James, you wrote Tuesday, February 17, 2009 5:26 PM
Of course I had to finish engraving a piece of music where I had
to have 22 lyrics contexts because I couldn't figure a neat way
of keeping the proper voice contexts alive in order to figure out
a way to actually keep the voice contexts
This looks like a bug. An attempt to add the
Instrument_name_engraver to a StaffGroup context *and* produce MIDI
output causes a Crash under Vista. Doing either separately is fine.
Here's a minimal example:
\version 2.12.2
\score {
\new StaffGroup \with { \consists Instrument_name_engraver
Jonathan Kulp wrote Wednesday, February 18, 2009 12:16 AM
Trevor Daniels wrote:
This looks like a bug. An attempt to add the
Instrument_name_engraver to a StaffGroup context *and* produce
MIDI output causes a Crash under Vista. Doing either separately
is fine. Here's a minimal example
Ted
Section 5.5.4 in the Notation Reference describes how to modify the
shape of ties, slurs and phrasing slurs. It's a little tricky, but
it's easy compared with modifying the two parts of a slur split over
a line break! This is described in section 6.8 of the Notation
Reference. You
Grammostola Rosea wrote Wednesday, February 18, 2009 8:09 PM
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Daniel Hulme wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:25:19PM +0100, Grammostola Rosea
wrote:
My default Debian lenny version, works ok. But how do I install
the newest lilypond on Debian testing?
When I
Alberto Simões wrote Sunday, February 22, 2009 3:25 PM
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
hi,
this melody:
g4 a bes | es1( | es4) f, g a | d2 d
and I want to add these lyrics:
The fall - ing leaves_ drift by my win - dow,
Probably you want:
The fall- ing leaves drift by my win- dow
It should work, unless you have no notes in \upperOne
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: Alberto Simões al...@alfarrabio.di.uminho.pt
To: lilypond lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2009 3:24 PM
Subject: help with: Cannot find voice
Hello
I am trying to produce a SATB
Hmm. Not sure it's a bug. The \transpose command transposes all
pitches within its scope, including the pitch in the \transposition
command.
You can compensate for this by using \transposition ees rather than
\transposition bes in your example, but this seems a little
confusing
and rather
Peter Chubb wrote Monday, February 23, 2009 2:23 AM
Trevor == Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk writes:
Trevor Hmm. Not sure it's a bug. The \transpose command
transposes
I think it is (and I reported it as one some time ago).
I agree this is a bug now.
It doesn't seem
Anthony W. Youngman wrote
In message 874oyl28nj.wl%pe...@chubb.wattle.id.au, Peter Chubb
pet...@gelato.unsw.edu.au writes
Trevor == Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk writes:
Trevor Hmm. Not sure it's a bug. The \transpose command
transposes
I think it is (and I reported it as one
Carl, you wrote Tuesday, February 24, 2009 1:43 AM
On 2/23/09 12:52 PM, Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl wrote:
I have a piece of music in 3/4 which has bars like { d4. c8 b8.
a16 }
Lilypond groups the last three notes together, making it look
like a 6/8
measure, but I want the c8 to be
Peter Chubb wrote Tuesday, February 24, 2009 10:28 AM
Trevor == Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk writes:
Trevor Producing the correct pitch in MIDI for transposing
Trevor instruments being notated at pitch is certainly the
principal
Trevor use of \transposition. It's other use
Wilbert Berendsen wrote Thursday, February 26, 2009 9:21 AM
Op woensdag 25 februari 2009, schreef Stefan Thomas:
I'm only missing a feature, that can change pitches
enharmonically,
e.g. convert a cis to des.
Is it possible to write a plugin for this?
Yes, this kind of operations is
James
We discussed this last October, and I agreed to make the change in
2.13, but then the suggestion was made (by Mats):
Better yet, why can't the shorthand automatically do the right
thing? i.e.,
{} \\ {}
should be translated automagically into
{} \new Voice {}
I'd rather
Voice.keepAlive = ##t ?
