Andrew,
Thank you for your reply and instructions. They do what I want and I learned a
new technique!
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Bernard [mailto:andrew.bern...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2016 5:42 PM
To: Mark Stephen Mrotek
Cc: lilypond-user Mailinglist
Subject: Re:
Hi Mark,
On 6 June 2016 at 04:24, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:
> In the attached snippet I want the aftergrace positioned closer to the
> subsequent bar line.
>
Hi Mark,
> On 6 June 2016 at 4:26:08 AM, Mark Stephen Mrotek (carsonm...@ca.rr.com)
> wrote:
>
> In the attached snippet I want the af
> IIRC it's a compatibility issue. I think the LilyPond wrapper script
(usually ~/bin/lilypond) has to set
> the right path to the local Lilypond gs.
> Basically, if LilyPond invokes the system gs it's often the wrong version.
The wrapper looks good to me:
#!/bin/sh
me=`basename $0`
export LD_L
Am 5. Juni 2016 22:59:17 MESZ, schrieb Mike :
>> This sort of error is usually a good sign that you're trying to run a
>> locally installed LP with the Linux Distribution versions of, eg,
>> GhostScript or Python; not a good idea.
>>
>> Your full output of the installation process (in the other
> This sort of error is usually a good sign that you're trying to run a
> locally installed LP with the Linux Distribution versions of, eg,
> GhostScript or Python; not a good idea.
>
> Your full output of the installation process (in the other subthread)
> is useful, difficult to understand, and
> Interesting that you had to descend a level to see those links.
>
> My suggestion is that you reinstall with the script just as I showed,
> using a unique, non-existing prefix. The obvious prefix is
> lilypond-2.18.2-1 which includes the version number. I'm *guessing*
> that you've tried to inst
On 05/06/16 11:32, Alberto Simões wrote:
On 05/06/16 11:30, Alberto Simões wrote:
Hi
I have a standard "\markup{Da Capo al fine}" in a score.
That score is being included in a lilypond-book document.
pdfTeX complains with:
pdfTeX warning: pdflatex (file
/usr/local/texlive/2015/texmf-dis
Hello,
In the attached snippet I want the aftergrace positioned closer to the
subsequent bar line.
What should I do?
Thank you,
Mark
\version "2.18.2"
upper = \relative c'' {
\clef treble
\key g \major
\time 6/8
\afterGrace 2.\fermata {s8 b16 ([c] d [c b a])} |
\stemNeutral
why /home1/myusername?
Normally linux uses /home/myusername
without a one.
Am 05.06.2016 16:43, schrieb David Wright:
Just a quick note before I go off to do real work...
On Sun 05 Jun 2016 at 07:49:41 (+), Mike wrote:
> > [~]# bash lilypond_install/lilypond-2.18.2-1.linux-64.sh --prefix l
2016-06-05 15:18 GMT+02:00 Simon Albrecht :
> On 04.06.2016 12:51, Thomas Morley wrote:
>>
>> Otoh, it may be worth considering making `calc-blot` public. It's a
>> simple c/p from bar-line.scm and I was annoyed by the need to do so
>> before.
>
>
> I agree. Defining custom bar lines is not so far-
Just a quick note before I go off to do real work...
On Sun 05 Jun 2016 at 07:49:41 (+), Mike wrote:
> > > [~]# bash lilypond_install/lilypond-2.18.2-1.linux-64.sh --prefix lilypond
> >
> > I can't understand this. It looks like root's prompt, not a user's.
>
> It's just my user's prom
On Sun 05 Jun 2016 at 09:54:35 (+), Mike wrote:
> > I'll try a hello world now.
>
> Uhm... Hello world is having trouble with ps->pdf, so far as I can see.
> Again, executing that command manually worked fine, and the resulting PDF
> looks good.
> Should I start a new thread?
