rafael,
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Rafael Arndt rafaelar...@web.de wrote:
2014/1/9 Rafael Arndt rafaelar...@web.de
There is a tiny estatical detail I would like to change, but found out
nowhere how to do it:
I would like to have a bar at the beginning of the system here:
...SNIP...
Hi all,
the first Engraving Challenge is ready to take off.
I have subscribed everybody who has so far declared interest in
participating to the openlilylib-user mailing list.
If I should have forgotten someone please tell me privately.
Everybody else is invited to have a look at the entry
Hi all,
I have a wish for a scheme function integrated in LilyPond:
A function that returns the short form of the version used: e.g. 2.18
(and not 2.18.0)
I don’t know if that already exists, I couldn’t find it anywhere. The
reason why I want this function is below. It would be very easy to
On 01/10/2014 07:37 AM, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jan 2014, j...@post.cz wrote:
Hi,
I am new to this forum and also new to Lilypond Frescobaldi. Still
learning the basics...
I would like to ask for some help with xml import/export since I am
not able
to get it to work.
First
Interesting behaviour!
I suggest you also open an issue at the snippets repo so the problem
doesn't get lost.
Urs
Am Donnerstag, den 09.01.2014, 21:54 +0100 schrieb Simon Bailey:
hi all,
when running the following file (sorry, this is as minimal as i can get it):
\version 2.18.0
I think this is important also for us:
http://www.sibeliusblog.com/news/mei-plug-in-released-for-sibelius/
MEI is an important initiative for standardizing the encoding of music,
with particular interest in encoding every aspect of a composition and
its sources. I think this will be an
Hi,
I wanted to test the swing patch, do I need version 2.16 for that? 2.14
doesnt seems to work
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/attachmentText?id=687aid=6870029001name=swingtest.lytoken=ndOkZOHxPedrruWZArMs5tLny80%3A1389347237994
Starting lilypond 2.14.2 [swingtest.ly]...
Processing
On 01/10/2014 07:37 AM, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
Lilypond assumes 4/4 by default when time signature is given, but you
version of Frescobaldi's musicxml importer doesn't. (has been fixed in
development by now)
I meant Lilypond assumes 4/4 default when *no* time signature is given
...
Nick Baskin wrote
Eluze,
Apologies for being unclear! I've attached a minimal example that I hope
will demonstrate what I mean. Notice how the 8va text collides with the
beam; I would like to move the 8va text to the left to avoid this
collision, and cannot figure out how to do so. Changing
Noeck noeck.marb...@gmx.de writes:
Hi all,
I have a wish for a scheme function integrated in LilyPond:
A function that returns the short form of the version used: e.g. 2.18
(and not 2.18.0)
I don’t know if that already exists, I couldn’t find it anywhere. The
reason why I want this
rosea grammostola rosea.grammost...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
I wanted to test the swing patch, do I need version 2.16 for that? 2.14
doesnt seems to work
yep, works with 2.16, thx
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 11:26 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
rosea grammostola rosea.grammost...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
I wanted to test the swing patch, do I need version 2.16 for that? 2.14
doesnt seems to work
Hi David,
Am 10.01.2014 10:15, schrieb David Kastrup:
guile (format LilyPond ~:@{~a.~a~} (ly:version))
LilyPond 2.19
That does not really require a command of its own.
That is indeed quite short and usable. I am still a stranger to scheme.
I suppose it does something like in python
Thank you!
The problem was indeed the missing time signature.
I thought there must have been something broken with my installation of the
software because it was just a very simple score...
So now it works.
The fact is that I am still not able to export//import more complex scores
but it is
Hi,
I can change fonts like this:
\paper {
myStaffSize = #19.0
fonts = #(make-pango-font-tree
Linux Libertine O
Linux Biolinum O
Ubuntu Mono
(/ myStaffSize 20))
}
But that way I always need to specify the staff size. However, I would
like to
hiya,
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Noeck noeck.marb...@gmx.de wrote:
But that way I always need to specify the staff size. However, I would
like to put this in a style sheet and set the staff size later in a
file. Is that possible?
Or is it possible to read in the global staff size?
Or
Thanks Simon,
that works. I still have to specify the staff size before the include (I
can live with that).
The interesting thing is this: If I have a set-global-staff-size after
the include, not the font size is wrong but the choice of fonts is
reverted and I have the default fonts again.
-Original Message-
From: David Kastrup [mailto:d...@gnu.org]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 2:11 PM
To: Daniel Rosen
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Errors running lilypond-book
Daniel Rosen drose...@gmail.com writes:
I'm trying to follow the tutorial at
-Original Message-
From: Eluze [mailto:elu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2014 2:31 PM
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Automatic octaves
instead of this (broken) snippet you could use dak's most elegant and short
proposal:
Hi Daniel,
Does this work?
\version 2.18.0
\version 2.18.0
myoctavate =
#(define-music-function (parser location music) (ly:music?)
