On Sun, 18 May 2014, Graham King wrote:
If you're going to use xargs, be careful of .ly files containing whitespace
in the filename. The GNU implementations of find and xargs support an
option for that:
find . -name \*.ly -print0 | xargs -0 -n 1 convert-ly -e
The commandline solution for
Is it possible to use a text spanner in a \mark?
That is, accel... is about tempo, so it makes sense -- as with other
tempo marks -- to print it just once in the score (especially this score: 3
players, 3 staves). But it seems this is not possible with a text spanner.
hjh
Sent with
Hello,
It would indeed be nice (as a \tempo rather than \mark, I should say). It
was added as an issue here:
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3176
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3176
Philippe
--
View this message in context:
I was just toying with articulate.ly, to hear some trills, when I noticed
that it's starting the trill on the upper note. This is appropriate for
older music but dead wrong for contemporary music. (If not dead wrong,
then certainly generally wrong.)
How to configure this?
\include
On Sunday, May 18, 2014 3:38:43 PM HKT, James Harkins wrote:
I was just toying with articulate.ly, to hear some trills, when
I noticed that it's starting the trill on the upper note. This
is appropriate for older music but dead wrong for contemporary
music. (If not dead wrong, then certainly
2014-05-18 7:20 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Knute Snortum ksnor...@gmail.com writes:
My situation is I need to transcribe a crescendo starting without a dynamic
marking. If I put in a \mf then I don't get warning. If I can hide the
dynamic mark, all will be fine. Is there a \hide
Martin Tarenskeen m.tarensk...@zonnet.nl writes:
On Sun, 18 May 2014, Graham King wrote:
If you're going to use xargs, be careful of .ly files containing whitespace
in the filename. The GNU implementations of find and xargs support an
option for that:
find . -name \*.ly -print0 | xargs -0
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com writes:
2014-05-18 7:20 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Knute Snortum ksnor...@gmail.com writes:
My situation is I need to transcribe a crescendo starting without a dynamic
marking. If I put in a \mf then I don't get warning. If I can hide the
Hello Sebastian,
it seems to me like you would require more than 16 midi channels (which
normally correspond to the staves in your score) and midi doesn't
support more than 16. So the output which would have gone to channel #17
is actually put into channel #1 (and inherits its instrument,
Hello,
I just tried to suppress a series of expected warnings, but the scheme
function seems to suppress only the first of a kind. See attached file.
Why is this?
Best regards,
Simon
\version 2.19.3
#(ly:expect-warning MIDI channel wrapped around)
#(ly:expect-warning remapping modulo 16)
Hi Simon,
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 5:57 AM, Simon Albrecht simon.albre...@mail.dewrote:
Hello,
I just tried to suppress a series of expected warnings, but the scheme
function seems to suppress only the first of a kind. See attached file. Why
is this?
Each call suppresses a single
On Sun, 18 May 2014 08:38:09 +0200 (CEST) Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
Luckily I don't need this kind of commandline virtuosity. I think I
can do what I need with one of the first and easiest suggestions
convert-ly -e **/*.ly
I'm glad that you have a solution that works for you. Simple is
- Original Message -
From: Javier Ruiz-Alma
To: Phil Holmes ; LilyPond User Group
Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 4:51 AM
Subject: Re: Adjusting distance between staves in a system
Phil, I used your advice and made it to work.
I added an extra voice, a hidden note to push the
Thanks! The \omit works better than the \hide.
Knute Snortum
(via Gmail)
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Paul Morris p...@paulwmorris.com wrote:
Knute Snortum wrote
My situation is I need to transcribe a crescendo starting without a
dynamic
marking. If I put in a \mf then I don't
2014-05-18 12:28 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com writes:
2014-05-18 7:20 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Knute Snortum ksnor...@gmail.com writes:
My situation is I need to transcribe a crescendo starting without a dynamic
marking. If I put
Dear list,
After much search, I finally found the \repeat unfold N, but is it
possible with scheme to create new operators, to abbreviate things? Like
using for that purpose ** (since * is already taken) ? Or is that
hard-coded deep in the interpreter?
Intuitively, as a beginner, I would
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com writes:
2014-05-18 12:28 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com writes:
2014-05-18 7:20 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Knute Snortum ksnor...@gmail.com writes:
My situation is I need to transcribe a
Philippe Baril Lecavalier pbl@gmail.com writes:
Dear list,
After much search, I finally found the \repeat unfold N, but is it
possible with scheme to create new operators, to abbreviate things?
[...]
So for
simplicity, could one create a new operator through scheme, like **?
Example
On May 18, 2014, at 12:28:22 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 12:28:22 +0200
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: MIDI dynamics parsing error
If \omit is too strong and \hide leaves too much space, maybe
Am 18.05.2014 16:32, schrieb David Kastrup:
Philippe Baril Lecavalier pbl@gmail.com writes:
Dear list,
After much search, I finally found the \repeat unfold N, but is it
possible with scheme to create new operators, to abbreviate things?
[...]
So for
simplicity, could one create a new
Am 18.05.2014 16:33, schrieb Patrick or Cynthia Karl:
On May 18, 2014, at 12:28:22 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 12:28:22 +0200
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: MIDI dynamics parsing error
If \omit is
Patrick or Cynthia Karl pck...@mac.com writes:
On May 18, 2014, at 12:28:22 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 12:28:22 +0200
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: MIDI dynamics parsing error
If \omit is too
2014-05-18 16:18 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com writes:
2014-05-18 12:28 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com writes:
2014-05-18 7:20 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Knute Snortum ksnor...@gmail.com
Conor Cook wrote
It is my impression that a decrescendo starts where you are and gets
quieter. Does Lilypond not have a default (e.g. mf) MIDI dynamic like
Sibelius?
Good point. Wouldn't it make sense to just use a default volume for MIDI,
if it has not been specified in the score with a
On Sun, 18 May 2014, Graham King wrote:
On Sun, 18 May 2014 08:38:09 +0200 (CEST) Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
Luckily I don't need this kind of commandline virtuosity. I
think I
can do what I need with one of the first and easiest
suggestions
convert-ly -e **/*.ly
One
Martin Tarenskeen m.tarensk...@zonnet.nl writes:
On Sun, 18 May 2014, Graham King wrote:
On Sun, 18 May 2014 08:38:09 +0200 (CEST) Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
Luckily I don't need this kind of commandline virtuosity. I
think I
can do what I need with one of the first and easiest
It's sorted under the \ character:
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/visibility-of-objects#index-_005comit-1
On Sun, 2014-05-18 at 09:33 -0500, Patrick or Cynthia Karl wrote:
On May 18, 2014, at 12:28:22 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 18 May 2014
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
No. The closest you can probably get is
\\* =
#(define-music-function (parser location n m) (index? ly:music?)
(make-music 'UnfoldedRepeatedMusic
'repeat-count n
'element m))
\* 6 {c8 g e g}
Good enough for me!
-- Johan
28 matches
Mail list logo
