Re: Generating Interest in LilyPond through Kickstarter

2014-03-25 Thread Urs Liska
When the idea or selling point of a campaign is to provide a free edition it 
can be argued what that is needed for when there already _are_ good editions 
freely available.
Then one should really find a good surplus over existing editions. This could 
for example be the possibility to make modifications like new arrangement of 
voices or transpositions.
Don't know how this relates to your ideas, though.

Urs

Paul Tannous ptann...@hotmail.com schrieb am 25.03.2014:

Urs Liska wrote:  

 

I recently made a similar suggestion with the Winterreise, and some commented 
it problematic to create new free editions of pieces that already exist in 
good free editions.

Urs

 

 

Urs, 

Do you recall why others found this to be “problematic”?  

Thanks,

Paul T.

 

 


-- 
Diese Nachricht wurde mit a 
href=https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.onegravity.k10.pro2;bK-@
 Mail/b/a gesendet.___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Generating Interest in LilyPond through Kickstarter

2014-03-25 Thread David Kastrup
Paul Tannous ptann...@hotmail.com writes:

 Shane:
 it would be more sensible to sell the .ly file at a higher cost. It
 is certainly the more valuable entity, both in terms of work in and
 future utility.

 After considering your comments, I and my team believe that we should
 offer the .ly files as the primary premiums to Kickstarter
 contributors.

I'm not sure what primary premiums are.

 After all, anyone wanting to contribute to this initiative would most
 likely have an interest in LilyPond sources in general and in the
 LilyPond sources that we will be producing in particular.

Well, the principal motivation of those supporting the free angle will
likely be inpired by the free software movement, based on the four
software freedoms:

Freedom 0: The freedom to run the program for any purpose.

Freedom 1: The freedom to study how the program works, and change it
   to make it do what you wish.

Freedom 2: The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help your neighbor.

Freedom 3: The freedom to improve the program, and release your
   improvements (and modified versions in general) to the
   public, so that the whole community benefits.

It's pretty obvious that freedom 1 and freedom 3, when applied to a
score rather than software, would best benefit from the availability of
the .ly file.  Make no mistake: I have seen impressive arrangements
made by xerox and scissors (I remember some Brandenburg concerto
rearrangement for strings, with flaps from orchestra voices pasted into
another voice, and with transpositions and range adaptations by
drawing in other clefs and additional staff lines while striking out
others).  But that's peanuts to what one can reasonably well do using
LilyPond.

The spirit of the GPL is that you can ask whatever you want for a
program, but you get the right to distribute it and the corresponding
sources for it in the bargain.

So I think it would be a nice fit if the .ly file was included in any
offering, making the people feel they are actually doing something for a
freely available score as source material.

As for perks: many people will consider it quite an effort actually
doing anything with the .ly file, so you could offer custom
transpositions or paper formats (of course, sans tweaking) in PDF form
as perks.  That's nothing that someone willing to learn LilyPond would
not be able to do himself, but it might be a nice motivation for those
who are in it for the paper score.

-- 
David Kastrup

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Generating Interest in LilyPond through Kickstarter

2014-03-25 Thread Simon Albrecht
You might check imslp.org, which often is a source for excellent 
engravings. I have no idea whether there is a scientifically approvable 
edition there. My thoughts referred in particular to the 19th century 
complete editions for example of Bach which combine unsurpassed 
typographical excellence and beauty with scholarly text. There are some 
who say that the NBA (New Bach Edition) does not give a significant 
advantage over that.


Best, Simon

Am 25.03.2014 07:23, schrieb Urs Liska:
When the idea or selling point of a campaign is to provide a free 
edition it can be argued what that is needed for when there already 
_are_ good editions freely available.
Then one should really find a good surplus over existing editions. 
This could for example be the possibility to make modifications like 
new arrangement of voices or transpositions.

Don't know how this relates to your ideas, though.

Urs

Paul Tannous ptann...@hotmail.com schrieb am 25.03.2014:

Urs Liska wrote:

I recently made a similar suggestion with the Winterreise, and
some commented it problematic to create new free editions of
pieces that already exist in good free editions.

Urs

*Urs, *

*Do you recall why others found this to be problematic? *

*Thanks,*

*Paul T.*


-- Diese Nachricht wurde mit *K-@ Mail* 
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.onegravity.k10.pro2 gesendet. 




___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Generating Interest in LilyPond through Kickstarter

2014-03-25 Thread Urs Liska
That's similar to what we do with the Fried songs: we include the sources in 
all perks starting from a certain price.

Urs

David Kastrup d...@gnu.org schrieb am 25.03.2014:
Paul Tannous ptann...@hotmail.com writes:

 Shane:
 it would be more sensible to sell the .ly file at a higher cost. It
 is certainly the more valuable entity, both in terms of work in and
 future utility.

