No, the arrow modifications are the only departures from standard notation.
MT
On 31 January 2018 at 16:47, Hans Åberg wrote:
>
>
> > On 31 Jan 2018, at 21:25, Michael Taylor
> wrote:
> >
> > Thank you for your message & the links. I have
I think this is ok. I will be using a proportional notation anyway so I
think it is fine to set
\override Glissando.after-line-breaking = ##f
Maybe ideally there would be some distribution or only partial
reiteration (instead of getting all colors again), but I think this will
work fine.
Thanks. You have gone far and above the call of duty. I will post
questions if I have any, but wont shed tears if you cannot get around to it.
Best,
Michael
On 01/31/2018 06:28 PM, Thomas Morley wrote:
2018-01-31 19:02 GMT+01:00 Michael Winter :
I am now
2018-02-01 1:28 GMT+01:00 Thomas Morley :
> 2018-01-31 19:02 GMT+01:00 Michael Winter :
>
>> I am now curious what you are thinking about the line breaking. Maybe I am
>> out to lunch here and you have a much better idea. I will wait to hear
2018-01-31 19:02 GMT+01:00 Michael Winter :
> I am now curious what you are thinking about the line breaking. Maybe I am
> out to lunch here and you have a much better idea. I will wait to hear from
> you before I do any heavy lifting.
I'm very busy. My shitty
ah. ok. somehow I though it broke all together. So perhaps you are
having the same problem as me. Well... at least I got my feet a bit more
wet with scheme. Not sure if by "how the broken part should look" if you
are asking a question. But admittedly, I do not have a solid idea, I
just want
2018-01-31 18:37 GMT+01:00 Michael Winter :
> As for linebreaking. That is indeed a showstopper at the moment. Is that
> because you are using filled box stencil?
No, I was not clear enough, though.
Line-breaks worked, but they were not nice.
One reason was bad padding
If you attach the tilde to the individual notes rather than the entire chord,
that should work. That is, ` ` rather than `~ `.
On 02/01/18 00:30, Rohan Srinivasan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am tying two chords together. Is it possible to have the top tie be above
> the note and the
Hi Rohan,
Am 01.02.2018 um 00:30 schrieb Rohan Srinivasan:
Hi all,
I am tying two chords together. Is it possible to have the top tie be
above the note and the bottom tie to be below?
Generally this should be the case. That is, if you are in \oneVoice
mode. If you instead have a first or
Hi all,
I am tying two chords together. Is it possible to have the top tie be above
the note and the bottom tie to be below?
i.e. When I use _~ the tie is below both notes and vice versa for ^~
Thanks in advance
___
lilypond-user mailing list
Stefano Troncaro writes:
> Hello again everyone!
>
> Suppose I have the following example:
>
> \version "2.19.80"\language "english"
> command = {
> %What should go here to omit the sharp while keeping the natural?}
> \score {
> \new Staff {
> \new Voice
> On 31 Jan 2018, at 21:25, Michael Taylor wrote:
>
> Thank you for your message & the links. I have attached a fragment of the
> source to clarify what I am trying to replicate.
Are there any other microtonal accidentals, except for plain up and down
arrows?
almost. something seems to be not quite right about the alignment...
On 01/31/2018 03:30 PM, Michael Winter wrote:
ok. I have learned a tremendous amount with your help. I went ahead
and hacked away replacing your function with line markups and now it
seems to work with line breaks. let me
ok. I have learned a tremendous amount with your help. I went ahead and
hacked away replacing your function with line markups and now it seems
to work with line breaks. let me know if you see anything wrong with this.
Best,
Michael
---
\version "2.18"
\paper {
When placing chord names on a lead-sheet, sometimes a slash ( / ) is used on
subsequent measures or beats to indicate repeating the previous chord. How can
this be done in lilypond?
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
In that case, you could use something like this:
⋘
\version "2.19.80"
nth =
#(define-music-function
(n tweak mus) (integer? ly:music? ly:music?)
(single tweak (list-ref (ly:music-property mus 'elements) n))
mus)
{
\nth 1 \omit Accidental % Remember, zero-indexed
}
⋙
If you could be
I just tried it, but unfortunately it appears to only work when used inside
the chord, and I need to find a way to do it from outside.
2018-01-31 17:39 GMT-03:00 Caagr98 :
> You could try \single instead of \once, as in cs,>.
