Thanks! Works well, even if it takes a little time.
James Bailey-4 wrote:
I would do this:
soprano = \relative c'' {
…
c4. d8 es4. as,8| %11
b2 r4
}
sopranoDynamics = {
…
s2 s4\ s8\! s\| %11
% or possibly
% s2 s8\ s8\! s\ s\!
In most music I see out there, I've noticed that related dynamics (and often
markup) are usually parallel (such that if you drew a horizontal line, it
would meet both at the same vertical position). In fact, I'm hard pressed to
think of a situation where they're not in the sheet music I've seen
a'\p?var1 c' d' b'\mf?var1 f'\markup{asdf}?var1 d''2\?var2 e''4\!
c''\?var2 b'\!
I mean, all the var1 dynamics are parallel with each other. All the var2
dynamics are parallel with each other. However, the var1 dynamics are not
parallel with the var2 ones (unless by coincidence).
--
View this
I'm trying to replicate a specific notation used at London Russian
Orthodox Cathedral. It's very simple, and consists of two forward-diagonal
lines across the middle line of the stave extending to the line above and
the line below. It's used to indicate that the note preceding it is to
be
Hi,
I'm sorry if it was asked before, but I didn't have any luck finding it:
I need to change the vertical space between the systems so they collide
(similarly to this example only it's for the the staves inside the system
On 19 October 2010 09:58, Richard Downing rich...@langside.org.uk wrote:
I'm trying to replicate a specific notation used at London Russian
Orthodox Cathedral. It's very simple, and consists of two forward-diagonal
lines across the middle line of the stave extending to the line above and
the
2010/10/19 Keith E OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net
The defaults are :
Staves within a group are spaced 9 staff-lines apart (from centerline to
centerline).
After the last staff in a group, the next staff is placed 10.5 staff-lines
below (centerline-to-centerline).
After a staff that is not in a
Hello
On 19/10/2010 10:01, Jan Warchoł wrote:
2010/10/19 Keith E OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net mailto:k-ohara5...@oco.net
The defaults are :
...
However, in my opinion (and i'm an amateur, judging only by my personal
taste about readability) there should be more space after
...
While all
2010/10/19 Cordilow arv...@gmail.com
In most music I see out there, I've noticed that related dynamics (and
often
markup) are usually parallel (such that if you drew a horizontal line, it
would meet both at the same vertical position). In fact, I'm hard pressed
to
think of a situation where
2010/10/19 James james.l...@datacore.com
On 19/10/2010 10:01, Jan Warchoł wrote:
However, in my opinion (and i'm an amateur, judging only by my personal
taste about readability) there should be more space after (...)
While all these suggestions are perfectly reasonable, let's not forget
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Jan Warchoł
lemniskata.bernoulli...@gmail.com wrote:
Lily places all dynamics from this group at the same vertical position level
if the difference is greater, Lily divides this group of related
dynamics in more groups in such a way that the differencies
If I understand correctly, is this similar to the (rather hackish, imo) lsr
snippet? http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=450
On Oct 19, 2010, at 8:46 AM, Cordilow wrote:
In most music I see out there, I've noticed that related dynamics (and often
markup) are usually parallel (such that if
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 09:00:55 -0700, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
While all these suggestions are perfectly reasonable, let's not forget
after all this is a *template*.
Yep. If any clear need comes to light from this discussion of the new spacing,
let's make it an enhancement
If I understand correctly, is this similar to the (rather hackish, imo) lsr
snippet? http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=450
I don't think so. What I mean is with multiple notes so that the dynamics
above each note (not the same note) are the same height above the staff.
--
View this message
It's a nice idea, however i'd prefer that LilyPond would do this more
automatically (the less input user needs to type the better).
Lily forgets about dynamics that are not related to any other dynamics,
i.e.
too far apart (like 2 full measures apart or 30 staff spaces apart) …
It's a good
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Jan Warchoł
lemniskata.bernoulli...@gmail.com wrote:
Lily forgets about dynamics that are not related to any other dynamics, i.e.
too far apart (like 2 full measures apart or 30 staff spaces apart)
for each group of related dynamics:
for each dynamic in
On Oct 19, 2010, at 7:59 PM, Cordilow wrote:
If I understand correctly, is this similar to the (rather hackish, imo) lsr
snippet? http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=450
I don't think so. What I mean is with multiple notes so that the dynamics
above each note (not the same note) are the
LilyPond where one could add a tag to certain dynamics to make them
parallel: e.g.
a'\p?var1 c' d' b'\mf?var1 f'\markup{asdf}?var1 d''2\?var2 e''4\!
c''\?var2 b'\!
James wrote:
If I understand correctly, is this similar to the (rather hackish, imo) lsr
snippet?
Phil
I'm happy to replace this template in the LM now. If you're happy
too,
could you approve it please? Are you able to run makelsr.py to
move
it to git?
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: Keith E OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 19,
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 9:03 PM, Keith E OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
Some people like to put all dynamics at exactly the same height:
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=357
Speaking of which, this snippet is slightly out-of-date since the
Dynamics context is now built-in and ready-to-use.
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 02:01:22 -0700, zbigb wrote:
I tried modifying all of the vertical spacing snippets I could find, but
didn't get any closer,
The link in your message was to the manual for the development version 2.13, and the
vertical spacing system is changing in that version. Instead,
On 10/13/10 11:49 AM, James Bailey wrote:
On Oct 13, 2010, at 4:01 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
Any chance the full-measure/multi-measure problem will get fixed?
How can we merge a multi-measure rest with a part-measure rest?
Unless things have changed, even trying to merge multi-measure
On 10/11/10 6:22 PM, James Bailey wrote:
On Oct 11, 2010, at 11:22 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 04:32:48PM -0400, James Wilkinson wrote:
On 9/23/10 6:00 PM, Vicente Solsona wrote:
if the dynamics are the same, it's better to write them just once. thus
you:
1) save
Hello,
I couldn't find anything useful re: placing the lyrics inside the staff -
i.e. shifting vertically
is it possible?
thanks,
zb
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Lyrics-inside-the-staff-tp30004819p30004819.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list
On 10/11/10 5:22 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 04:32:48PM -0400, James Wilkinson wrote:
On 9/23/10 6:00 PM, Vicente Solsona wrote:
if the dynamics are the same, it's better to write them just once. thus
you:
1) save typing
2) help lilypond so it does't need to waste time
Hi zb,
I couldn't find anything useful re: placing the lyrics inside the staff
Does the snippet http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=356 not do what you want?
If not, please be more specific in your question, and include an image of the
desired output if possible.
Cheers,
Kieren.
Hi zb,
I couldn't find anything useful re: placing the lyrics inside the staff
Does the snippet http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=356 not do what you want?
If not, please be more specific in your question, and include an image of the
desired output if possible.
Cheers,
Kieren.
On 10/19/10 4:19 PM, James Wilkinson ji...@cs.cofc.edu wrote:
On 10/13/10 11:49 AM, James Bailey wrote:
On Oct 13, 2010, at 4:01 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
Any chance the full-measure/multi-measure problem will get fixed?
How can we merge a multi-measure rest with a part-measure rest?
On Oct 20, 2010, at 12:21 AM, James Wilkinson wrote:
On 10/11/10 6:22 PM, James Bailey wrote:
On Oct 11, 2010, at 11:22 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 04:32:48PM -0400, James Wilkinson wrote:
On 9/23/10 6:00 PM, Vicente Solsona wrote:
if the dynamics are the same,
29 matches
Mail list logo
