Crist,
you forgot to attach a file. Did you compile my code as it is or did you insert
it in a larger .ly-file? In the latter case just post it and I'll have a look
at it.
patrick
Am 17.09.2011 um 06:12 schrieb Crist Khachikian:
Patrick,
I inserted your code directly into my lilypond
I am using BendAfter and the lines extend to the next note or rest, sometimes
creating flying lines at the top of the next page of the score.
Is there a way to limit the length of the line? A #maximum-length command of
sorts?
cheers,
Andrea
--
View this message in context:
Dear community,
I would like to define a variable with sheme and I want to substract the
number one from this variable.
I tried it with:
% the following defines a Slur, lasting a certain number of eigth-notes
xaS = #(define-music-function (parser location x) (number?)
#{ % in der folgenden
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 7:18 AM, Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net wrote:
I've been setting some Carcassi studies. His Op60 No 8 has a pf dynamic
marking at one point (see
http://erato.uvt.nl/files/imglnks/usimg/c/c8/IMSLP34430-PMLP03629-ribs0980_06.pdf,
fifth stave on the first
I added the variable definition pf = #(make-dynamic-script pf) to
my ly source, but is there any reason why this should not be added
to dynamic-scripts-init.ly? That already contains fp as a dynamic
marking, why not pf?
I don't see why it couldn't contain more permutations of 'p', 'f'
On 17 September 2011 14:23, Stefan Thomas
kontrapunktste...@googlemail.com wrote:
Dear community,
I would like to define a variable with sheme and I want to substract the
number one from this variable.
I tried it with:
% the following defines a Slur, lasting a certain number of eigth-notes
Hey all,
I'd like to change (and add) some minor things in musicxml2ly, but before I
make a patch I wanted to make sure that no-one objects:
1) tagline: musicxml2ly currently uses the contents of the software-element
for the LilyPond-tagline. So the tagline at the end of a piece engraved by
I compiled your snippet and everything looks fine (see file attached). So the
problem must be somewhere else in your score. You will have to comment out
parts of your code to narrow down the problem (see
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/usage/troubleshooting)
hth
patrick
inline:
Hi lilyponders!
I look for a command simil systems-per-page = x!
(bar-per-system?)
It is possible?
--
oiram/bin/selom
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Dear Neil,
thanks for Your proposal.
I've tried Your code, but unfortunately Your code connects always two notes
under one slur, no matter which number I've choosen for x.
2011/9/17 Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com
On 17 September 2011 14:23, Stefan Thomas
kontrapunktste...@googlemail.com
On 17 September 2011 17:42, Stefan Thomas
kontrapunktste...@googlemail.com wrote:
I've tried Your code, but unfortunately Your code connects always two notes
under one slur, no matter which number I've choosen for x.
Which version? It might rely on a recent change in behaviour for #{ #}.
I don't know if such a command exists,
but you can use an additional voice with spacer rests and manual breaks,
something like
\repeat unfold 120 { % The number of systems in the piece
s1* 4 % supposed you only have 4/4 time and want 4 measures per system
\break
}
HTH
Urs
Am 17.09.2011
Hi Xavier,
Ok, this could be a bug but I was looking for an alternative. Maybe I
would better call it a work arround.
I was trying to use a top-level page break. Is there any reason why this
doen't work?
\version 2.15.10
% instrument.ly
mvtI = { c'4 c' c' c' }
mvtII = { d'4 d' d' d' }
I use 2.14.2!
2011/9/17 Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com
On 17 September 2011 17:42, Stefan Thomas
kontrapunktste...@googlemail.com wrote:
I've tried Your code, but unfortunately Your code connects always two
notes
under one slur, no matter which number I've choosen for x.
Which
Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com writes:
On 17 September 2011 14:23, Stefan Thomas
kontrapunktste...@googlemail.com wrote:
Dear community,
I would like to define a variable with sheme and I want to substract the
number one from this variable.
I tried it with:
% the following defines a
In data sabato 17 settembre 2011 18:46:54, Urs Liska ha scritto:
I don't know if such a command exists,
but you can use an additional voice with spacer rests and manual breaks,
something like
\repeat unfold 120 { % The number of systems in the piece
s1* 4 % supposed you only have 4/4 time
On 17 September 2011 17:52, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
In which case
xaS = #(define-music-function (parser location x) (number?)
