Re: Simultaneous accidental breaks cross-staff stem

Am 19.07.2016 um 22:39 schrieb Joel C. Salomon: From “Arrival of the Wolves”: an accidental in the upper Staff’s voiceOne shifts a chord in its voiceTwo so it no longer aligns with the corresponding note in the lower Staff, yielding the attached result. You can force the to the right place

Re: Slur over single note?

All the rest of the signs are phrasing slurs in this snippet. I would say it’s also a phrasing slur, and not a mistake or error. The Peter Pan score seems to be full of such _descriptive_ indications. Not all scores are entirely _prescriptive_. Andrew

Re: Slur over single note?

On Tue 19 Jul 2016 at 15:12:37 (-0700), Flaming Hakama by Elaine wrote: > > >> >> It could be a LaissezVibrer tie, but I'm wondering if there isn't > > >a > > >> >> connection to the next bar. The tie extends so far and touches the > > >> >> BarLine at the end of that measure that makes me wonder,

Re: 17th century English kbd ornaments

Just my opinion, but I think it is usually a good idea to use an original source such as Purcell's mentioned in the original post, rather than rely on a secondary source such as Dolmetsch. -- View this message in context:

Re: Lyrics.LyricText.font-size in layout block

On Tuesday, July 19, 2016, Noeck [via Lilypond] < ml-node+s1069038n192849...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Am 19.07.2016 um 22:54 schrieb tisimst: > > real-lyric-font-size = x*(1+y/6)*(12/20) > > I doubt this formula as y = -6 should give half of the normal size and > not a negative number. I

Re: Slur over single note?

> >> >> It could be a LaissezVibrer tie, but I'm wondering if there isn't > >a > >> >> connection to the next bar. The tie extends so far and touches the > >> >> BarLine at the end of that measure that makes me wonder, but it's > >> >only > >> >> speculation at this point. Given the ending tip's

Re: Lyrics.LyricText.font-size in layout block

Hi, Am 19.07.2016 um 22:54 schrieb tisimst: > real-lyric-font-size = x*(1+y/6)*(12/20) I doubt this formula as y = -6 should give half of the normal size and not a negative number. I still think this is correct: factor = 2^((font-size-1)/6) Cheers, Joram

Re: Lyrics.LyricText.font-size in layout block

Hi Colin, > My question is: > Is there documentation of what number I should give to get a particular > decrease or increase in font size? > > There is this page: > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/internals/lyrictext > > From the above page: > The font size, compared to the ‘normal’

Re: Lyrics.LyricText.font-size in layout block

Colin Tennyson writes: > From the above page: > The font size, compared to the ‘normal’ size. 0 is style-sheet’s normal > size, -1 is smaller, +1 is bigger. Each step of 1 is approximately 12% > larger; 6 steps are exactly a factor 2 larger. Fractional values are >

Re: Lyrics.LyricText.font-size in layout block

Colin, On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 1:55 PM, Colin Tennyson [via Lilypond] < ml-node+s1069038n192840...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > I was looking for a way to change the font size of the lyrics in choir > music > > Looking around I came across a page describing a command 'fontsize' for > use in markup

Re: Slur over single note?

> On 19 Jul 2016, at 22:10, Joel C. Salomon wrote: > > On 2016-07-19 2:37 PM, Urs Liska wrote: >> Mind sending that (privately if you want) or a download link? > > The file is “39087011212125score.pdf” from > , the piece “The Flying

Lyrics.LyricText.font-size in layout block

I was looking for a way to change the font size of the lyrics in choir music Looking around I came across a page describing a command 'fontsize' for use in markup sections http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/font On this page it is described that many font properties can be

Simultaneous accidental breaks cross-staff stem

>From “Arrival of the Wolves”: an accidental in the upper Staff’s voiceOne shifts a chord in its voiceTwo so it no longer aligns with the corresponding note in the lower Staff, yielding the attached result. Minimized example: \version "2.19" \language "english" global = {

Re: Slur over single note?

On 2016-07-19 2:37 PM, Urs Liska wrote: > I'm 98% sure that's an engraving error of some kind that may > be resolved by analogy. I'd have to see the full score ... > > Mind sending that (privately if you want) or a download link? The file is “39087011212125score.pdf” from

Re: Slur over single note?

On Tue 19 Jul 2016 at 18:58:36 (+0200), Urs Liska wrote: > Am 19. Juli 2016 18:11:14 MESZ, schrieb "Joel C. Salomon" > : > >On 2016-07-19 2:45 AM, tisimst wrote: > >> It could be a LaissezVibrer tie, but I'm wondering if there isn't a > >> connection to the next bar. The

Re: 17th century English kbd ornaments

Thanks, just downloaded, I'll take a close look. Cheers, Pierre 2016-07-19 19:31 GMT+02:00 Mark Stephen Mrotek : > Pierre, > > > > Arnold Dolmetsch in his *The Interpretation of the Music of the 17th and > 18th Centuries*, provides a list of “signs” with examples of

Re: Slur over single note?

Am 19. Juli 2016 20:02:10 MESZ, schrieb David Wright : >On Tue 19 Jul 2016 at 18:58:36 (+0200), Urs Liska wrote: >> Am 19. Juli 2016 18:11:14 MESZ, schrieb "Joel C. Salomon" >: >> >On 2016-07-19 2:45 AM, tisimst wrote: >> >> It could be a

RE: 17th century English kbd ornaments

Pierre, Arnold Dolmetsch in his The Interpretation of the Music of the 17th and 18th Centuries, provides a list of “signs” with examples of execution. Mark From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Pierre Perol-Schneider Sent:

Re: Slur over single note?

