.] This sort of thing: % for unfilled

Re: Tuplet number note size/font

. > > How can I get access to the font used in tuplet numbers for the notes > when you use them, as per the non-default tuplet number examples? Sorry, not a direct answer to your question, but how are you using a custom font for the notes? I’ve not had the problem with my fonts you are de

Tuplet number note size/font

use them, as per the non-default tuplet number examples? Andrew ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: moving tuplet number nearer to beam

> padding (for TupletNumber) only comes into effect for Y-offset when > considering kneed beams: > > > \version "2.19.82" > { > \tuplet 5/2 { b8[ b'' b b'' b] } > \once \override TupletNumber.padding = #1 > \tuplet 5/2 { b8[ b'' b b'' b] } > } > > > Otherwise, the computation is

Re: moving tuplet number nearer to beam

On 2019-04-01 1:16 pm, Werner LEMBERG wrote: Folks, if I use `\magnifyStaff', the tuplet number is too far away from the beam. How can I move it nearer to the beam? Looking into `tuplet-number.cc' I see a `padding' property with a default value of 0.5 (and which is apparently completely

Re: moving tuplet number nearer to beam

>> if I use `\magnifyStaff', the tuplet number is too far away from >> the beam. How can I move it nearer to the beam? Looking into >> `tuplet-number.cc' I see a `padding' property with a default value >> of 0.5 (and which is apparently completely undocumented). >

Re: moving tuplet number nearer to beam

On 4/1/2019 4:16 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote: Folks, if I use `\magnifyStaff', the tuplet number is too far away from the beam. How can I move it nearer to the beam? Looking into `tuplet-number.cc' I see a `padding' property with a default value of 0.5 (and which is apparently completely

moving tuplet number nearer to beam

Folks, if I use `\magnifyStaff', the tuplet number is too far away from the beam. How can I move it nearer to the beam? Looking into `tuplet-number.cc' I see a `padding' property with a default value of 0.5 (and which is apparently completely undocumented). However, doing something like

how to get y-extent for tuplet number

Dear community, I have a problem with the spacing between the piano staff for the left hand and the violin staff. I would like to increase the distance. Off course, I could do it generally, but I would like to do it for just a few measures. I tried it by changing the minimun-Y-extent for

Re: Tuplet number and articulation

On 1/27/2018 10:29 AM, Thomas Morley wrote: 2018-01-27 15:26 GMT+01:00 Ben <soundsfromso...@gmail.com>: On 1/26/2018 11:32 PM, Tiago Pereira wrote: Hi, everybody! In the example below, the tuplet number is moved upwards when the articulation is added. How to prevent this from hap

Re: Tuplet number and articulation

2018-01-27 15:26 GMT+01:00 Ben <soundsfromso...@gmail.com>: > On 1/26/2018 11:32 PM, Tiago Pereira wrote: > > Hi, everybody! > > In the example below, the tuplet number is moved upwards when the > articulation is added. How to prevent this from happening? > >

Re: Tuplet number and articulation

On 1/26/2018 11:32 PM, Tiago Pereira wrote: Hi, everybody! In the example below, the tuplet number is moved upwards when the articulation is added. How to prevent this from happening? \relative c' {     \stemUp     \tuplet 3/2 4 {     c8 d e f g a b c d e f g     c,,8^> d e f^> g a b^&

Re: Tuplet number and articulation

On 1/26/2018 11:32 PM, Tiago Pereira wrote: Hi, everybody! In the example below, the tuplet number is moved upwards when the articulation is added. How to prevent this from happening? \relative c' {     \stemUp     \tuplet 3/2 4 {     c8 d e f g a b c d e f g     c,,8^> d e f^> g a b^&

Tuplet number and articulation

Hi, everybody! In the example below, the tuplet number is moved upwards when the articulation is added. How to prevent this from happening? \relative c' {     \stemUp     \tuplet 3/2 4 {     c8 d e f g a b c d e f g     c,,8^> d e f^> g a b^> c d e^> f g } } T