El 28.02.2009, a las 10:33, Trevor Daniels escribió:
James
We discussed this last October, and I agreed to make the change
in 2.13, but then the suggestion was made (by Mats):
Better yet, why can't the shorthand automatically do the right
thing? i.e.,
{} \\ {}
should
Mats Bengtsson wrote Tuesday, March 10, 2009 10:10 AM
Why not use an invisible grace note to start the glissando? Then,
there's no need to fiddle with the timing:
\transpose c c'{
\grace{ \hideNotes g,8\glissando \unHideNotes} c'4 c'4 c'4 r4 |
\grace{\hideNotes c''8\glissando \unHideNotes}
Yes, it's possible. See the example Permitting line breaks within
beamed tuplets in section 1.2.1 of the Notation Reference.
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: urisala uris...@gmail.com
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 8:43 AM
Subject: Re: Line break and page
Yes, it's possible. See the example Permitting line breaks within
beamed tuplets in section 1.2.1 of the Notation Reference.
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: urisala uris...@gmail.com
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 8:43 AM
Subject: Re: Line break and page
Hi Maarten
I've made some changes which should produce the correct beaming by
default in this situation (along with quite a few more). They
should take effect in the first 2.13 version to be released.
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl
To: Lilypond
Hi
The easiest way to do this is to set measureLength and beatLength
explicitly (as you've begun to do), but for them to be effective you
need to either
a) revert any autoBeam settings that apply to the time signature in
force (here the default 4/4), as explained in Notation Reference
the
changes and create a patch. The Contributor's Guide describes
how to do it.
I've gotten this far, and everything is fine.
If I understand this correctly, you're proposing to make changes
to the
docs, rather than the code. Is that right? If so, you should
submit your
patch to Trevor
Message -
From: Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk
To: Benedict Singer sing...@mac.com; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 9:22 AM
Subject: Re: Auto beaming in unmetered music
Hi
The easiest way to do this is to set measureLength and beatLength
explicitly (as you've
Hi
This is almost but not quite possible. You have to use beam-ending
rules to obtain different beaming for different note durations
(rather than beat-grouping rules, which apply to all note
durations).
In 2.12 the beam-ending rules are
((end * * 2 4) . ,(ly:make-moment 1 4))
((end
Carl D. Sorensenwrote Thursday, March 19, 2009 2:42 PM
On 3/19/09 8:34 AM, Mats Bengtsson mats.bengts...@ee.kth.se
wrote:
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
On 3/19/09 5:13 AM, Mats Bengtsson mats.bengts...@ee.kth.se
wrote:
Should we turn this into feature request to make the automatic
Yes, I see the same with 2.12.1 on Vista and viewed with Adobe
Reader 8.1.3. See attached. A minor bug, but a definite one for a
program in which beautifully typeset music is the main objective.
Valentin?
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: Nick Payne njpa...@internode.on.net
To:
Thanks Jon - pushed to origin/master.
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: Jonathan Kulp jonlancek...@gmail.com
To: James E. Bailey derhindem...@googlemail.com
Cc: Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk; lilypond-user
Mailinglist lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 1:54
Cameron Horsburgh wrote Thursday, March 19, 2009 10:28 AM
I'm having trouble trying to modify the automatic beaming for a
piece
I'm working on. This piece has many examples of this figure in 4/4
time:
a8 a a a16 a
I would like the beaming to be:
a8[ a] a[ a16 a]
___ ___
| |
I believe shiftOn and friends only have an effect if
there would otherwise be a collision of note heads.
Maybe you are looking for the 'force-hshift property
of NoteColumn? See Learning Manual 4.5.2, towards the
bottom.
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: Alberto Simões
M Watts wrote Saturday, March 21, 2009 6:57 AM
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Trevor Daniels wrote:
Unfortunately, this will also subdivide 16th beams too. This is
what I meant by not quite possible. You would need to turn
subdivideBeams on and off as required.
