Hi Roland,
Le dim. 24 mai 2020 à 10:34, R.H. a écrit :
...
> Let us assume you want the top or bass voice to be in another color. Here,
> the way you created it seems to make this difficult to do, for example to
> assign a different color to note heads of different voices -- independently
> of
I'm not the author (I had it in my archives) The license seems to show
that it can be placed in a git repository.
Marc
Le 24/05/2020 à 11:41, Matt Wallis a écrit :
On 24/05/2020 05:05, Andrew Bernard wrote:
Hello Marc,
Who are we to thank for this wonderful and useful work? I see the name
Wols Lists writes:
> On 24/05/20 01:08, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>> Actually, GNU allows charging for the software. From the Preamble to the
>> GNU GPL:
>>
>> "When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not
>> price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that
>>
On 24/05/2020 11:59, David Kastrup wrote:
Wols Lists writes:
On 24/05/20 01:08, Carl Sorensen wrote:
Actually, GNU allows charging for the software. From the Preamble to the GNU
GPL:
"When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not
price. Our General Public Licenses are
Oh, thank you Mark
I start understanding how differently source files are made by different
people. It is very helpful.
What I see is that you do not separate voices but you separate actually
fingering into "rightone", "righttwo" and "left". I hope I understood this
correctly? I have to study
On 24/05/2020 05:05, Andrew Bernard wrote:
Hello Marc,
Who are we to thank for this wonderful and useful work? I see the name
Ph. Hardy in the score with an email. Is he still active?
Andrew
On Sun, 24 May 2020 at 02:26, Marc via LilyPond user discussion
wrote:
Dropbox link
I would suggest doing so and making it somewhat more accessible in the
sense to not having each chorale live in a self-contained file. I would
love to see an interface where you can *select* which chorale(s) to
engrave, apply style sheets, choose voices to engrave/hide etc. That
would make a
Hello Phil,
Thanks for writing and thank your for your efforts.
From which edition did you derive this set? The Breitkopf edition of
the original CPE Bach's edition?
[As you may know, your website in the links has been hacked. Maybe take
it down?]
Andrew
On 24/05/2020 15:00, Ph. Hezaine wrote:
An updated version with included tar.bz2 sources is available:
http://superbonus.project.free.fr/spip.php?article48
Phil,
Many thanks for this work.
With your permission, I would like to add the updates to the git
repository I just set up at
Many thanks - yes, that's what it was. I'm using VSCode and its Lilypond
extension, and I had installed the vscode-pdf viewer, which clashed with my
LaTeX-Workshop extension, which has its own PDF viewer in it. Anyway,
after a bit of fiddling and a few VSCode restarts I was able to use the
LaTeX
Hi Alasdair,
Just in case, Sumatra PDF viewer does not cause such issue.
Cheers,
Pierre
Le dim. 24 mai 2020 à 17:11, Alasdair McAndrew a écrit :
> Many thanks - yes, that's what it was. I'm using VSCode and its Lilypond
> extension, and I had installed the vscode-pdf viewer, which clashed with
On 5/24/20, Ph. Hezaine wrote:
> many thanks Valentin. It seems my precedent mail was not receipt.
Hey!! Nice to hear from you Phil. I hope your family’s all right,
and I wish your health gets better soon. There are quite a few people
here and on -user-fr who’ll be delighted to exchange with
On 24/05/2020 11:27, Urs Liska wrote:
I would suggest doing so and making it somewhat more accessible in the
sense to not having each chorale live in a self-contained file. I would
love to see an interface where you can *select* which chorale(s) to
engrave, apply style sheets, choose voices to
On 24/05/20 12:52, David Kastrup wrote:
> antlists writes:
>
>> So you don't understand the difference between the story, and the book?
>
> You are working from the premise that everybody except you is an idiot.
> That does not make a backdrop for a discussion but monologueing. I am
> not
On 5/24/20, Andrew Bernard wrote:
> Who are we to thank for this wonderful and useful work? I see the name
> Ph. Hardy in the score with an email. Is he still active?
It’s an alias of Philippe Hézaine, who was quite active on -user and
-user-fr a few years ago:
On 5/24/20, David Kastrup wrote:
> You are working from the premise that everybody except you is an idiot.
Guys, stop bickering and veering off-topic. The original purpose of
this thread was to help Francesco gain some insight into the copyright
modalities and possible publishing choices;
I think it is a ghostscript version mismatch error., Have a search
through the list archives about this. I use Linux so I cant comment
apart from that, but I think this is commonly seen.
Andrew
Regarding the set of 371 it's of interest that a scan of the 1784
edition is available at IMSLP:
https://imslp.org/wiki/371_Vierstimmige_Choralges%C3%A4nge_(Bach%2C_Johann_Sebastian)
And with proper clefs (my well known hobbyhorse!).