Re: placement of tuplet number on broken tuplet

Hi David, Thank you for clarifying. This is all good to know. Interestingly I uniformly set horizontal tuplet brackets so the vertical offset for slanting brackets never occurred to me in my small utility function. Andrew On 18 April 2017 at 22:33, David Nalesnik

Re: placement of tuplet number on broken tuplet

he number within the bracket and have the gap >> adjust, but you can lengthen the broken bracket: >> > > This is a function I use all the time, and it seems to work for me. > > tupletNumberShift = > #(define-music-function (offset) >(number?) &

Re: placement of tuplet number on broken tuplet

on I use all the time, and it seems to work for me. tupletNumberShift = #(define-music-function (offset) (number?) " Move tuplet number across. Offset is from left of tuplet bracket. " #{ \once \override TupletNumber.whiteout = ##t \once \override Score.Tup

Re: placement of tuplet number on broken tuplet

hat I’m looking for. > I wonder if there is a way of modifying the properties of the left and right > side of a broken tuplet (something similar to broken-left and broken right in > a TextSpanner).In the example provided, the innermost tuplet number of the > first bar needs to be shi

Re: placement of tuplet number on broken tuplet

mage faked by a > graphic program? > > > Sorry if I was not very clear describing what I’m looking for. > I wonder if there is a way of modifying the properties of the left and > right side of a broken tuplet (something similar to broken-left and broken > right in a TextSpanner).

Re: placement of tuplet number on broken tuplet

ay of modifying the properties of the left and right side of a broken tuplet (something similar to broken-left and broken right in a TextSpanner).In the example provided, the innermost tuplet number of the first bar needs to be shifted in order to be displayed correctly. Here are two possible solutions t

Re: placement of tuplet number on broken tuplet

ant? I am reproducing what the composer has written. I see no issue with the tuplet over a barline (with us since Ives at least). The placement of the tuplet number and the left side form of the bracket however are not ideal. > Can you post a sketch of what is actually required? I ha

Re: placement of tuplet number on broken tuplet

Hello Juan, I have various ways of doing this, but with all respect, this is really very illegible engraving from the point of view of a player. Is this truly what you want? Can you post a sketch of what is actually required? I half see what you are getting at, but why do you need to split across

Re: placement of tuplet number on broken tuplet

2017-04-11 21:26 GMT+02:00 Juan Cristóbal Cerrillo : > Hello, > > Is there a way of changing the position of tuplet numbers in broken tuplets? > In the following example I would like to be able to displace the lower three > in the first bar to the right. > Any suggestions?

placement of tuplet number on broken tuplet

Hello, Is there a way of changing the position of tuplet numbers in broken tuplets? In the following example I would like to be able to displace the lower three in the first bar to the right. Any suggestions? all best, jc \version "2.19.57" \layout { ragged-right = ##t \context {\Voice

Re: Force tuplet number above notes

w, but I think > the reason for this is that it's the tuplet *bracket* that is responsible > for the direction, so you can't override the tuplet *number*'s direction > independently. > > Instead of the explicit override you could probably also use the shorthand > \tupletUp (optionally prepended w

Re: Force tuplet number above notes

That works, thanks! --- Knute Snortum (via Gmail) On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 1:45 PM, Jeffery Shivers wrote: > On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Knute Snortum wrote: > > I am trying to get both tuplet numbers above the notes in the following > >

Re: Force tuplet number above notes

On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Knute Snortum wrote: > I am trying to get both tuplet numbers above the notes in the following > code. I've tried \override TupletNumber.direction = #UP, but evidently this > does not work. What's the correct way to do this? > > \version

Force tuplet number above notes

I am trying to get both tuplet numbers above the notes in the following code. I've tried \override TupletNumber.direction = #UP, but evidently this does not work. What's the correct way to do this? \version "2.19.55" \language "english" \relative { \omit TupletBracket \override

Re: Drop tuplet number?