Should we turn this into feature
Neil Puttock wrote Sunday, March 22, 2009 12:44 PM
2009/3/19 Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk:
Yes, I see the same with 2.12.1 on Vista and viewed with Adobe
Reader 8.1.3.
See attached. A minor bug, but a definite one for a program in
which
beautifully typeset music is the main
Patrick McCarty Monday, March 23, 2009 11:07 PM
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Cameron Horsburgh
ca...@netcall.com.au wrote:
I've also just noticed another thing: the figure
a8 a16 a16 a8 a16 a6
is rendered
a8[ a16 a16] a8[ a16 a6]
which is my preferred option. In fact, I would prefer
Neil
AFAIK the properties of beams are set at the moment the
beam starts and can't be changed thereafter, so I don't
think there's any way to make beams grow and contract in
a single unit.
One possible hack is to use two voices with the growing
beam in one and the contracting beam in the other,
I agree with all you suggest, Carl. How do we
make this change?
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: Carl D. Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu
To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen janneke-l...@xs4all.nl; Jonathan Kulp
jonlancek...@gmail.com
Cc: Jeb maestro...@comcast.net; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent:
Graham Percival wrote Friday, March 27, 2009 2:11 PM
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 07:56:53AM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
On 3/27/09 7:24 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen janneke-l...@xs4all.nl
wrote:
Well, this is utterly ridiculous IMNSHO. I would suggest to
* fix the main lilypond repo so
Peter Chubb wrote Saturday, March 28, 2009 8:44 AM
That's right. I want no lines on the stave for the RhythmicStaff,
but
I do want lines for the Staff context, and no StaffGroup bracket.
Peter
Have you tried setting 'line-count of StaffSymbol to 0
rather than removing
Anthony W. Youngman Saturday, March 28, 2009 3:50 PM
In message 73a00026c6f3454c9cf5c090b12d0...@trevorlaptop, Trevor
Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk writes
Carl, you wrote Tuesday, February 24, 2009 1:43 AM
On 2/23/09 12:52 PM, Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl wrote:
I have a piece of music
Graham Percival wrote Sunday, March 29, 2009 4:12 AM
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 08:38:08PM +, Anthony W. Youngman
wrote:
In message 3cbf99092d5f4e77a0cae01edf7be...@trevorlaptop,
Trevor
Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk writes
You'll be pleased to know the revert will not be required
at all
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote Tuesday, March 31, 2009 7:34 PM
Op dinsdag 31-03-2009 om 19:37 uur [tijdzone +0300], schreef Simon
Dahlbacka:
The unknown publisher warning sounds like OP is running Vista.
The
warning is due to the fact that the installer isn't authenticode
signed. Getting a
Francisco Vila wrote Tuesday, March 31, 2009 10:37 PM
2009/3/31 Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk:
(...)
You need a X.509 version 3 code-signing certificate to sign an
application.
See
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc962053.aspx
For a full description of the process see
Helge Kruse wrote Sunday, April 05, 2009 7:22 AM
I write a piece with where are a lot of triplets in one variation.
It
looks nice to have the beaming in the same length as the triplets
as it
is done in the hand writing original.
I found in the manual (1.2.4 Beams) that I can manually set
} }
}
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: Helge Kruse helge.kruse-nos...@gmx.net
To: Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Sunday, April 05, 2009 9:10 AM
Subject: Re: Automatic beaming
Trevor Daniels wrote:
Helge Kruse wrote Sunday, April 05, 2009 7:22
Helge
The 'slurs' in the hand-written score look as if they are
really triplet indicators, with the '3' omitted from the
later ones. If so, I don't think Lily can do this very well
automatically. The closest I can get is to make the tuplet
brackets transparent and use slurs, as shown below.
