Hi,
2013/10/20 SoundsFromSound soundsfromso...@gmail.com:
Hello,
I stumbled upon this website recently and just noticed they have this font
offered for sale, dubbed Lilypond look is here!
Do any of you know anything about this vendor and/or fonts? I'm
curious...anyone try these fonts
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
2013/10/20 SoundsFromSound soundsfromso...@gmail.com:
Hello,
I stumbled upon this website recently and just noticed they have this font
offered for sale, dubbed Lilypond look is here!
Do any of you know anything about this vendor and/or fonts?
Am 20.10.2013 10:14, schrieb David Kastrup:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
2013/10/20 SoundsFromSound soundsfromso...@gmail.com:
Hello,
I stumbled upon this website recently and just noticed they have this font
offered for sale, dubbed Lilypond look is here!
Do any of you
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
Am 20.10.2013 10:14, schrieb David Kastrup:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
2013/10/20 SoundsFromSound soundsfromso...@gmail.com:
Hello,
I stumbled upon this website recently and just noticed they have this font
offered for sale,
Hmm... the code:
{
\override Tie.after-line-breaking =
#(lambda (grob)
(display (ly:grob-property grob 'control-points))
(newline))
c'1~ c'1
}
doesn't work for me. I see no control points (nor the numbers).
Meanwhile, I've found this:
===
#(define (make-cross-stencil coords)
Am 20.10.2013 11:00, schrieb David Kastrup:
But SIL wouldn't allow to sell them as a standalone project either,
isn't it?
No idea, I'm just familiar with the GPL. At any rate, they say
Lilypond look is here, but that does not in itself imply that they
copied or converted the font programs.
Hi Paul,
2013/10/20 Paul Morris p...@paulwmorris.com:
Hi all, I'm trying to use make-connected-path-stencil, but it's not working
as expected, in two ways. Here's a tiny example:
\version 2.17.28
myStencil =
#(let* ((A 0) (B 1))
(make-connected-path-stencil
'((A
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com writes:
Hi Paul,
2013/10/20 Paul Morris p...@paulwmorris.com:
Hi all, I'm trying to use make-connected-path-stencil, but it's not working
as expected, in two ways. Here's a tiny example:
\version 2.17.28
myStencil =
#(let* ((A 0)
Paul Morris p...@paulwmorris.com writes:
2. Setting connect to #t gives this GUILE error (this seems like a bug):
Wrong type argument in position 1 (expecting empty list): closepath
Try making a report (including example) focusing just on that problem.
Our bug squad is not a team of
2013/10/20 Karol Majewski karo...@wp.pl:
Hmm... the code:
{
\override Tie.after-line-breaking =
#(lambda (grob)
(display (ly:grob-property grob 'control-points))
(newline))
c'1~ c'1
}
doesn't work for me. I see no control points (nor the numbers).
Well, it works for me.
I must be doing something wrong. Where are the numbers? In PDF? In separate
file?
I use version 2.17.28 on Windows 7. Perhaps it is Windows issue?
Dnia 20-10-2013 o godz. 12:45 Thomas Morley napisał(a):
2013/10/20 Karol Majewski karo...@wp.pl:
Hmm... the code:
{
\override
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 6:20 AM, Karol Majewski karo...@wp.pl wrote:
I must be doing something wrong. Where are the numbers? In PDF? In
separate file?
I use version 2.17.28 on Windows 7. Perhaps it is Windows issue?
The numbers are in the log.
___
Hi all,
Here are two possible little bugs (of type ugly) that do not look well IMO.
If you give me green light, I would happily add them to our Issue Tracker
myself.
1) Some ugly positioning when using \pitchedTrill:
\version 2.17.28
\markup {Everything is fine here}
{
\pitchedTrill
And David, I am so sorry to bother you so much with this subject, but you
didn't mention if there is any hope for a possible exhumation of the Issue
1333.
Thanks and take care,
Gilberto
--
View this message in context:
Am 19.10.2013 05:45, schrieb Joshua Nichols:
I'd like to tie the common notes below:
{
{a1~}\\{f4 e}
a1
}
But I'm not sure I'm doing it correctly.
Thoughts?
OK, the remainder of this thread obviously went into a different direction.
Apart from the documentation (which is authoritative on
David Kastrup wrote
Thomas Morley lt;
thomasmorley65@
gt; writes:
Hi Paul,
2013/10/20 Paul Morris lt;
paul@
gt;:
Hi all, I'm trying to use make-connected-path-stencil, but it's not
working as expected, in two ways. Here's a tiny example:
\version 2.17.28
David Kastrup wrote
Paul Morris lt;
paul@
gt; writes:
2. Setting connect to #t gives this GUILE error (this seems like a bug):
Wrong type argument in position 1 (expecting empty list): closepath
Try making a report (including example) focusing just on that problem.
Our bug squad is
2013/10/20 Paul Morris p...@paulwmorris.com:
[...]
I see there's no snippet about using make-connected-path-stencil in the LSR.
I'll put it on my list to add one when I get a chance.
[...]
There are some snippets using 'path'
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Search?q=path
Would be nice to have one
Paul Morris p...@paulwmorris.com writes:
David Kastrup wrote
Paul Morris lt;
paul@
gt; writes:
2. Setting connect to #t gives this GUILE error (this seems like a bug):
Wrong type argument in position 1 (expecting empty list): closepath
Try making a report (including example) focusing
2013/10/20 Paul Morris p...@paulwmorris.com:
David Kastrup wrote
Paul Morris lt;
paul@
gt; writes:
2. Setting connect to #t gives this GUILE error (this seems like a bug):
Wrong type argument in position 1 (expecting empty list): closepath
Try making a report (including example)
Thomas Morley-2 wrote
Why not simply:
\markup \stencil
#(make-connected-path-stencil
'((0 2) (2 2))
0.1
1
1
#f ;; -- error if set to #t
#t)
Maybe including the error-log
Sounds good, and good call on using \markup.