% \version "2.19.47" { \omit TupletBracket \voiceOne \partial 4 \tuplet 3/2 { bes'4 a'8 } d''4 } %% the tuplet number is positioned as if there were still a bracket. Is it possible to ‘drop’ it into the gap, outside staff

Re: Drop tuplet number?

n Albrecht <simon.albre...@mail.de>: > Hello, > > in this snippet > > %% > \version "2.19.47" > { > \omit TupletBracket > \voiceOne > \partial 4 > \tuplet 3/2 { bes'4 a'8 } > d''4 > } > %% > > the tuplet number

Re: Drop tuplet number?

On 28.09.2016 18:05, Karlin High wrote: On 9/28/2016 9:49 AM, Simon Albrecht wrote: Also, I’m sure I’ve already seen a solution with ‘slur-style’ tuplets, or tuplet indication and slur merged. But I’m terribly bad at finding such stuff from the archives or LSR. Can anyone please give a hint?

Re: Drop tuplet number?

> TIA, Simon There was a discussion somewhere around here: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2016-04/msg00321.html April 15, 2016 or thereabouts. Subject is "Tuplet number direction." I'm not sure where it concludes. -- Karlin High Missouri, USA

Re: Drop tuplet number?

> TIA, Simon > > On 28.09.2016 16:39, Simon Albrecht wrote: > > Hello, > > > > in this snippet > > > > %% > > \version "2.19.47" > > { > > \omit TupletBracket > > \voiceOne > > \partial 4 > >

Re: Drop tuplet number?

Hi, if I understand your question, this moves the tuplet number: \version "2.19.47" { \omit TupletBracket \voiceOne \partial 4 \override TupletNumber #'Y-offset = #1.4 \tuplet 3/2 { bes'4 a'8 } d''4 } Increase the number to position it higher, decrease it to get it lowe

Re: Drop tuplet number?

%% \version "2.19.47" { \omit TupletBracket \voiceOne \partial 4 \tuplet 3/2 { bes'4 a'8 } d''4 } %% the tuplet number is positioned as if there were still a bracket. Is it possible to ‘drop’ it into the gap, outside staff or maybe even into the staff? B

Drop tuplet number?

Hello, in this snippet %% \version "2.19.47" { \omit TupletBracket \voiceOne \partial 4 \tuplet 3/2 { bes'4 a'8 } d''4 } %% the tuplet number is positioned as if there were still a bracket. Is it possible to ‘drop’ it into the gap, outside staff or

Re: Tuplet number direction

David Wright writes: > On Fri 15 Apr 2016 at 10:23:55 (+0200), David Kastrup wrote: >> >> Which would usually involve triplet brackets rather than hacking this >> into partial note values at measure boundaries. Which is how it was >> done in the score I have been

Re: Tuplet number direction

On Fri 15 Apr 2016 at 10:23:55 (+0200), David Kastrup wrote: > "Phil Holmes" writes: > > - Original Message - > > From: "David Kastrup" > > Sent: Friday, April 15, 2016 8:04 AM > >> Simon Albrecht writes: > >>> On 15.04.2016

Re: Tuplet number direction

2016-04-16 16:30 GMT+02:00 Trevor Daniels : > > Thomas Morley wrote Friday, April 15, 2016 11:25 PM > >> Agreed. I never considered to disallow tuplets over line-break. >> Gould has nothing to say about it? (I still don't own the book...) > > She has a complete chapter

Re: Tuplet number direction

Thomas Morley wrote Friday, April 15, 2016 11:25 PM > Agreed. I never considered to disallow tuplets over line-break. > Gould has nothing to say about it? (I still don't own the book...) She has a complete chapter devoted to tuplets. She talks of tuplets across barlines (can be sub-divided

Re: Tuplet number direction

>> Nice! One minor thing: If space allows, I would move the `3' a bit >> nearer to the center to reduce the curvature of the slur. > > You mean move the `3' nearer to the staff, right? Yep. Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list