Jay Anderson wrote Monday, April 06, 2009 2:50 AM
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
as long as I have anything to do with LilyPond, I will veto
changes
like this that introduce inconsistent whitespace handling in the
syntax. Please come up with something
Stefan
I would not normally expect to see a separate syllable for one or
both grace notes. The syllable sung on the note following, or in
your case preceding, the grace note would be extended to cover the
grace note(s) too. Is this not what you would expect?
Trevor
- Original Message
Snippet?
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca
To: Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com
Cc: lilypond-user Mailinglist lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 4:25 AM
Subject: Re: TimeSignature with white border?
Mark,
This one
James
I've no idea what the problem is - the lines in error look correct
to me. But are the last two lines in the log a clue? These point
to lines 53 and 65. I suspect the error is there.
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: James E. Bailey derhindem...@googlemail.com
To:
Nick
You will need to revert the default auto-beaming rules for 3/4 time
to turn off the beaming every 8th note. You don't say what version
you are using, and there are differences in the default auto-beaming
rules. Look up revert-automatic-beam-setting in the index to the
Notation
Simon
Thanks for this, but the text is not quite right. IIRC the default
is .mid for Windows systems and .midi for all others. Could you
please amend and resubmit to reflect this?
It's also worth mentioning the equivalent command line option as
Eluze suggested:
would it be advisable to
Thanks Simon, pushed to git origin/master.
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: Simon Bailey bina...@gmail.com
To: Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk
Cc: lilypond-user Mailinglist lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 11:23 AM
Subject: Re: LilyPond midi extension
Eluze
There's a paragraph in section 5.5.1 which may (nor may not!) help.
It says:
All graphical objects have a reference point, a horizontal extent
and a vertical extent. The horizontal extent is a pair of numbers
giving the displacements from the reference point of the left and
right
Werner LEMBERG wrote Saturday, April 11, 2009 9:35 AM
In an english context, the plural is simple: crescendoes.
Ouch. I would use `crescendos'.
To be pedantic, if crescendo is not a noun there is no
plural, even in English. It should always be written as
crescendo markings or
Nick Payne wrote Sunday, April 12, 2009 12:10 PM
I find the same thing happens with guitar fingering - that
sometimes the
order in which the fingering indications appear above the stave
doesn't
match the pitch order of the notes they are applied to.
Do you have an example which shows this
Thanks Simon
LGTM. Pushed to git origin/master,
Editing docs is fun, isn't it ;)
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: Simon Bailey bina...@gmail.com
To: Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com
Cc: Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk; lilypond-user
Mailinglist lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent
Whoops, Sorry Simon. I'd replied to your
earlier note before I saw this.
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: Simon Bailey bina...@gmail.com
To: Simon Bailey bina...@gmail.com
Cc: lilypond-user lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2009 12:07 PM
Subject: Re: relative position of
Graham Percival wrote Friday, April 24, 2009 4:42 PM
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 04:10:37PM +0200, Simon Bailey wrote:
Graham Percival wrote:
If you have an idea for a general clarification that the syntax
is
pitch duration other, then I'm all for it. If it's a simple
you need to put the '
Graham Percival wrote Saturday, April 25, 2009 12:53 PM
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 12:31:14PM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Graham Percival wrote Saturday, April 25, 2009 10:13 AM
Eh?!?! You want to tell people to put articulation and dynamic
marks after the duration, before they've been
From: Tim Rowe wrote Monday, May 11, 2009 12:29 AM
2009/5/10 Mats Bengtsson mats.bengts...@ee.kth.se:
This is explained in Sect. 3.2.3 Voices and vocals in the
Learning Manual
for LilyPond.
