Ah! Thanks a lot. Kieren also for taking the effort!
regards, Jogchum
Op 15-12-2022 om 16:27 schreef Jean Abou Samra:
Le 15/12/2022 à 14:57, Kieren MacMillan a écrit :
Hi Jogchum,
I suppose it is very simple, but I can't find it in documentation,
or here on the list.
How can one set
No, I haven't. Thank you for the direction.
Jerry
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022, 8:33 PM Jean Abou Samra wrote:
> Le 16/12/2022 à 02:25, JxStarks a écrit :
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I'm feeling rather foolish. I'm running under Windows 10 and use
> > Frescobaldi (3.1.2) as my main interface with LilyPond.
Op 15-12-2022 om 16:27 schreef Jean Abou Samra:
<...>
As said in another thread [1], I would recommend using the \repeat
construct in the lyrics too:
\version "2.23.82"
theMusic = {
\repeat volta 2 {
g'4 4 4 4
\alternative { { f'1 } { c''1 } }
}
}
theLyrics = \lyricmode {
Have sent it to Xavier, in stead of to the list - apologies!
Jogchum
Op 15-12-2022 om 20:38 schreef Xavier Scheuer:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2022 at 16:29, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
>
>
> As said in another thread [1], I would recommend using the \repeat
> construct in the lyrics too:
>
Hello,
This is
Kenneth Wolcott writes:
> HI;
>
> Dumb question here. I'm sure that this is covered in the
> documentation, but I have yet to find out where.
>
> Lilypond 2.22.2, MacOs (via homebrew).
>
> How to implement "f (second time p)" for midi?
\volta 1 <>\f
\volta 2 <>\p
could possibly work.
Le 16/12/2022 à 10:40, Jogchum Reitsma a écrit :
Hi, without a doubt it is my bad, but while I've spend quite some time
looking for this in the documentation, I didn't come across it.
Looked, among a lot of other places, in
Hi Jean,
> I think I was not clear explaining what is OK and what is not. The golden
> rule is: *if a bit of music is repeated, in the actual performance by the
> player, it should be enclosed in a \repeat block, otherwise it shouldn’t*.
Maybe *that* should be included in the docs…? :)
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 1:43 PM Jonas Hahnfeld via LilyPond user discussion
wrote:
> We are proud to announce the release of GNU LilyPond 2.24.0.
> LilyPond 2.24 is brought to you by
>
> Main Developers:
> Jean Abou Samra, Colin Campbell, Dan Eble, Jonas Hahnfeld, Phil Holmes,
> David Kastrup,
Le 16/12/2022 à 10:47, Jogchum Reitsma a écrit :
Hi Jean,
While this work in placing the words correctly, it is, in my case, not
quite flawless.
If I render the attached snippet, there is no "2"-bracket above the
second alternative.
But if you comment out the lyrics part, the "problem"
Hi Xavier,
> This is also what is recommended in the documentation, there is even a whole
> section dedicated to lyrics and repeats, and in particular repeats with
> alternative (with special cases of melisma, extenders and hyphens, etc).
> Cf. NR 2.1.2 Techniques specific to lyrics > Lyrics
> Le 16 déc. 2022 à 15:25, Kieren MacMillan a
> écrit :
>
> In a certain way, the unfolded example is inconsistent, right? Shouldn’t it
> be something like […]
>
> Otherwise, you have an example with music that has a \repeat command and
> lyrics that don’t…
This doc example is not a
On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 10:33:58AM -0800, H. S. Teoh via LilyPond user
discussion wrote:
[...]
> This latest release broke one of my scores. I have reduced the
> problem to the following snippet:
>
> \version "2.18.2"
> \score {
> \tuplet 3/2 4 { \repeat tremolo 6 { 8( } }
Hi David;
Thank you for the hint. I successfully ran Lilypond 2.24.0
convert.ly on my source and successfully engraved it using Lilypond
version 2.24.0. Now I'll look into the /volta idea.
Thanks,
Ken
On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 7:16 AM David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Kenneth Wolcott writes:
>
> >
Hi David;
I have attached the updated Lilypond source.
It looks like my attempt failed to implement your hint :-)
Here's the results of my attempt to implement your idea...
%%
%%
Here's my sanitized (long
Hello Ralph,
I think the same, and I'm thankful, too.
A nice Christmas to all ponders. :-)
Best Regards Roland
You wrote::
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 1:43 PM Jonas Hahnfeld via LilyPond user discussion
> wrote:
>
> > We are proud to announce the release of GNU LilyPond 2.24.0.
> >
Kenneth Wolcott writes:
> Hi David;
>
> I have attached the updated Lilypond source.
>
> It looks like my attempt failed to implement your hint :-)
Well, for one thing you might want to remove your
\f_second_time_p
phrases. For another, the error message occurs in the typeset output.
Hi David;
Thank you! I copied the right hand notes so that there would be a
midi-specific version. I then reverted the changes I made to the
right hand notes containing the \volta hint. I then modified the
right hand notes for midi without the New Dynamic notation but with
the \volta hint.
Le 16/12/2022 à 20:39, H. S. Teoh via LilyPond user discussion a écrit :
Hmm. I'm running a local Linux build of 2.24.0 (commit
916ae4111441a9426fbb9c11f7c42735eccf0cac).
That is not 2.24.0, but current master. 2.24.0 is the tag v2.24.0,
which the branch stable/2.24 also currently points to.
On Sat, Dec 17, 2022 at 12:52:27AM +0100, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
> Le 16/12/2022 à 20:39, H. S. Teoh via LilyPond user discussion a écrit :
> > Hmm. I'm running a local Linux build of 2.24.0 (commit
> > 916ae4111441a9426fbb9c11f7c42735eccf0cac).
>
>
> That is not 2.24.0, but current master.
I am running Lilypond 2.24.0 on Windows 11.
I am trying the use the snippet entitled "Parenthesize a group of notes using a
Scheme function" located at https://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=902.
I receive the following errors:
Hi Joseph,
If you use convert-ly on your files, it will update ParenthesesItem to
Parentheses, which will eliminate the error.
Hope that helps!
Kieren.
On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 11:48 AM Joseph Srednicki
wrote:
> I am running Lilypond 2.24.0 on Windows 11.
>
> I am trying the use the snippet entitled "Parenthesize a group of notes
> using a Scheme function" located at
> https://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=902.
>
> I receive the following
Your snippet compiles correctly (with the errors) on my Windows install of
2.24.0
Paul
From: H. S. Teoh via LilyPond user discussion
To:
Sent: 16/12/2022 18:33
Subject: Re: LilyPond 2.24.0 released!
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 10:42:42PM +0100, Jonas Hahnfeld via LilyPond user
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 10:42:42PM +0100, Jonas Hahnfeld via LilyPond user
discussion wrote:
> We are proud to announce the release of GNU LilyPond 2.24.0.
[...]
This latest release broke one of my scores. I have reduced the problem
to the following snippet:
\version "2.18.2"
Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Joseph,
If you use convert-ly on your files, it will update ParenthesesItem to
Parentheses, which will eliminate the error.
Yes, but:
The LSR snippets don't have a \version statement.
If convert-ly doesn't help, insert the line
\version "2.22.0"
and try again.
Hmm. I'm running a local Linux build of 2.24.0 (commit
916ae4111441a9426fbb9c11f7c42735eccf0cac). My configure command was
just running autogen.sh with --prefix. Does that make a difference?
--T
On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 07:31:46PM +, Paul Hodges wrote:
>Your snippet compiles correctly
26 matches
Mail list logo