 After considering your comments, I and my team believe that we should
 offer the .ly files as the primary premiums to Kickstarter
 contributors.

I'm not sure what primary premiums are.

 After all, anyone wanting to contribute to this initiative would most
 likely have an interest in LilyPond sources in general and in the
 LilyPond sources that we will be producing in particular.

Well, the principal motivation of those supporting the free angle
will
likely be inpired by the free software movement, based on the four
software freedoms:

Freedom 0: The freedom to run the program for any purpose.

   Freedom 1: The freedom to study how the program works, and change it
   to make it do what you wish.

Freedom 2: The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help your
neighbor.

Freedom 3: The freedom to improve the program, and release your
   improvements (and modified versions in general) to the
   public, so that the whole community benefits.

It's pretty obvious that freedom 1 and freedom 3, when applied to a
score rather than software, would best benefit from the availability of
the .ly file.  Make no mistake: I have seen impressive arrangements
made by xerox and scissors (I remember some Brandenburg concerto
rearrangement for strings, with flaps from orchestra voices pasted into
another voice, and with transpositions and range adaptations by
drawing in other clefs and additional staff lines while striking out
others).  But that's peanuts to what one can reasonably well do using
LilyPond.

The spirit of the GPL is that you can ask whatever you want for a
program, but you get the right to distribute it and the corresponding
sources for it in the bargain.

So I think it would be a nice fit if the .ly file was included in any
offering, making the people feel they are actually doing something for
a
freely available score as source material.

As for perks: many people will consider it quite an effort actually
doing anything with the .ly file, so you could offer custom
transpositions or paper formats (of course, sans tweaking) in PDF form
as perks.  That's nothing that someone willing to learn LilyPond would
not be able to do himself, but it might be a nice motivation for those
who are in it for the paper score.

-- 
Diese Nachricht wurde mit a 
href=https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.onegravity.k10.pro2;bK-@
 Mail/b/a gesendet.___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Generating Interest in LilyPond through Kickstarter

2014-03-24 Thread Paul Tannous
Richard Shann wrote:  

 

Presumably someone will generate a set of PDFs and put them on IMSLP.

And people who are not prepared to read the LilyPond sources - they just
want the printed score - will get those, and would be wise to do so, since
someone malicious could generate an altered version the the LilyPond sources
to do bad things. While LilyPond is a specialized interest thing malicious
files are not going to happen, except by pranksters, but it is something to
bear in mind. (I hate to sound a note of caution).

 

Richard 

 

 

Richard,  

You make a good point.  We are now thinking of providing the LilyPond
sources to Kickstarter contributors as premiums, rather than putting them
out in the public domain.  

Thanks,

Paul T. 

 

 

 

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Generating Interest in LilyPond through Kickstarter

2014-03-24 Thread Paul Tannous
Urs Liska wrote:  

 

I recently made a similar suggestion with the Winterreise, and some
commented it problematic to create new free editions of pieces that
already exist in good free editions.

Urs

 

 

Urs, 

Do you recall why others found this to be problematic?  

Thanks,

Paul T.

 

 

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Generating Interest in LilyPond through Kickstarter

2014-03-24 Thread Paul Tannous
it would be more sensible to sell the .ly file at a higher cost. It is

certainly the more valuable entity, both in terms of work in and

future utility.

 

Shane

 

On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 5:27 AM, Johan Vromans address@hidden wrote:

 Paul Tannous address@hidden writes:

 

 Anyone wanting a printed copy, could download and

 install LilyPond if they didn't have it already. The idea would be to

 generate interest in LilyPond.

 

 That's a noble idea, but aren't you afraid that it will have the

 opposite effect and scare people away?

 

 I don't see many vanilla computer using musicians jump through the hoops

 of building and installing LilyPond just to get some score PDFs.

 

 Wouldn't something like this work better (amounts are arbitrary):

 

   - for 5$ or more you get the source

   - for 10$ or more you get the PDF

   - for 50$ or more you get a printed copy mailed

 

 -- Johan

 

 ___

 

 

Shane and Johan,  

After considering your comments, I and my team believe that we should offer
the .ly files as the primary premiums to Kickstarter contributors.  After
all, anyone wanting to contribute to this initiative would most likely have
an interest in LilyPond sources in general and in the LilyPond sources that
we will be producing in particular.  

Thanks,

Paul T.  

 

 

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Generating Interest in LilyPond through Kickstarter

2014-03-24 Thread Paul Tannous
Mike Solomon wrote:  

Sounds like a great idea!