I can't see anything relating to it there -- it was the first
place I
looked! Perhaps you don't
Tim Rowe wrote Thursday, May 14, 2009 1:18 AM
2009/5/14 Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com:
In your lyrics definition, you're missing curly brackets around
the
alternatives:
\alternative
{ so }
{ do }
The { do } block isn't part of the \alternative block, so
lilypond
interprets the
Mats Bengtsson wrote Monday, May 25, 2009 8:03 PM
Henning Plumeyer wrote:
\relative c'' {
\key f \major g1*1/4 bes1*1/4 a1*1/4 g1*1/4 d'1.*1/6 c4 bes4
c1*1/4
}
Hi, Carl,
could you explain why this works? I would have expected that
g1*1/4 is
exactly the same as g4, but it is
Patrick McCarty wrote Monday, May 25, 2009 11:43 PM
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 03:26:42PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Trevor Daniels
t.dani...@treda.co.uk wrote:
The lines in the html version of this section of the
Notation Reference are significantly
Patrick McCarty wrote Tuesday, May 26, 2009 8:24 AM
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 07:51:22AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Patrick McCarty wrote Monday, May 25, 2009 11:43 PM
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 03:26:42PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Trevor Daniels
t.dani
- Original Message -
From: Kjetil Rossavik lilyp...@rossavik.co.uk
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 11:23 AM
Subject: Re: Four bars per line
-Eluze eluzew at gmail.com writes:
Kjetil Rossavik wrote:
How do I get Lilypond to lay out my music with 4 bars per
Graham Percival wrote Tuesday, May 26, 2009 12:02 PM
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:41:17AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
I've looked again more closely at your original patch. The
reason
it fails to apply is that line 45 in the existing version of
/input/lsr/non-default-tuplet-numbers.ly has
Hi
This works fine for me. Are you including the title in a \header
{ ... } block?
If you are, tell us what version of LilyPond you are using, what the
error is, and post more of your .ly file so we can look for the
problem.
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: Jayaratna
delete the %\include 04_fig.ly line, Lilypond starts giving
errors
from the next character.
Thank you,
Andrea
Trevor Daniels wrote:
Hi
This works fine for me. Are you including the title in a \header
{ ... } block?
If you are, tell us what version of LilyPond you are using, what
the
error
Nick Payne wrote Wednesday, June 10, 2009 11:55 PM
Is there anywhere in the documentation that states where
whitespace *is*
required? I was getting a warning in my console output: warning:
More
alternatives than repeats. Junking excess alternatives, and I
couldn't see
what could be causing
Valentin Villenave wrote Wednesday, January 07, 2009 12:21 AM
Greetings,
NR1.2.4 says:
Known issues and warnings
Automatically kneed cross-staff beams cannot be used together with
hidden staves.
Why?
The following piece of code works well (and if you uncomment the
last
line, an ugly #76
Stefan Thomas wrote Monday, June 15, 2009 4:11 PM
Dear community,
I have a problem with different Beam-Gruops in different 5/8-bars.
The first
bar looks lke expected, the 2nd doesn't. How can I change the 2nd
Bar to
proper beam-groups of 3+2 8th-notes?
Here the example:
\version 2.13.0
Hans
SubdivideBeams will break beams at intervals
defined by beatLength, which by default is set
to 1 over the denominator of the time signature.
I think you need to set beatLength explicitly with
\set beatLength = #(ly:make-moment 1 8)
HTH
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: Hans
Hans Aberg Sunday, June 21, 2009 5:48 PM
On 21 Jun 2009, at 16:47, Trevor Daniels wrote:
SubdivideBeams will break beams at intervals
defined by beatLength, which by default is set
to 1 over the denominator of the time signature.
I think you need to set beatLength explicitly with
\set
Tao Cumplido wrote Wednesday, June 24, 2009 12:10 AM
what is the correct way of using scheme unicode chars in LilyPond?
(display #\©) or (display #\u00a9) don't work (both do in
DrScheme).
It can't be the file encoding because (display ©) works.
\char ##x00a9
See Notation Reference
Jay
If you enter the name into Run the name of the program is
convert-ly.py.
Are you missing the .py?