Re: Tuplet number direction

2016-04-15 19:07 GMT+02:00 David Nalesnik : > Even if it is unlikely that an era of music which favors bow notation would > require tuplets across bars or line breaks, it still makes sense to allow > them for consistency. Agreed. I never considered to disallow tuplets

Re: Tuplet number direction

2016-04-15 7:25 GMT+02:00 Werner LEMBERG : > >> Meanwhile I recoded it (using make-bow-stencil which is not >> available in 2.18.2) making things way easier. > > Nice! One minor thing: If space allows, I would move the `3' a bit > nearer to the center to reduce the curvature of the

Re: Tuplet number direction

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Simon Albrecht wrote: > On 15.04.2016 10:23, David Kastrup wrote: > >> Josquin des Prez? I've sung some Missa from him with wildly augmented triplets crossing a number of bars. Timing them accurately took some math because at

Re: Tuplet number direction

On 15.04.2016 10:23, David Kastrup wrote: Josquin des Prez? I've sung some Missa from him with wildly augmented triplets crossing a number of bars. Timing them accurately took some math because at that speed there was no natural flow any more really. That would be early 16th century.

Re: Tuplet number direction

David Kastrup writes: [...] > "Phil Holmes" writes: > >> So to notate it for singers today, you could do it any way that you >> choose to make it look sensible. > > Which would usually involve triplet brackets rather than hacking this > into partial note

Re: Tuplet number direction

"Phil Holmes" <m...@philholmes.net> writes: > - Original Message - > From: "David Kastrup" <d...@gnu.org> > To: "Simon Albrecht" <simon.albre...@mail.de> > Cc: "Thomas Morley" <thomasmorle...@gmail.com>; <lily

Re: Tuplet number direction

- Original Message - From: "David Kastrup" <d...@gnu.org> To: "Simon Albrecht" <simon.albre...@mail.de> Cc: "Thomas Morley" <thomasmorle...@gmail.com>; <lilypond-user@gnu.org> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2016 8:04 AM Subject: Re:

Re: Tuplet number direction

Simon Albrecht writes: > On 15.04.2016 00:51, Thomas Morley wrote: >> (1) The TupletNumbers are always inside the bow, I coded no >> possibility to print the Number cutting the bow. >> I maybe add it later. >> (2) What to do at line-break? > > Wouldn’t it better do

Re: Tuplet number direction

> Meanwhile I recoded it (using make-bow-stencil which is not > available in 2.18.2) making things way easier. Nice! One minor thing: If space allows, I would move the `3' a bit nearer to the center to reduce the curvature of the slur. Would that be possible? Werner

Re: Tuplet number direction

On 15.04.2016 00:51, Thomas Morley wrote: (1) The TupletNumbers are always inside the bow, I coded no possibility to print the Number cutting the bow. I maybe add it later. (2) What to do at line-break? Wouldn’t it better do disallow line-breaks during tuplets (i.e. \override

Re: Tuplet number direction

y typeset the tuplet bracket like a slur, with the tuplet number >> inside? > > I once made the attached code. > Maybe you can adapt it to fit your needs. > > Cheers, > Harm Meanwhile I recoded it (using make-bow-stencil which is not available in 2.18.2) making things way

Re: Tuplet number direction

> > Thinking about it, I wonder if I've missed something: is > > there a way to > > > > say typeset the tuplet bracket like a slur, with the > > tuplet number > > > > inside? > > > > > &g

Re: Tuplet number direction

ing: is > there a way to > > > say typeset the tuplet bracket like a slur, with the > tuplet number > > > inside? > > > > I once made the attached code. > > Maybe you can adapt it to fit yo

Re: Tuplet number direction

l.jtp?type=node=189594=0>>: > > > Thanks Abraham, that's most informative. > > > Thinking about it, I wonder if I've missed something: is there a way > to > > > say typeset the tuplet bracket like a slur, with the tuplet number > > > inside? > > >

Re: Tuplet number direction

tuplet bracket like a slur, with the tuplet number > > inside? > > I once made the attached code. > Maybe you can adapt it to fit your needs. Hmm, quite a battle to get that I see! In fact your code does something extra-fancy compared with the commonplace examples I see in old prints, n