Make sure to e-mail choir directors across the US to see what may interest
them 

- even if they cannot contribute financially to the project, it will have
more 

chances of success if you have concerts lined up to which donors can go, a 

recording that they can receive, a program in which their name appears,
etc..

 

All the best and good luck!

 

Cheers,

MS

 

Mike,

I think that your suggestion to reach out to choir directors is a good one.
What do you believe would be the most efficient way to contact choir
directors across the country? 

Thanks,

Paul T.  

 

 

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Generating Interest in LilyPond through Kickstarter

2014-03-22 Thread Mike Solomon

On Mar 22, 2014, at 4:21 AM, Paul Tannous ptann...@hotmail.com wrote:

 Lilyponders,
 
 I am considering starting a Kickstarter project to engrave a major choral 
 work in LilyPond that is in the public domain. The idea is to raise funds 
 to pay for the LilyPond engraving, proofreading, contributor premiums, etc.
 
 The LilyPond source would then be put into the public domain. Rather than 
 make PDFs available, the LilyPond source could be put on a web site with 
 the URL for LilyPond. Anyone wanting a printed copy, could download and 
 install LilyPond if they didn't have it already. The idea would be to 
 generate interest in LilyPond.
 
 Premiums for contributors could be PDFs of some of the parts of the 
 engraved choral work or even the whole score for large contributors. From 
 what I've seen of Kickstarter, typically the smallest premium that is 
 attractive enough to generate contributions is a T-Shirt. So, this could be 
 one of our premiums. If you have ideas for other premiums, they would be 
 appreciated.
 
 If this project is successful, other projects for different works could be 
 started. A successful project might spawn imitators making even more 
 LilyPond source works available.
 
 I have talked to several choir directors about what to use for a first 
 project. Handel's 'Messiah' was suggested by all of them. I am aware of 
 Nicolas Sceaux's fine work in engraving 'Messiah', but the choir directors 
 who spoke with me prefer to use a different version for their performances.
 
 All comments regarding this project will be appreciated.
 
 Thank you,
 Paul Tannous
 

Sounds like a great idea!
Make sure to e-mail choir directors across the US to see what may interest them 
- even if they cannot contribute financially to the project, it will have more 
chances of success if you have concerts lined up to which donors can go, a 
recording that they can receive, a program in which their name appears, etc..

All the best and good luck!

Cheers,
MS
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Generating Interest in LilyPond through Kickstarter

2014-03-22 Thread Urs Liska

Am 22.03.2014 08:57, schrieb Mike Solomon:


On Mar 22, 2014, at 4:21 AM, Paul Tannous ptann...@hotmail.com wrote:


Lilyponders,

I am considering starting a Kickstarter project to engrave a major choral
work in LilyPond that is in the public domain. The idea is to raise funds
to pay for the LilyPond engraving, proofreading, contributor premiums, etc.

The LilyPond source would then be put into the public domain. Rather than
make PDFs available, the LilyPond source could be put on a web site with
the URL for LilyPond. Anyone wanting a printed copy, could download and
install LilyPond if they didn't have it already. The idea would be to
generate interest in LilyPond.

Premiums for contributors could be PDFs of some of the parts of the
engraved choral work or even the whole score for large contributors. From
what I've seen of Kickstarter, typically the smallest premium that is
attractive enough to generate contributions is a T-Shirt. So, this could be
one of our premiums. If you have ideas for other premiums, they would be
appreciated.

If this project is successful, other projects for different works could be
started. A successful project might spawn imitators making even more
LilyPond source works available.

I have talked to several choir directors about what to use for a first
project. Handel's 'Messiah' was suggested by all of them. I am aware of
Nicolas Sceaux's fine work in engraving 'Messiah', but the choir directors
who spoke with me prefer to use a different version for their performances.

All comments regarding this project will be appreciated.

Thank you,
Paul Tannous



Sounds like a great idea!
Make sure to e-mail choir directors across the US to see what may interest them 
- even if they cannot contribute financially to the project, it will have more 
chances of success if you have concerts lined up to which donors can go, a 
recording that they can receive, a program in which their name appears, etc..



I recently made a similar suggestion with the Winterreise, and some 
commented it problematic to create new free editions of pieces that 
already exist in good free editions.


Urs

BTW: Did you see http://igg.me/at/free-fried?


All the best and good luck!

Cheers,
MS
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user




--
Urs Liska
www.openlilylib.org

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Generating Interest in LilyPond through Kickstarter

2014-03-22 Thread Johan Vromans
Paul Tannous ptann...@hotmail.com writes:

 Anyone wanting a printed copy, could download and 
 install LilyPond if they didn't have it already. The idea would be to 
 generate interest in LilyPond.