But both convert-ly and convert-ly.py should work in a Command
Prompt
window. At least they do here (Windows Vista). This is better than
Run
as the window stays open so you can read the
Eluze wrote Friday, June 26, 2009 5:47 AM
Trevor Daniels wrote:
If
the path to the file contains spaces you'll need to surround the
full path
with double quotes.
i just found that triple double quotes are needed:
convert-ly.py -e my
file.ly
this works for me in windows vista
That's
Hi Mats
I've already made some changes - see git.
More comments below.
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: Mats Bengtsson mats.bengts...@ee.kth.se
To: Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk
Cc: -Eluze elu...@gmail.com; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 10:12 AM
Subject
Eluze wrote Friday, June 26, 2009 7:19 PM
Trevor Daniels wrote:
maybe it should be added in the docs:
I'll do that. I'll also fix the documentation
to avoid misleading people in the Jay was misled.
i think the whole issue comes from the two lines 279 280 in
convert-ly.py
Eluze wrote Monday, June 29, 2009 12:19 AM
Mats Bengtsson-4 wrote:
There already is an example in the manual showing the use of *.
I think that is probably sufficient.
Yes, but it uses a for ... in ... do syntax that only works in
BASH,
there is a similar syntax in batch processing for
Eluze wrote Tuesday, June 30, 2009 5:55 PM
one more argument for the easy way to convert-ly 9'999 files
(all with the
same content):
convert-ly -e typ2*.ly -- 36
sec.
FOR %%x IN (typ1*.ly) DO convert-ly -e %%x -- 35 minutes
btw i realized that
Graham, Mats
I agree the warning about incomplete bars is hard to find - I tried
and couldn't until I searched git, and I wrote it!
There is a section in the Learning Manual, section 5.2 When things
don't work, which I intend to extend to include help about common
errors, obscure error
Graham Percival wrote Thursday, July 02, 2009 9:27 AM
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 10:22:11AM +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Do you mean into the current LM 5.2 When thing's don't work or
somewhere else? If you prefer to rename the FAQ (or rather the
section
on common mistakes of the FAQ) into
Werner LEMBERG wrote Thursday, July 02, 2009 7:42 AM
From time to time, users complain that the display of lilypond PDF
files with acroread or xpdf looks awkward on screen. In such
cases, I
strongly recommend to use ghostscript itself to view the PDF file,
or
a wrapper program like gv or
Kieren MacMillan wrote Monday, July 06, 2009 3:50 PM
Also, is there a way to increase the font size of the 8 in the
treble_8 clef?
Override the Clef stencil, and build the markup yourself -- I
don't know any other way.
See the docs (especially the LSR) for examples of overriding grob
it on a regular basis. But if there was
a limited-time X-month project, I might do it again.
Trevor Daniels might have an interesting opinion on this; he's
another retired British windows user, who started off during GDP
(and has said on multiple occasions that he would have never
started contributing
Jonathan
Thanks for your comments. For the present you
can continue sending them to this list. An
editor can easily pick them from here. See
below for my responses.
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, July
Graham Percival wrote Tuesday, July 14, 2009 11:33 AM
Hmm, maybe we could set up a pyramid scheme here. Trevor handles
git for two new contributors, then in a few months, each of those
people learn git and handles it for for two more new contributors,
etc. :)
Happy to do that - Mark is
Patrick Schmidt wrote Tuesday, July 14, 2009 3:44 PM
how can I tweak the form of a tie in one voice in order to avoid a
collision of
the tie with the notes of another voice of a single staff
polyphony? I do not
merely want to move the tie position but bend the tie to almost
achieve a
Patrick, you wrote Tuesday, July 14, 2009 6:27 PM
thank you for the hint. It took me a while to find
out that the commands have to be right in front of
the note to which the tie is attached.
Thanks for the feedback. I've clarified that point
in the docs.