-Paul
--
View this message in
No numbers in log file.
After generating PDF from this code:
==
\version "2.17.28"{ \override Tie.after-line-breaking = #(lambda (grob) (display (ly:grob-property grob 'control-points)) (newline)) c'1~ c'1}
==
I get the following log:
==
# -*-compilation-*-Processing
Try running lilypond simply from the command line, with no options to create
the logfile (i.e. no redirection, no -dgui).
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: Karol Majewski
To: David Nalesnik
Cc: Thomas Morley ; lilypond-user
Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2013 3:58 PM
Works now :) Thank you. Is there any way to have these numbers displayed in log file on Windows?
Dnia 20-10-2013 o godz. 18:06 Phil Holmes napisał(a):
Try running lilypond simply from the command line, with no options to create the logfile (i.e. no redirection, no -dgui).
--Phil Holmes
I want to indicate a hemiola - the best method seems to be horizontal brackets
indicating each double-length beat.
I can't find anything in the documentation or snippets telling how to do it.
What am I missing please?
Regards,
Peter
mailto:lilyp...@ptoye.com
Peter,
Does this help?
\version 2.16.2
global = {
\key c \major
\numericTimeSignature
\time 6/8
}
violin = \relative c'' {
\global
c8 [ c c ] c [ c c ] |
c [ c ] c [ c ] c [ c ] |
}
\score {
\new Staff \violin
\layout { }
}
Mark
I'm using the same as Mark but with back slash.
c \[ a b e d \]
It's actually a ligature in the docs.
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/ancient-notation_002d_002dcommon-features#ligatures
also take a look at
Thanks both. I'd not thought of it as ancient notation - its only Purcell!
And I use it for Handel as well. Early, maybe.
It doesn't work too well (as the 2.16 doc says), and there's definitely a
problem where there's a 4-beat note (tied over the 3-beat bar) in the relevant
voice. Can't work
Hi Peter,
It doesn't work too well (as the 2.16 doc says), and there's definitely a
problem where there's a 4-beat note (tied over the 3-beat bar) in the
relevant voice. Can't work out how to do that one.
Might I suggest including a minimal snippet to the list, so we can see the
exact
Kieren,
I was in the process of preparing one!
\version 2.16.2
\language english
sopranoVoice = \relative c'' {
\key c \major
\numericTimeSignature
\time 3/2
{ \[ d2 ef \] \[ f | g \] \[ f1 \]}
}
\score {
\new Staff { \sopranoVoice }
}
The last ligature isn't printed.
Best regards,
Peter
Hi Peter,
All three print fine here (2.17).
Maybe try this with 2.16 (which I don't have):
\version 2.16.2
\language english
sopranoVoice = \relative c'' {
\key c \major
\numericTimeSignature
\time 3/2
{ \[ d2 ef \] \[ f | g \] \[ f1*15/16 s16 \]}
}
\score {
\new Staff { \sopranoVoice }
}
Hope
I've heard of these guys before, but we never got round to initiating
any sort of legal action. From what I remember, it looked like a
one-man company somewhere in Switzerland.
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 10:52 PM, SoundsFromSound
soundsfromso...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I stumbled upon this
(I bought a copy of the fon a while ago, and yes, some glyphs are
verbatim copies of the LilyPond ones)
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com wrote:
I've heard of these guys before, but we never got round to initiating
any sort of legal action. From what I
Hello,
I have a fresh install of Lilypond 2.17.28 in my home directory (under
~/local/opt/lilypond-2.17.28) on CentOS release 6.4. I do not have sudo
powers. When I try to compile this file, named test.ly:
\version 2.17.28
{
c' e' g' e'
}
using lilypond test.ly, I get:
warning: `(gs -q
2013/10/20 Marcos Press tdy.p...@gmail.com
The result I need is the one that said correct.
I don't know whay, in 2.16 the
\override Stem.transparent = ##t
It just turn transparent the steams, without toching the Beams.
But now 2.17 It turn transparent the beams too.
seen recently on this
Hi Pierre,
2013/10/16 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com:
2013/10/16 Pierre Perol-Schneider pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com:
There is something I found disturbing for years : I think \super and \sub
are not properly settled. []
Here's a patch that fixes it:
Graet!
Thanks!
2013/10/20 Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com
2013/10/20 Marcos Press tdy.p...@gmail.com
The result I need is the one that said correct.
I don't know whay, in 2.16 the
\override Stem.transparent = ##t
It just turn transparent the steams, without toching the Beams.
But now
Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com writes:
2013/10/20 Marcos Press tdy.p...@gmail.com
The result I need is the one that said correct.
I don't know whay, in 2.16 the
\override Stem.transparent = ##t
It just turn transparent the steams, without toching the Beams.
But now 2.17 It turn
The question was not over convert-ly. I'm sory if it sounds like that. It
was not the intention.
Actualy I first try by re-tipeing under 2.17 and when that didn't work I
went back to the original file and convert it.
I don't think it has nothing to do with convert-ly and absolutly don't
think
Hi! I'm full of questions today :D
In these case, I have three times the same last ligature and when I repeat
it a fourth time, it doesn't print the same before like you can see at the
attached file.
Why?
\version 2.17.28
one = \relative c''{e8-. g( e) c( b[) d( b) a8*1/2]( s8*1/2)}
two =
Joram,
I stumbled upon a solution to this! It turns out that the second parameter
to extra-offset is vertical spacing, so for odd staff lines you can draw
the rest at the even line below it, and then bump it up by 0.5 with
extra-offset to get the desired effect.
This is what I came up with:
41 matches
Mail list logo