That's a noble idea, but aren't you afraid that it will have the
opposite effect and scare people away?

I don't see many vanilla computer using musicians jump through the hoops
of building and installing LilyPond just to get some score PDFs.

Wouldn't something like this work better (amounts are arbitrary):

  - for 5$ or more you get the source
  - for 10$ or more you get the PDF
  - for 50$ or more you get a printed copy mailed

-- Johan

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Generating Interest in LilyPond through Kickstarter

2014-03-22 Thread Richard Shann
On Sat, 2014-03-22 at 03:21 +, Paul Tannous wrote:
 The LilyPond source would then be put into the public domain. Rather
 than 
 make PDFs available, the LilyPond source could be put on a web site
 with 
 the URL for LilyPond. Anyone wanting a printed copy, could download
 and 
 install LilyPond if they didn't have it already. The idea would be to 
 generate interest in LilyPond. 

Presumably someone will generate a set of PDFs and put them on IMSLP.
And people who are not prepared to read the LilyPond sources - they just
want the printed score - will get those, and would be wise to do so,
since someone malicious could generate an altered version the the
LilyPond sources to do bad things. While LilyPond is a specialized
interest thing malicious files are not going to happen, except by
pranksters, but it is something to bear in mind. (I hate to sound a note
of caution).

Richard



___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Generating Interest in LilyPond through Kickstarter

2014-03-22 Thread Shane Brandes
it would be more sensible to sell the .ly file at a higher cost. It is
certainly the more valuable entity, both in terms of work in and
future utility.

Shane

On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 5:27 AM, Johan Vromans jvrom...@squirrel.nl wrote:
 Paul Tannous ptann...@hotmail.com writes:

 Anyone wanting a printed copy, could download and
 install LilyPond if they didn't have it already. The idea would be to
 generate interest in LilyPond.

 That's a noble idea, but aren't you afraid that it will have the
 opposite effect and scare people away?

 I don't see many vanilla computer using musicians jump through the hoops
 of building and installing LilyPond just to get some score PDFs.

 Wouldn't something like this work better (amounts are arbitrary):

   - for 5$ or more you get the source
   - for 10$ or more you get the PDF
   - for 50$ or more you get a printed copy mailed

 -- Johan

 ___
 lilypond-user mailing list
 lilypond-user@gnu.org
 https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


RE: Generating Interest in LilyPond through Kickstarter

2014-03-22 Thread Chris Crossen
Urs Liska wrote:
 I recently made a similar suggestion with the Winterreise, and some
 commented it problematic to create new free editions of pieces that
 already exist in good free editions.
 
 Urs
 
 BTW: Did you see http://igg.me/at/free-fried?
 
If you start a project, be sure and give the URL on the list as Urs did. I
looked at his project and contributed.

Chris


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Generating Interest in LilyPond through Kickstarter

2014-03-22 Thread Urs Liska

Am 22.03.2014 19:23, schrieb Chris Crossen:

Urs Liska wrote:

I recently made a similar suggestion with the Winterreise, and some
commented it problematic to create new free editions of pieces that
already exist in good free editions.

Urs

BTW: Did you see http://igg.me/at/free-fried?


If you start a project, be sure and give the URL on the list as Urs did.


And don't be shy and do that more than once ;-)


I
looked at his project and contributed.


Thank you very much! Already noticed :-)



Chris


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user




___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Generating Interest in LilyPond through Kickstarter

2014-03-21 Thread Paul Tannous
Lilyponders,

I am considering starting a Kickstarter project to engrave a major choral 
work in LilyPond that is in the public domain. The idea is to raise funds 
to pay for the LilyPond engraving, proofreading, contributor premiums, etc.

The LilyPond source would then be put into the public domain. Rather than 
make PDFs available, the LilyPond source could be put on a web site with 
the URL for LilyPond. Anyone wanting a printed copy, could download and 
install LilyPond if they didn't have it already. The idea would be to 
generate interest in LilyPond.

Premiums for contributors could be PDFs of some of the parts of the 
engraved choral work or even the whole score for large contributors. From 
what I've seen of Kickstarter, typically the smallest premium that is 
attractive enough to generate contributions is a T-Shirt. So, this could be 
one of our premiums. If you have ideas for other premiums, they would be 
appreciated.

If this project is successful, other projects for different works could be 
started. A successful project might spawn imitators making even more 
LilyPond source works available.

I have talked to several choir directors about what to use for a first 
project. Handel's 'Messiah' was suggested by all of them. I am aware of 
Nicolas Sceaux's fine work in engraving 'Messiah', but the choir directors 
who spoke with me prefer to use a different version for their performances.

All comments regarding this project will be appreciated.

Thank you,
Paul Tannous



___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user