Trevor
Given the wide variation in the use of the
x-shaped note head I think the only possible
name to use is one that reflects the shape of
the note head - crossNote, crossNoteHead or
similar - rather than trying to find a suitable
generic name which adequately covers all these
disparate uses.
Trevor
Mark Polesky wrote Friday, July 24, 2009 10:14 AM
Alexander Kobel wrote:
% Allow grob to go into the staff
-\tweak #'outside-staff-priority #'()
I would have never thought to set 'outside-staff-priority to '().
Is that in the docs somewhere? If not, we really need to put it
there.
Hans Aberg wrote Friday, July 24, 2009 10:06 AM
On 24 Jul 2009, at 07:58, Marc Hohl wrote:
I think it would be the easiest way to define a neutral name
first.
Personally, I like the idea of \xHead, \xHeadOn and \xHeadOff.
I think so, too. In computer lingo terms, you want define two
craigbakalian wrote Friday, July 24, 2009 11:58 PM
I am writing a large ensemble work, a saxophone concerto. The
first
movement is in 8/4. It has got to be an 8/4 because I am
constantly
shifting the 3+3+2 to 3+2+3 and 2+3+3 quality of beat emphasis and
phrasing. The sax has 16th notes,
Carl Sorensen wrote Friday, July 24, 2009 2:07 PM
On 7/24/09 6:16 AM, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk
wrote:
The structure of the Notation Reference is designed
to accommodate documenting this. The specialist
sections in NR 2 would contain an indexed description
of all the uses
Carl Sorensen wrote Tuesday, July 21, 2009 10:13 PM
On 7/21/09 3:00 PM, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk
wrote:
Given the wide variation in the use of the
x-shaped note head I think the only possible
name to use is one that reflects the shape of
the note head - crossNote, crossNoteHead
Graham Percival wrote Thursday, July 30, 2009 11:41 AM
Subject: Re: Best name for function to create cross-style noteheads
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:18:42AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Carl Sorensen wrote Tuesday, July 21, 2009 10:13 PM
\crossHeadsOn : turns on cross noteheads for all
Thanks Jonathan - pushed to remote/origin.
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: Jonathan Kulp jonlancek...@gmail.com
To: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
Cc: Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, August 01, 2009 2:53 PM
Subject: Re: First
Haipeng
This score is a joke. It's an impossibly complex score with all
sorts of ridiculous constructs and amusing articulations. For
example,the header says Words and music by John Stump, arranged by
Accident and there are textual instructions like Adagio cantabile
with a rock tempo feel
Graham Norton wrote Sunday, August 02, 2009 2:06 PM
PS I think it would be useful if the doc in Notation Reference
3.3.3 said something about how to obtain the unicodes (for users
who are not using a UTF-8 supported edito)r.
Done. I've added a uref to the Unicode Consortium
at
Patrick Schmidt wrote Sunday, August 02, 2009 1:50 PM
I would like to achieve a chord slide.
1) How come that I can see the glissando marks when I use half
notes but not when I use sixteenths?
The glissando can often become so short it
is invisible, as happens here. It's length
can be
Stefan
It is tricky if you don't understand Bezier curves,
but quite easy if messy once they are understood.
Have you read Modifying ties and slurs in
section 5.5.4 Modifying shapes in the
Notation Reference? That gives some clues. It
also helps to Google for Bezier curves. In the
end though
Patrick Schmidt wrote Monday, August 03, 2009 9:24 AM
Subject: Re: chord slides
thank you very much for your solution. I managed to achieve what I
wanted without fully understanding of what's going on. Here's the
code:
\version 2.13.3
\relative c' {
\new Staff
\new Voice = visible {
Helge Kruse wrote Monday, August 03, 2009 12:21 PM
Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
Ok, trying it right now...
--- On Wed, 7/29/09, Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net
wrote:
From: Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net
Subject: RE: How do you move a note horizontally?
To: 'Jonathan Wilkes'
1 - 100 of 1230 matches
Mail list logo