>
> Thanks
>
>
On 04.06.2016 12:51, Thomas Morley wrote:
Otoh, it may be worth considering making `calc-blot` public. It's a
simple c/p from bar-line.scm and I was annoyed by the need to do so
before.
I agree. Defining custom bar lines is not so far-fetched a use case, and
this seems an odd necessity.
Best
I define the following macros, which I adapted from the LSR some time ago:
/showEmptyStaff = {
\set Staff.keepAliveInterfaces = #'(
rhythmic-grob-interface
multi-measure-rest-interface
lyric-interface
stanza-number-interface
percent-repeat-interface)
}
unShowEmptyStaff = { \unset Sta
On 05/06/16 11:30, Alberto Simões wrote:
Hi
I have a standard "\markup{Da Capo al fine}" in a score.
That score is being included in a lilypond-book document.
pdfTeX complains with:
pdfTeX warning: pdflatex (file
/usr/local/texlive/2015/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/tex-gyre/qcsri.pfb):
gl
Hi
I have a standard "\markup{Da Capo al fine}" in a score.
That score is being included in a lilypond-book document.
pdfTeX complains with:
pdfTeX warning: pdflatex (file
/usr/local/texlive/2015/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/tex-gyre/qcsri.pfb):
glyph `f_i' undefined
the PDF gets 'Da Ca
On 05/06/16 11:19, Klaus Blum wrote:
Hi Alberto,
here's what I would start with:
% -
\version "2.19.25"
\defineBarLine "|-norepeat" #'("|" "" "|") % End / Start / Middle of line
\relative c'{
\override Score.TimeSignatu
Hi Alberto,
here's what I would start with:
% -
\version "2.19.25"
\defineBarLine "|-norepeat" #'("|" "" "|") % End / Start / Middle of line
\relative c'{
\override Score.TimeSignature.break-visibility = #'#(#f #t #t) % E
> I'll try a hello world now.
Uhm... Hello world is having trouble with ps->pdf, so far as I can see.
Again, executing that command manually worked fine, and the resulting PDF
looks good.
Should I start a new thread?
Thanks
[~/tmp/lily]# lilypond test.ly
GNU LilyPond 2.18.2
Processing `test.ly'
james writes:
>> On Jun 5, 2016, at 11:35 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> james writes:
>>
>>> Is there an easier way of creating a partially frenched score?
>>
>> Easier than what?
>>
>>> I'd like to hide all of the empty staves for a bit, but then show even
>>> the 20 measures of rests lat
> On Jun 5, 2016, at 11:37 AM, james wrote:
>
>
>> On Jun 5, 2016, at 11:35 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> james writes:
>>
>>> Is there an easier way of creating a partially frenched score?
>>
>> Easier than what?
>>
>>> I'd like to hide all of the empty staves for a bit, but then show e
> On Jun 5, 2016, at 11:35 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> james writes:
>
>> Is there an easier way of creating a partially frenched score?
>
> Easier than what?
>
>> I'd like to hide all of the empty staves for a bit, but then show even
>> the 20 measures of rests later on.
>
> Well, shouldn
OK, linking manually seemed to work! Weird huh? Seems like I can create
symlinks, but not from within the install script.
Is there a conclusive test to thoroughly verify my install?
I'll try a hello world now.
Thanks again.
[~]# lilypond -v
GNU LilyPond 2.18.2
Copyright (c) 1996--2012 by
Han-We
2016-06-05 7:52 GMT+02:00 Andrew Bernard :
> Ahem. Let me correct that. I am trying to beam across a rest, not a quarter
> note. It works fine in the rest of my other scores.
>
> Andrew
>
> == snip
>
> \version "2.19.42"
> {
> \time 1/4
> \stemUp
> \stemNeutral
> \tuplet 3/2 { dis''16[ b'4\
james writes:
> Is there an easier way of creating a partially frenched score?
Easier than what?
> I'd like to hide all of the empty staves for a bit, but then show even
> the 20 measures of rests later on.