Re: Tuplet number direction

On 14.04.2016 06:19, Werner LEMBERG wrote: is there a way to say typeset the tuplet bracket like a slur, with the tuplet number inside? I once made the attached code. Very nice! LSR? Actually, I would even like to see this directly in lilypond! Such triplet slurs are used very often

Re: Tuplet number direction

>>> is there a way to say typeset the tuplet bracket like a slur, with >>> the tuplet number inside? >> >> I once made the attached code. > > Very nice! LSR? Actually, I would even like to see this directly in lilypond! Such triplet slurs are used very o

Re: Tuplet number direction

; Thinking about it, I wonder if I've missed something: is there a way to >>> say typeset the tuplet bracket like a slur, with the tuplet number >>> inside? >> >> I once made the attached code. >> Maybe you can adapt it to fit your needs. > > > Very nice! L

Re: Tuplet number direction

On 13.04.2016 23:28, Thomas Morley wrote: 2016-04-13 15:06 GMT+02:00 Richard Shann<rich...@rshann.plus.com>: Thanks Abraham, that's most informative. Thinking about it, I wonder if I've missed something: is there a way to say typeset the tuplet bracket like a slur, with the tuplet number

Re: Tuplet number direction

2016-04-13 15:06 GMT+02:00 Richard Shann <rich...@rshann.plus.com>: > Thanks Abraham, that's most informative. > Thinking about it, I wonder if I've missed something: is there a way to > say typeset the tuplet bracket like a slur, with the tuplet number > inside? I once made

Re: Tuplet number direction

Hi, perhaps this goes into the right direction: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011-10/msg00325.html I thought I've seen more of this in the snippets, but I couldn't find anything. HTH, Joram ___ lilypond-user mailing list

Re: Tuplet number direction

On 13.04.2016 15:06, Richard Shann wrote: Thinking about it, I wonder if I've missed something: is there a way to say typeset the tuplet bracket like a slur, with the tuplet number inside? That would be great to have, and I think has been requested some times already. But I assume this would

Re: Tuplet number direction

Thanks Abraham, that's most informative. Thinking about it, I wonder if I've missed something: is there a way to say typeset the tuplet bracket like a slur, with the tuplet number inside? The reason I ask is that I came to this section of the manual because when typesetting 18th c. music

Re: Tuplet number direction

Richard, et al, Many grob properties are given a function (like tuplet-number::calc-direction) rather than a static value (like UP) when the property depends on many factors. In other words, by default, it's as if the 'direction property was set with \override TupletNumber.direction = #tuplet

Re: Tuplet number direction

> Andrew > > > > On 13/04/2016, 19:37, "lilypond-user on behalf of Richard Shann" > <lilypond-user-bounces+andrew.bernard=gmail@gnu.org on behalf of > rich...@rshann.plus.com> wrote: > > > put the tuplet number above rather than below __

Re: Tuplet number direction

On Wed, 2016-04-13 at 11:00 +0100, Phil Holmes wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Richard Shann" <rich...@rshann.plus.com> > To: <lilypond-user@gnu.org> > Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 10:37 AM > Subject: Tuplet number direction > &g

Re: Tuplet number direction

- Original Message - From: "Richard Shann" <rich...@rshann.plus.com> To: <lilypond-user@gnu.org> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 10:37 AM Subject: Tuplet number direction I wonder if someone could illuminate the tuplet direction property - I wanted to put t

Re: Tuplet number direction

Above or below what object? Andrew On 13/04/2016, 19:37, "lilypond-user on behalf of Richard Shann" <lilypond-user-bounces+andrew.bernard=gmail@gnu.org on behalf of rich...@rshann.plus.com> wrote: put the tuplet number above r

Tuplet number direction

I wonder if someone could illuminate the tuplet direction property - I wanted to put the tuplet number above rather than below and looked up: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/internals/tupletnumber direction (direction): tuplet-number::calc-direction If side-axis is 0 (or X