>
> On 01/31/18 21:27, Stefano Troncaro wrote:
> >
You could try \single instead of \once, as in .
On 01/31/18 21:27, Stefano Troncaro wrote:
> Hello again everyone!
>
> Suppose I have the following example:
>
> \version "2.19.80" \language "english" command = { %What should go here to
> omit the sharp while keeping the natural? } \score {
Hello again everyone!
Suppose I have the following example:
\version "2.19.80"\language "english"
command = {
%What should go here to omit the sharp while keeping the natural?}
\score {
\new Staff {
\new Voice \relative c'' {
\key b \minor \accidentalStyle modern
\partial 4
Thank you for your message. I am hoping to reproduce the arrow notation used by
the composer,
rather than substituting a different notational convention (which this composer
has employed in other pieces).
The fact that he implies a difference between a slightly lowered F & a slightly
raised E
On 1/31/2018 1:58 PM, Knute Snortum wrote:
Wow, okay. That works just fine. Thanks!
Sure:
{
\key g \minor
4
}
-David
Yup, that's a great little snippet indeed. You could even bump the notes
Wow, okay. That works just fine. Thanks!
---
Knute Snortum
(via Gmail)
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 8:04 AM, David Nalesnik
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 8:58 AM, Knute Snortum wrote:
> > Is it possible to shape a slur that goes from one note in
Hi Jan-Peter,
That's exactly what I was looking for. Perfect! Thank you so much!
Craig
On 1 February 2018 at 01:02, Jan-Peter Voigt wrote:
> Hi Craig,
>
> the intent of the edition engraver is to separate overrides from the
> content. So it is not the EE that is creating
Another option for the line breading is to give the target final note
for a system, hide it (basically the last note in your example). then in
the next system. do the same with the starting note on the left side and
hide it. Kind of a hack, but could actually look nice because you would
see
Hmmm... I made the change to use the stencil extent and that seems to be
fine. I am not sure what you are saying about the visibility of the
final stencil.
As for linebreaking. That is indeed a showstopper at the moment. Is that
because you are using filled box stencil? When I was using a
[Please cc the list so that others can follow.]
> On 31 Jan 2018, at 16:00, Michael Taylor wrote:
>
> Thank you for your message. I am hoping to reproduce the arrow notation used
> by the composer,
> rather than substituting a different notational convention (which
Thank you for your message. I am hoping to reproduce the arrow notation used by
the composer,
rather than substituting a different notational convention (which this composer
has employed in other pieces).
The fact that he implies a difference between a slightly lowered F & a slightly
raised E
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 8:58 AM, Knute Snortum wrote:
> Is it possible to shape a slur that goes from one note in a chord to another
> note in another chord, or do I have to create the slur from "scratch" with
> tweak control-points? For instance:
>
> \version "2.19.80"
>
Hi Craig,
the intent of the edition engraver is to separate overrides from the
content. So it is not the EE that is creating custom dynamics, but it
might prove useful, if you want to apply them on an external Score or on
arbitrary spots inside the Score.
A attached an example.
HTH
Is it possible to shape a slur that goes from one note in a chord to
another note in another chord, or do I have to create the slur from
"scratch" with tweak control-points? For instance:
\version "2.19.80"
\language "english"
{
\key g \minor
4
}
I would like to shape
Hi Guy
I've updated the wiki page.
Thanks
Il giorno mar 30 gen 2018 alle 19:56, Guy Stalnaker
ha scritto:
Federico,
You wiki document makes no mention of Qsynth. I use it in conjunction
with FluidSynth and Frescobaldi on LinuxMint and MacOS (I use
CoolSoft Virtual
Hi Craig,
I'd say, you need a custom stencil. The EE can then set the stencil with a
command like this: \editionMod ed-target 1 0/4 Staff \override
DynamicText.stencil = #(lambda (grob) ...)
I am not at my desktop right now. The stencil function (lambda) could analyze
the dynamic string and
2018-01-31 3:46 GMT+01:00 Michael Winter :
> On first glance. This looks ideal. THANK YOU
>
> I am a bit brain dead at the moment, so will dig in tomorrow and let you
> know if I have any further questions / thoughts / ideas.
Glad you like it.
I've found a weakness,
33 matches
Mail list logo