Re: Font problems in 2.3.24
I guess that the PDF file you get doesn't look too good, at least not on screen, since it will contain bitmap fonts instead of vector fonts. What LilyPond does internally, is to call dvips with the following flags: dvips -Ppdf -u+lilypond -u+ec-mftrace filename.dvi What happens when you try this manually? Maybe it's a problem with the the map file ec-mftrace.map. The command kpsewhich -format='PostScript header' ec-mftrace.map should return something like /usr/share/texmf/dvips/ec-fonts-mftraced/ec-mftrace.map /Mats Alexandre Beneteau wrote: Thanks for your reply, I have no problem with missfonts (anyway kpsewhich ecrm10.pfa returns /usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/ec-fonts-mftraced/ecrm10.pfa) Xdvi runs fine with dvi generated by lily ; but gv displays strange symbols for graces notes and fermata on bar. Anyway, I dug a little more and I can get good postscript and pdf files starting with the dvi produced by lily using : dvips -f -Z flute.dvi flute.ps This is dvips(k) 5.92b Copyright 2002 Radical Eye Software (www.radicaleye.com) ' TeX output 2004.10.30:1258' - dvips: Checksum mismatch in font feta20 dvips: Design size mismatch in font feta26 dvips: Checksum mismatch in font feta26 dvips: Design size mismatch in font feta13 dvips: Checksum mismatch in font feta13 dvips: Design size mismatch in font feta14 dvips: Checksum mismatch in font feta14 texc.promusic-drawing-routines.psspecial.pro. [1] [2] [3] [4] As you can see, there are still problems (even after having deleted the font caches), but the output is correctly displayed by gv (?) I'm still using Pedro's packages of lilypond-2.3.24... Hoping this will help to track the problem, Thanks, Alex. Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thanks for your reply. I've just had a closer look at a few things, and I found a log file named missfont.log in my project directory, which contains the line mktexpk --mfmode ljfour --bdpi 8000 --mag 1+0/8000 --dpi 8000 ecrm1000 Does this give any clues as to the problem? yes - I suspect that the font package is installed incorrectly. over here I have byrd:~/usr/src/lilypond$ kpsewhich ecrm10.pfa /usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/ec-fonts-mftraced/ecrm10.pfa what does kpsewhich say? ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user -- = Mats Bengtsson Signal Processing Signals, Sensors and Systems Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Sweden Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe = ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Font problems in 2.3.24
Thanks for your reply. I've just had a closer look at a few things, and
I found a log file named missfont.log in my project directory, which
contains the line
mktexpk --mfmode ljfour --bdpi 8000 --mag 1+0/8000 --dpi 8000 ecrm1000
Does this give any clues as to the problem?
Cameron
Alexandre Beneteau wrote:
Hello,
I have similars problem using like you lily 2.3.24 (Debian Sid) from
Pedro's repository, having installed latest ec-fonts-mftraced and
cleaned my var/cache/fonts.
To complete your bug-report, I would notice that :
At default staff size :
- dvi produced by lily is correctly displayed in xdvi (but not by kdvi
which does not find music-drawing-routines.ps, but I guess it's another
history !)
- ps produced by lily is correctly displayed by gv but grace notes and
fermatas on bars are not correctly displayed ( like you for the firsts
and L for fermata !)
- pdf produced by lily has the same problems with gv and acroread.
At other staff size :
- dvi is correctly handled in xdvi
- other formats have the mess you describe.
Anybody has an idea about the source of the problem ?
Is it a debian-package problem or lily's fault ?
TIA,
Alex.
Cameron Horsburgh wrote:
Hi folks,
I've just downloaded Lilypond 2.3.24 (Debian Sid) from Pedro's
repository. I had a few font problems, which I fixed by upgrading to
the latest ec-fonts-mftraced, also from Pedro's site.
Now, however, when I use a global staff size less than 20 points I get
greater-than signs and other math symbols in the place of note heads,
and a lot of other notation is similarly affected.
Here's a fairly minimal case score that has the dud behaviour:
%
\version 2.3.22 % this should be 2.3.24
#(set-global-staff-size 18) % the problem happens for all numbers
less than 20
\layout {
papersize = a4
}
\score {
{
\clef treble % No clef appears
a4 b c' d'
}
}
%%
Am I doing something wrong, or is this a bug?