Re: Grace note kicks tuplet number away

.nabble.com/Grace-note-kicks-tuplet-number-away-tp184567p186671.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: tuplet number

Stanton Sanderson writes: >> On Jan 18, 2016, at 5:07 PM, Malte Meyn wrote: >> >> >> >>> Am 18.01.2016 um 23:52 schrieb Mark Stephen Mrotek: >>> In 2.18, >>> >>> Tuplet - no number\override TupletNumber #'stencil = ##f >> >> Setting the

Re: tuplet number

Stanton Sanderson writes: > How does one revert \omit TupletNumber to allow the number to appear for a > specific tuplet? In the following example, I would like to show the tupet > number in the second measure. Thanks in advance. > > Stan > > \version "2.19.35" >

Re: tuplet number

> On Jan 18, 2016, at 5:07 PM, Malte Meyn wrote: > > > >> Am 18.01.2016 um 23:52 schrieb Mark Stephen Mrotek: >> In 2.18, >> >> Tuplet - no number\override TupletNumber #'stencil = ##f > > Setting the stencil to ##f is exactly what \omit does ;) (\omit already >

Re: tuplet number

Am 18.01.2016 um 23:46 schrieb Stanton Sanderson: > How does one revert \omit TupletNumber to allow the number to appear for a > specific tuplet? There are two options: 1. If you want to omit only one TupletNumber you can use \once: … \once \omit TupletNumber \tuplet … 2. Revert the

Re: tuplet number

Am 18.01.2016 um 23:52 schrieb Mark Stephen Mrotek: > In 2.18, > > Tuplet - no number\override TupletNumber #'stencil = ##f Setting the stencil to ##f is exactly what \omit does ;) (\omit already exists in 2.18) ___ lilypond-user mailing list

tuplet number

How does one revert \omit TupletNumber to allow the number to appear for a specific tuplet? In the following example, I would like to show the tupet number in the second measure. Thanks in advance. Stan \version "2.19.35" \relative c'' { c \omit TupletNumber \tuplet 3/2 {c4 b8}

Re: tuplet number

et - no bracket \override TupletBracket #'bracket-visibility = ##f > Tuplet - no number\override TupletNumber #'stencil = ##f > Tuplet - number \revert TupletNumber #'stencil > > Mark > > -Original Message- > From: lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org

RE: tuplet number

Stan, In 2.18, Tuplet - no bracket \override TupletBracket #'bracket-visibility = ##f Tuplet - no number \override TupletNumber #'stencil = ##f Tuplet - number \revert TupletNumber #'stencil Mark -Original Message- From: lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org

Grace note kicks tuplet number away

Hi all, When cross staffing, I found that sometimes a grace note in the middle of the beam causes the tuplet number to move absurdly higher or lower: \version "2.19.32" \markup{"ugly"} \autochange { \tuplet 7/4 { c,32[ c, c, \grace{ c,8 } c,32 c, c''' c,] } } \markup{&

Re: Grace note kicks tuplet number away

ilyissues/issues/3831/>. Yours, Simon On 07.12.2015 21:08, Gilberto Agostinho wrote: Hi all, When cross staffing, I found that sometimes a grace note in the middle of the beam causes the tuplet number to move absurdly higher or lower: \version "2.19.32" \markup{"ugly"} \autoc

Re: Grace note kicks tuplet number away

taking grace notes into consideration. I added this information mentioned here, as well as a link to this discussion, to the issue tracker, but my post is pending moderation. Cheers, Gilberto -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Grace-note-kicks-tuplet-number-away-tp18456

Moving tuplet number

How can you move a tuplet number to a different position relative to the centre of the bracket, say 75% along rather than 50%? I can use X-offset for the TupletNumber, but this reveals the gap in the bracket that is the room for the number. How does one move that as well? Andrew

Re: Moving tuplet number

Hi Andrew, On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Andrew Bernard andrew.bern...@gmail.com wrote: How can you move a tuplet number to a different position relative to the centre of the bracket, say 75% along rather than 50%? I can use X-offset for the TupletNumber, but this reveals the gap