Well, shouldn't adding rest-interface to keepAliveInterfaces do the
trick?
--
David K
Hi
I would like to hide the cautionary time signature change from the end
of the staff. I found out that
\set Staff.explicitKeySignatureVisibility = #end-of-line-invisible
works for the key, but I couldn't find the equivalent for the time
signature.
Also, this change is from a Marcia to a
> For example, we have:
>
> libtiff.so -> libtiff.so.5.2.0 (in the same directory).
>
> To this extent, lilypond is self contained.
Nice one, thanks. OK I'm trying to sort out these links manually, so far so
good!
[~/lilypond/usr/lib]# ln -s libgs.so.8.70 libgs.so
[~/lilypond/usr/lib]# ls -l li
Is there an easier way of creating a partially frenched score? I'd like to hide
all of the empty staves for a bit, but then show even the 20 measures of rests
later on.
Thanks,
james
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.g
Mike writes:
> I see. Well this is the prompt I found, I didn't override it.
>
> [~]# id
> uid=1292(myusername) gid=1288(myusername) groups=1288(myusername)
The ids are standard fare. So they just set up the prompt against
convention for you. Which is a bad idea exactly because of triggering
s
I see. Well this is the prompt I found, I didn't override it.
[~]# id
uid=1292(myusername) gid=1288(myusername) groups=1288(myusername)
[~]# uname -a
Linux host137.hostmonster.com 3.12.52-20160119.106.ELK6.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue
Jan 19 16:53:32 CST 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
[~]#
Thanks all f
Mike writes:
>> >> > [~]# bash lilypond_install/lilypond-2.18.2-1.linux-64.sh --prefix
> lilypond
>> >>
>> >> I can't understand this. It looks like root's prompt, not a user's.
>> >
>> > It's just my user's prompt. It shows that I'm in my home dir.
>>
>> Are you sure? The `#' sign usua
Hi Mike,
id
will tell you who you are presently.
The $ and # prompt conventions are just that, but they are universally
accepted conventions. It would be highly unusual for a UNIX system to be
set up for a normal user prompt to be #. That in itself is indicative of
the possibility that your Host
2016-06-05 10:54 GMT+02:00 Mike :
>> >> > [~]# bash lilypond_install/lilypond-2.18.2-1.linux-64.sh --prefix
> lilypond
>> >>
>> >> I can't understand this. It looks like root's prompt, not a user's.
>> >
>> > It's just my user's prompt. It shows that I'm in my home dir.
>>
>> Are you sure?
Hi Mike,
The lilypond installation uses symlinks in its /usr/lib area to link to
versions of shared libraries in the same directory, not in /usr on the
system.
For example, we have:
libtiff.so -> libtiff.so.5.2.0 (in the same directory).
To this extent, lilypond is self contained.
Are you able
> >> > [~]# bash lilypond_install/lilypond-2.18.2-1.linux-64.sh --prefix
lilypond
> >>
> >> I can't understand this. It looks like root's prompt, not a user's.
> >
> > It's just my user's prompt. It shows that I'm in my home dir.
>
> Are you sure? The `#' sign usually indicates a super-us
Hi Mike,
It would be helpful if we could know the type of linux system you are on,
which distribution and version I could not see that in this thread.
Andrew
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lil
>> > [~]# bash lilypond_install/lilypond-2.18.2-1.linux-64.sh --prefix lilypond
>>
>> I can't understand this. It looks like root's prompt, not a user's.
>
> It's just my user's prompt. It shows that I'm in my home dir.
Are you sure? The `#' sign usually indicates a super-user shell,
whil
> > [~]# bash lilypond_install/lilypond-2.18.2-1.linux-64.sh --prefix lilypond
>
> I can't understand this. It looks like root's prompt, not a user's.
It's just my user's prompt. It shows that I'm in my home dir.
> Please post all the output. It ought to be about 40 lines at most.
> If the
38 matches
Mail list logo