Am 19. Juli 2016 18:11:14 MESZ, schrieb "Joel C. Salomon" : >On 2016-07-19 2:45 AM, tisimst wrote: >> It could be a LaissezVibrer tie, but I'm wondering if there isn't a >> connection to the next bar. The tie extends so far and touches the >> BarLine at the end of that

Re: Slurs within & across \repeat tremolo

On 2016-07-19 6:21 AM, Simon Albrecht wrote: > Here, it’s important that the slurs don’t need to be directly appended > to the notes, they only have to be at the right timestep. Empty chords, > parallel music expressions and once again the nice \after function can > be used for the following neat

Re: Slur over single note?

On 2016-07-19 2:45 AM, tisimst wrote: > It could be a LaissezVibrer tie, but I'm wondering if there isn't a > connection to the next bar. The tie extends so far and touches the > BarLine at the end of that measure that makes me wonder, but it's only > speculation at this point. Given the ending

Re: Slurs within & across \repeat tremolo

On Tue 19 Jul 2016 at 12:21:39 (+0200), Simon Albrecht wrote: > On 19.07.2016 06:07, Joel C. Salomon wrote: [...] > > a16( gs a gsa gsa gs\repeat tremolo 4 { a gs) } > > | \kluge | > > \voiceOne > > \repeat tremolo 4 { f( d } \repeat

Re: Slur over single note?

Hi Abraham, I don’t think it is actually a laissezvibrer tie, I am only suggesting that because that is a way to do it in lilypond, which does not have single sided slurs, as I call them, built in. OP: here is the code to extend a laissezviber tie to ‘fake out’ a long indication like this on a

Re: Defining a function that passes contents between braces to a markup

Mojca Miklavec writes: > Dear David, > > On 16 July 2016 at 09:31, David Kastrup wrote: >> Mojca Miklavec writes: >>> >>> I've learnt some basics of scheme and managed to write some simple >>> functions, but I'm unable to figure out how to write a function that

Re: Defining a function that passes contents between braces to a markup

Dear David, On 16 July 2016 at 09:31, David Kastrup wrote: > Mojca Miklavec writes: >> >> I've learnt some basics of scheme and managed to write some simple >> functions, but I'm unable to figure out how to write a function that >> would take all the contents between braces as an argument and

Re: 17th century English kbd ornaments

On Tue, 2016-07-19 at 12:08 +0200, Simon Albrecht wrote: > On 19.07.2016 09:56, Richard Shann wrote: > >> If we did them as > >> ornaments the possibility would arise of being able to use them to set > >> English Virginal Music which uses the slash and double slash, > > those behave rather

Re: Vertical clash of contents

On 19.07.2016 11:17, Mojca Miklavec wrote: I would really like all the buttons / fingers to be aligned vertically, otherwise it looks horrible (I can post the example again). But if someone can show me how to tweak the fingerings properly to satisfy my needs, I'll gladly use those instead. I

Re: Slurs within & across \repeat tremolo

On 19.07.2016 06:07, Joel C. Salomon wrote: At is my current effort toward recreating the original score, but I’m having trouble with the opening bars (image attached). I can imitate the _look_ of

Re: 17th century English kbd ornaments

On 19.07.2016 09:56, Richard Shann wrote: If we did them as ornaments the possibility would arise of being able to use them to set English Virginal Music which uses the slash and double slash, those behave rather differently from ornaments, being as you say, through the stem. through the stem,

Re: Vertical clash of contents

On 18 July 2016 at 14:55, David Kastrup wrote: > Mojca Miklavec writes: > >> I also totally agree that the fingerings are *the most sensible* place >> where this information should be entered. (Placing the information >> inside the lyrics is "kind-of horrible" idea, but I don't know how to >>

Re: Behaviour of \paper and \layout in ly:book-process

Am 18.07.2016 um 19:19 schrieb David Kastrup: > Urs Liska writes: > >> Am 18.07.2016 um 13:46 schrieb David Kastrup: >> >>> The defaultpaper argument of ly:book-process is only consulted when the >>> book argument does not already have a paper block of its own, and every

Re: 17th century English kbd ornaments

On Tue, 2016-07-19 at 05:34 +0500, Andrew Bernard wrote: > Hi Pierre, > > > Wouldn’t it be better to do these are actual ornaments instead of just > markup? I say this because there is a page on the lilyond blog > regarding this, but it is only partially complete. If we did them as > ornaments

Re: 17th century English kbd ornaments

BTW, I found this : http://home.insightbb.com/~cratonkiwi/music/orn3.jpg Are these glyphs and explanation accurate? (Actually, the example taken to draw my glyph was: http://imslp.nl/imglnks/usimg/c/c7/IMSLP351896-PMLP568401-Purcell_CorantZ644.pdf ) Cheers, Pierre 2016-07-19 9:49 GMT+02:00

Re: 17th century English kbd ornaments

Hi Andrew, Interesting question. I'm not familiar with Purcell's work but what I found on IMSLP was that this shake is used as (e.g.) a trill. So how about : \version "2.19.45" purcell-shake-glyph = \markup\stencil #(make-path-stencil '(M -0.20 0.05 L 1.55 0.51 M -0.31 0.43 L 1.45

Re: 17th century English kbd ornaments

Or even: shake = -\tweak stencil #(lambda (grob)(grob-interpret-markup grob purcell-shake-glyph)) \trill Cheers, Pierre 2016-07-19 9:44 GMT+02:00 Pierre Perol-Schneider < pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com>: > Hi Andrew, > > Interesting question. > I'm not familiar with Purcell's work but what I

Re: Slur over single note?

On Monday, July 18, 2016, Andrew Bernard [via Lilypond] < ml-node+s1069038n192810...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > Hi Joel > > Use a laissezvibrer tie. I have a function to extend them, Away from the > computer right now. Will send later. Can't remember if it is on LSR. > > Andrew > > On Tuesday, 19