Re: Moving tuplet number

Hi Andrew, 2015-03-30 17:06 GMT+02:00 David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com: Hi Andrew, On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Andrew Bernard andrew.bern...@gmail.com wrote: How can you move a tuplet number to a different position relative to the centre of the bracket, say 75% along rather

Re: Moving tuplet number

Gentlemen, Thank You! Here’s a simplified example of the horizontal shift of the tuplet number that I want to achieve. The key to it is the understanding of the use of the X-extent property. Thank you so much for your help. \version 2.19.17 bass = \relative c {   \time 1/4   \clef bass

Re: Moving tuplet number

move a tuplet number to a different position relative to the centre of the bracket, say 75% along rather than 50%? I can use X-offset for the TupletNumber, but this reveals the gap in the bracket that is the room for the number. How does one move that as well? Sorry, I don't believe

Tuplet Number Down

I want the tuplet number to be below the notes. I am evidently doing something wrong. \version 2.18.2 \language english \relative c' { \override TupletNumber.direction = #DOWN \tuplet 3/2 { c8 d c } c4 c c } } Knute Snortum (via Gmail

Re: Tuplet Number Down

2014-10-13 20:08 GMT+02:00 Knute Snortum ksnor...@gmail.com: I want the tuplet number to be below the notes. I am evidently doing something wrong. Try : \version 2.18.2 \language english \relative c' { \tweak direction #DOWN \tuplet 3/2 { c8 d c } c4 c c } HTH, Pierre

Re: Tuplet Number Down

The point of this is you don't want the tuplet *number* down but the whole thing. Am 13. Oktober 2014 20:13:01 MESZ, schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com: 2014-10-13 20:08 GMT+02:00 Knute Snortum ksnor...@gmail.com: I want the tuplet number to be below the notes

Re: Tuplet Number Down

On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org wrote: The point of this is you don't want the tuplet *number* down but the whole thing. Knute, In other words, instead of TupletNumber, use TupletBracket. You can also use the shortcut \tupletDown :) Regards, Abraham P.S

Re: Tuplet Number Down

Hi Abraham, 2014-10-13 21:03 GMT+02:00 Abraham Lee tisimst.lilyp...@gmail.com: P.S. Can anyone tell us why TupletNumber supports the 'direction property at all? I tried them all (UP, DOWN, CENTER, RIGHT, LEFT) and it did nothing. I can't tell. Probably for historical reasons. Actually,

Capped tuplet number

Is it possible to add these caps to tuplet numbers? ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Fwd: Re: Capped tuplet number

I really should remember to always answer to the list ... Original Message Subject: Re: Capped tuplet number Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2014 18:03:53 +0200 From: Malte Meyn lilyp...@maltemeyn.de To: Javier Ruiz-Alma jav...@ruiz-alma.com Of course it is. I don’t have an exact solution

Re: help on improving (kneed-beam tuplet-number) function

On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 4:05 PM, David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.comwrote: I've got a newer version of this which allows you to make adjustments to the position of the tuplet number along the beam from the default centered position. (This sometimes proves necessary when there's

Re: help on improving (kneed-beam tuplet-number) function

oops--forgot to change the version statement back to 2.16.2. --David ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

help on improving (kneed-beam tuplet-number) function

Hi Quite some time ago David Nalesnik wrote this amazing function: http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=646 The problem is that when I apply it to a staff with { fontSize = #-3 \override StaffSymbol #'staff-space = #(magstep -3) } ... the tuplet numbers are still missplaced. My scheme

Re: help on improving (kneed-beam tuplet-number) function

2013/7/9 Karol Majewski karo...@wp.pl: Hi Quite some time ago David Nalesnik wrote this amazing function: http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=646 The problem is that when I apply it to a staff with { fontSize = #-3 \override StaffSymbol #'staff-space = #(magstep -3) } ... the

  1   2   >