#{ % in der folgenden Zeile Lilypondcode eingeben
s1*0 ( \repeat unfold $(- x 1) {s8 } s8)
#})
should work just fine. The slur has no noteheads
Am 17.09.2011 18:54, schrieb Mario Moles:
In data sabato 17 settembre 2011 18:46:54, Urs Liska ha scritto:
I don't know if such a command exists,
but you can use an additional voice with spacer rests and manual breaks,
something like
\repeat unfold 120 { % The number of systems in the
Dear David,
thanks for Your help!
Your code seems to work perfectly.
But I would like to know:
do I have to expect problems with this function?
You wrote
The slur has no noteheads to attach itself to,
though.
On 17 September 2011 14:23, Stefan Thomas
kontrapunktste...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello
I just change from 2.10.25 to 2.14.2-1 lilypond version. I had to adapt my
style sheets to have aproximately the same design than before, but there is
still things I can't make work properly: When I want to split the violin 1 part
in two voices in the middle of the piece, the second
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Schermann Colette
colettescherm...@yahoo.fr wrote:
Hello
I just change from 2.10.25 to 2.14.2-1 lilypond version. I had to adapt my
style sheets to have aproximately the same design than before, but there is
still things I can't make work properly: When I want
On 17 September 2011 20:50, Jonathan Kulp jonlancek...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry but first question has to be whether you ran convert-ly on all
of your files to update them?
I just replied on the French users mailing list (where Colette asked
the same question) and that was my first question too!
Hello,
This is maybe a question I have already asked but I cannot find the
answer (and I'm trying to typeset a score).
I'd like to define a variable that actually consists of a tweak command.
I.e. to replace
c1-\tweak #'to-barline ##f \ | % it works
d4\! % etc.
by
c1\notToBarline \ |
Xavier Scheuer wrote:
Hello,
This is maybe a question I have already asked but I cannot find the
answer (and I'm trying to typeset a score).
I'd like to define a variable that actually consists of a tweak command.
I.e. to replace
c1-\tweak #'to-barline ##f \ | % it works
d4\!
Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com writes:
On 17 September 2011 17:42, Stefan Thomas
kontrapunktste...@googlemail.com wrote:
I've tried Your code, but unfortunately Your code connects always two notes
under one slur, no matter which number I've choosen for x.
Which version? It might rely on
Hello,
I seems quite common, in parts with a lot of multi-measure rests, to
print the tempo indications *centered* above the multi-measure rest
(i.e. in the middle of the measure).
However I do not find a clean way with LilyPond to have the measure
width to adapt to the text length. Would you
On 17 September 2011 23:58, harm6 thomasmorle...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Xavier,
you can't put \tweak in variable.
Try:
crescTweak = #(let ((m (make-music 'CrescendoEvent
'span-direction -1)))
(set! (ly:music-property m 'tweaks)
On 17 September 2011 23:30, Xavier Scheuer x.sche...@gmail.com wrote:
However I do not find a clean way with LilyPond to have the measure
width to adapt to the text length. Would you recommend me to use
MetronomeMark, MultiMeasureRestText or TextScript?
MultiMeasureRestText. If you set
Xavier Scheuer x.sche...@gmail.com writes:
Hello,
This is maybe a question I have already asked but I cannot find the
answer (and I'm trying to typeset a score).
I'd like to define a variable that actually consists of a tweak command.
I.e. to replace
c1-\tweak #'to-barline ##f \ | %
On 17 September 2011 23:27, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
I don't think so. This should have worked years ago already.
Which snippet are you referring to? My snippet doesn't work in 2.14
since #{ #} returns sequential music rather than the direct object
(i.e., the \repeat unfold music).
Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com writes:
On 17 September 2011 23:27, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
I don't think so. This should have worked years ago already.
Which snippet are you referring to? My snippet doesn't work in 2.14
since #{ #} returns sequential music rather than the
31 matches
Mail list logo
