Am 13.07.2016 um 10:26 schrieb bart deruyter:
> Perhaps Frescobaldi can provide easier setup/template to mix LaTeX and
> Lilypond in the future, with pdf-preview. If there's plenty of
> interest for that, I post a feature request for frescobaldi :-).
>
I would like that too, but Frescobaldi's
Hi all,
thanks for the suggestions and ideas. I posted this not only for
practically using it at the moment, but for triggering some ideas and
thoughts for the future.
It is obvious that music typesetting is meant for complete scores, but the
mix of text and music seems quite frequent too. On
Am 12.07.2016 um 18:24 schrieb David Wright:
On Tue 12 Jul 2016 at 17:25:35 (+0200), Marc Hohl wrote:
IIUC, the original question was about to integrate LaTeX code within
LilyPond, not the other way round ;-)
? Of course it is when you snip the rest of the OP,
Ok, sorry.
On Tue 12 Jul 2016 at 17:25:35 (+0200), Marc Hohl wrote:
> IIUC, the original question was about to integrate LaTeX code within
> LilyPond, not the other way round ;-)
? Of course it is when you snip the rest of the OP, as you did in
IIUC, the original question was about to integrate LaTeX code within
LilyPond, not the other way round ;-)
Am 12.07.2016 um 16:35 schrieb Henning Hraban Ramm:
Hi,
maybe have a look at my LilyPond/ConTeXt setup at
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/LilyPond (Sample Include File).
If you dont like
Hi,
maybe have a look at my LilyPond/ConTeXt setup at
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/LilyPond (Sample Include File).
If you dont like lilypond-book, you might try LyLuaTeX
(https://github.com/jperon/lyluatex).
Greetlings, Hraban
---
fiëé visuëlle
Henning Hraban Ramm
http://www.fiee.net
Am 11.07.2016 um 21:26 schrieb bart deruyter:
Hi all,
[...]
I don't think it is possible now, but maybe it would be interesting to
work the other way round: inserting latex code in a lilypond file. Or
would it be possible? :-)
Is
On Mon 11 Jul 2016 at 21:26:48 (+0200), bart deruyter wrote:
> the thread "state-of-the-art for algorithmic hooks and Lilypond+(La)TeX"
> caught my eye because I recently started documenting what I'm studying in
> music and because I often stumble upon pdf's in imslp, method-books for
> guitar and
Hi all,
the thread "state-of-the-art for algorithmic hooks and Lilypond+(La)TeX"
caught my eye because I recently started documenting what I'm studying in
music and because I often stumble upon pdf's in imslp, method-books for
guitar and piano, which use a lot of text and scores (obviously). In
[+lilypond-user]
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Tobias Braun
tob...@braun-oberkochen.de wrote:
Hello Han-Wen,
Sorry to bother you with this, but I could not find a clear answer to the
following question elsewhere:
How does LilyPond create the ps/pdf output? Does it use TeX in any way as
How does LilyPond create the ps/pdf output?
It directly creates PS output which is then converted by ghostscript
to PDF.
Does it use TeX in any way as a backend?
This has been the case a few years ago, however, it has been
abandonded since we meanwhile need direct access to the fonts. Using
Good evening,
I have just installed Lilypond for the first time and my first
attempts at using Lilypond have been frustrated. I installed Lilypond
2.2.2 (I'm using FreeBSD and this is the version found in the ports
tree).
Following the tutorial, the first file I created contained the following:
Miguel Ramos escreveu:
Good evening,
I have just installed Lilypond for the first time and my first
attempts at using Lilypond have been frustrated. I installed Lilypond
2.2.2 (I'm using FreeBSD and this is the version found in the ports
tree).
Try getting a binary from
(I've lost your previous e-mail to reply to Mats, but thanks for pointing
me to the bibliography.)
Hi all,
I'm trying to use Lilypond in Tex; I'm using Lilypong 2.8.6.1 MiKTeX 2.5
on Windows XP.
When I run TeX on a file with Lilypond, I get the error 'Environment Lilypond
undefined.'
You didn't read the full section on lilypond-book in the manual
(lilypond-book is a separate program to preprocess the file before
you can send it through LaTeX). However, there are several problems
with lilypond-book on Windows, so you will have to search the mailing
list archives for more
Well, actually as I found, the recent versions of lilypond-book just
doesn't work on Windows. However, I didn't investigate it.
Bert
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
With several decades' of programming behind me, one of the first things
I look for in studying a new language is concise descriptions of the
syntax of the language and of the structure of well-formed programs.
It's also nice to get direction from experienced writers in the language
as to
Yes in truth the way programmers document/read
documents is add odds with tech writing. Tech writing
will choose to repeat thingsor give extra example so
as to be as clear and understandable as possible and
programmers want things not to be repeated and as
concise as possible.
I unfortunetly have
On 31-May-05, at 11:01 AM, Aaron Mehl wrote:
I copied the template from the docs but it uses
relative mode whereas my original files use absolute.
In trying to remove the
melody = \relative c' {
lilypond choked.
What I need is a template with no this = that but a
score block with header,
Well,
I read the docs and I still am coming short:
The file structure page uses the phrase:
music should be inside other expressions
I gather it means music must be inside other
expressions.
then it says:
A .ly file contains any number of toplevel
expressions, where a toplevel expression is one
On 31-May-05, at 1:07 PM, Aaron Mehl wrote:
I read the docs and I still am coming short:
The file structure page uses the phrase:
music should be inside other expressions
I gather it means music must be inside other
expressions.
I think we use should be and must fairly interchangeably.
Hi
When I was first learning lilypond I found most things
confusing. After all I was coming from Finale.
I also am a html/sgml docbook person and found the
structure of lilypond confusing. But that was then,
now it appears things have changed for the good,
better docs, more logical structure,
uhg I am using yahoo and hitting enter sent the email
in the midths of typing
If a file won't parse, then something else is wrong.
This is true but my only way of determining this is
by absolutly knowing what is an essential top level
block and what is not and their heirarchy. That is the
same again yahoo sent it without my wanting to ..
I see a layout block has this replaced the
\paper{} ?
Kind-of. See the Paper output section in Output
formats.
I will.
with no includes and lyrics.
In addition to reading the manual, you might want to
look at
some examples from
On 31-May-05, at 7:53 PM, Aaron Mehl wrote:
I think we use should be and must fairly
interchangeably.
As a techwriter/user this confuses me. should be is
a much weaker expression, like it doesn't have to but
if you want.. must says that it is a requirement to
have on of these.
I really
I really don't think it makes a big difference. If
you want to
submit a patch that changes all should bes to
musts,
I won't complain.
then it says:
A .ly file contains any number of toplevel
That's what the tutorial is for. I still don't
understand what
the difficulty is.
I
(./testlyrics.texstr
LaTeX2e 2001/06/01
Babel v3.7h and hyphenation patterns for american,
nohyphenation, catalan, ir
ish, icelandic, swedish, loaded.
! LaTeX Error: File `lilypond-tex-metrics.tex' not
found.
Type X to quit or RETURN to proceed,
or enter new name. (Default extension: tex)
Enter file
extended mode
(./testlyrics.texstr
LaTeX2e 2001/06/01
Babel v3.7h and hyphenation patterns for american,
nohyphenation, catalan, ir
ish, icelandic, swedish, loaded.
! LaTeX Error: File `lilypond-tex-metrics.tex' not
found.
Type X to quit or RETURN to proceed,
or enter new name. (Default extension
28 matches
Mail list logo
