Werner LEMBERG wrote:
(1) If you reduce this to a single keyword, then don't allow the
bare argument 3: \times 3 looks like \times 3/1 to me; so of
course, I'm a dodo, but I predict that Mats Erik several others
would wind up spending a lot of time explaining what \times 7 (or
\tuplet 7)
I'm not sure I understand. Do you want a layout where simultaneous notes
in different staves don't necessarily have the same horizontal position?
One trick you could do, is described in Scaling durations. For
example, you
can replace
c4 d e f
by
c4*5/4 d4*3/4 e4 f
/Mats
Bertalan Fodor
Paul Scott wrote:
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Indeed, `\times 3' is problematic, but `\tuplet 3' sounds clear to me.
Additionally, I suggest that `\tuplet 3' prints the `3' above the
group, while `\tuplet 3:2' prints `3:2' (which some composers prefer).
You *could* keep \times and *add* the keyword
luis jure wrote:
hello list,
i'm new to lilypond and this is my first message to the list. first of
all, a big thank you to all the developers and contributors for this
great software.
Welcome!
...
now i have three questions regarding a short fragment i've written, i
hope it's OK to
Yes, this is exactly what I need
Thank you!
Bert
Mats Bengtsson írta:
I'm not sure I understand. Do you want a layout where simultaneous notes
in different staves don't necessarily have the same horizontal position?
One trick you could do, is described in Scaling durations. For
example, you
Please don't add redundant constructs, that will just cause the confusion.
If we introduce \tuplet, then we should definitely remove \times, just as
Graham said.
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Indeed, `\times 3' is problematic, but `\tuplet 3' sounds clear to me.
Additionally, I suggest that `\tuplet
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(2) \times 2/3 and \tuplet 3:2 don't mean the same thing:
\times 2/3 {c8 d e d e f}
makes sense, but I don't think that
\tuplet 3:2 {c8 d e d e f}
does. The least messy option would be the status quo. The keyword
\times is
thank you very much mats for your prompt and detailed answer! i'll try
to upgrade soon to 2.10.3 (out yesterday!) and look at the examples you
mention.
Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
It seems that all three of your problems would classify as bugs or at
least as requests for
Karl Hammar wrote:
Werner:
Erik:
I think these changes sound scary, it is an additional hack in the
parser machinery.
...
I think it would be cleaner if \times could be changed to a
proper music function, e.g. as
\tuplet 2 3 {...}
This would remove rules from the parser
OK, I'm starting to have a hard time keeping all the pieces together. I'll
try and summarize the discussion so far.
There seems to be general consensus:
- that having both \times and \tuplet is unnecessary and confusing. It should
be one _or_ the other.
- that \tuplet is clearer than \times
Does anyone have a work around for using the internal documentation on the local
machine. I have downloaded the tarball, but the links are all broken (both on
IE and Firefox) because they do not include filename suffixes. I'm going away
over the break and would like to be able to reference them.
Jonathan Henkelman wrote:
Does anyone have a work around for using the internal documentation on the
local
machine. I have downloaded the tarball, but the links are all broken (both on
IE and Firefox) because they do not include filename suffixes. I'm going away
over the break and would
John Mandereau john.mandereau at free.fr writes:
I've just submitted a patch on lilypond-devel which should fix that.
Until its commit and the next releases, you can browse the docs online,
or try to the download the 2.10.1 docball, which should be OK:
Hi,
This is kind of an antibugreport or, perhaps, a cool feature report.
2.11.3 fixes things with afterGrace described in issue 176:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=176can=1q=
2.11.3 supports, therefore, opposite-stem after graces interspersed
between manually beamed notes
« Although I like the idea of accepting both \tuplet 3:2 and \tuplet 2/3,
I don't like the notion of having \tuplet and \times. I suppose we
could keep \times as an old command and remove it from the manual to
avoid confusion... but that seems silly. Either eliminate \times, or
don't bother
Ok. Based on what everyone has been saying and seeming to come to an agreement
on, here's the details of the changes that we are proposing be made.
1. \times is replaced by \tuplet since tuplet makes more musical sense and
convert-ly can easily be updated to make the change. Because of
Good!
Frédéric
2006/12/20, Kress, Stephen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ok. Based on what everyone has been saying and seeming to come to an
agreement on, here's the details of the changes that we are proposing be
made.
1. \times is replaced by \tuplet since tuplet makes more musical sense
and
Hi,
One more fun example with graces under 2.11.3.
Proportional notation settings keep notes in place; GraceSpacing
settings can move graces around.
%%% BEGIN %%%
\version 2.11.3
\layout { indent = #0
ragged-right = ##t
}
\paper { between-system-padding = #10 }
\new Staff \with {
On 12/20/06, Jonathan Henkelman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I'm starting to have a hard time keeping all the pieces together. I'll
try and summarize the discussion so far.
There seems to be general consensus:
- that having both \times and \tuplet is unnecessary and confusing. It
should
be
And I definitely don't want \times #'(2 . 3) This pseudo-Scheme syntax
is
very hard to understand for the beginner, especially the ' ! The
least
Scheme syntax necessary, the better!
I agree!
Tim Reeves___
lilypond-user mailing list
Excuse me, I am almost newbie...
I have a quick small question here:
How do you mark a extra boxed rehersal mark such as A1 ?
My script goes like this:
\mark \default%% supposse this is boxed A
\mark A1%% supposse this is A1, bu I prefer boxed A1
\mark A2%% supposse this
You can use :
\set Score.markFormatter = #format-mark-box-letters
to put boxes around letters
Frédéric
2006/12/20, Neuro [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Excuse me, I am almost newbie...
I have a quick small question here:
How do you mark a extra boxed rehersal mark such as A1 ?
My script goes like
Thank Frédéric veru much, ^_^
But, I did.
\set Score.markFormatter = #format-mark-box-letters
\mark \default%% so, this is boxed A
\mark A1%% this is unboxed A1, bu I prefer boxed A1
\mark A2%%
\mark A3%%
\mark \default%% this is boxed B
..., so what next shall
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 06:22:05PM -0800, Neuro wrote:
Thank Frédéric veru much, ^_^
But, I did.
\set Score.markFormatter = #format-mark-box-letters
\mark \default%% so, this is boxed A
\mark A1%% this is unboxed A1, bu I prefer boxed A1
\mark A2%%
\mark A3
Neuro wrote:
Thank Frédéric veru much, ^_^
But, I did.
\set Score.markFormatter = #format-mark-box-letters
\mark \default%% so, this is boxed A
\mark A1%% this is unboxed A1, bu I prefer boxed A1
\mark A2%%
\mark A3%%
\mark \default%% this is boxed B
..., so
I believe that Score.markFormatter only works from \mark \default for
the others you need:
\mark \markup{ \box A1 }
, etc.
Paul Scott
Yes ! ~ It works. ^_^
Thank you all very much :)
Neuro
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
lilypond-user mailing list
26 matches
Mail list logo