(Less important: You may also notice that convert-ly-snapshot didn't
change the version number correctly -- the original file this is based
on was 2.2.6, and I'm pretty sure I'm using 2.3.24)
Thanks for your help folks,
Cameron
___
lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Font problems in 2.3.24
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thanks for your reply. I've just had a closer look at a few things, and I found a log file named missfont.log in my project directory, which contains the line mktexpk --mfmode ljfour --bdpi 8000 --mag 1+0/8000 --dpi 8000 ecrm1000 Does this give any clues as to the problem? yes - I suspect that the font package is installed incorrectly. over here I have byrd:~/usr/src/lilypond$ kpsewhich ecrm10.pfa /usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/ec-fonts-mftraced/ecrm10.pfa what does kpsewhich say? -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Font problems in 2.3.24
Thanks for your reply, I have no problem with missfonts (anyway kpsewhich ecrm10.pfa returns /usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/ec-fonts-mftraced/ecrm10.pfa) Xdvi runs fine with dvi generated by lily ; but gv displays strange symbols for graces notes and fermata on bar. Anyway, I dug a little more and I can get good postscript and pdf files starting with the dvi produced by lily using : dvips -f -Z flute.dvi flute.ps This is dvips(k) 5.92b Copyright 2002 Radical Eye Software (www.radicaleye.com) ' TeX output 2004.10.30:1258' - dvips: Checksum mismatch in font feta20 dvips: Design size mismatch in font feta26 dvips: Checksum mismatch in font feta26 dvips: Design size mismatch in font feta13 dvips: Checksum mismatch in font feta13 dvips: Design size mismatch in font feta14 dvips: Checksum mismatch in font feta14 texc.promusic-drawing-routines.psspecial.pro. [1] [2] [3] [4] As you can see, there are still problems (even after having deleted the font caches), but the output is correctly displayed by gv (?) I'm still using Pedro's packages of lilypond-2.3.24... Hoping this will help to track the problem, Thanks, Alex. Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thanks for your reply. I've just had a closer look at a few things, and I found a log file named missfont.log in my project directory, which contains the line mktexpk --mfmode ljfour --bdpi 8000 --mag 1+0/8000 --dpi 8000 ecrm1000 Does this give any clues as to the problem? yes - I suspect that the font package is installed incorrectly. over here I have byrd:~/usr/src/lilypond$ kpsewhich ecrm10.pfa /usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/ec-fonts-mftraced/ecrm10.pfa what does kpsewhich say? ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Font problems in 2.3.24
Hi folks,
I've just downloaded Lilypond 2.3.24 (Debian Sid) from Pedro's
repository. I had a few font problems, which I fixed by upgrading to the
latest ec-fonts-mftraced, also from Pedro's site.
Now, however, when I use a global staff size less than 20 points I get
greater-than signs and other math symbols in the place of note heads,
and a lot of other notation is similarly affected.
Here's a fairly minimal case score that has the dud behaviour:
%
\version 2.3.22 % this should be 2.3.24
#(set-global-staff-size 18) % the problem happens for all numbers
less than 20
\layout {
papersize = a4
}
\score {
{
\clef treble % No clef appears
a4 b c' d'
}
}
%%
Am I doing something wrong, or is this a bug?
(Less important: You may also notice that convert-ly-snapshot didn't
change the version number correctly -- the original file this is based
on was 2.2.6, and I'm pretty sure I'm using 2.3.24)
Thanks for your help folks,
Cameron
___
lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Font problems in 2.3.24
Hello,
I have similars problem using like you lily 2.3.24 (Debian Sid) from Pedro's
repository, having installed latest ec-fonts-mftraced and cleaned my
var/cache/fonts.
To complete your bug-report, I would notice that :
At default staff size :
- dvi produced by lily is correctly displayed in xdvi (but not by kdvi which
does not find music-drawing-routines.ps, but I guess it's another history !)
- ps produced by lily is correctly displayed by gv but grace notes and fermatas
on bars are not correctly displayed ( like you for the firsts and L for fermata !)
- pdf produced by lily has the same problems with gv and acroread.
At other staff size :
- dvi is correctly handled in xdvi
- other formats have the mess you describe.
Anybody has an idea about the source of the problem ?
Is it a debian-package problem or lily's fault ?
TIA,
Alex.
Cameron Horsburgh wrote:
Hi folks,
I've just downloaded Lilypond 2.3.24 (Debian Sid) from Pedro's
repository. I had a few font problems, which I fixed by upgrading to the
latest ec-fonts-mftraced, also from Pedro's site.
Now, however, when I use a global staff size less than 20 points I get
greater-than signs and other math symbols in the place of note heads,
and a lot of other notation is similarly affected.
Here's a fairly minimal case score that has the dud behaviour:
%
\version 2.3.22 % this should be 2.3.24
#(set-global-staff-size 18) % the problem happens for all numbers
less than 20
\layout {
papersize = a4
}
\score {
{
\clef treble % No clef appears
a4 b c' d'
}
}
%%
Am I doing something wrong, or is this a bug?
(Less important: You may also notice that convert-ly-snapshot didn't
change the version number correctly -- the original file this is based
on was 2.2.6, and I'm pretty sure I'm using 2.3.24)
Thanks for your help folks,
Cameron
___
lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Font problems in 2.3.24
Cameron Horsburgh wrote:
Hi folks,
I've just downloaded Lilypond 2.3.24 (Debian Sid) from Pedro's
repository. I had a few font problems, which I fixed by upgrading to
the latest ec-fonts-mftraced, also from Pedro's site.
Now, however, when I use a global staff size less than 20 points I get
greater-than signs and other math symbols in the place of note heads,
and a lot of other notation is similarly affected.
Here's a fairly minimal case score that has the dud behaviour:
%
\version 2.3.22 % this should be 2.3.24
#(set-global-staff-size 18) % the problem happens for all numbers
less than 20
\layout {
papersize = a4
}
\score {
{
\clef treble % No clef appears
a4 b c' d'
}
}
%%
Am I doing something wrong, or is this a bug?
Works fine here (Debian sid also) *but* I do have random problems with
gv giving similar results with any staff-size. I can *always* fix this
by restarting gv. xdvi doesn't work for me at all.
(Less important: You may also notice that convert-ly-snapshot didn't
change the version number correctly -- the original file this is based
on was 2.2.6, and I'm pretty sure I'm using 2.3.24)
convert-ly[-snapshot] only updates the version to the last necessary
change level. Mine are all currently marked 2.3.23.
Paul Scott
___
lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
