When you installed 2.13.4, did you remember to delete the old
lilypond app? If you didn't, that would explain why everything is
screwed up now.
You could also try deleting any $HOME/.font* directories you find,
as well as the lilypond app, before downloading 2.13.4 and trying
again.
Cheers,
-
Hello fellow pond dwellers,
I'm trying to set several scores (songs) at once, using \include.
I use \layout and \midi for every single song to be able to get single
output files.
All scores should inherit some global settings like these:
\layout {
\context { \ChordNames
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Samstag, 19. September 2009 11:47:48 schrieb fiëé visuëlle:
I'm trying to set several scores (songs) at once, using \include.
I use \layout and \midi for every single song to be able to get single
output files.
[...]
Such a \layout block is the
Am 2009-09-19 um 12:23 schrieb Reinhold Kainhofer:
Am Samstag, 19. September 2009 11:47:48 schrieb fiëé visuëlle:
Such a \layout block is the only way for global options that i
found
in the docs.
Exactly.
And LilyPond even complains that \set is unexpected here!
Just remove it. You
How would you solve these two collisions?:
\version 2.12
smN = \override NoteHead #'font-size = #-2
\relative c'' {
\clef treble
\key d \minor
\time 4/4
{ d,2 r } \\ { \smN a'4( g f e) } |
a2 \\ { \smN a8 g f e }
}
Greetlings from Lake Constance
---
Hi,
How would you solve these two collisions?:
Which collision(s), exactly?
When I compile [in 2.12.2 or 2.13.3] the score you posted, there is
nothing I would call a collision.
Cheers,
Kieren.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
Hi,
2009/9/19 Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca:
Hi,
How would you solve these two collisions?:
Which collision(s), exactly?
When I compile [in 2.12.2 or 2.13.3] the score you posted, there is nothing
I would call a collision.
I suppose it's the (double) 'a', first note of
Am 2009-09-19 um 14:13 schrieb Xavier Scheuer:
2009/9/19 Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca:
Hi,
How would you solve these two collisions?:
Which collision(s), exactly?
When I compile [in 2.12.2 or 2.13.3] the score you posted, there is
nothing
I would call a collision.
I
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 09:48:04 +0100
Von: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
An: Patrick Schmidt p.l.schm...@gmx.de
CC: Jonathan Kulp jonlancek...@gmail.com, lilypond-user@gnu.org,
phorg...@yahoo.com
Betreff: Re: command-line usage - bus error
pngtopnm tie.png tie.pnm
pnmcrop -white tie.pnm tie-cropped.pnm
ppmtopng tie-cropped.pnm
/Users/PLS/bin/lily2image: line 626: ppmtopng: command not found
ppmtopng failed converting to final output - lily2image aborting.
Isn't ppmtopng part of netpbm (I have netpbm version 10.26.61)? I
Hello,
Can someone point out what I am doing wrong?
I have a staff where the first note has an appoggiatura (see below)
When this staff is converted, the layout looks good although there's too
much horizontal space between the appoggiatura and the quarter note
If it is laid out with another
Have you added the spacer appoggiatura to the other staff?
On 19.09.2009, at 21:07, Nick Didkovsky wrote:
Hello,
Can someone point out what I am doing wrong?
I have a staff where the first note has an appoggiatura (see below)
When this staff is converted, the layout looks good although
Hello,
I'm doing some tweaking of a score I found of Schumann's Traeumerei
on IMSLP. Not the greatest edition to copy from, but it's given me
some experience tweaking in Lilypond.
Now I'm trying to use the my-callback tweak shown in the NR, and I
can't get it to change the positions
fiëé visuëlle wrote:
Would you move the eights in the second measure to the right
or combine the different note heads or what else?
Would you change the stem direction?
I think your specific readability criteria should determine whether
you combine noteheads or change the stem direction
On 9/19/09 1:39 PM, Nick Didkovsky didk...@mail.rockefeller.edu wrote:
Hello James
Thanks for your prompt reply. No, I assume the contents of staff 2 does
not need to be altered depending on the contents of staff 1.
Staff 2 simply contains:
\time 4/4
\clef treble
R4*4
How are
Thank-you Carl
Adding a spacer to staff 2 solves the corrupt layout when two staves are
laid out.
However when I convert just staff 1, whose first quarter note has a
grace note, the resulting score displays a big distance between the
grace note and the quarter note, which is not good.
Note
2009/9/19 Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com:
Now I'm trying to use the my-callback tweak shown in the NR, and I
can't get it to change the positions of the first slur in m. 5. I'd like
the starting and ending positions of the slur to be at the same vertical
position, right above the
Hi list,
Is there a scheme snippet that will reprint a sharp as the enharmonic
flat if it appears after a flat, reprint a flat as the enharmonic
sharp if it appears after a sharp, and leave a note alone if it
appears after a natural? Better yet would be if it always left fis
and bes alone.
--- On Sat, 9/19/09, Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
I assume those control-points in your example are just a
test, since
that's a rather wild slur. :)
Ah, wonderful! Yes, those were just test values I found on the list.
Decent values are:
'((6 . 1) (8 . 2.5) (14 . 2.5) (16 .
19 matches
Mail list logo