#{ \context Bottom $music \transpose c c' \relative $music #})
\relative { \myoctavate { a b c d } e f g a }
%% Instead of
\myoctavate \relative { a b c d e f
-Original Message-
From: Richard Shann [mailto:rich...@rshann.plus.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 12:49 PM
To: Urs Liska
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Markedly different-looking ties
Have a look here:
http://lilypondblog.org/2013/07/lilypond-tie-crusade/
Ah,
-Original Message-
From: Kieren MacMillan [mailto:kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 10:42 AM
To: Daniel Rosen
Cc: Eluze; Lilypond-User Mailing List
Subject: Re: Automatic octaves
Hi Daniel,
Does this work?
\version 2.18.0
\version 2.18.0
Daniel Rosen drose...@gmail.com writes:
-Original Message-
From: Eluze [mailto:elu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2014 2:31 PM
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Automatic octaves
instead of this (broken) snippet you could use dak's most elegant and short
proposal:
-Original Message-
From: David Kastrup [mailto:d...@gnu.org]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 11:31 AM
To: Daniel Rosen
Cc: Eluze; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Automatic octaves
You could use dak's most elegant make-relative macro...
myoctavate =
#(define-music-function
joram,
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Noeck noeck.marb...@gmx.de wrote:
that works. I still have to specify the staff size before the include (I
can live with that).
The interesting thing is this: If I have a set-global-staff-size after
the include, not the font size is wrong but the
Daniel Rosen drose...@gmail.com writes:
-Original Message-
From: David Kastrup [mailto:d...@gnu.org]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 11:31 AM
To: Daniel Rosen
Cc: Eluze; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Automatic octaves
You could use dak's most elegant make-relative macro...
Am 10/01/14 09:47, schrieb Simon Bailey:
rafael,
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Rafael Arndt rafaelar...@web.de wrote:
2014/1/9 Rafael Arndt rafaelar...@web.de
There is a tiny estatical detail I would like to change, but found out
nowhere how to do it:
I would like to have a bar at the
Am 10.01.2014 16:53, schrieb Daniel Rosen:
The other thing about the broken snippet, though, is that it allowed
the user to choose both the direction of octavation and the number of
octaves. Is there any way for this kind of functionality to be added
here? E.g. \relative { \myoctavate #-1 {
After installing version 2.18 on Windows 7 (64bit) I was not able to
produce test.pdf.
It did however produce test.ps
I had to revert to 2.16
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
*Awesome!!*
I don't know when i'll have time to finish the thing i need this for,
but it will be very awesome when done. Many thanks!!
Janek
2014/1/10 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
2014/1/9 David Kastrup
Am 10.01.2014 19:34, schrieb Tom van der Hoeven:
After installing version 2.18 on Windows 7 (64bit) I was not able to
produce test.pdf.
It did however produce test.ps
I had to revert to 2.16
Hi Tom,
I am sorry to hear, that the upgrade didn’t work properly for you.
Could you write a bit
-Original Message-
From: Richard Shann [mailto:rich...@rshann.plus.com]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 12:51 PM
To: Daniel Rosen
Subject: Re: Markedly different-looking ties
On Fri, 2014-01-10 at 15:44 +, Daniel Rosen wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Richard Shann
-Original Message-
From: David Kastrup [mailto:d...@gnu.org]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 12:19 PM
To: Daniel Rosen
Cc: Eluze; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Automatic octaves
Daniel Rosen drose...@gmail.com writes:
-Original Message-
From: David Kastrup
Here you are
test.ly
\version 2.16.0 % necessary for upgrading to future LilyPond versions.
\header{
title = A scale in LilyPond
subtitle = For more information on using LilyPond, please see
http://lilypond.org/introduction.html;
}
\relative c' {
c d e f g a b c
}
Working on the Godowsky challenge posed by Urs, I came up with this
really unpleasant workaround to splitting the beams as in the
original. Can anyone make this work without having to resort to adding
a second voice?
Shane
\version 2.18.0
\relative c''
{{
\once \override Beam #'positions =
trying random instruments from the list of instruments on this page:
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/midi-instruments
here are the values for which my timidity (version 2.13.2) creates an
audible track (a few picked at random):
cello
xylophone
pan flute
From a Fringe Coder,
I like Vim (text editor). I like to code with minimal but descriptive
syntax(ie. Visual Basic). XML code for web-applications I find bloated
and working with it is ugly. If MusicXML is guided by the right people
and does become/is a definitive standard that can support the
Kevin,
On 2014-01-11 17:40, Kevin Tough wrote:
From a Fringe Coder,
I like Vim (text editor).
The choice of champions!
I like to code with minimal but descriptive
syntax(ie. Visual Basic).
Basic will cause brain damage - try Ruby!
XML code for web-applications I find bloated
and
38 matches
Mail list logo