Beautifully engraved and remarkably modern looking.And of
On 24/05/20 14:18, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> On 5/24/20, David Kastrup wrote:
>> You are working from the premise that everybody except you is an idiot.
>
> Guys, stop bickering and veering off-topic. The original purpose of
> this thread was to help Francesco gain some insight into the
914/5000
Hi,
I'm in the process of transcribing the suites from Charles Dieupart from the
original. Like Rameau, Dieupart also uses special ornaments that are aligned
directly with the notehead. ("Port de voix" and "Pincé").
I found an interesting article about the realization under Lilypond
antlists writes:
> So you don't understand the difference between the story, and the book?
You are working from the premise that everybody except you is an idiot.
That does not make a backdrop for a discussion but monologueing. I am
not interested in that.
--
David Kastrup
Le 24/05/2020 à 06:05, Andrew Bernard a écrit :
Hello Marc,
Who are we to thank for this wonderful and useful work? I see the name
Ph. Hardy in the score with an email. Is he still active?
Andrew
On Sun, 24 May 2020 at 02:26, Marc via LilyPond user discussion
wrote:
Dropbox link
Le 24/05/2020 à 15:01, Valentin Villenave a écrit :
On 5/24/20, Andrew Bernard wrote:
Who are we to thank for this wonderful and useful work? I see the name
Ph. Hardy in the score with an email. Is he still active?
It’s an alias of Philippe Hézaine, who was quite active on -user and
-user-fr
You get this sort of error if the PDF from the previous compilation is still
open in many PDF viewers - they lock the file. Try closing your PDF viewer and
trying again.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: Alasdair McAndrew
To: lilypond-user Mailinglist
Sent: Sunday,
Am So., 24. Mai 2020 um 16:36 Uhr schrieb Franz-Rudolf Kuhnen
:
>
> 914/5000
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm in the process of transcribing the suites from Charles Dieupart from the
> original. Like Rameau, Dieupart also uses special ornaments that are aligned
> directly with the notehead. ("Port de voix" and
Hi Franz-Rudolf,
Try enclosed file.
Cheers,
Pierre
Le dim. 24 mai 2020 à 16:35, Franz-Rudolf Kuhnen a
écrit :
> 914/5000
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm in the process of transcribing the suites from Charles Dieupart from
> the original. Like Rameau, Dieupart also uses special ornaments that are
> aligned
Le dimanche 24 mai 2020 à 12:58 +0100, Matt Wallis a écrit :
> On 24/05/2020 11:27, Urs Liska wrote:
> > I would suggest doing so and making it somewhat more accessible in
> > the
> > sense to not having each chorale live in a self-contained file. I
> > would
> > love to see an interface where you
I have just installed Lilypond on Windows 10, following the instructions to
basically download, install, and add its path to the environment variable.
However, it won't compile; on a simple file; the log finishes with:
warning: `(gs -q -dNOSAFER -dDEVICEWIDTHPOINTS=595.28 -dDEVICEHEIGHTPOINTS=
On 24/05/20 01:08, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> Actually, GNU allows charging for the software. From the Preamble to the GNU
> GPL:
>
> "When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not price. Our
> General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you have the freedom
> to
Maybe the simplest way to achieve this is the good old "!"
\language "english"
{
\key d \major
d' e' fs'! g' a' b' cs''! d''
}
On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 6:50 PM Timothy Lanfear wrote:
> On 24/05/2020 20:35, Frédéric wrote:
> >
> > Halas, my web server is under raspberry pi which has only
Dear Pierre
Indeed, very helpful.
I also chieved coloring of notes, stems, etc. I did not want to color
lines, clef... but it works similar to what you suggest, but the solution
you proposed I did not know. Any suggestion allows me to learn more and
more about LP.
I will post my solution soon
> > {
> >\override AccidentalCautionary.parenthesized=##f
> >\accidentalStyle teaching
> >\key d\major
> >d'4 e' fis' g' a' b' cis'' d''
> > }
>
> This is really good and so simple!
> Thanks a lot all of you for your help.
Halas, my web server is under raspberry pi which has only
> On 23 May, 2020, at 7:34 PM, David Wright wrote:
>
> If you follow some simple rules in your source layout, constructing
> such a list might be most straightforward to do in the shell, using
> grep.
It’s not quite as straight-forward as you seem to think:
1) You haven’t accounted for the
On 24/05/2020 20:35, Frédéric wrote:
Halas, my web server is under raspberry pi which has only lilypond
2.18.2. But 2.18.2 does not give a suitable output (too many natural
signs).
Try that:
\version "2.18.2"
{
\override AccidentalCautionary.parenthesized = ##f
\accidentalStyle teaching
34 matches
Mail list logo
